reactordev

4 ms·

1.
by reactordev 6d ago
Solar and wind is extremely reliable. What isn’t reliable is deployment of it. Energy storage is required along with solar farms.
2.
by reactordev 6d ago
Lobbyists lies a foot. “We can’t provide more power with these pesky regulations”
3.
by reactordev 6d ago
Full steam ahead towards greenhouse gases, climate change, and +5degree temperatures. Why not?
4.
by reactordev 8d ago
except for those pesky things called rights
5.
by reactordev 16d ago
Call 211
6.
by reactordev 18d ago
Not TCP ( Takeoff Clearance Prohibited )
7.
by reactordev 18d ago
He loved the term “revolutionary”
8.
by reactordev 18d ago
Ahhh behavioral science…
9.
by reactordev 20d ago
“Just place all that corporate malware on the X, X marks the spot”
10.
by reactordev 22d ago
It's modern C++ so, a little of both I think. 20 years of it and I still have people saying "I should work on my fundamentals" so it's totally fine to be a bit of both.
11.
by reactordev 24d ago
I agree on all of that, and to add to it that the leaders of these studios that had good games were leaders because they made good games. Not because they were good at business management. They weren’t and they thought bringing in the big f
12.
by reactordev 24d ago
If that were true, then Bungie post-Halo would still be Bungie post-Halo, a part of Microsoft. Not Bungie post-Activision... certainly not Bungie post-Sony... It's not all the studio head's fault in some of these situations. It wa
13.
by reactordev 25d ago
Ubisoft, Bungie, id software… Blizzard
14.
by reactordev 25d ago
It's not, AI labs and scalers are buying up all the mac mini's and mac studios.
15.
by reactordev 25d ago
Every game is a time sink, and RPG's are a time investment. Do you not understand this?
16.
by reactordev 25d ago
I no longer have the time to invest
17.
by reactordev 25d ago
Oh Britannia, how you were so amazing before the Tramel/Felucia split.
18.
by reactordev 26d ago
Correct, but to dismiss the NeXT contributions from BSD into modern mac and Darwin would be to dismiss Darwin entirely. Macintosh from the System7 days was a dramatically different beast.
19.
by reactordev 26d ago
why do anything? why Linux? why FreeBSD? why Mac at all? Why build your own wind turbine when corporations make large ones? Why build a cyclekart when you own a car? Why workout when everyone's going to die? With that mindset, everythi
20.
by reactordev 26d ago
a lot of the kernel extensions are closed source proprietary. The core is still open but a lot of what makes modern Mac, Mac, are those kexts.
21.
by reactordev 26d ago
This site scrolls at a snail's pace.
22.
by reactordev 26d ago
FX futures, but yes.
23.
by reactordev 27d ago
pre-plex, yes
24.
by reactordev 28d ago
It's one guy and 40 alts now
25.
by reactordev 1mo ago
Wow I actually got a 7/10. It was hard to tell at first but there are signs that tipped me off to which one probably had a higher score out of the multiple choice.
26.
by reactordev 1mo ago
Signoz? But yes it seemed like OTel was more interested in being a spec than a tool.
27.
by reactordev 1mo ago
Oooof… well played go team, well played.
28.
by reactordev 1mo ago
At no point did I mention myself or what programs I know.
29.
by reactordev 1mo ago
>"I don't get everyone's complaints about the interface. I've been using it for years..." That's the problem, you have a bias because you've already learned the tribal knowledge. Having to learn it from
30.
by reactordev 1mo ago
I think you misread. I never said not to learn it. In fact, for your entry level I would recommend testing for it. At senior+ it should be more about software architecture, design patterns, and distributed systems.

More ›