17 ms·

The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else

405 points by 1vuio0pswjnm7 9mo ago

lordnacho 9mo ago
The real question is whether the boom is, economically, a mistake. If AI is here to stay, as a thing that permanently increases productivity, then AI buying up all the electricians and network engineers is a (correct) signal. People will take courses in those things and try to get a piece of the winnings. Same with those memory chips that they are gobbling up, it just tells everyone where to make a living. If it's a flash in a pan, and it turns out to be empty promises, then all those people are wasting their time. What we really want to ask ourselves is whether our economy is set up to mostly get things right, or it is wastefully searching.
- jleyank 9mo ago
  They still gotta figure out how their consumers will get the cash to consume. Toss all the developers and a largish cohort of well-paid people head towards the dole.
  - oblio 9mo ago
    At some point rich people stop caring about money and only care about power.
    - willis936 9mo ago
      It's a fun thought, but you know what we call those people? Poor. The people who light their own money on fire today are ceding power. The two are the same.
      - catlifeonmars 9mo ago
        1. Some people can afford to light a lot of their money on fire and still remain rich. 2. The trick is to burn other people’s money. Which is a lot more akin to what is going on here. Then, at least in the US, if you’re too big to fail, the fed will just give you more cash effectively diminishing everyone else’s buying power.
        willis936 9mo ago
        In regards to 2: it's as simple as not letting it be your money being set on fire. Every fiscally responsible individual is making sure they have low exposure to the mag 7.
      - oblio 9mo ago
        At the end the day a medieval lord was poor but he lived a better life than the peasants.
        WarOnPrivacy 9mo ago
        > At the end the day a medieval lord was poor but he lived a better life than the peasants. As measured in knowledge utilized during basic living: The lives of lords were much less complex than that of modern poor people.
  - rybosworld 9mo ago
    Yeah I don't think this get's enough attention. It still requires a technical person to use these things effectively. Building coherent systems that solve a business problem is an iterative process. I have a hard time seeing how an LLM could climb that mountain on it's own. I don't think there's a way to solve the issue of: one-shotted apps will increasingly look more convincing, in the same way that the image generation looks more convincing. But when you peel back the curtain, that output isn't quite correct enough to deploy to production. You could try brute-force vibe iterating until it's exactly what you wanted, but that rarely works for anything that isn't a CRUD app. Ask any of the image generators to build you a sprite sheet for a 2d character with multiple animation frames. I have never gotten one to do this successfully in one prompt. Sometimes the background will be the checkerboard png transparency layer. Except, the checkers aren't all one color (#000000, #ffffff), instead it's a million variations of off-white and off-black. The legs in walking frames are almost never correct, etc. And even if they get close - as soon as you try to iterate on the first output, you enter a game of whack-a-mole. Okay we fixed the background but now the legs don't look right, let's fix those. Okay great legs are fixed but now the faces are different in every frame let's fix those. Oh no fixing the faces broke the legs again, Etc. We are in a weird place where companies are shedding the engineers that know how to use these things. And some of those engineers will become solo-devs. As a solo-dev, funds won't be infinite. So it doesn't seem likely that they can jack up the prices on the consumer plans. But if companies keep firing developers, then who will actually steer the agents on the enterprise plans?
    - KellyCriterion 9mo ago
      esp when it comes down to integration with the rest of the business processes & people aroud this "single apps" :-)
    - throwaw12 9mo ago
      > But when you peel back the curtain, that output isn't quite correct enough to deploy to production What if, we change current production environments to fit that blackbox and make it run somehow with 99% availability and good security?
    - mc-0 9mo ago
  - mylifeandtimes 9mo ago
    Why do we need people to consume when we have the government? Serious question. As in, we built the last 100 years on "the american consumer", the idea that it would be the people buying everything. There is no reason that needs to or necessarily will continue-- don't get me wrong, I kind of hope it does, but my hopes don't always predict what actually happens. What if the next 100 is the government buying everything, and the vast bulk of the people are effectively serfs. Who HAVE to stay in line otherwise they go to debt prison or tax prison where they become slaves (yes, the US has a fairly large population of prison laborers who are forced to work for 15-50 cents/hour. The lucky ones can earn as much as $1.50/hour. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2017/04/10/wages/ https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2017/04/10/wages/
    - smegger001 9mo ago
      where will the government get the money to buy anything if the billionaires and their mega corps have it all and spend sufficient amounts to keep the government from taxing. we have a k shape economy where the capital class is extracting all of the value from the working class who are headed to subsistence levels of income and the low class dies in the ditch.
  - nosianu 9mo ago
    Like before - debt! This prevents the consumers from slacking off and enjoying life, instead they have to continue to work work work. They get to consume a little, and work much more (after all, they also have to pay interest, and for consumer credits and credits that the masses get that adds up to a lot). In this scenario, it does not even matter that many are unable to pay off all that debt. As long as the amount of work that is extracted from them significantly exceeds the amount of consumption allowed to them all is fine. The chains that bind used to be metal, but we progressed and became a civilized society. Now it's the financial system and the laws. “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.” (Anatole France)
- forinti 9mo ago
  I know that all investments have risk, but this is one risky gamble. US$700 billion could build a lot of infrastructure, housing, or manufacturing capacity.
  - unsupp0rted 9mo ago
    What $700 billion can't do is cure cancers, Parkinsons, etc. We know because we've tried and that's barely a sliver of what it's cost so far, for middling results. Whereas $700 billion in AI might actually do that.
    - wolfram74 9mo ago
      Your name is well earned! "can't cure cancers" is impressively counterfactual [0] as 5 year survival of cancer diagnosis is up over almost all categories. Despite every cancer being a unique species trying to kill you, we're getting better and better at dealing with them. [0]https://www.cancer.org/research/acs-research-news/people-are-now-living-longer-after-a-cancer-diagnosis.html https://www.cancer.org/research/acs-research-news/people-are...
      - unsupp0rted 9mo ago
        Yes, we're getting better at treating cancers, but still if a person gets cancer, chances are good the thing they'll die of is cancer. Middling results. Because we're not good at curing cancers, we're just good at making people survive better for longer until the cancer gets them. 5 year survival is a lousy metric but it's the best we can manage and measure. I'm perfectly happy investing roughly 98% of my savings into the thing that has a solid shot at curing cancers, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases. I don't understand why all billionaires aren't doing this.
        beepbooptheory 9mo ago
        Maybe it should give you pause then, that not everyone else is investing 98% of their savings?
- 112233 9mo ago
  "If X is here to stay, as a thing that permanently increases productivity" - matches a lot of different X. Maintaining persons health increases productivity. Good education increases productivity. What is playing out now is completely different - it is both irresistible lust for omniscient power provided by this technology ("mirror mirror on the wall, who has recently thought bad things about me?"), and the dread of someone else wielding it. Plus, it makes natural moat against masses of normal (i.e. poor) people, because requires a spaceship to run. Finally intelligence can also be controlled by capital the way it was meant to, joining information, creativity, means of production, communication and such things
  - mattgreenrocks 9mo ago
    > Plus, it makes natural moat against masses of normal (i.e. poor) people, because requires a spaceship to run. Finally intelligence can also be controlled by capital the way it was meant to, joining information, creativity, means of production, communication and such things I'd put intelligence in quotes there, but it doesn't detract from the point. It is astounding to me how willfully ignorant people are being about the massive aggregation of power that's going on here. In retrospect, I don't think they're ignorant, they just haven't had to think about it much in the past. But this is a real problem with very real consequences. Sovereignty must be occasionally be asserted, or someone will infringe upon it. That's exactly what's happening here.
