Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mwigdahl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mwigdahl
9d ago
Same here, then I watch _The Orville_ and I'm happy again.
2.
▲
by
mwigdahl
10d ago
I’m not defending private equity _at all_, they’re brand-sucking vampires, but all it takes to give some dogs digestion issues is to switch ingredients. I have two that are extremely sensitive to chicken, which is in almost all dog foods du
3.
▲
by
mwigdahl
15d ago
That's a very interesting idea for a benchmark!
4.
▲
by
mwigdahl
15d ago
They're being trained by a lot of repetitions of one-shot bugfixes and feature implementations. If they don't have to maintain code over the long term they have no incentive to not take the easy win with lower immediate risk and
5.
▲
by
mwigdahl
15d ago
Probably stole it from Tesla... :)
6.
▲
by
mwigdahl
22d ago
In other words, "Look how she was dressed, she was asking for it." This argument is BS, it has everything to do with Anthropic's resistance to the DoD's strongarm tactics in trying to force their desired contract terms o
7.
▲
by
mwigdahl
26d ago
More likely inspired by Asimov's names (R. Daneel, etc.) from his Robots stories.
8.
▲
by
mwigdahl
1mo ago
My father-in-law died of pancreatic cancer three months after diagnosis. It is a horrible disease, not least of which because it’s difficult to diagnose. By the time they get a clear bead on it, in many cases, it’s stage four and already ra
9.
▲
by
mwigdahl
1mo ago
But addition is commutative! :)
10.
▲
by
mwigdahl
1mo ago
It's still there. You can use up to half your Max capacity on Fable, then you have to downshift.
11.
▲
by
mwigdahl
1mo ago
Nothing said that this candidate was actually hired by Anthropic, just that he or she applied.
12.
▲
by
mwigdahl
1mo ago
I get a lot of mileage using Fable to spec, then Sol to review the spec, then Fable to plan, then Sol to review the plan, then Fable to implement, then Sol to review the implementation. It's a lot of steps, but a great boost in qualit
13.
▲
by
mwigdahl
1mo ago
Stars! was awesome, many fond memories of play-by-email games of that...
14.
▲
by
mwigdahl
1mo ago
In the late 80s, a friend of mine broke up with his girlfriend via email while they were both sitting in the same computer lab.
15.
▲
by
mwigdahl
1mo ago
What do folks think of Hefferon's _Linear Algebra_?
16.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
I don’t think it’s absurd. We’ve created these things, however alien the structure, with as much human text as we can scrounge up and jam into them. Text is an imperfect distillation of the human experience, but it doesn’t surprise me that
17.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
Wirth's Law I believe.
18.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
"Beads is the best. If you're not using Beads, you're failing. Gas Town, which I have just told you was a failure, was built on Beads. Gas City, which also failed, was also built on Beads. Wheelhouse, which I'm worki
19.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
If you wouldn't mind sharing, what's your Comfy workflow for this? I have the same video card setup and would like to give it a shot.
20.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
I don't buy it, although I agree with GP's larger point about other strengths. Printing presses are about exact duplication of writing. The internet is a higher layer printing press. LLMs substitute for (some of) the human effor
21.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
Nice! Not 100% sure, but it reads very human to me. The only LLM-ism that jumped out at me was "An honest note before we continue", but that was the only time the word "honest" appeared. If it's not human-written
22.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
Well, this inevitable flamewar will be a nice change from the pro-AI / anti-AI comment threads, at least...
23.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
You just keep right on driving...
24.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
There's big money in it, so of course there's going to be a huge PR push to cast it as a great moral and societal good. The thing that gets me is that the rationalists who were such outspoken proponents of prediction markets (look
25.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
Sure! I use an orchestrator main agent whose only job is to run subagents through the workflow process I've defined. Part of that workflow is to invoke a review subagent at particular points to check the spec, the implementation plan
26.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
Subagents whose only job is to review the actions of your other agents for rule compliance? It works reasonably well for me in complex workflows using Claude Code.
27.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
And to note, the law in question is from the 1800s -- hardly something novel Wisconsin is doing.
28.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
The book clearly and repeatedly makes the point that immersion in ubiquitous computing made the younger generation smarter and quicker than their forebears. Miri was 13 and Juan was, what, 9? Both were depicted as running rings around the
29.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
Do you really think that if a Chinese model had achieved a significant math breakthrough that it wouldn't be trumpeted to the global media? The "Deepseek moment" was great for China; this would be the same.
30.
▲
by
mwigdahl
2mo ago
Well, an oracle except for that part in the same book where unlimited access to the internet made all children prodigies self-motivated by their love of learning.
More ›