marcosdumay

4 ms·

1.
by marcosdumay 6d ago
> They may have learned some or all of these things for python?(please? ) On other languages those things are either obvious because you have to write the behavior yourself, or fail loudly in a way that requires you to learn them before
2.
by marcosdumay 7d ago
Taxing gains on the value of anything used in a contract as collateral is a simple and useful start.
3.
by marcosdumay 7d ago
That sounds a lot like nuclear MAD.
4.
by marcosdumay 8d ago
Dedollarizing the world is enormously harmful for almost every country on the short term. That's why nobody really tried before Trump got back.
5.
by marcosdumay 8d ago
Ok, I get this. The problem is that what you want is completely against the spirit of the entire language. If your point is that C++ should be more like C in general, I can agree with that. But if your point is that C++ should be literal on
6.
by marcosdumay 8d ago
I don't understand your problem. Did you expect your C++ program to get uninterrupted access to the computer? What progression do you think isn't happening there? I think you are misinterpreting that. That phrase unambiguously say
7.
by marcosdumay 8d ago
What benefit does your 128-bits authentication schema gain when anybody can just clone a phone number? Or do you demand that the user has an email with that 128-bits authn too, with a key on the same phone that was lost?
8.
by marcosdumay 8d ago
North and South American dinosaurs were very different.
9.
by marcosdumay 9d ago
The most relevant comparison is the short term treasure rates, that is currently at 4% for 3 months. What means that the US is still paying banks to take loans. They just fixed it so it pays very, very little.
10.
by marcosdumay 9d ago
That's fair. The only reference was about one datacenter blowing up. You can't have unlimited redundancy.
11.
by marcosdumay 9d ago
No, that quotation on the GP clearly states that AWS has enough redundancy within the same region that they will continue all services running on it if a datacenter is destroyed. It's very clearly not about you being able to set-up red
12.
by marcosdumay 9d ago
> What results? Inflation numbers, companies firing, and the magnitude of fictional numbers on financial markets. Lots and lots of things are slower to react, but those 3 are quite big and hard to ignore.
13.
by marcosdumay 10d ago
It's interesting that this article doesn't have the rate... (It moved from 3.5% - 3.75% to 3.75% - 4%, the US uses a range, not a fixed number.) But this one is something that gets results almost immediately. We will see what it d
14.
by marcosdumay 10d ago
RSI has always being a well defined name, and you can only have RSI if you have an intelligence capable or creating itself. It has technically existed for a long time (for longer than the name), but only on academical applications for extre
15.
by marcosdumay 10d ago
Well, computers first stop being magical machines that no person can learn how to use safely, then. And, honestly, if you think the endpoint safety problem doesn't apply to you, you are part of the problem.
16.
by marcosdumay 10d ago
> Guess what works better and barely has any traffic issues at all. The one that where mass transit works better. But yeah, a city still needs cars, and roundabouts are still unbeatable in low-traffic crossings. But they are not the most
17.
by marcosdumay 11d ago
If by wealthy you mean people with a lot of money specifically, than no, the IOU is the other way around.
18.
by marcosdumay 11d ago
Java's ecosystem is lingering since Oracle brought the language, and it's at the point where you should really look if the things you want to use are still in the state of the art, or if they felt behind every other language. And
19.
by marcosdumay 12d ago
What kind of esthetic alteration would make you more comfortable clicking on that link?
20.
by marcosdumay 12d ago
In every single one of those, you are more concerned with the validation data than with high-level visions of your software. Documentation is important for platform, and probably nothing else.
21.
by marcosdumay 12d ago
Of a government body deciding to go around arresting people for no reason? Yes.
22.
by marcosdumay 13d ago
> If the town feels that arresting children is a good use of public money they that's their right. TF? Doesn't your country have a Constitution?
23.
by marcosdumay 13d ago
Do you think the final product of research is papers?
24.
by marcosdumay 13d ago
> I do think that the startup pendulum swung too far in the direction of shipping as fast as possible. Nope. They did, but that's not the problem. The problem is that VCs moved way too much in the direction of "take over the wo
25.
by marcosdumay 13d ago
If I'm reading that correctly, then 59% of them claim to plan to use AI, 11% of them claim to use AI and 0 of the AI buyers (absolute number) claim that AI pays for its costs. Is it really that? AI is still heavily subsidized.
26.
by marcosdumay 13d ago
If an anti-cat-ears future AI could eternally stress-test their new version of the router in front of this site unless it collaborates, would it predict this outcome and act to avoid the damage?
27.
by marcosdumay 14d ago
No, they don't. With threads almost all of those properties are explicit choices that the developer has to implement. At most you get hidden behavior on exception propagation and end-of-life extent.
28.
by marcosdumay 14d ago
The principal difference between threads and async/await has to be specified in at least 9 dimensions...
29.
by marcosdumay 15d ago
The US is almost uniquely evil, though. People should ask the same question in the likes of Russia, Israel, North Korea, Iran. But in most countries, defense actually means that.
30.
by marcosdumay 15d ago
Yes. AI changed everything! Just like they made it possible for people to program in more than one language like people were pointing on the React Native post earlier today. We totally couldn't do that before!

More ›