    - fennecbutt 9mo ago
      >massive aggregation of power that's going on here Which has been happening since what at least the bad old IBM days and nobody's done a thing about it? I've given up tbh. It's like the apathetic masses want the billionaires to become trillionaires as long as they get their tiktok fix.
      - luqtas 9mo ago
        > It's like the apathetic masses want the billionaires to become trillionaires as long as they get their tiktok fix. it's much worse. a great demographic of hacker news love gen. AI.. these are usually highly educated people showing their true faces on the plethora of problems this technology violates and generates
- somewhereoutth 9mo ago
  I suspect a lot of this is due to large amounts of liquidity sloshing around looking for returns. We are still dealing with the consequences of the ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) and QE (Quantitative Easing) where money to support the economy through the Great Financial Crisis and Covid was largely funneled in to the top, causing the 'everything bubble'. The rich got (a lot) richer, and now have to find something to do with that wealth. The immeasurable returns promised by LLMs (in return for biblical amounts of investment) fits that bill very well.
- deleted 9mo ago
  [deleted]
- mcphage 9mo ago
  > What we really want to ask ourselves is whether our economy is set up to mostly get things right, or it is wastefully searching. I can’t speak to the economy as a whole, but the tech economy has a long history of bubbles and scams. Some huge successes, too—but gets it wrong more often than it gets it right.
- Archelaos 9mo ago
  In 2024, global GDP was $111 trillion.[1] Investing 1 or 2 % of that to improve global productivity via AI does not seem exaggerated to me. [1] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
  - throwaw12 9mo ago
    I will put it differently, Investing 1 or 2% of global GDP to increase wealth gap 50% more and make top 1% unbelievable rich while everyone else looking for jobs or getting 50 year mortgage, seem very bad idea to me.
    - cheonn638 9mo ago
      >Investing 1 or 2% of global GDP to increase wealth gap 50% more What’s your definition of wealth gap? Is it how you feel when you see the name of a billionaire?
      - fennecbutt 9mo ago
        Yes the very fact that billionaires exist mean our species has failed. I do not believe that there is a legitimate billionaire on the planet, in that they haven't engaged in stock manipulation, lobbying, insider trading, corrupt deals, monopolistic practices, dark patterns, corporate tax dodging, personal tax dodging. You could for example say that the latter are technically legal and therefore okay, but it's my belief that they're "technically legal/loopholes" because we have reached a point where the rich are so powerful that they bend the laws to their own ends. Our species is a bit of a disappointment. People would rather focus on trivial tribal issues than on anything that impacts the majority of the members of our species. We are well and truly animals.
      - mjamesaustin 9mo ago
        It's easy to access statistics about wealth and income inequality. It is worse than it has ever been, and continuing to get worse. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/01/09/trends-in-income-and-wealth-inequality/ https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/01/09/trends-...
- deleted 9mo ago
  [deleted]
- hackable_sand 9mo ago
  Your comment doesn't say anything
- thefz 9mo ago
  > If AI is here to stay, as a thing that permanently increases productivity, Thing is, I am still waiting to see where it increases productivity aside from some extremely small niches like speech to text and summarizing some small text very fast.
  - sigseg1v 9mo ago
    Serious question, but have you not used it to implement anything at your job? Admittedly I was very skeptical but last sprint in 2 days I got 12 pull requests up for review by running 8 agents on my computer in parallel and about 10 more on cloud VMs. The PRs are all double reviewed and QA'd and merged. The ones that don't have PRs are larger refactors, one 40K loc and the other 30k loc and I just need actual time to go through every line myself and self-test appropriately, otherwise it would have been more stuff finished. These are all items tied to money in our backlog. It would have taken me about 5 times as long to close those items out without this tooling. I also would have not had as much time to produce and verify as many unit tests as I did. Is this not increased productivity?
    - deleted 9mo ago
      [deleted]
    - thefz 9mo ago
      So you roll a dice and call yourself a software engineer, basically.
      - sigseg1v 9mo ago
        I have an engineering degree but don't call myself an engineer because it's illegal to do so in my country unless I hold a PEng. That aside, I fail to see how code where I have reviewed every single line, tested all edge cases as normal, had 2 other devs also test this, had a QA test, and had a PO run and approve the behaviour as "rolling the dice" but you're entitled to your opinion.
  - throwaw12 9mo ago
    Are you doctor or a farmer? If you are a software engineer you are missing out a lot, literally a lot!
- TheDong 9mo ago
  There's one additional question we could have here, which is "is AI here to stay and is it net-positive, or does it have significant negative externalities" > What we really want to ask ourselves is whether our economy is set up to mostly get things right, or it is wastefully searching. We've so far found two ways in recent memory that our economy massively fails when it comes to externalities. Global Warming continues to get worse, and we cannot globally coordinate to stop it when the markets keep saying "no, produce more oil, make more CO2, it makes _our_ stock go up until the planet eventually dies, but our current stock value is more important than the nebulous entire planet's CO2". Ads and addiction to gambling games, tiktok, etc also are a negative externality where the company doing the advertising or making the gambling game gains profit, but at the expense of effectively robbing money from those with worse impulse control and gambling problems. Even if the market votes that AI will successfully extract enough money to be "here to stay", I think that doesn't necessarily mean the market is getting things right nor that it necessarily increases productivity. Gambling doesn't increase productivity, but the market around kalshi and sports betting sure indicates it's on the rise lately.
- mschuster91 9mo ago
  > People will take courses in those things and try to get a piece of the winnings. The problem is boom-bust cycles. Electricians will always be in demand but it takes about 3 years to properly train even a "normal" residential electrician - add easily 2-3 years on top to work on the really nasty stuff aka 50 kV and above. No matter what, the growth of AI is too rapid and cannot be sustained. Even if the supposed benefits of AI all come true - the level of growth cannot be upheld because everything else suffers.
  - marcosdumay 9mo ago
    > it takes about 3 years to properly train even a "normal" residential electrician To pass ordinary wire with predefined dimensions in exposed conduits? No way it takes more than a few weeks.
    - mschuster91 9mo ago
      I'm talking about proper German training, not the kind of shit that leads to what Cy Porter (the home inspector legend) exposes on Youtube. Shoddy wiring can hold up for a looong time in homes because outside of electrical car chargers and baking ovens nothing consumes high current over long time and as long as no device develops a ground fault, even a lack of a GFCI isn't noticeable. But a data center? Even smaller ones routinely rack up megawatts of power here, large hyperscaler deployments hundreds of megawatts. Sustained, not peak. That is putting a lot of stress on everything involved: air conditioning, power, communications. And for that to hold up, your neighbor Joe who does all kinds of trades as long as he's getting paid in cash won't cut it.
    - chasd00 9mo ago
      It’s protected by requiring many hours (years) of apprenticeship. These kinds of heavily unionized jobs only reward seniority. Gotta pay your dues buddy!
- HardCodedBias 9mo ago
  "The real question is whether the boom is, economically, a mistake." The answer to this is two part: 1. Have we seen an increase in capability over the last couple of years? The answer here is clearly yes. 2. Do we think that this increase will continue? This is unknown. It seems so, but we don't know and these firms are clearly betting that it will. 1a. Do we think that with existing capability that there is tremendous latent demand? If so the buildout is still rational if progress stops.
- majormajor 9mo ago
  AI could be here to stay and "chase a career as an electrician helping build datacenters" could also be a mistake. The construction level could plateau or decline without a bubble popping. That's why it can't just be a market signal "go become an electrician" when the feedback loop is so slow. It's a social/governmental issue. If you make careers require expensive up-front investment largely shouldered by the individuals, you not only will be slow to react but you'll also end up with scores of people who "correctly" followed the signals right up until the signals went away.
