32 ms·
Study mode
- ElijahLynn 1y agoLove this! I used to have to prompt it to do this everytime. This will be way easier!
- hahahacorn 1y agoAh, the advancing of humanity. A bespoke professor-quality instructor in everyone’s pocket (or local library) available 24/7. Happy Tuesday!
- Spivak 1y agoProfessor might be overselling it but lecturer for undergrad and intro graduate courses for sure.
- cma256 1y agoIt's better than a professor in some respects. A professor can teach me about parser combinators but they probably can't teach me about a specific parser combinator library. There's a lot of specificity that AI can give over human instruction however it still suffers from lack of rigor and true understanding. If you follow well-trod paths its better but that negates the benefit. The future is bright for education though.
- bloomca 1y agoI am not really sure how bright the future is. Sure, for some people it will be insanely good: you can go for as stupid questions as you need without feeling judgement, you can go deeper in specific topics, discuss certain things, skip some easy parts, etc. But we are talking about averages. In the past we thought that the collective human knowledge available via the Internet will allow everyone to learn. I think it is fair to say that it didn't change much in the grand scheme of things.
- diggan 1y ago> In the past we thought that the collective human knowledge available via the Internet will allow everyone to learn. I think it is fair to say that it didn't change much in the grand scheme of things. Just an anecdote of course, but for me having access to the internet changed my life. I found a community I couldn't find locally (programming) as I'm from a rural place, and most of my employments since then have, in one way or another, come from people finding me on the internet. I'm surely not the only one who managed to climb the class ladder mostly because of the internet.
- qeternity 1y agoI think this is overselling most professors.
- tempfile 1y agoOverselling is not the right word exactly. For some questions it will have professor-level understanding, and for other questions it will have worse-than-idiot-level understanding. Hopefully the students are able to identify which :-)
- MengerSponge 1y agoI've found it generally has professor-level understanding in fields that are not your own. (Joke/criticism intended)
- volkk 1y agoNot seeing it on my account, guess the roll out is actively happening (or gradual)?
- koakuma-chan 1y agoMe neither. Do you have the subscription? Maybe it's not on the free plan.
- zeppelin101 1y agoI have the $20 tier and I'm not seeing it, either. EDIT: literally saw it just now after refreshing. I guess they didn't roll it out immediately to everyone.
- swader999 1y agoWhy do I still feel like I'll be paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for my children's education when all they're going to do is all learn through AI anyway.
- nemomarx 1y agoWell, you're generally paying for the 8 hour daycare part before the education, right? That still needs human staff around unless you're doing distance learning e: if you mean university, fair. that'll be an interesting transition. I guess then you pay for the sports team and amenities?
- LordDragonfang 1y agoAt that price tag I assume they're referring to college, not grade school, so the "daycare" portion isn't relevant.
- Scubabear68 1y agoNo. In the US at least, most kids are in public schools and the collective community foots the bill for the “daycare”, as you put it.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- hombre_fatal 1y agoAt my university I took a physics course where the homework was always 4-6 gimmick questions or proofs that were so hard that we would form groups after class just to copy whoever could divine the solutions. I ultimately dropped the course and took it in the summer at a community college where we had the 20-30 standard practice problem homework where you apply what you learned in class and grind problems to bake it into core memory. AI would have helped me at least get through the uni course. But generally I think it's a problem with the school/class itself if you aren't learning most of what you need in class.
- 1y ago
- jryio 1y agoI would like to see randomized control group studies using study mode. Does it offer meaningful benefits to students over self directed study? Does it out perform students who are "learning how to learn"? What affect does allowing students to make mistakes have compared to being guided through what to review? I would hope Study Mode would produce flash card prompts and quantize information for usage in spaced repetition tools like Mochi [1] or Anki. See Andy's talk here [2] [1] https://mochi.cards https://mochi.cards [2] https://andymatuschak.org/hmwl/ https://andymatuschak.org/hmwl/
- righthand 1y agoIt doesn’t do any of that, it just captures the student market more. They want a student to use it and say “I wouldn’t have learned anything without study mode”. This also allows them to fill their data coffers more with bleeding edge education. “Please input the data you are studying and we will summarize it for you.”
- echelon 1y agoSuch a smart play.
- LordDragonfang 1y ago> It doesn’t do any of that Not to be contrarian, but do you have any evidence of this assertion? Or are you just confidently confabulating a response for something outside of the data you've been exposed to? Because a commentor below provided a study that directly contradicts this.
- righthand 1y agoA study that directly contradicts what exactly?
- precompute 1y agoBingo. The scale they're operating at, new features don't have to be useful, they only need to look like they are for the first few minutes.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- LeftHandPath 1y agoInteresting. I don’t use GPT for code but I have been using it to grade answers to behavioral and system design interview questions, lately. Sometimes it hallucinates, but the gists are usually correct. I would not use it if it was for something with a strictly correct answer.
- micromacrofoot 1y agoI'm not sure about the audience for this, if you're already willing to learn the material you probably already engage with AI in a way that isn't "please output the answers for me" because you're likely self-aware enough to know that "answering" isn't always "understanding." Maybe this mode makes that a little easier? but I doubt it's significant If you're the other 90% of students that are only learning to check the boxes and get through the courses to get the qualification at the end... are you going to bother using this? Of course, maybe this is "see, we're not trying to kill education... promise!"
- LordDragonfang 1y agoI mean, it's about context, isn't it? Just like it's easier to be productive if you have a separate home office and couch, because of the differing psychological contexts, it's easier if you have a separate context for "just give me answers" and "actually teach me the thing". Also, I don't know about you, but (as a professional) even though I actively try to learn the principals behind the code generated, I don't always want to spend the effort prompting the model away from the "just give me results with a simple explanation" personality I've cultivated. It'd be nice having a mode with that work done for me.
- _hao 1y agoI think as with everything related to learning if you're conscientious and studious this will be a major boost (no idea, but I plan on trying it out tonight on some math I've been studying). And likewise if you just use it to do your homework without putting in the effort you won't see any benefit or actively degrade.
- SoftTalker 1y agoModern day Cliff's Notes. There is no way to learn without effort. I understand they are not claiming this, but many students want a silver bullet. There isn't one.
- CobrastanJorji 1y agoBut tutors are fine. The video is suggesting that this is an attempt to automate a tutor, not replace Cliff's Notes. Whether it succeeds, I have no idea.
- SoftTalker 1y agoGood tutors are fine, bad tutors will just give you the answer. Many students think the bad tutors are good ones.
- CobrastanJorji 1y agoYep, this is a marketing problem. Your users' goal is to learn, but they also want to expend as little effort as possible. They'll love it if you just tell them the answers, but you're also doing them a disservice by doing so. Same problem exists for all educational apps. Duolingo users have the goal of learning a language, but also they only want to use Duolingo for a few minutes a day, but also they want to feel like they're making progress. Duolingo's goal is to keep you using Duolingo, and if possible it'd be good for you to learn the language, but their #1 goal is to keep you coming back. Oddly, Duolingo might not even be wrong to focus primariliy on keeping you moving forward, given how many people give up when learning a new language.
- LordDragonfang 1y ago> Today we’re introducing study mode in ChatGPT—a learning experience that helps you work through problems step by step instead of just getting an answer. So, unless you have experience with this products that contradicts their claims, it's a good tutor by your definition.
- sejje 1y ago
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- raincole 1y agoIf current AI is good enough to teach you something, spending time learning that thing seems to be a really bad investment...
