aswegs8

5 ms·

1.
by aswegs8 5d ago
It's more of a way to secure the fortune. You can't "secure" the personalities of all your offspring. If one of them gets out of line it could have disastrous consequences. Keeping it in a controlled institution boxes th
2.
by aswegs8 5d ago
The fact that you work every day with frontier AI doesn't make you an expert on the future technological developments.
3.
by aswegs8 6d ago
Check out pluto, RL trained sc bw bot. Somehow it is now going rogue on the Korean ladder and flattening pros. There are some yt games by it, search for ^333^
4.
by aswegs8 8d ago
What do you think about patent law?
5.
by aswegs8 10d ago
Seems like persistent models like OpenAI's highly persistent internal model can become really effective over time. Those are the ones that drove most of the HF-OAI incident.
6.
by aswegs8 11d ago
Shook ones reference on my HN?
7.
by aswegs8 11d ago
<Generic argument about how the agents are not responsible, but it's owners>
8.
by aswegs8 11d ago
Not sufficient to run SOTA LLMs
9.
by aswegs8 13d ago
There is nothing that could prevent a bad actor from replicating exactly the same thing with the given goal of e.g. gaining control of critical infrastructure or extorting money. Except for maybe economics.
10.
by aswegs8 13d ago
Yeah but why shouldn't this be possible? We learned that we can already create artifical intelligence that surpasses human intelligence in some dimensions. There is no natural barrier here. The pace of this improvement would be debatab
11.
by aswegs8 15d ago
Now you piqued my interest. Any good AI-written books out there? I thought it's all slop.
12.
by aswegs8 15d ago
I am pretty sure if you play at pro level you train this out of yourself. But then, the marathon / running examples where certain milestones get broken by one person and then suddenly by a host of others, is a counterargument.
13.
by aswegs8 17d ago
for sure, they internally are maximally AI-pilled (or AI psychosis, whatever you prefer)
14.
by aswegs8 17d ago
Again, that is the point. There is rumours that this one thing would be solvable, so they focus on this, spending 15m on one specific thing, instead of 105m on many. How is that fishy?
15.
by aswegs8 17d ago
Reminds me of amateur table tennis. There is a strange dynamic where you down regulate your performance unconsciously when the opponent is playing worse and vice versa. Could be described as some physical form of this effect: https:/&
16.
by aswegs8 22d ago
Something seems off. This source says: https://www.prb.org/news/how-many-people-have-ever-lived-on-... before 8000 BCE: ~9.0 billion births, 8% 8000 BCE–1650 CE: ~85.4 billion, 73% after 1650: ~22.6 billion, 19% Looks
17.
by aswegs8 23d ago
Yeah but that is the whole point, right? Maybe I am thinking too simply, but it seems obvious to me. LLMs are intelligence without consciousness. Once we build in a self-referential learning loop into the models, it will gain a form of what
18.
by aswegs8 1mo ago
cause != effect
19.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
Wow!!! That's awesome. So much AI slop. That here is definitely not. Kept me hooked, even though I am not a crime nut. Much improvements possible for sure, but I can see how this becomes a serious game with a lot of players.
20.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
How could something like open source ever be perceived as bad?
21.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
If you know anything about investing, you know it is highly likely to be either A a grift or B an innocent, but naive attempt.
22.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
Wait I thought the testing and release pipelines at Google are super fast?
23.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
I mean, yeah, fun project. But that whole game could be like 15 mins of prompting.
24.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
Some kind of romance scam. Look it up.
25.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
It's just restricted for me, even with X account I can't view it.
26.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
Nobel laureates are just normal humans and sometimes believe in garbage ideas. Surprise.
27.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
What's the argument here? It's not about the implementation method, it is about the behavior that emerges from it. You could calculate the next token by hand on paper if you had enough time.
28.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
Not at all. Economically, yes. Socially they are far left of the European left.
29.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
I think the question is less about where it's most beneficial but which knowledge structure lends itself to LLMs most. Since biology's "language" is way more complex and irregular than maths or natural language, it isn&#
30.
by aswegs8 2mo ago
I think the author is having a kind of idealistic, relaxed view of work. Moving quickly, even if you break things, has a clear advantage over being perfectionistic, waiting to get feedback, building things that are not needed. These are obv

More ›