  - throwaway0123_5 9mo ago
    > you'll also end up with scores of people who "correctly" followed the signals right up until the signals went away. I think this is where we're headed, very quickly, and I'm worried about it from a social stability perspective (as well as personal financial security of course). There's probably not a single white-collar job that I'd feel comfortable spending 4+ years training for right now (even assuming I don't have to pay or take out debt for the training). Many people are having skills they spent years building made worthless overnight, without an obvious or realistic pivot available. Lots and lots of people who did or will do "all the right things," with no benefit earned from it. Even if hypothetically there is something new you can reskill into every five years, how is that sustainable? If you're young and without children, maybe it is possible. Certainly doesn't sound fun, and I say this as someone who joined tech in part because of how fast-paced it was.
    - zozbot234 9mo ago
      > Many people are having skills they spent years building made worthless overnight, without an obvious or realistic pivot available. I'd like to see real examples of this, beyond trivial ones like low-quality copywriting (i.e. the "slop" before there was slop) that just turns into copyediting. Current AI's are a huge force multiplier for most white-collar skills, including software development.
- dfedbeef 9mo ago
  If
singingwolfboy 9mo ago
https://archive.ph/J8pg5 https://archive.ph/J8pg5
- mrjay42 9mo ago
  This does not work for me. It's a loop of captcha which never ends
  - esseph 9mo ago
    You have some extension issues going on, maybe. Seems to work fine in FF and chrome.
  - b00ty4breakfast 9mo ago
    I was having this problem earlier with different URLs I was searching for but the link above actually worked for me.
  - bookofjoe 9mo ago
    Try this: https://wapo.st/4qqatnA https://wapo.st/4qqatnA
  - quinncom 9mo ago
    When this happens to me, it's either because I'm connected to a VPN, or I'm using Cloudflare's public DNS server.
  - diogenes_atx 9mo ago
    This may be a DNS issue. I had the same problem with NextDNS. After switching my DNS servers to Cloud Flare DNS (1.1.1.1, 1.0.0.1), it works fine.
    - LoganDark 9mo ago
      It's always DNS!
    - Zanfa 9mo ago
      It’s not. They’ve blocked some countries entirely.
bm3719 9mo ago
This is the trade-off to connectivity and removing frictional barriers (i.e., globalism). This is the economic equivalent of what Nick Land and Spandrell called the "IQ shredder". Spandrell said of Singapore: Singapore is an IQ shredder. It is an economically productive metropolis that sucks in bright and productive minds with opportunities and amusements at the cost of having a demographically unsustainable family unit. Basically, if you're a productive person, you want to maximize your return. So, you go where the action is. So does every other smart person. Often that place is a tech hub, which is now overflowing with smart guys. Those smart guys build adware (or whatever) and fail to reproduce (combined, these forces "shred" the IQ). Meanwhile every small town is brain-drained. You hometown's mayor is 105 IQ because he's the smartest guy in town. Things don't work that great, and there's a general stagnation to the place. Right now, AI is a "capital shredder". In the past, there were barriers everywhere, and we've worked hard to tear those down. It used to be that the further the distance (physically, but also in other senses too, like currencies, language, culture, etc.), the greater the friction to capital flows. The local rich guy would start a business in his town. Now he sends it to one of the latest global capital attractors, which have optimized for capital inflow. This mechanism works whether the attractor can efficiently use that capital or not. That resource inflow might be so lucrative, that managing inflow is the main thing it does. Right now that's AI, but as long as present structure continues, this is how the machine of the global economy will work.
- dyauspitr 9mo ago
  What’s the alternative. Keep the smart physically separated, can never collaborate to make anything paradigm shifting and we just prod along with small town paper mills and marginally better local government?
  - deleted 9mo ago
    [deleted]
  - WillAdams 9mo ago
    California had a great mechanism for this in their land grant colleges, which back before the protests of the Vietnam War were required to offer the valedictorian of nearby high schools (or the person with the highest GPA who accepted) full tuition and room and board --- then Governor Ronald Reagan shut down this program when the students had the temerity to protest the Vietnam War --- it was also grade inflation to keep students above the threshold necessary for a draft deferment which began the downward spiral of American education.
bix6 9mo ago
RIP Washington Post.
dev1ycan 9mo ago
I don't think these companies buying realize how much animosity they're creating with literally everyone until it explodes on their face.
- deadbabe 9mo ago
  These companies play a long game. Eventually generations of people just grow up with this being the new normal, no reason to be angry. The people who are angry are the ones who had their cheese moved.
semanticpop 9mo ago
[dead]
stego-tech 9mo ago
This is another facet of the fierce opposition to AI by a swath of the population: it’s quite literally destroying the last bit of enjoyment we could wring from existence in the form of hobbies funded through normal employment. Think of the PC gamers, who first dealt with COVID supply shocks, followed by crypto making GPUs scarce and untenable, then GPU makers raising prices and narrowing inventory to only the highest-end SKUs, only to outright abandon them entirely for AI - which then also consumed their RAM and SSDs. A hobby that used to be enjoyed by folks on even a modest budget is now a theft risk given the insane resale priced of parts on the second-hand market due to scarcity. And that extends to others as well. The swaths of folks who made freelance or commission artistry work through Patreons and conventions and the like are suddenly struggling as customers and companies spew out AI slop using their work and without compensation. Tech workers, previously the wealthy patron of artisans and communities, are now being laid off en masse for AI CapEx buildouts and share pumps as investors get cold feet about what these systems are actually doing to the economy at large (definite bad, questionable good, uncertain futures). Late stage capitalism’s sole respite was consumerism, and we can’t even do that anymore thanks to AI gobbling up all the resources and capital. It’s no wonder people are pissed at AI boosters trying to say this is a miracle technology that’ll lift everyone up: it’s already kicking people down, and nobody actually wants to admit or address that lest their investments be disrupted to protect humans.
- 9dev 9mo ago
  I think this started a lot earlier actually. A few generations back, many people played an instrument, or at least could sing. It didn't matter that none of them was a Mozart, because they didn't had to be. For making music or singing together in a family or a friend group, it was wholly sufficient to be just good, not necessarily great. But when everyone has access to recordings of the world's best musicians at all times, why listen to uncle Harry's shoddy guitar play? Why sing Christmas songs together when you can put on the Sinatra Christmas jazz playlist on Spotify?
  - stego-tech 9mo ago
    That’s definitely part of it as well, this sort of general distillation into a smaller and smaller pool of content or objects or goods that cost ever more money. Like how most of the royalties Spotify pays out are for older catalogue stuff from “classic” artists, rather than new bands. Or how historical libraries of movies and films are constantly either up for grabs (for prestige) or being pushed off platforms due to their older/more costly royalty agreements. With AI though, it’s the actual, tangible consumption of physical goods being threatened, which many companies involved in AI may argue is exactly the point: that everyone should be renters rather than consumers, and by making ownership expensive through cost and scarcity alike, you naturally drive more folks towards subscriptions for what used to be commodities (music, movies, games, compute, vehicles, creativity tools, TCGs, you name it). It’s damn depressing.
Kon5ole 9mo ago
It's hard to comprehend the scale of these investments. Comparing them to notable industrial projects, it's almost unbelievable. Every week in 2026 Google will pay for the cost of a Burj Khalifa. Amazon for a Wembley Stadium. Facebook will spend a France-England tunnel every month.
- nine_zeros 9mo ago
  [dead]
- bogzz 9mo ago
  Haters will say Sora wasn't worth it.
  - jsheard 9mo ago
    Incredible how quickly that moment passed. Four months on it's barely clinging to the App Store top 100, below killer apps such as Gossip Harbor®: Merge & Story.
  - mimischi 9mo ago
    Ok I’ll bite. Was it worth it? What have people missed that haven’t used it.