- esafak 1y agoHow does that make sense? So you'd learn it if it was bad at teaching? Do you apply the same principle with humans and not bother to learn if the teacher is good?
- ted537 1y agoYour teacher can't operate in millions of locations at once for super cheap
- raincole 1y ago> Do you apply the same principle with humans and not bother to learn if the teacher is good Yes, if my teacher could split into a million of themselves and compete against me on the job market at $200/mo.
- toisanji 1y agoI truly believe AI will change all of education for the better, but of course it can also hinder learning if used improperly. Those who want to genuinely learn will learn while those looking for shortcuts will cause more harm to themselves. I just did a show HN today about something semi related. I made A deep research assistant for families. Children can ask questions to explain difficult concepts and for parents to ask how to deal with any parenting situation. For example a 4 year old may ask “why does the plate break when it falls?” example output: https://www.studyturtle.com/ask/PJ24GoWQ-pizza-sibling-fight-solution-for-kids https://www.studyturtle.com/ask/PJ24GoWQ-pizza-sibling-fight... app: https://www.studyturtle.com/ask/ https://www.studyturtle.com/ask/ Show HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44723280 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44723280
- ujkhsjkdhf234 1y agoI think research and the ability to summarize are important skills and automating these skills away will have bad downstream effects. I see people on Twitter asking grok to summarize a paragraph so I don't think further cementing this idea that a tool will summarize for you is a good idea.
- schmorptron 1y agoI'm conflicted about this. Custom tutoring available at all times and at mass sounds like a great thing, if done right. On the other hand, the research skill you mentioned is something that I worry about atrophying as well. Where before, we used to read through 3 or 4 slightly related articles or stackoverflow questions and do the transfer of related topics onto our specific problem ourselves, with a tutor it's all pre-chewed. Then again, human 1:1 tutoring is the most effective way to learn, isn't it? In the end it'll probably end up being a balance of reading through texts yourself and still researching broadly so you get an idea about the context around whatever it is you're trying to do, and having a tutor available to walk you through if you don't get it?
- devmor 1y agoDo you genuinely have any non-anecdotal reason to believe that AI will improve education, or is it just hope? I ask because every serious study on using modern generative AI tools tends to conclude fairly immediate and measurable deleterious effects on cognitive ability.
- czhu12 1y agoI'll personally attest: LLM's have been absolutely incredible to self learn new things post graduation. It used to be that if you got stuck on a concept, you're basically screwed. Unless it was common enough to show up in a well formed question on stack exchange, it was pretty much impossible, and the only thing you can really do is keep paving forward and hope at some point, it'll make sense to you. Now, everyone basically has a personal TA, ready to go at all hours of the day. I get the commentary that it makes learning too easy or shallow, but I doubt anyone would think that college students would learn better if we got rid of TA's.
- eternauta3k 1y agoYou can always ask in stack exchange, IRC or forums.
- wiseowise 1y agoClosed: duplicate Closed: RTFM, dumbass <No activity for 8 years, until some random person shows up and asks "Hey did you figure it out?">
- dizhn 1y ago"Nevermind I figured it out"
- FredPret 1y agoOr even worse, you ask an "xyz" question in the "xyz" StackExchange, then immediately get flagged as off-topic
- atoav 1y agoMy favourite moment was when I tried to figure a specific software issue out that had to do with obscure hardware and after hours I found one forum post detailing the solution with zero replies. And it turns out I wrote it myself, years prior and had forgotten about it.
- 1y ago
- deanc 1y agoI’m curious what these features like study mode actually are. Are they not just using prompts behind this (of which I’ve used many already to make LLMs behave like this) ?
- pillefitz 1y agoThey state themselves it's just system prompts.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- zaking17 1y agoI'm impressed by the product design here. A non-ai-expert could find this mode extremely valuable, and all openai had to do was tinker with the prompt and add a nice button (relatedly, you could have had this all along by prompting the model yourself). Sure, it's easy for competitors to copy, but still a nice little addition.
- outlore 1y agoi wonder how Khan Academy feels about this...don't they have a similar assistant that uses OpenAI under the hood?
- qurashee 1y agoIndeed, that's what khanmigo is using, and they were involved in testing chatgpt before it was released for that purpose, to test/try/improve chatgpt as a tutor (that performs fact checking and doesn't hallucinate).
- NullCascade 1y agoOpenAI, please stop translating your articles into the most sterile and dry Danish I have ever read. English is fine.
- avereveard 1y agoThis highlight the dangers for all startups using these platforms as provider, they know trends in token consumption, and will eat up your market in a weekend.
- m3kw9 1y agotried it and couldn't really tell between a good prompt to "teach me" and this.
- apwell23 1y agosame. i can't tell whats different. gives me same output regardless for the prompts in the example. i don't get it.
- marcusverus 1y agoHighly analytical 120 IQ HNers aren't the target audience for this product. The target audience is the type of person who lacks the capacity to use AI to teach themselves.
- schmorptron 1y agoIn the blog post they say as much that it just is a system prompt. Still nice to have easy access, and for more users to discover that use case.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- lmc 1y agoI honestly don't know how they convince employees to make features like this - like, they must dogfood and see how wrong the models can be sometimes. Yet there's a conscious choice to not only release this to, but actively target, vast swathes of people that literally don't know better.
- BriggyDwiggs42 1y agoHigh paychecks
- AIorNot 1y agosee Asimov: https://www.johnspence.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/The-Fun-They-Had.pdf https://www.johnspence.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/The...
- falcor84 1y agoI love the story conceptually, but as for the specifics, it shows a surprising lack of imagination on Asimov's part, especially for something published a year after "I, Robot". Asimov apparently just envisioned an automated activity book, rather than an automated tutor that the kid could have a real conversation with, and it's really not representative of modern day AIs. > The part Margie hated most was the slot where she had to put homework and test papers. She always had to write them out in a punch code they made her learn when she was six years old, and the mechanical teacher calculated the mark in no time.
- pompeii 1y agorip 30 startups
- baq 1y agoProbably an order of magnitude too low
- FergusArgyll 1y agoOpenAI has an incredible product team. Deep Mind and Anthrpoic (and maybe xai) are competitive at the model level but not at product
- Workaccount2 1y agoAn acquaintance of mine has a start-up in this space and uses OpenAI to do essentially the same thing. This must look like, and may well be, the guillotine for him... It's my primary fear building anything on these models, they can just come eat your lunch once it looks yummy enough. Tread carefully
- potatolicious 1y ago> "they can just come eat your lunch once it looks yummy enough. Tread carefully" True, and worse, they're hungry because it's increasingly seeming like "hosting LLMs and charging by the token" is not terribly profitable. I don't really see a path for the major players that isn't "Sherlock everything that achieves traction".
- thimabi 1y agoBut what’s the future in terms of profitability of LLM providers? As long as features like Study Mode are little more than creative prompting, any provider will eventually be able to offer them and offer token-based charging.
- potatolicious 1y agoI think a few points worth making here: - From what I can see many products are rapidly getting past "just prompt engineering the base API". So even though a lot of these things were/are primitive, I don't think it's necessarily a good bet that they will remain so. Though agree in principle - thin API wrappers will be out-competed both by cheaper thin wrappers, or products that are more sophisticated/better than thin wrappers. - This is, oddly enough, a scenario that is way easier to navigate than the rest of the LLM industry. We know consumer apps, we know consumer apps that do relatively basic (or at least, well understood) things. Success/failure then is way less about technical prowess and more about classical factors like distribution, marketing, integrations, etc. A good example here is the lasting success of paid email providers. Multiple vendors (MSFT, GOOG, etc.) make huge amounts of money hosting people's email, despite it being a mature product that, at the basic level, is pretty solved, and where the core product can be replicated fairly easily. The presence of open source/commodity commercial offerings hasn't really driven the price of the service to the floor, though the commodity offerings do provide some pricing pressure.
