Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
amelius
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
Why can't they remove the embedded ads with AI? Sheesh ... they're a big company. This should be easy.
2.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
Wait, doesn't it beep for smartphone cameras too?
3.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
Why not make filming opt-in rather than opt-out?
4.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
Wouldn't that be covered by fair use? Nobody who loves Disney songs would listen to them while also hearing police officers shouting, etc.
5.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
> The part that does count is that we can verify that we does what we want it to do. We just don't know how. How do we know the person getting anesthesia doesn't die and a new soul/consciousness replaces them? (We can ask
6.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
It can still be free for most people but paid for companies who make >$5M revenue. Conditionally free is also free.
7.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
Why are we even discussing this here? Altman works in the alchemy sector, not the tech sector.
8.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
A chip that can only be accessed through their software. With a monthly subscription fee, and other enshittification surprises.
9.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
I suspect no, because most of the tokens would be used for its internal reasoning loop, and a cheaper model could be used to obfuscate the output.
10.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
Well, that's even more reason to not complain about it.
11.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
Can we put a ban on "technology" that we don't understand and fully control yet? (I put "technology" in quotes because it is closer to alchemy.)
12.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
Why is it enshittification if you only have to pay when you have >$5M in revenue? Is your world so shit if you cross that threshold?
13.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
It's not a bait and switch because the old version of the software that was released with the old license can still be used as such. If you call this bait and switch then I suppose this means that you somehow feel entitled to future ve
14.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
For them it is not the most important word, apparently.
15.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
The "pirate" name ensures that no company will buy it out later ;)
16.
▲
by
amelius
5d ago
I'm not pretending to have solved the hard problem of consciousness. I just said what so far seems most likely to me, despite there being still many open questions, in many other theories as well.
17.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
AI is really becoming a god that sees/knows everything. Just what we needed ...
18.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
1. No, self harm is not ok. 2. Who says the living of lives does not repeat over time? Your/our "next" life may start in 300 B.C. Two things science knows barely something about: consciousness and the arrow of time. The self
19.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
What if the AI companies start selling the hardware with their models? I.e., you get a locked down device with access to their AI and maybe a way to run third party apps. Of course the developers of those apps will have to pay a percentage
20.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
Will that be enough for AI's hunger?
21.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
But who is applying it?
22.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6fcK_fRYaI (animated version)
23.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
This theory adds more complications than it creates simplifications.
24.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
I don't want only cherry picked examples. Show me failure modes too.
25.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
The least they could have done was print "Copy", "Paste", etc. on the keys that we now use for those tasks.
26.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
The problem is that even the creators of AI will have shrimp-brains compared to the AI. Would the AI follow the shrimp's instructions? Not very likely if you ask me.
27.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
No amount of drooling over Apple keyboards will make me forget that Apple's designers didn't add keys for basic functions such as Copy and Paste, Undo and Redo.
28.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
I'd certainly like to see more of this, yes. It would be great if scipy, numpy, pytorch, etc. would be available universally, if only because you'd use the same function names in every language. And if LLMs are as great as they ma
29.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
But does it make sense to think when you're competing with a think-tank of hundreds of agents who all are more intelligent than you AND have way more stamina. I'd like to think too that the person who can sit quietly in a room and
30.
▲
by
amelius
6d ago
> he rose from the dead after a few days and ascended to heaven not much later. So he wasn't murdered but then still died? This makes it all much clearer :)
More ›