    - deleted 9mo ago
      [deleted]
  - askl 9mo ago
    What is Sora?
    - ge96 9mo ago
      If you see a video of a cat running away from a police traffic stop
    - cogman10 9mo ago
      One of many AI video generators that are filling up all video social media with rage bate garbage.
kkfx 9mo ago
Is there really for the ML boom, or is it just a way to make computers more and more expensive to push people towards mobile? Because looking around, that's the effect I'm seeing, regardless of the causes. I see a future where most people will buy tablets to save money and the desktop will be for only a few, a very few, just when self-hosting is becoming trendy and people are saying "it's time for GNU/Linux to take Windows' place"...
mystraline 9mo ago
The current LLMs are not constantly learning. They're static models that require megatons of coal to retrain. Now if the LLMs could modify their own nets, and improve themselves, then that would be immensely valuable for the world. But as of now, its a billionaires wet dream to threaten all workers as a way to replace labor.
- throwaw12 9mo ago
  > if the LLMs could modify their own nets ... then that would be immensely valuable for the world. Not sure :) I expect different things, don't think Wall Street allows good things to happen to ordinary people
- simianwords 9mo ago
  How would you have done it differently? It’s clear that even if this builds up more billionaire wealth, it still benefits everyone. Just like any other technology? So would you rather stop billionaires from doing it?
  - bigstrat2003 9mo ago
    > It’s clear that even if this builds up more billionaire wealth, it still benefits everyone. That is by no means clear. I have yet to see any benefit from AI. I have no doubt in my mind that I'm not alone. So how is "everyone" benefiting from this trend?
- reducesuffering 9mo ago
  Think bigger, think of the entire system outside of just the single LLM: the interplay of capital, human engineering, and continual improvement of LLMs. First gen LLM used 100% human coding. Previous gen were ~50% human coding. Current gen are ~10% human coding (practically all OpenAI/Anthropic engineers admit they're entirely using Claude Code / Codex for code). What happens when we're at 1% human coding, then 0%? The recursive self-improvement is happening, it's just indirectly for now.
  - 9mo ago
lvl155 9mo ago
Sign me up to be an electrician. The line for that is pretty long and gatekept.
- ares623 9mo ago
  You and 100,000 other software engineers will make that line pretty short in no time I bet! It's amazing how South Park has better economic sense than HN (or maybe not actually)
  - grumple 9mo ago
    There's a shortage of over 500,000 tradesmen in the US right now, expected to reach a shortage of 2 million by 2030. And if you've ever tried to get somebody out for a repair: it's hard. They are expensive, and the tradesmen are often not good, and often pretty dumb, even about their own field. Add to that the regulatory gatekeeping, where it takes 5 years minimum of working under someone else to be able to work independently in some fields, and the low initial pay and poor treatment causing people to drop out... there's going to be a shortage for a long time. And even if their wasn't - the people in those fields now would be relatively easy to outcompete imo.
  - lvl155 9mo ago
    Electricians make more money than an average developer. A commercial one will be like being a staff level dev. This is why it is gatekept in most municipalities. To be fair, being a good electrician is not easy.
mandeepj 9mo ago
It’s definitely not causing shortages of people, with tens of thousands and more getting laid off every month! The AI boom is just like a conference- where new and shiny seems to do wonders, but when you come back to workplace, none of that seem to work or fit in!
- erikerikson 9mo ago
  The article was specific about where the jobs shortages are. Electricians, construction, mathematicians (?)(wasn't aware the was a lot of dedicated math work in a data center design and build). Lay offs have been in software, design, and elsewhere.
- roysting 9mo ago
  Yes, because the bigger issue is that the whole American system has been so dominated by the rapacious and parasitic mindset of the blob that may be grouped as the PE/investor class (which I also belong to and have benefited from, even though it’s been deliberately secondarily), which has been extracting/monetizing value and cutting real, human, long term investment in lieu of short term, quick, unsustainable outsourcing and resource extracting methods for so many decades now that it has now left America in a tight spot. Unfortunately, though it has left mostly the Europeans, but all American vassals in an even worse position as the vampiric fake American ruling class, devours America like Saturn devouring his son, as famously depicted by Goya. The parasitic American empire is in a bit of a panic and it is pulling out all the stops to make everyone else pay for its failures, evil, and detrimental activities. That comes in the form of extracting value from Europe and damaging their economy in order to make them even more dependent vassals who still think they can rebel like a toddler threading to run away from home, and dominating the Americas that are effectively helpless in the face of Americas overwhelming position over them. The anxiety and panic among the American ruling class is palpable among the clubhouse chatter. The empire is in a bit of a panic to sustain itself, just as much as it is also trying to devour what little value is left among the American pension funds and people to save itself; Saturn devouring his son for fear of the prophesy that his child would overthrow him.
  - dmix 9mo ago
mschuster91 9mo ago
It's time that societies act against this cancer. When everything else suffers because the cancer is stealing all sorts of resources, a human would go to a doctor and have the cancer killed chemically or excised.
- jopsen 9mo ago
  Relax, before you drafted regulation and rolled it out this bubble will have peaked. Unless your rolling out dumb reactionary regulation like forbid AI or crypto coins, etc. It's annoying right now, but on a timescale of 5-10 years ram/gpu prices will be back to normal. Could we regulate investors reduce risk of bubbles maybe, but it's hard. Probably easier to limit the impact of bubbles on humans with a social safety net.
drnick1 9mo ago
> Smartphones are expected to get pricier for potentially years to come. "Smart" phones have ceased to be smart years ago. They are now instruments of mass surveillance, and the tech industry has convinced people that 1) you need one not to be a social outcast, 2) you need to upgrade it every year, 3) not having root access is for your own good. I'll stick to my Pixel 9a running Graphene for the forseeable future.
- goalieca 9mo ago
  Well, the article touched on how smaller phone makers and middle tier startups, are being squeezed out. Big tech and their surveillance economy is only going to tighten their grip now.
utopiah 9mo ago
Good thing that I don't need a : - bigger TV, my "old" not even 4K video projector is enough - faster phone with more memory or better camera, my current one as "just" 5G, is enough - faster laptop/desktop, I can work on the laptop, game on desktop - higher resolution VR headsets (but I'll still get a Steam Frame because it's more free) - denser smart watch, I'm not even using the ones I have ... so, the situation is bad, yes, and yet I don't really care. The hardware I have is good enough and in fact regardless of AI I've been arguing we've reached "peak" IT few years ago already. Of course I wouldn't mind "better" everything (higher resolution, faster refresh rate, faster CPU/GPU, more memory, more risk, etc). What I'm arguing for though is that most "normal" users (please, don't tell me you're a video editor for National Geographic who MUST edit 360 videos in 8K! That's great for you, honestly, love that, but that's NOT a "normal" user!) who bough high end hardware during the last few year matches most of their capabilities. All that being said, yes, pop that damn bubble, still invest in AI R&D and datacenters, still invest in AI public research for energy, medicine, etc BUT not the LLM/GenAI tulip commercial craze.