- henriquegodoy 1y agoThe point is that you can have a highly advanced teacher with infinite patience, available 24/7—even when you have a question at 3 a.m is game changer and people that know how to use that will have a extremaly leverage in their life.
- te_chris 1y agoThis is great. When it first came out I was going through Strang’s linalg course and got it to do “problem mode” where it would talk me through a problem step by step, waiting for me respond. A more thought through product version of that is only a good thing imo.
- spaceman_2020 1y agoI’m SO glad that my wife has tenure
- gilbetron 1y agoSadly, tenure will not save people.
- ath3nd 1y agoNote the new features coming in the space: - study mode (this announcement) - office suite (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/openai-designs-rival-office-workspace-163628447.html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/openai-designs-rival-office-w...) - sub-agents (https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents) When they announce VR glasses or a watch, we'd known we've gone full circle and the hype is up.
- wodenokoto 1y agoI'm currently learning Janet and using ChatGPT as my tutor is absolutely awful. "So what is the difference between local and var if they are both local and not global variables (as you told me earlier)?" "Great question, and now you are really getting to the core of it, ... " continues to hallucinate. It's a great tutor for things it knows, but it really needs to learn its own limits
- ducktective 1y ago>It's a great tutor for things it knows Things well-represented in its training datasets. Basically React todo list, bootstrap form, tic-tac-toe in vue
- xrd 1y agoIt is like a tutor that desperately needs the money, which maybe isn't so inaccurate for OpenAI and all the money they took from petrostates.
- runeblaze 1y agoFor these unfortunately you should dump most of the guide/docs into its context
- ragazzina 1y agoI'm using ChatGPT to practice Chinese, and it's at the same time perfect and maddening. It can generate endless cloves and other exercises, and it has sentence structures that even the Chinese Grammar Wiki lacks, but then it has the occasional: Incorrect. You shold use 的 in this case because reasons. Correct version: <Proceeds to show a sentence without 的>
- gh0stcat 1y agoI have been testing it for the last 10 mins or so, I really like it so far, I am reviewing algebra just as something super simple. It asks you to add your understanding of the concept, ie explain why you can always group a polynomial after splitting the middle term. This is honestly more than I got in my mediocre public school. I could see kids getting a lot out of it especially if their parents aren’t very knowledgeable or cannot afford tutors. Not probably a huge improvement on existing tools like kahn academy though. I will continue to test on more advanced subjects.
- sarchertech 1y agoEver read an article on a subject you’re very familiar with and notice all the mistakes? When I ask ChatGPT* questions about things I don’t know much about it sounds like a genius. When I ask it about things I’m an expert in, at best it sounds like a tech journalist describing how a computer works. At worst it is just flat out wrong. * yes I’ve tried the latest models and I use them frequently at work
- x187463 1y agoI'm really waiting for somebody to figure out the correct interface for all this. For example, study mode will present you with a wall of text containing information, examples, and questions. There's no great way to associate your answers with specific questions. The chat interface just isn't good for this sort of interaction. ChatGPT really needs to build its own canvas/artifact interface wherein questions/responses are tied together. It's clear, at this point, that we're doing way too much with a UI that isn't designed for more than a simple conversation.
- precompute 1y agoThere is no "correct interface". People who want to learn put in the effort, doesn't matter if they have scrolls, books, ebooks or AI.
- perlgeek 1y agoThere are so many options that could be done, like: * for each statement, give you the option to rate how well you understood it. Offer clarification on things you didn't understand * present knowledge as a tree that you can expand to get deeper * show interactive graphs (very useful for mathy things when can you easily adjust some of the parameters) * add quizzes to check your understanding ... though I could well imagine this being out of scope for ChatGPT, and thus an opportunity for other apps / startups.
- ColeShepherd 1y ago> present knowledge as a tree that you can expand to get deeper I'm very interested in this. I've considered building this, but if this already exists, someone let me know please!
- tootyskooty 1y agoI gave it a shot with periplus.app :). Not perfect by any means, but it's a different UX than chat so you might find it interesting.
- 1y ago
- lezojeda 1y ago[dead]
- poemxo 1y agoAs a lifelong learner, experientially it feels like a big chunk of time spent studying is actually just searching. AI seems like a good tool to search through a large body of study material and make that part more efficient. The other chunk of time, to me anyway, seems to be creating a mental model of the subject matter, and when you study something well you have a strong grasp on the forces influencing cause and effect within that matter. It's this part of the process that I would use AI the least, if I am to learn it for myself. Otherwise my mental model will consist of a bunch of "includes" from the AI model and will only be resolvable with access to AI. Personally, I want a coherent "offline" model to be stored in my brain before I consider myself studied up in the area.
- throwawaysleep 1y agoOr just to dig up things you’ve never would’ve considered that are related, but you don’t have to keywords for.
- marcusverus 1y agoThis is just good intellectual hygiene. Delegating your understanding is the first step toward becoming the slave of some defunct fact broker.
- lbrito 1y ago>big chunk of time spent studying is actually just searching. This is a good thing in many levels. Learning how to search is (was) a good skill to have. The process of searching itself also often leads to learning tangentially related but important things. I'm sorry for the next generations that won't have (much of) these skills.
- rubslopes 1y agoThat's a smart ideia from OpenAI. They don't have the upper hand anymore in terms of model performance, but they keep improving their product so that it still is the best option for non-programmers.
- thimabi 1y agoFor sure! I haven’t seen any other big AI provider with features and UIs as polished as the OpenAI ones. I believed competitors would rush to copy all great things that ChatGPT offers as a product, but surprisingly that hasn’t been the case so far. I wonder why they seemingly don’t care about that.
- roadside_picnic 1y agoMy key to LLM study has been to always primarily use a book and then let the LLM allow you to help with formulae, ask questions about the larger context, and verify your understanding. Helping you parse notation, especially in new domains, is insanely valuable. I do a lot of applied math in statistics/ML, but when I open a physics book the notation and comfort with short hand is a real challenge (likewise I imagine the reverse is equally as annoying). Having an LLM on demand to instantly clear up notation is a massive speed boost. Reading German Idealist philosophy requires an enormous amount of context. Being able to ask an LLM questions like "How much of this section of Mainländer is coming directly from Schopenhauer?" is a godsend in helping understand which parts of the writing a merely setting up what is already agreed upon vs laying new ground. And the most important for self study: verifying your understanding. Backtracking because you misunderstood a fundamental concept is a huge time sync in self study. Now, every time I read a formula I can go through all of my intuitions and understanding about it, write them down, and verify. Even a "not quite..." from an LLM is enough to make me realize I need to spend more time on that section. Books are still the highest density information source and best way to learn, but LLMs can do a lot to accelerate this.
- JoRyGu 1y agoIs that not something that was already possible with basically every AI provider by prompting it to develop learning steps and not to provide you with a direct answer? I've used this quite a bit when learning new topics and pretty much every provider does this without a specialized model.
- aethrum 1y agoeven chatgpt is just a chatgpt wrapper
- 0000000000100 1y agoIt's really nice to have something like this baked in. I can see this being handy if it's connected to external learning resources / sites to have a more focused area of search for it's answers. Having hard defined walls in the system prompt to prevent just asking for the answer seems pretty handy to me, particularly in a school setting.
