refulgentis

5 ms·

1.
by refulgentis 6d ago
In one sense, nothing, in another, everything. It is DRAM, but the bandwidth requirements mean it’s paired to a processor, i.e. no DIMMs. Not 100% sure but things like MacBooks and the Framework tower, where you have fixed RAM for the devic
2.
by refulgentis 6d ago
> I really don’t know what we’re arguing about here. Your post above! :) - "His LinkedIn post says “At OpenAI, I co-invented ChatGPT and RLHF”. And while ChatGPT claim is a marketing stretch, RLHF one is a pure lie." > You c
3.
by refulgentis 6d ago
The 4th author on "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" is purely lying when he says he coinvented ChatGPT and RLHF because writing a paper about RLHF is like writing about driving cars on the highw
4.
by refulgentis 6d ago
4th author on "Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback" https://arxiv.org/html/2203.02155v1 . Pure lie?
5.
by refulgentis 6d ago
> you haven't answered how adding 'coinventor' to my comment changes the meaning of my comment. inventor or coinventor doesnt make a difference. I guess! :) To be clear, of course, I trust you on what you mean. My conjectu
6.
by refulgentis 6d ago
"I invented ChatGPT" is plainly false. "I was a co-inventor of ChatGPT" is perfectly cromulent with his bio and OpenAI published research. I'm curious what is pedantic about that distinction, if you have the time. :
7.
by refulgentis 7d ago
Claimed: "The guy who invented ChatGPT" Headline: a ChatGPT inventor.
8.
by refulgentis 7d ago
"will hallucinate tool calls" doesn't match any definition of hallucination I've seen in 4 years. Tool calls are output of the model, it can't "hallucinate" they happened. Maybe you're describing outp
9.
by refulgentis 7d ago
As long as we're in a thread about people "tricking", what you're claiming was written, or a synonym thereof, or kinda-sorta-the-same-thing, is not written anywhere.
10.
by refulgentis 7d ago
"But to me it seems like they were able to trick the VCs with "can't hallucinate" etc." I don't understand why we lept to accusatory and personal, nor do I understand where this connects with the article, nor d
11.
by refulgentis 8d ago
The irony here being: - the "vibecoded site" was not vibecoded. - when you turn "vibecoded off" on this vibecoded site, you get standard Claude slop Nasty little site, between that and pretending LLMs are the same as Jev
12.
by refulgentis 15d ago
I don't get it, why?
13.
by refulgentis 17d ago
I'm sorry, it's going over my head still - my reading is "all models with any training after August 10 know how GPT 5.5 Pro thinks", but I'm not sure why - my initial guess was that's when GPT 5.5 was released,
14.
by refulgentis 17d ago
The thoughts trick was known before their paper / August. I "independently" "invented" it for the first Anthropic reasoning models because the API required you have thoughts for each assistant message. My app lets y
15.
by refulgentis 17d ago
I'm less bullish, this model and previous are halfway decent and you can do diffusion sub-agents and sub-agent-agents today, and there hasn't been a sea change, or anything noticeable or well-known. Economically, there's ~no
16.
by refulgentis 18d ago
Carefully worded; it's extremely likely to be the same large frontier model that started training again on August 28th as well, as they revealed in some of the RL message board follow-up - for several reasons, most importantly, if we a
17.
by refulgentis 18d ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html - "Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine."; "Don't be curmudgeonly." FWIW, with a foothold in both domains, thi
18.
by refulgentis 21d ago
Is any piece you've seen in good enough shape to be in a Lean library?
19.
by refulgentis 22d ago
If it makes you feel any better the curmudgeon who drives the ARC-AGI tests feels the same way, that's why we're on 3 and I'm sure we'll see 4. Also, we can all avoid calling it "moving the goalposts" so no one
20.
by refulgentis 23d ago
I don’t know why people think DeepSeek did reasoning models / RLVR before OpenAI, there was a gap of months.
21.
by refulgentis 24d ago
There's, quietly, a llama.cpp WebGPU backend that works *great*. Some hacking required, it's unsupported, a side project for one of the lead maintainers and someone in school. Note of caution, llama.cpp isn't what it was, the
22.
by refulgentis 24d ago
They're quite selective in benchmarks, c.f. notably only bad one is 10% on TerminalBench. It's a really addled model, one time I said "Hi" and it built out a 4 panel hello world app with (fake) weather, a todo list, and
23.
by refulgentis 24d ago
Project is de facto dead, used it for many years and had to rip it out 6 months ago, don't waste your time.
24.
by refulgentis 24d ago
Let’s say it’s fine to give emotionally based arguments the same credence as rational arguments. That’s a huge cede, and yet, it doesn’t change anything, let’s see here: If my cousin kept ranting about my other cousin was going to go bank
25.
by refulgentis 26d ago
My $0.02: it doesn't actually exist. GitHub repo indicates they're working on basic, basic, bringup. Like, Objective-C works at all and CLI utilities work . This is gutting, when combined with a prior post showing this dates ba
26.
by refulgentis 28d ago
Running on ported userspace components, with a shim, isn't the same as running on the OS in itself. That really matters, some times. But not the vast majority of the time. (source: been coding iOS since pre-SDK iPhone OS 1.0)
27.
by refulgentis 28d ago
There’s this strain of thinking that’s complete alien to me, I can’t interpret what’s being said and it sounds incredibly aggressive. ex. our lead post asking if Sam Altman still thinks GPT-3 is unsafe to release, and I don’t understand wha
28.
by refulgentis 29d ago
> Not even sure why this person is trying to get this stuff to run on hardware that wasn't designed for AI? Posturing/overclaiming like this shades rather than illuminates, there are no worlds in which the "M3...wasn'
29.
by refulgentis 29d ago
Slop; all those LocalLlama threads "you" read had #s too. And Q1 quant? Why? You have the memory...
30.
by refulgentis 1mo ago
Dario has less space than a Nomad!

More ›