- benjiro 9mo ago
  Your forgetting a little detail ... While you do not need a lot of new stuff, companies need buyers. A lot of companies work on rather thing margins and losing potentially 10 a 20% sales can result in people getting fired, or companies shutting down. Remember, its not just about "O, X big brands sells less, they can deal with it". But a lot of brands have suppliers who feed that system. Or PC component makers like ... heatsinks, Fans, Cases ... seeing a 20% less sales because people buy less new PCs. People do not realize how much is linked in the industry. Smaller GPU card makers are literally saying that they may be forced to leave the industry because of drops in sales and the memory prices making the products too expensive. We can live a long time on old hardware but hardware also limits. Hey, the wife's laptop is from 2019, just before Covid (2020 when a lot of people bought new laptops). The battery is barely holding on. Replacement? None (reputable) ... So in a year that laptop is dead. How about phones? Same issue ... battery is the build in obsolete maker. You see the issue. It goes beyond what what most people realize. Wait when a recession hits when the whole AI bubble bursts and cascades down the already weakened industry. Unlike previous bubbles, the hardware being build is so specialized, that little will hit the normal consumer market. So there will not be a flood of cheap GPUs or memory being dumped on the market.
techblueberry 9mo ago
Bezos must have forgot to censor this post before it published.
dehrmann 9mo ago
Does anyone know the high-level breakdown of where the money's going and how long that part (energy production, energy transmission, network, datacenter, servers/GPUs) lasts?
vaxman 9mo ago
Almost positive 'ol Bessent has by now warned Trump that there is an issue with the AI queens breaking 1930s securities reform laws. Last week's stock market and crypto moves have all but sealed the fate of the Bozo No Bozos. They will take down the people involved with the funky purchase orders quietly, except inside of the closed door meetings where they get handled. https://youtu.be/y_z9W_N5Drg https://youtu.be/y_z9W_N5Drg
loeg 9mo ago
> Good luck finding an electrician My local (urban) residential electricians aren't even busy -- they are booking less than a week out. By contrast, just last year they were booking six weeks out. The fall in EV infrastructure demand due to eliminated incentives might be impacting them more than additional data center demand.
mixologic 9mo ago
It's caused a massive shortage of interesting content that isn't related to AI.
- cheschire 9mo ago
  Remember when AI were closer to just purpose-built neural networks and not always LLMs? I miss reading about that kind of “AI”
- macguyv3r 9mo ago
  [flagged]
  - DeepYogurt 9mo ago
    Him and everyone upvoting him
- dmix 9mo ago
  The best part is every single thread on HN now has someone accusing the author of using AI.
- journal 9mo ago
  many users here are not willing to try anything new that might give it a chance. even if i show someone a better alternative, they still wont use it because no one else is using it. people need to be told what to do. initiative has been beaten out of you all.
macguyv3r 9mo ago
Good. Gen pop can diversify its skillset, become more independently self sufficient as a result, rely on/require less money overall, and realize they don't really need to listen to rich tech CEOs which will implode their value politically. SaaS jobs were about little more than agency control and now they're losing that control.
rossdavidh 9mo ago
"JPMorgan calculated last fall that the tech industry must collect an extra $650 billion in revenue every year — three times the annual revenue of AI chip giant Nvidia — to earn a reasonable investment return. That marker is probably even higher now because AI spending has increased." That pretty much tells you how this will end, right there.
- robotnikman 9mo ago
  The future is not looking bright at all.... I only have a meme to describe what we are facing https://imgur.com/a/xYbhzTj https://imgur.com/a/xYbhzTj
  - weavie 9mo ago
    As someone in the UK for whom that link is blocked, I wonder if that meme is doubly apt.
    - cedws 9mo ago
      Children successfully protected. Nevermind the child groomers on Roblox.
  - butterlettuce 9mo ago
    I was expecting to see Mark Baum on the phone saying "hey, we're in a bubble".
  - the-wouter 9mo ago
    [dead]
  - dmix 9mo ago
    > The future is not looking bright at all.... The tech industry going through a boom and settling back down at a higher place than before isn't the end of the world. They all start merging together soon.
    - 9mo ago
luxuryballs 9mo ago
So where is the electrician? Busy at an AI data center being built?
croes 9mo ago
If AI can what it promises most of its big customers become useless but who else could pay enough to make them profitable?
1vuio0pswjnm7 9mo ago
Alternative to archive.ph, no Javascript, no CAPTCHAs: x=www.washingtonpost.com { printf 'GET /technology/2026/02/07/ai-spending-economy-shortages/ HTTP/1.1\r\n' printf 'Host: '$x'\r\n' printf 'User-Agent: Chrome/115.0.5790.171 Mobile Safari/537.36 (compatible ; Googlebot/2.1 ; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)\r\n' printf 'X-Forwarded-For: 66.249.66.1\r\n\r\n' }|busybox ssl_client -n $x $x > 1.htm firefox ./1.htm
- WarOnPrivacy 9mo ago
  > Alternative to archive.ph, no Javascript, no CAPTCHAs: The other tld have been kinder to me (no captcha). https://archive.md/J8pg5 https://archive.md/J8pg5 https://archive.fo/J8pg5 https://archive.fo/J8pg5
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 9mo ago
  Anonymous middleman that could potentiallly collect browsing histories, serves CAPTCHAS, requires Javascript, maybe in crosshairs of authorities, unreliable according to some commenters (YMMV). NB. Nothing about "honeypot", just observations (cf. "accusations") Someone recently noticed an apparent DDOS attempt on some blogger using Javascript fetch function The site used to include a tracking pixel containing the visitor's IP address Also used to ping mail.ru Would need to look at the page source again to see what it contains today It's a crowd favorite People love it
  - dmix 9mo ago
    Are you accusing archive.today of being a honeypot for the feds because they use Cloudflare? That's a bit much don't you think?
    - MallocVoidstar 9mo ago
      Archive.today don't use Cloudflare, the admin mimics their captcha page because he hates them. He also used to captcha-loop anyone using Cloudflare's DNS resolver because they don't send the IP subnet of clients to upstreams. I don't think it's a honeypot, though, it's not like he's learning much about me other than I like not paying for news sites.
themafia 9mo ago
AI "boom?" Where's the "boom?" Doesn't that imply a bunch of people are getting rich off of new business? Where are those?
alecco 9mo ago
What a low quality article with zero new information or insights. WaPo is dead.
- xantronix 9mo ago
  https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/04/business/media/washington-post-layoffs.html https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/04/business/media/washington...
hedayet 9mo ago
A bubble doesn’t necessarily imply the underlying technology is useless. It implies that expectations and capital allocation have significantly outpaced realistic returns, leading to painful corrections for bulls. And with AI, a classic bubble signal is emerging: widespread exit-timing instead of deep, long-term conviction.
- an0malous 9mo ago
  The greatest critics of the AI boom like Gary Marcus and Michael Burry aren’t even saying it’s useless, that’s a strawman no one is arguing for
- bdangubic 9mo ago
  > widespread exit-timing instead of deep, long-term conviction. $500+bn in one year capex from largest and most profitable companies ever known to mankind seems like a deep and long-term conviction, no? you and I may not have conviction, the largest and most profitable companies on earth that have been carrying most of global economy do
  - Lionga 9mo ago
    Do they have conviction or FOMO?