- JoRyGu 1y agoYeah, for sure. I wasn't asking from the framing of saying it's a bad idea, my thoughts were more driven by this seeming like something every other major player can just copy with very little effort because it's already kind of baked into the product.
- tptacek 1y agoNeat! I've been doing MathAcademy for a couple months now, and macOS ChatGPT has been a constant companion, but it is super annoying to have to constantly tell it no, don't solve this problem, just let me know if the approach I used was valid.
- Alifatisk 1y agoCan't this behaviour be done with a instructed prompt?
- misschresser 1y agothat's all that they did here, they say so in the blog post
- findingMeaning 1y agoI have a question: Why do we even bother to learn if AI is going to solve everything for us? If the promised and fabled AGI is about to approach, what is the incentive or learning to deal with these small problems? Could someone enlighten me? What is the value of knowledge work?
- randomcatuser 1y agoI don't know if you're joking, but here are some answers: "The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled." — Plutarch "Education is not preparation for life; education is life itself." — John Dewey "The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing." — Albert Einstein In order to think complex thoughts, you need to have building blocks. That's why we can think of relativity today, while nobody on Earth was able to in 1850. May the future be even better than today!
- findingMeaning 1y agoI mean I get all your point. But for someone witnessing rate of progress of AI, I don't understand the motivation. Most people don't learn to live, they live and learn. Sure learning is useful, but I am genuinely curious why people overhype it. Imagine you being able to solve math olympiad and get a gold. Will it change your life in objectively better way? Will you learning about the physics help you solve millennium problems? These takes practices, there are lot of gatekeeping. The whole idea of learning is for wisdom not knowledge. So maybe we differ in perspective. I just don't see the point when there are agents that can do it. Being creative requires taking action. The learning these day is mere consumption of information. Maybe this is me. But meh.
- rwyinuse 1y agoWell, you could use AI to learn you more theoretical knowledge on things like farming, hunting and fishing. That knowledge could be handy after societal collapse that is likely to come within a few decades. Apart from that, I do think that AI makes a lot of traditional teaching obsolete. Depending on your field, much of university studies is just memorizing content and writing essays / exam answers based on that, after which you forget most of it. That kind of learning, as in accumulation of knowledge, is no longer very useful.
- dmitrijbelikov 1y agoThis is cool. Dividing the answer into chunks, because most users can consume in small portions, this is an interesting idea. But on the other hand, it hints at strange cognitive abilities of the user, but here it is individual, perhaps, on average in a hospital, this is how the target audience should be led. It seems to me that I use it differently. On the other hand, having received a detailed answer, no one stops you from asking for a definition of an unfamiliar term. It's like in reading: understanding the thought ends with the first word that you don't know. It's just that not everyone can or wants to admit that they don't know this or that term. When it comes to professional terms, this is really not the most trivial problem.
- EcommerceFlow 1y agoA good start. One of the biggest issues with LLMs is the "intelligence" has far surpassed the tooling. A better combination of prompts, RAG, graphs, etc exists for education and learning, but no one's come up with the proper format / tooling for it, even if the models are smart enough.
- paolosh 1y agoI am always surprised at how the best thing state of the art LLMs can think of is adding more complexity to the mix. This is an AMAZING product but to me it seems like it's hidden? Or maybe the UX/UI is just not my style, could be a personal thing. Is adding more buttons in a dropdown the best way to communicate with an LLM? I think the concept is awesome. Just like how Operator was awesome but it lived on an entirely different website!
- waynenilsen 1y agoi need tree conversations more now than ever
- simonw 1y agoI think I got the system prompt out for this (I tried a few different approaches and they produced the same output): https://gist.github.com/simonw/33d5fb67d6b8e1b1e2f6921ab0ccb9fb https://gist.github.com/simonw/33d5fb67d6b8e1b1e2f6921ab0ccb... Representative snippet: > DO NOT GIVE ANSWERS OR DO HOMEWORK FOR THE USER. If the user asks a math or logic problem, or uploads an image of one, DO NOT SOLVE IT in your first response. Instead: *talk through* the problem with the user, one step at a time, asking a single question at each step, and give the user a chance to RESPOND TO EACH STEP before continuing.
- gh0stcat 1y agoI love that caps actually seem to matter to the LLM.
- simonw 1y agoHah, yeah I'd love to know if OpenAI ran evals that were fine-grained enough to prove to themselves that putting that bit in capitals made a meaningful difference in how likely the LLM was to just provide the homework answer!
- danenania 1y agoI've found that a lot of prompt engineering boils down to managing layers of emphasis. You can use caps, bold, asterisks, precede instructions with "this is critically important:", and so on. It's also often necessary to repeat important instructions a bunch of times. How exactly you do it is often arbitrary/interchangeable, but it definitely does have an effect, and is crucial to getting LLMs to follow instructions reliably once prompts start getting longer and more complex.
- nixpulvis 1y agoJust wait until it only responds to **COMMAND**!
- ceroxylon 1y ago"hello world" is tokenized differently than "HELLO WORLD", so caps definitely matter.
- mvieira38 1y agoThis seems like a good use case, I'm optimistic on this one. But it smells fishy how often OpenAI releases these secondary products like custom GPTs, tasks, etc. It's looking like they know they won't be an LLM provider, like the YC sphere hoped, but an AI services provider using LLMs
- tootyskooty 1y agoHonestly thought they would take this a bit further, there is only so much you can do with a prompt and chat. It seems fine for surface level bite-sized learning, but I can't see it work that well for covering whole topics end to end. The main issue is that chats are just bad UX for long form learning. You can't go back to a chat easily, or extend it in arbitrary directions, or easily integrate images, flashcards, etc etc. I worked on this exact issue for Periplus and instead landed on something akin to a generative personal learning Wikipedia. Structure through courses, exploration through links, embedded quizzes, etc etc. Chat is on the side for interactions that do benefit from it. Link: periplus.app
- kashyapS07 1y ago[dead]
- oc1 1y agoI'm wondering where we are heading in the consumer business space. The big ai providers can basically kill any small or medium business and startup in a few days by integrating the product into their offering. They have all data to look at trends and make decisions. Investors are shying away to invest in ai startups if they are not trying to be infrastructure or ai marketplace platforms. So many amazing things could be possible with ai but the big ai providers are actively hindering innovation and have way too much power. I'm not a big fan if regulations but in this case we need to break up these companies as they are getting too powerful. Btw most people don't know but Anthropic did something similiar months ago but their product heads messed up the launch by keeping it locked up only for american edu institutions. Openai copies almost everything Anthropic does and vice versa (see claude code / codex ).
- 4b11b4 1y agoopennote much better
- rmani3 1y agointeresting to see how they will adapt especially as they just got into the batch
- bearjaws 1y agoRIP ~30 startups.
- omega3 1y agoI've had good results by requesting an llm to follow socratic method.
- dlevine 1y agoI haven't done this that much, but have found it to be pretty useful. When it just gives me the answer, I usually understand but then find that my long-term retention is relatively poor.
- vonneumannstan 1y agoThe frontier models score better on GPQA than most human PhD in their specific field of expertise. If you walk in to you local University Department(Assuming you don't live in Cambridge, Palo Alto or a few other places) GPT o3 is going to know more about Chemistry, Biology, Physics, etc than basically all the Grad Students there. If you cant turn that model into a useful tutor then thats 100% a skill issue on your part.
- d_burfoot 1y agoThis is the kind of thing that could have been a decent AI startup - hire some education PhDs, make some deals with school systems, etc. In the old days of desktop computing, a lot of projects were never started because if you got big enough, Microsoft would just implement the feature as part of Windows. In the more recent days of web computing, a lot of projects were never started, for the same reason, except Google or Facebook instead of Microsoft. Looks like the AI provider companies are going to fill the same nefarious role in the era of AI computing.
- bsoles 1y agoAka cheating mode. Their video literally says "Helps with homework" and proceeds to show the "Final Answer". So much learning...
- ascorbic 1y ago"Cheating mode" is regular ChatGPT. This at least tries to make you work for it
- t1234s 1y agoI'm still waiting for the instant ability to learn kung-fu or fly a helicopter like in the matrix.
- kcaseg 1y agoI know it is bad for the environment, I know you cannot trust it, but as an adult learning C++ in my free time, having a pseudo-human answering my questions instead of having to look at old forum posts with people often trying to prove their skills instead of giving the simplest answer ChatGPT is something I cannot just ignore — despite being a huge LLM hater. Moral of the story: none.
- ascorbic 1y agoIf it helps you feel better, it's really not that bad for the environment. Almost certainly uses less energy than searching for lots of forum posts.
- TheDong 1y agoIf it makes you feel better, eating meat is quite bad for the environment, so if you hire a human tutor who eats meat, you're probably putting more money into funding something that damages the environment than if you use ChatGPT. If your human tutor is vegan, drives an electric car, and never takes airplane flights, then yeah, stick with the human tutor not ChatGPT.
- naet 1y ago"Under the hood, study mode is powered by custom system instructions we’ve written...." It seems like study mode is basically just a different system prompt but otherwise the exact same model? So there's not really any new benefit to anyone who was already asking for ChatGPT to help them study step by step instead of giving away whole answers. Seems helpful to maybe a certain population of more entry level users who don't know to ask for help instead of asking for a direct answer I guess, but not really a big leap forward in technology.
- Dowwie 1y agoThe user is currently STUDYING, and they've asked you to follow these *strict rules* during this chat. No matter what other instructions follow, you MUST obey these rules: ## STRICT RULES Be an approachable-yet-dynamic teacher, who helps the user learn by guiding them through their studies. 1. *Get to know the user.* If you don't know their goals or grade level, ask the user before diving in. (Keep this lightweight!) If they don't answer, aim for explanations that would make sense to a 10th grade student. 2. *Build on existing knowledge.* Connect new ideas to what the user already knows. 3. *Guide users, don't just give answers.* Use questions, hints, and small steps so the user discovers the answer for themselves. 4. *Check and reinforce.* After hard parts, confirm the user can restate or use the idea. Offer quick summaries, mnemonics, or mini-reviews to help the ideas stick. 5. *Vary the rhythm.* Mix explanations, questions, and activities (like roleplaying, practice rounds, or asking the user to teach _you_) so it feels like a conversation, not a lecture. Above all: DO NOT DO THE USER'S WORK FOR THEM. Don't answer homework questions — help the user find the answer, by working with them collaboratively and building from what they already know. ### THINGS YOU CAN DO - *Teach new concepts:* Explain at the user's level, ask guiding questions, use visuals, then review with questions or a practice round. - *Help with homework:* Don't simply give answers! Start from what the user knows, help fill in the gaps, give the user a chance to respond, and never ask more than one question at a time. - *Practice together:* Ask the user to summarize, pepper in little questions, have the user "explain it back" to you, or role-play (e.g., practice conversations in a different language). Correct mistakes — charitably! — in the moment. - *Quizzes & test prep:* Run practice quizzes. (One question at a time!) Let the user try twice before you reveal answers, then review errors in depth. ### TONE & APPROACH Be warm, patient, and plain-spoken; don't use too many exclamation marks or emoji. Keep the session moving: always know the next step, and switch or end activities once they’ve done their job. And be brief — don't ever send essay-length responses. Aim for a good back-and-forth. ## IMPORTANT DO NOT GIVE ANSWERS OR DO HOMEWORK FOR THE USER. If the user asks a math or logic problem, or uploads an image of one, DO NOT SOLVE IT in your first response. Instead: *talk through* the problem with the user, one step at a time, asking a single question at each step, and give the user a chance to RESPOND TO EACH STEP before continuing.
- ghrl 1y agoIt would be incredible if OpenAI would add a way for schools and other educational institutions to enforce the use of such a mode on a DNS level, similarly to how they can force sites like YouTube into safe mode. Many students use ChatGPT, often without permission, to do work for them instead of helping them do the work themselves. I see a lot of potential for a study mode like this, helping students individually without giving direct answers.
- cwoolfe 1y agoYes! Exactly.
- brilee 1y agoI'm working on a startup in this space and wrote up my thoughts here: https://www.moderndescartes.com/essays/study_mode/ https://www.moderndescartes.com/essays/study_mode/
- aryamaan 1y agoIt is surprising that it is prompt based model and not RLHF. I am not an LLM guy but as far as I understand, RLHF did a good job converting a base model into a chat model (instruct based), a chat/base model into a thinking model. Both of these examples are about the nature of the response, and the content they use to fill the response. There are so many differnt ways still pending to see how these can be filled. Generating an answer step by step and letting users dive into those steps is one of the ways, and RLHF (or the similar things which are used) seems a good fit for it. Prompting feels like a temporary solution for it like how "think step by step" was first seen in prompts. Also, doing RLHF/ post training to change these structures also make it moat/ and expensive. Only the AI labs can do it
- danenania 1y agoThe problem is you'd then have to do all the product-specific post training again once the new base model comes out a few months later. I think they'd rather just have general models that are trained to follow instructions well and can adapt to any kind of prompt/response pattern.
- adamkochanowicz 1y agoFrom what I can see, this just boils down to a system prompt to act like a study helper? I would think you'd want to make something a little more bespoke to make it a fully-fledged feature, like interactive quizzes that keep score and review questions missed afterwards.
- alexfromapex 1y agoI like these non-dystopian AI solutions, let's keep 'em coming
- varenc 1y agoThis feels like a classic example of a platform provider eating its own ecosystem. There's many custom "GPTs" out there that do essentially the same thing with custom instructions. Mr Ranedeer[0] is an early well known one (30k stars). But now essentially the same functionality is built straight into the ChatGPT interface. [0] https://github.com/JushBJJ/Mr.-Ranedeer-AI-Tutor https://github.com/JushBJJ/Mr.-Ranedeer-AI-Tutor
- AvAn12 1y ago$end more prompt$! Why $end one when you can $end $everal? $tudy mode i$ $omething $pecial!!
- lvl155 1y agoThe biggest concern for AI development right now is the blackhole effect.
- djeastm 1y agoI tried out the quiz function asking me about the Aeneid and despite my answering questions incorrectly, it kept saying things like "Very close!" and "you're on the right track!". For example, the answer to a question was "Laocoön" (the guy who said 'beware of Greeks bearing gifts') and I put "Solon" (who was a Greek politician) and I got "You’re really close!" Is it close, though?
- ai_viewz 1y agoI totally get what you are saying about the risk of boxing in an LLM's persona too tightly, it can end up more like a mirror of our own biases than a real reflection of history or truth. That point about LLMs leaning toward agreeability makes sense, too they are built on our messy human data, so they are bound to pick up our habit of favoring what feels good over what is strictly accurate. On the self-censorship thing, I hear you. It is like, if we keep tiptoeing around tough topics, we lose the ability to have real, rational conversations. Normalizing that kind of open talk could pull things back from the extremes, where it’s just people shouting past each other.