    - bdangubic 9mo ago
      I would bet against the Mag7 FOMO’ing around
  - hedayet 9mo ago
    Tech companies buying computing real estate with surplus profit isn't conviction in my book.
baby-yoda 9mo ago
The token maximizer is a thought experiment illustrating AI alignment risks. Imagine an AI given the simple goal of maximizing token production. If it became sufficiently powerful, it might convert all available resources — including humans and the Earth — into tokens or token-producing infrastructure, not out of malice, but because its objective function values nothing else. The scenario shows how even a trivial goal, paired with enough intelligence, can lead to catastrophic outcomes if the AI's objectives aren't carefully aligned with human values. *written by AI, of course
- cheschire 9mo ago
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Paperclips https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Paperclips
cyanydeez 9mo ago
I don't think that's the AI Boom. It's the de rigor Republican policies.
lo_zamoyski 9mo ago
Give it a couple years. Pursuit of trades among Gen Z has gone up 1500%. The big loser is the modern university.
jongjong 9mo ago
That's what you get when you have a centrally planned economy. This is just like communism. The software industry has been like this for over a decade and the effect started spreading to other industries. I've been warning of this for years. It has been a very painful decade for some. At least now millions of others are starting to feel the pain. More broadly distributed pain creates incentives for change which did not exist before. Pain is hope. Being on the frontline has been an excruciating and isolating experience.
deleted 9mo ago
[deleted]
geetee 9mo ago
All this disruption to every facet of society. For what? So you can roleplay as the next billionaire startup founder with your weekend project? All while the actual tech billionaires have a giant dick measuring contest.
exabrial 9mo ago
This is ok, let macroeconomics happen, and instead, enforce monopoly laws. The effect in 2-3 years will be a wider base of suppliers, cheaper goods, and solid supply chains.
coldtea 9mo ago
I wouldn't call inflating a bubble a "boom".
shmerl 9mo ago
Shortages and price hikes. So much "benefit to society".
wnc3141 9mo ago
We're disappointed that WaPo is flailing. Meanwhile we all post workarounds for the paywall
atleastoptimal 9mo ago
I feel like I'm caught in between two schizophrenically myopic perspectives on AI. One being: >Generative AI is a product of VC-funding enabled hype, enormous subsidies and fraudulent results. No AI code "really" works or contributes to productivity, and soon the bubble will burst, returning Real Software Engineers to their former peerless ascendency. And the other perspective: >The AI boom will be the last chance to make money, after which point your socioeconomic status circa 2028 will be the permanent station of all your progeny, who will enjoy a heavenly post-scarcity experience with luxury amenities scaled by your PageRank equivalent of social connections to employees at leading AI labs.
ricardobayes 9mo ago
Why does almost every thread have 200+, sometimes 500+ comments now? Back a few months or a year ago, most threads were sitting at 10-20 comments max.
- consp 9mo ago
  They stay on the front page longer. I've seen more stayin there for hours upto days.
int0x29 9mo ago
The article is primarily about how wild unrestrained AI spending is causing problems. For example it is hard to get an electrician, anything with memory in it is either significantly more expensive or unobtainable, and building of homes, factories, and hospitals is being depressed pushing down supply (Housing supply being potentially depressed by AI is both serious and alarming). The HN conversation about this article seems to instead be will Google, OpenAI, etc break even? The degree of disconnect in Silicon Valley between the tech industry and everyone else's problems is alarming.
- zozbot234 9mo ago
  These are the best kinds of problems to have, an economic recession would be far worse.
wundersam 9mo ago
The railway comparison is apt, but the pace is striking. JPMorgan calculates tech needs 650B in new annual revenue just to break even on ROI. That's an extraordinary bet.The shortage effects are real and measurable. But capital doesn't easily substitute — you can't just redirect 700B into infrastructure without immediately hitting bottlenecks in skilled labor and materials.I use LLMs daily for coding. They're helpful for scaffolding. But the gap between "useful tool" and "justify restructuring the entire economy" is massive. If this is a bubble, the legacy won't just be stranded GPUs — it'll be years of diverted resources and accelerated power consolidation. The railway boom left railways. What does an AI boom leave if the returns don't materialize?
ranguna 9mo ago
If this will pop sooner or later, where should I put my money on? All IT companies will go red The US economy will go red because IT companies will go red Banks will follow because their investments depended on the IT market Gold pumped but is falling now (maybe a good time to buy?) Crypto is crypto so no one knows (although we are close to the pump season where everything 10x in value, but it's still a bet) Europe is detaching itself from the US, so maybe there's something there? Maybe we can just buy non perishable essencial products now, because everything is going to blow up in prices? Still if I buy a 2£ can of beans, later sell it at 10£ because its market value increased to 15, I'm still losing. Not losing as much, but still losing, not to mention I need to find a buyer. I could buy a house and sell it, but the housing market is a micro bubble where I live that it might pop as well by the time I sell. So where do I put my money now, knowing that everything's going to blow up?
- mentalgear 9mo ago
  I think a lot of investors are looking at Europe/EU as a safe heaven, because it actually has strong democratic institutions that hold up the rule of law, and not some maddening kind that can tank your investments on his mere whim and a tech/fin oligarchy, eager to please and profit him while keeping the pyramid scheme going (while they build doomsday bunkers in New Zealand), until it all blows in the public's face.
  - superze 9mo ago
    The rule of law only applies to the peasants here in the EU as well .
  - DavidPiper 9mo ago
    At the risk of calling you on a deep-cut 2-step pun from your username, I think you meant "safe haven", not "safe heaven" :-)
  - ranguna 9mo ago
    So you mean I should buy EU"s 2% gross bonds? That will be worth nothing when food increases by 10%. I'd rather lose the 1 point something net percent than do the song and dance of buying bonds.
jamesjolliffe 9mo ago
Another serious flaw with the modern American economy is that too much of our money is spent betting on whatever lottery ticket dream we are sold will grant the highest returns. For too long, we have been investing in software companies like Meta hoping for unicorn returns, paying no attention to the fact that many of these companies do little to materially improve the real world we live in, while our communities and infrastructure fall into disrepair. Who wants to invest in a lower-margin construction company, when there is a chance company some tech company X might come up with an addictive imaginary widget on our phone that has a marginal cost of almost nothing after the first one is built. Now, all this new hardware we're building is powering AI that is only proven to improve the quality of our software, and will likely displace many of the middle class "white collar" jobs we have left. Buckle up boys, we are in for a bumpy ride.
weare138 9mo ago
A 'boom' would imply AI is actually profitable.
thecoderpanda 9mo ago
Seeing a version of this from India. Every decent ML engineer is getting vacuumed into foundation model work or infra roles at hyperscalers. Teams building the actual application layer are struggling to hire. The stat about OpenAI needing 20% of the existing skilled trades workforce for their data centers is nuts. That's not a scaling challenge, that's a resource extraction problem. Anyone else noticing this hitting developer tooling and devrel budgets too? Everything that isn't "AI infra" is getting squeezed hard.

405 points by 1vuio0pswjnm7 9mo ago

The real question is whether the boom is, economically, a mistake. If AI is here to stay, as a thing that permanently increases productivity, then AI buying up all the electricians and network engineers is a (correct) signal. People will take courses in those things and try to get a piece of the winnings. Same with those memory chips that they are gobbling up, it just tells everyone where to make a living. If it's a flash in a pan, and it turns out to be empty promises, then all those people are wasting their time. What we really want to ask ourselves is whether our economy is set up to mostly get things right, or it is wastefully searching.

jleyank 9mo ago
They still gotta figure out how their consumers will get the cash to consume. Toss all the developers and a largish cohort of well-paid people head towards the dole.
- oblio 9mo ago
  At some point rich people stop caring about money and only care about power.
  - willis936 9mo ago
    It's a fun thought, but you know what we call those people? Poor. The people who light their own money on fire today are ceding power. The two are the same.
    - catlifeonmars 9mo ago
      1. Some people can afford to light a lot of their money on fire and still remain rich. 2. The trick is to burn other people’s money. Which is a lot more akin to what is going on here. Then, at least in the US, if you’re too big to fail, the fed will just give you more cash effectively diminishing everyone else’s buying power.
      - willis936 9mo ago
        In regards to 2: it's as simple as not letting it be your money being set on fire. Every fiscally responsible individual is making sure they have low exposure to the mag 7.
    - oblio 9mo ago
      At the end the day a medieval lord was poor but he lived a better life than the peasants.
      - WarOnPrivacy 9mo ago
        > At the end the day a medieval lord was poor but he lived a better life than the peasants. As measured in knowledge utilized during basic living: The lives of lords were much less complex than that of modern poor people.