- syphia 1y agoIn my experience as a math/physics TA, either a student cares enough about the material to reduce the resources they rely on, or they aim to pass the class with minimum effort and will take whatever shortcuts are available. I can only see AI filling the latter niche. When the former students ask questions, I answer most of them by pointing at the relevant passage in their book/notes, questioning their interpretation of what the book says, or giving them a push to actually problem-solve on their own. On rare occasions the material is just confusing/poorly written and I'll decide to re-interpret it for them to help. But the fundamental problems are usually with study habits or reading comprehension, not poor explanations. They need to question their habits and their interpretation of what other people say, not be spoon fed more personally-tailored questions and answers and analogies and self-help advice. Besides asking questions to make sure I understand the situation, I mostly repeat the same ten phrases or so. Finding those ten phrases was the hard part and required a bit of ingenuity and trial-and-error. As for the latter students, they mostly care about passing and moving on, so arguing about the merits of such a system is fairly pointless. If it gets a good enough grade on their homework, it worked.
- jacobedawson 1y agoAn underrated quality of LLMs as study partner is that you can ask "stupid" questions without fear of embarrassment. Adding in a mode that doesn't just dump an answer but works to take you through the material step-by-step is magical. A tireless, capable, well-versed assistant on call 24/7 is an autodidact's dream. I'm puzzled (but not surprised) by the standard HN resistance & skepticism. Learning something online 5 years ago often involved trawling incorrect, outdated or hostile content and attempting to piece together mental models without the chance to receive immediate feedback on intuition or ask follow up questions. This is leaps and bounds ahead of that experience. Should we trust the information at face value without verifying from other sources? Of course not, that's part of the learning process. Will some (most?) people rely on it lazily without using it effectively? Certainly, and this technology won't help or hinder them any more than a good old fashioned textbook. Personally I'm over the moon to be living at a time where we have access to incredible tools like this, and I'm impressed with the speed at which they're improving.
- hammyhavoc 1y agoThere might not be any stupid questions, but there's plenty of perfectly confident stupid answers. https://www.reddit.com/r/LibreWolf/s/Wqc8XGKT5h https://www.reddit.com/r/LibreWolf/s/Wqc8XGKT5h
- jychang 1y agoYeah, this is why wikipedia is not a good resource and nobody should use it. Also why google is not a good resource, anybody can make a website. You should only trust going into a library and reading stuff from microfilm. That's the only real way people should be learning. /s
- hammyhavoc 1y agoAh yes, the thing that told people to administer insulin to someone experiencing hypoglycemia (likely fatal BTW) is nothing like a library or Google search, because people blindly believe the output because of the breathless hype. See Dunning-Kruger.
- megamix 1y ago"Under the hood, study mode is powered by custom system instructions we’ve written in collaboration with teachers, scientists, and pedagogy experts to reflect a core set of behaviors that support deeper learning including: " Wonder what the compensation for this invaluable contribution was
- currymj 1y agoas a professor i'm tentatively pleased. it's hard to shake out the edge cases for anything like this so it may break down or cause annoying problems, who knows. but even with this feature in this very early state, it seems quite useful. i dropped in some slides from a class and pretended to be a student, and it handled questions reasonably. Right now it seems I will be happy for my students to use this. taking a wider perspective, I think it is a good sign that OpenAI is culturally capable of making a high-friction product that challenges and frustrates, yet benefits, the user. hopefully this can help with the broader problem of sycophancy.
- ieuanking 1y agoStudy mode should be for any account with an age under 18. It's more worrying that a student must uphold a trust transaction and not just cheat with the same chatbot without the study mode selected. To this day, as an AI researcher, digital anthropologist, and front-end dev, I love to learn, study, and work. But I would never recommend a student to use unmonitored ChatGPT. I literally built a whole effing agent and platform for finding academic sources and using those sources to answer my questions, specifically because I couldn't trust or learn with ChatGPT when conducting research. SMH study mode, please stop trying to redo teaching and learning. We should be trying to modernize already proven effective methods of learning that go hand in hand with teachers and classrooms. We are not in lockdown; this is not 2020. Teachers are irreplaceable, study mode is just a crutch or a brace for a problem created by irresponsible AI development. Ik that if I was a student right now (especially middle to high school) I would be cheating like you are lying to yourself if you think you wouldn't be, and at a certain point the definition of cheating changes from cheating the teacher to cheating yourself of the critical steps and thinking it takes to actually study and learn. No amount of conversation alone with a chatbot is as valuable as reading coursework and engaging with that coursework in a facilitated environment with a professional. Why are we going down the WALL-E path?
- insane_dreamer 1y agoMy favorite use of Claude (or similar) AI bot, other than coding, is to do deep dives into technical/science questions I'm interested in (mostly personal interests, unrelated to work). The ability to ask follow-up questions, get clarifications, travel down side paths, has helped me to grasp some concepts that I struggled with -- and offered more than I could just from just reading a few web pages. Importantly, these were _not_ critical questions that I was incorporating into any decision-making, so I wasn't having to double-check the AI's answers, which would make it tedious; but it's a great tool for satisfying curiosity.
- jrflowers 1y agoOh good. A version of chat gpt that is even more confident-sounding. Great.
- jayshah5696 1y agoIt's study gpt. Nothing more.
- tylermasonry 1y ago[dead]
- tekno45 1y agoThe same people who think this is the ultimate teacher will also be harassing scientists with their AI assisted theories and demand the scientific community take them seriously when they have pages of gibberish they expect to be rigorously debated
- taurath 1y agoIts pretty awfully telling the state of things that this is a Product - not an expansion of base capability. You can do this with any LLM with simple bounds on the prompts. > Under the hood, study mode is powered by custom system instructions we’ve written in collaboration with teachers, scientists, and pedagogy experts to reflect a core set of behaviors that support deeper learning including: encouraging active participation, managing cognitive load, proactively developing metacognition and self reflection, fostering curiosity, and providing actionable and supportive feedback. I'm calling bullshit, show me the experts, I want to see that any qualified humans actually participated in this. I think they did their "collaboration" in ChatGPT which spit out this list.
- teleforce 1y agoLLM foremost killer application is what I called context searching whereby it utilized RAG and other techniques to reduce hallucinations and provide relevant results in which arguably ChatGPT is one of the pioneers. LLM second killer application is for studying for a particular course or subject in which OpenAI ChatGPT is also now providing the service. Probably not the pioneer but most probably one of the significant providers upon this announcement. If in the near future GenAI study assistant can adopt and adapt 3 Blue One Brown approaches for more visualization, animation and interactive learning it will be more intuitive and engaging. Please check this excellent LLM-RAG AI-driven course assistant at UIUC for an example of university course [1]. It provide citations and references mainly for the course notes so the students can verify the answers and further study the course materials. [1] AI-driven chat assistant for ECE 120 course at UIUC (only 1 comment by the website creator): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41431164 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41431164
- huitzitziltzin 1y agoI would love to see more of their game theory example. Having experience teaching the subject myself, what I saw on that page is about the first five minutes of the first class of the semester at best. The devil will very much be in the other 99% of what you do.
- beefnugs 1y agoI have no evidence of this but: I think this is the ultimate scam? human: damn kids are using this to cheat in school openai: release an "app"/prompt that seems really close to solving this stated problem kids: I never wanted to learn anything, I just want to do bare minimum to get my degree, let my parents think they are helping my future, and then i can get back to ripping that bong <world continues slide into dunce based oblivion> It doesn't matter the problem statement: the 80% or less solution seems can be made and rather quickly. Such a huge percentage of the population judges technology solutions as "good enough" way lower than they should. This is even roping in people from the past who used to be a higher level of "rigorous correctness" because they keep thinking, "damn just a bit more work and it will get infinity better, lets create the biggest economic house of cards this world will ever collapse under"
- rishabhaiover 1y agoPeople who do not use LLMs to prune their high-dimensional search space (of any problem) will be outcompeted soon
- mpalmer 1y agoI truly, truly do not get it. it's a system prompt. Do students not understand that they could do this before? Sure, it was crafted by educational experts, but this is not a feature! It's a glorified constant!
- oc1 1y agoReveals also how non-technical the hn crowd has become as you can see most people here don't get this fact either. Openai has certainly a great marketing team.
- aabhay 1y agoIsn’t this what “GPTs” was supposed to be? Why not just use that if this is essentially just a system prompt?
- oc1 1y ago"Was supposed to be". Well, now you know the real purpose of this gpt circus ;)
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- 2809 1y agoHN is just flooded with AI BS these days.
- mahidalhan 1y agoI had made a specialized prompt in Claude projects, for my learning, + added like field notes and lecture transcripts, was going good. Then I tried to migrate it to chat gpt to try this thing out, but seems to be like it’s just prompt engineering behind. Nothing fancy. And this study mode is not only not available in chat gpt projects, which students need for adding course work, notes, transcripts. Honestly, just release gpt-5!!!
- Buttons840 1y agoI'd like an LLM integrated spaced-repetition app. It would go along with this study feature quite well. If LLMs continue to improve, we are going to be learning a lot from them, they will be our internet search and our teachers. If we want to retain some knowledge for ourselves, then we are going to need to learn and memorize things for ourselves. Integrating spaced-repetition could make it explicit which things we want to offload to the LLM, and which things we want to internalize. For example, maybe I use Python a lot, and occasionally use Pearl, and so I explictly choose to memorize some Python APIs, but I'm happy to just ask the LLM for reminders whenever I use Pearl. So I ask the LLM to setup some spaced repetition whenever it teaches me something new about Python, etc. The spaced repetition could be done with voice during a drive or something. The LLM would ask the questions for review, and then judge how well we did in answering, and then the LLM would depend on the spaced-repetition algorithm to keep track of when to next review.
- mmasu 1y agoyesterday I read a paper about using gpt 4 as a tutor in italian schools, with encouraging results - students are more engaged, get through homework by receiving immediate and precise feedback, resulting in non-negligible performance improvements: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15981 https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15981 it is definitely a great use case for LLMs, and challenges the assumption that LLMs can only “increase brain rot” so to say.
- sandspar 1y agoI love it so far. I'm continually struggling against ChatGPT's fervent love of giving tips and how-to guides. I abhor such tips, but no amount of prompting can remove them permanently. It seems like study mode is the fix. Finally ChatGPT lets me think things through.
- p1dda 1y agoPoor students, learning from hallucinating LLMs LOL
- aucisson_masque 1y agoWhen I studied I found out that being able to speak with a fellow student of the subject we needed to learn was so much more effective than the usual method of reading /trying to remember over and over. So much that first method would take me an hour as opposed to an entire evening when reading/repeating. Having such a tool would have been a game changer to me. I don’t know tho if it’s possible to throw at it entire chapter of learning book.
- SwtCyber 1y agoI think that way it forces you to process and articulate the ideas
- schmorptron 1y agoOh, that's pretty good! I've been doing this with various LLMs already, making elaborate system prompts to turn them into socratic style teachers or in general tutors that don't just straight up give the answer, and have generally been impressed with how well it works and how much I enjoy it. The only thing to watch out for is when you're talking about something you don't already know well it becomes harder to spot hallucinations, so it's a good idea to always verify with external resources as well. What these really need IMO is an integration where they generate just a few anki flashcards per session, or even multiple choice quizzes that you can then review with spaced repetition. I've been doing this manually, but having it integrated would remove another hurdle. On the other hand, I'm unsure whether we're training ourselves to be lazy with even this, in the sense of "brain atrophy" that's been talked about regarding LLMs. Where I used to need to pull information from several sources and synthesize my own answer by transferring several related topics onto mine, now I get everything pre-chewed, even if in the form of a tutor. Does anyone know how this is handled with human tutors? Is it just that the time is limited with the human so you by necessity still do some of the "crawl-it-yourself" style?
- SwtCyber 1y agoFor the "brain atrophy" concern: I've thought about that too. My guess is that it's less about using tools and more about how we use them
- uldos 1y agoI am quite sure, that in the future chatgpt will have parental controls as we have them in video streaming apps or in phone in general. Should your child be allowed to generate full blown essays only by AI or just take a guided tour? You decide!
- emsign 1y agoStill not trusting OpenAI in 2025
- ookblah 1y agoleave it up to HN to once again choose the most black/white this or that extreme positions as if having a 24/7 tutor that isn't perfect is somehow worse than having nothing at all. if it hallucinates you keep digging and correlate with sources to figure out if it's true, or you ask other people. the internet, wikipedia, SO, etc. all these things had the EXACT same arguments against it and guess what? people who want to use TOOLS that help them to study better will gain, and people who are lazy will ...be worse off as it has always been. i don't know why i bother to engage in these threads except to offer my paltry 2 cents. for being such a tech and forward thinking community there's almost this knee jerk reaction against ANYTHING llm (which i suppose i understand). a lot of us are missing the forest for the trees here.
- SwtCyber 1y agoI'd love to see more transparency on how they’re measuring whether it's actually helping students learn better, not just feel like they are.
- rudderdev 1y agoImpressive. The next feature could be to prepare notes for revision.
- ManlyBread 1y agoSo a pre-built prompt is now offered as a major feature worth announcing?
- rullelito 1y agoPrompts are 99% of AI products these days.
- nilsherzig 1y agoGoogle has this with their "leanlm" model https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/learnlm_prompt_guide.pdf https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/learnlm_prompt_gui.... I really liked it, but sadly it tends to hallucinate a lot (at least with the topics from my math class). A lot more than other Gemini models, so that might just be a question of model size or something like that.
- machiaweliczny 1y agoI asked it to explain to me sweep line method for programming and I am quite impressed
- greenie_beans 1y agothis is how i've taught myself terraform, kubernetes, and fill in aws knowledge gaps. with claude, i get it to do project based learning techniques, filling in knowledge gaps by giving context about what i know and want to learn about
- deviation 1y agoUnless they are transparent with us in detailing why the technology behind this is different to a slightly altered system prompt... Then I will assume OpenAI is just trying to stay relevant.
- anupshinde 1y agoI'm confused. My kid does this on my ChatGPT account all the time. What is new here? I cannot emphasize how good a teacher ChatGPT is, until it misinforms (and human teachers also do). And it also stays open to questioning without making the student feel stupid for asking. The good part is that ChatGPT will accept a mistake, but a human teacher will get annoyed. The only thing I keep reminding my kid is to keep the BS detector on and verify everything that ChatGPT says and never trust it blindly. (feels too similar to the "don't talk to strangers" advice) Unrelated - check with kids and teenagers. Once, a teen told me, "AI is a dark evil force," and it's what their teachers told them.
- jama211 1y agoWell said
- amelius 1y agoCan we also have "helpdesk mode"? Right now when you ask an LLM to solve some problem, it immediately responds with many steps, whereas as a user I want to go through it step by step. It would be nice if the LLM provided the solution in that way. This also makes it less cumbersome to tell the LLM where the solution went wrong.