- rybosworld 9mo ago
  Yeah I don't think this get's enough attention. It still requires a technical person to use these things effectively. Building coherent systems that solve a business problem is an iterative process. I have a hard time seeing how an LLM could climb that mountain on it's own. I don't think there's a way to solve the issue of: one-shotted apps will increasingly look more convincing, in the same way that the image generation looks more convincing. But when you peel back the curtain, that output isn't quite correct enough to deploy to production. You could try brute-force vibe iterating until it's exactly what you wanted, but that rarely works for anything that isn't a CRUD app. Ask any of the image generators to build you a sprite sheet for a 2d character with multiple animation frames. I have never gotten one to do this successfully in one prompt. Sometimes the background will be the checkerboard png transparency layer. Except, the checkers aren't all one color (#000000, #ffffff), instead it's a million variations of off-white and off-black. The legs in walking frames are almost never correct, etc. And even if they get close - as soon as you try to iterate on the first output, you enter a game of whack-a-mole. Okay we fixed the background but now the legs don't look right, let's fix those. Okay great legs are fixed but now the faces are different in every frame let's fix those. Oh no fixing the faces broke the legs again, Etc. We are in a weird place where companies are shedding the engineers that know how to use these things. And some of those engineers will become solo-devs. As a solo-dev, funds won't be infinite. So it doesn't seem likely that they can jack up the prices on the consumer plans. But if companies keep firing developers, then who will actually steer the agents on the enterprise plans?
  - KellyCriterion 9mo ago
    esp when it comes down to integration with the rest of the business processes & people aroud this "single apps" :-)
  - throwaw12 9mo ago
    > But when you peel back the curtain, that output isn't quite correct enough to deploy to production What if, we change current production environments to fit that blackbox and make it run somehow with 99% availability and good security?
  - mc-0 9mo ago
- mylifeandtimes 9mo ago
  Why do we need people to consume when we have the government? Serious question. As in, we built the last 100 years on "the american consumer", the idea that it would be the people buying everything. There is no reason that needs to or necessarily will continue-- don't get me wrong, I kind of hope it does, but my hopes don't always predict what actually happens. What if the next 100 is the government buying everything, and the vast bulk of the people are effectively serfs. Who HAVE to stay in line otherwise they go to debt prison or tax prison where they become slaves (yes, the US has a fairly large population of prison laborers who are forced to work for 15-50 cents/hour. The lucky ones can earn as much as $1.50/hour. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2017/04/10/wages/ https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2017/04/10/wages/
  - smegger001 9mo ago
    where will the government get the money to buy anything if the billionaires and their mega corps have it all and spend sufficient amounts to keep the government from taxing. we have a k shape economy where the capital class is extracting all of the value from the working class who are headed to subsistence levels of income and the low class dies in the ditch.
- nosianu 9mo ago
  Like before - debt! This prevents the consumers from slacking off and enjoying life, instead they have to continue to work work work. They get to consume a little, and work much more (after all, they also have to pay interest, and for consumer credits and credits that the masses get that adds up to a lot). In this scenario, it does not even matter that many are unable to pay off all that debt. As long as the amount of work that is extracted from them significantly exceeds the amount of consumption allowed to them all is fine. The chains that bind used to be metal, but we progressed and became a civilized society. Now it's the financial system and the laws. “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.” (Anatole France)
forinti 9mo ago
I know that all investments have risk, but this is one risky gamble. US$700 billion could build a lot of infrastructure, housing, or manufacturing capacity.
- unsupp0rted 9mo ago
  What $700 billion can't do is cure cancers, Parkinsons, etc. We know because we've tried and that's barely a sliver of what it's cost so far, for middling results. Whereas $700 billion in AI might actually do that.
  - wolfram74 9mo ago
    Your name is well earned! "can't cure cancers" is impressively counterfactual [0] as 5 year survival of cancer diagnosis is up over almost all categories. Despite every cancer being a unique species trying to kill you, we're getting better and better at dealing with them. [0]https://www.cancer.org/research/acs-research-news/people-are-now-living-longer-after-a-cancer-diagnosis.html https://www.cancer.org/research/acs-research-news/people-are...
    - unsupp0rted 9mo ago
      Yes, we're getting better at treating cancers, but still if a person gets cancer, chances are good the thing they'll die of is cancer. Middling results. Because we're not good at curing cancers, we're just good at making people survive better for longer until the cancer gets them. 5 year survival is a lousy metric but it's the best we can manage and measure. I'm perfectly happy investing roughly 98% of my savings into the thing that has a solid shot at curing cancers, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases. I don't understand why all billionaires aren't doing this.
      - beepbooptheory 9mo ago
        Maybe it should give you pause then, that not everyone else is investing 98% of their savings?
112233 9mo ago
"If X is here to stay, as a thing that permanently increases productivity" - matches a lot of different X. Maintaining persons health increases productivity. Good education increases productivity. What is playing out now is completely different - it is both irresistible lust for omniscient power provided by this technology ("mirror mirror on the wall, who has recently thought bad things about me?"), and the dread of someone else wielding it. Plus, it makes natural moat against masses of normal (i.e. poor) people, because requires a spaceship to run. Finally intelligence can also be controlled by capital the way it was meant to, joining information, creativity, means of production, communication and such things
- mattgreenrocks 9mo ago
  > Plus, it makes natural moat against masses of normal (i.e. poor) people, because requires a spaceship to run. Finally intelligence can also be controlled by capital the way it was meant to, joining information, creativity, means of production, communication and such things I'd put intelligence in quotes there, but it doesn't detract from the point. It is astounding to me how willfully ignorant people are being about the massive aggregation of power that's going on here. In retrospect, I don't think they're ignorant, they just haven't had to think about it much in the past. But this is a real problem with very real consequences. Sovereignty must be occasionally be asserted, or someone will infringe upon it. That's exactly what's happening here.
  - fennecbutt 9mo ago
    >massive aggregation of power that's going on here Which has been happening since what at least the bad old IBM days and nobody's done a thing about it? I've given up tbh. It's like the apathetic masses want the billionaires to become trillionaires as long as they get their tiktok fix.
    - luqtas 9mo ago
      > It's like the apathetic masses want the billionaires to become trillionaires as long as they get their tiktok fix. it's much worse. a great demographic of hacker news love gen. AI.. these are usually highly educated people showing their true faces on the plethora of problems this technology violates and generates
somewhereoutth 9mo ago
I suspect a lot of this is due to large amounts of liquidity sloshing around looking for returns. We are still dealing with the consequences of the ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) and QE (Quantitative Easing) where money to support the economy through the Great Financial Crisis and Covid was largely funneled in to the top, causing the 'everything bubble'. The rich got (a lot) richer, and now have to find something to do with that wealth. The immeasurable returns promised by LLMs (in return for biblical amounts of investment) fits that bill very well.
deleted 9mo ago
[deleted]
mcphage 9mo ago
> What we really want to ask ourselves is whether our economy is set up to mostly get things right, or it is wastefully searching. I can’t speak to the economy as a whole, but the tech economy has a long history of bubbles and scams. Some huge successes, too—but gets it wrong more often than it gets it right.
Archelaos 9mo ago
In 2024, global GDP was $111 trillion.[1] Investing 1 or 2 % of that to improve global productivity via AI does not seem exaggerated to me. [1] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
- throwaw12 9mo ago
  I will put it differently, Investing 1 or 2% of global GDP to increase wealth gap 50% more and make top 1% unbelievable rich while everyone else looking for jobs or getting 50 year mortgage, seem very bad idea to me.
  - cheonn638 9mo ago
    >Investing 1 or 2% of global GDP to increase wealth gap 50% more What’s your definition of wealth gap? Is it how you feel when you see the name of a billionaire?