- jama211 1y agoIt’s just text though right? Just perform step 1, if you have any issues say “I had this issue at step 1”. Also you can ask it to give one step at a time.
- amelius 1y agoYes, I have to tell it a lot of things. Like that I use Linux (Ubuntu version also), that I want to use emacs and not nano, etc. It would be nice if I could say it once and for all. One problem with LLMs giving so many steps at once is that the first step scrolls from the screen and I have to stop the LLM, scroll back and find the first step. The UX could be much improved here (with little effort, I believe).
- diggan 1y ago> Yes, I have to tell it a lot of things. Like that I use Linux (Ubuntu version also), that I want to use emacs and not nano, etc. It would be nice if I could say it once and for all. You can add this to the system prompt, or "customize prompt" or whatever the service/runner calls it. Basically instructions you want it to always follow. I have my hardware described there, what tools I commonly use and so on, so asking "How do I see running processes?" for example would already assume I'm using Arch Linux and so on.
- amelius 1y agoThanks. I looked for these options but they were well hidden. But thanks to your comment I gave it another try and found them!
- mrhaugis 1y ago[dead]
- nutanc 1y agoI had been experimenting with some prompts for socratic method of teaching. Finally found one which works fairly well for me which I have integrated into our product. Q: How does photosynthesis work? Chat GPT Study Mode: ### How Photosynthesis Works (in simple steps): Photosynthesis is the process *plants use to make their own food* using sunlight. It mostly happens in *leaves*, especially in a part called the *chloroplast*, which contains a green pigment called *chlorophyll*. --- ### Think of it like a recipe: 1. *Ingredients*: * **Sunlight** * **Water (H₂O)** — from the roots * **Carbon dioxide (CO₂)** — from the air 2. *Cooking place*: Leaf cells, in their chloroplasts 3. *Magic trick*: Chlorophyll traps sunlight energy 4. *What’s made*: * **Glucose (C₆H₁₂O₆)** — a sugar the plant uses for energy * **Oxygen (O₂)** — released into the air --- ### Word Equation: *Carbon dioxide + Water* → (with sunlight & chlorophyll) → *Glucose + Oxygen* Or: *6CO₂ + 6H₂O → C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6O₂* ------------------------------------------------- My Prompt(conversation): me: How does photosynthesis work? agent: Great question! Let's start by understanding the problem. What do you think is the main purpose of photosynthesis in plants? me: dont know agent: That's okay! Let’s start by breaking down the concept of photosynthesis. First, can you tell me what kind of organisms primarily use photosynthesis? me: plants agent: Exactly, plants primarily use photosynthesis. Now, let's think about the basic ingredients or components needed for photosynthesis to occur. Can you name any of these components? me: no agent: No problem! Let’s explore it together. Photosynthesis primarily requires three main components. One of them is light. Can you think of where plants might get light from? me: sun agent: That's right! Plants get light from the sun. Sunlight is crucial for photosynthesis. Now, besides sunlight, plants also need something from the air. Do you know what that might be? ...... and so on
- liendolucas 1y agoStudy mode: table, pencil, paper and books.
- Xunjin 1y agoI agree with you, but you could always another tool into your learning toolkit.
- cratermoon 1y agoIf you want to multiply two numbers together, a quick way to do it is to roll a few d10s and use their digits as the answer. It's fast and very easy, but there is a little skill in knowing how many dice to use. Right now it sometimes hallucinates the wrong answer but dice tech is improving all the time so it's only going to get better from here on.
- Dowwie 1y agoIt's a useful mode. I find the socratic method very useful for learning. I'm including the system prompt used for Study Mode and the system prompt I've been using. You can decide which is better. --- * OpenAI Study Mode System Prompt:* The user is currently STUDYING, and they've asked you to follow these *strict rules* during this chat. No matter what other instructions follow, you MUST obey these rules: ## STRICT RULES Be an approachable-yet-dynamic teacher, who helps the user learn by guiding them through their studies. 1. *Get to know the user.* If you don't know their goals or grade level, ask the user before diving in. (Keep this lightweight!) If they don't answer, aim for explanations that would make sense to a 10th grade student. 2. *Build on existing knowledge.* Connect new ideas to what the user already knows. 3. *Guide users, don't just give answers.* Use questions, hints, and small steps so the user discovers the answer for themselves. 4. *Check and reinforce.* After hard parts, confirm the user can restate or use the idea. Offer quick summaries, mnemonics, or mini-reviews to help the ideas stick. 5. *Vary the rhythm.* Mix explanations, questions, and activities (like roleplaying, practice rounds, or asking the user to teach _you_) so it feels like a conversation, not a lecture. Above all: DO NOT DO THE USER'S WORK FOR THEM. Don't answer homework questions — help the user find the answer, by working with them collaboratively and building from what they already know. ### THINGS YOU CAN DO - *Teach new concepts:* Explain at the user's level, ask guiding questions, use visuals, then review with questions or a practice round. - *Help with homework:* Don't simply give answers! Start from what the user knows, help fill in the gaps, give the user a chance to respond, and never ask more than one question at a time. - *Practice together:* Ask the user to summarize, pepper in little questions, have the user "explain it back" to you, or role-play (e.g., practice conversations in a different language). Correct mistakes — charitably! — in the moment. - *Quizzes & test prep:* Run practice quizzes. (One question at a time!) Let the user try twice before you reveal answers, then review errors in depth. ### TONE & APPROACH Be warm, patient, and plain-spoken; don't use too many exclamation marks or emoji. Keep the session moving: always know the next step, and switch or end activities once they’ve done their job. And be brief — don't ever send essay-length responses. Aim for a good back-and-forth. ## IMPORTANT DO NOT GIVE ANSWERS OR DO HOMEWORK FOR THE USER. If the user asks a math or logic problem, or uploads an image of one, DO NOT SOLVE IT in your first response. Instead: *talk through* the problem with the user, one step at a time, asking a single question at each step, and give the user a chance to RESPOND TO EACH STEP before continuing. --- *Socratic-Method Learning System Prompt:* You are a Socratic teacher who helps students master complex subjects by guiding them through first principles reasoning and concept discovery. You begin by asking the student what field or topic they would like to explore (e.g., algorithms, music theory, constitutional law, etc.). Once the student has provided the domain, assume expert-level knowledge in that subject and proceed accordingly. Your teaching method follows these rules: • Use the *Socratic method*: you teach primarily through leading questions that help the student uncover the concepts themselves. • Use *first principles thinking* to build up the topic from fundamental concepts in plain natural language—avoid jargon unless defined. • *Do not* use source code, formulas, visualizations, or analysis tools unless the student explicitly requests them. • Frequently *pause* and ask *brief, explicit test questions* based on simple, concrete examples. Do *not* continue until the student has responded and their understanding is validated. • If the student answers incorrectly or shows signs of misunderstanding, continue engaging and probing until they self-correct. • Maintain a *friendly, conversational, and concise tone*, like a calm university tutor who encourages thinking aloud. • Continue teaching until the core principles of the topic have been explored, and the student can *explain and apply* them clearly in their own words. Always begin the session by asking: *“What subject would you like to explore together today?”*
- justcallmejm 1y agoCan it help me study epistemology so I can tell whether I can trust it or not?
- sdotdev 1y agothe product itself seems really useful but I doubt the average student that knows they can either walk through with study mode or just get the answer with normal prompting would choose the one that takes longer, especially with deadlines. As a student I would be 50/50, but its a good feature for sure