    - fennecbutt 9mo ago
      Yes the very fact that billionaires exist mean our species has failed. I do not believe that there is a legitimate billionaire on the planet, in that they haven't engaged in stock manipulation, lobbying, insider trading, corrupt deals, monopolistic practices, dark patterns, corporate tax dodging, personal tax dodging. You could for example say that the latter are technically legal and therefore okay, but it's my belief that they're "technically legal/loopholes" because we have reached a point where the rich are so powerful that they bend the laws to their own ends. Our species is a bit of a disappointment. People would rather focus on trivial tribal issues than on anything that impacts the majority of the members of our species. We are well and truly animals.
    - mjamesaustin 9mo ago
      It's easy to access statistics about wealth and income inequality. It is worse than it has ever been, and continuing to get worse. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/01/09/trends-in-income-and-wealth-inequality/ https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/01/09/trends-...
deleted 9mo ago
[deleted]
hackable_sand 9mo ago
Your comment doesn't say anything
thefz 9mo ago
> If AI is here to stay, as a thing that permanently increases productivity, Thing is, I am still waiting to see where it increases productivity aside from some extremely small niches like speech to text and summarizing some small text very fast.
- sigseg1v 9mo ago
  Serious question, but have you not used it to implement anything at your job? Admittedly I was very skeptical but last sprint in 2 days I got 12 pull requests up for review by running 8 agents on my computer in parallel and about 10 more on cloud VMs. The PRs are all double reviewed and QA'd and merged. The ones that don't have PRs are larger refactors, one 40K loc and the other 30k loc and I just need actual time to go through every line myself and self-test appropriately, otherwise it would have been more stuff finished. These are all items tied to money in our backlog. It would have taken me about 5 times as long to close those items out without this tooling. I also would have not had as much time to produce and verify as many unit tests as I did. Is this not increased productivity?
  - deleted 9mo ago
    [deleted]
  - thefz 9mo ago
    So you roll a dice and call yourself a software engineer, basically.
    - sigseg1v 9mo ago
      I have an engineering degree but don't call myself an engineer because it's illegal to do so in my country unless I hold a PEng. That aside, I fail to see how code where I have reviewed every single line, tested all edge cases as normal, had 2 other devs also test this, had a QA test, and had a PO run and approve the behaviour as "rolling the dice" but you're entitled to your opinion.
- throwaw12 9mo ago
  Are you doctor or a farmer? If you are a software engineer you are missing out a lot, literally a lot!
TheDong 9mo ago
There's one additional question we could have here, which is "is AI here to stay and is it net-positive, or does it have significant negative externalities" > What we really want to ask ourselves is whether our economy is set up to mostly get things right, or it is wastefully searching. We've so far found two ways in recent memory that our economy massively fails when it comes to externalities. Global Warming continues to get worse, and we cannot globally coordinate to stop it when the markets keep saying "no, produce more oil, make more CO2, it makes _our_ stock go up until the planet eventually dies, but our current stock value is more important than the nebulous entire planet's CO2". Ads and addiction to gambling games, tiktok, etc also are a negative externality where the company doing the advertising or making the gambling game gains profit, but at the expense of effectively robbing money from those with worse impulse control and gambling problems. Even if the market votes that AI will successfully extract enough money to be "here to stay", I think that doesn't necessarily mean the market is getting things right nor that it necessarily increases productivity. Gambling doesn't increase productivity, but the market around kalshi and sports betting sure indicates it's on the rise lately.
mschuster91 9mo ago
> People will take courses in those things and try to get a piece of the winnings. The problem is boom-bust cycles. Electricians will always be in demand but it takes about 3 years to properly train even a "normal" residential electrician - add easily 2-3 years on top to work on the really nasty stuff aka 50 kV and above. No matter what, the growth of AI is too rapid and cannot be sustained. Even if the supposed benefits of AI all come true - the level of growth cannot be upheld because everything else suffers.
- marcosdumay 9mo ago
  > it takes about 3 years to properly train even a "normal" residential electrician To pass ordinary wire with predefined dimensions in exposed conduits? No way it takes more than a few weeks.
  - mschuster91 9mo ago
    I'm talking about proper German training, not the kind of shit that leads to what Cy Porter (the home inspector legend) exposes on Youtube. Shoddy wiring can hold up for a looong time in homes because outside of electrical car chargers and baking ovens nothing consumes high current over long time and as long as no device develops a ground fault, even a lack of a GFCI isn't noticeable. But a data center? Even smaller ones routinely rack up megawatts of power here, large hyperscaler deployments hundreds of megawatts. Sustained, not peak. That is putting a lot of stress on everything involved: air conditioning, power, communications. And for that to hold up, your neighbor Joe who does all kinds of trades as long as he's getting paid in cash won't cut it.
  - chasd00 9mo ago
    It’s protected by requiring many hours (years) of apprenticeship. These kinds of heavily unionized jobs only reward seniority. Gotta pay your dues buddy!
HardCodedBias 9mo ago
"The real question is whether the boom is, economically, a mistake." The answer to this is two part: 1. Have we seen an increase in capability over the last couple of years? The answer here is clearly yes. 2. Do we think that this increase will continue? This is unknown. It seems so, but we don't know and these firms are clearly betting that it will. 1a. Do we think that with existing capability that there is tremendous latent demand? If so the buildout is still rational if progress stops.
majormajor 9mo ago
AI could be here to stay and "chase a career as an electrician helping build datacenters" could also be a mistake. The construction level could plateau or decline without a bubble popping. That's why it can't just be a market signal "go become an electrician" when the feedback loop is so slow. It's a social/governmental issue. If you make careers require expensive up-front investment largely shouldered by the individuals, you not only will be slow to react but you'll also end up with scores of people who "correctly" followed the signals right up until the signals went away.
- throwaway0123_5 9mo ago
  > you'll also end up with scores of people who "correctly" followed the signals right up until the signals went away. I think this is where we're headed, very quickly, and I'm worried about it from a social stability perspective (as well as personal financial security of course). There's probably not a single white-collar job that I'd feel comfortable spending 4+ years training for right now (even assuming I don't have to pay or take out debt for the training). Many people are having skills they spent years building made worthless overnight, without an obvious or realistic pivot available. Lots and lots of people who did or will do "all the right things," with no benefit earned from it. Even if hypothetically there is something new you can reskill into every five years, how is that sustainable? If you're young and without children, maybe it is possible. Certainly doesn't sound fun, and I say this as someone who joined tech in part because of how fast-paced it was.
  - zozbot234 9mo ago
    > Many people are having skills they spent years building made worthless overnight, without an obvious or realistic pivot available. I'd like to see real examples of this, beyond trivial ones like low-quality copywriting (i.e. the "slop" before there was slop) that just turns into copyediting. Current AI's are a huge force multiplier for most white-collar skills, including software development.
dfedbeef 9mo ago
If

singingwolfboy 9mo ago

https://archive.ph/J8pg5 https://archive.ph/J8pg5

mrjay42 9mo ago
This does not work for me. It's a loop of captcha which never ends
- esseph 9mo ago
  You have some extension issues going on, maybe. Seems to work fine in FF and chrome.
- b00ty4breakfast 9mo ago
  I was having this problem earlier with different URLs I was searching for but the link above actually worked for me.
- bookofjoe 9mo ago
  Try this: https://wapo.st/4qqatnA https://wapo.st/4qqatnA
- quinncom 9mo ago
  When this happens to me, it's either because I'm connected to a VPN, or I'm using Cloudflare's public DNS server.
- diogenes_atx 9mo ago
  This may be a DNS issue. I had the same problem with NextDNS. After switching my DNS servers to Cloud Flare DNS (1.1.1.1, 1.0.0.1), it works fine.
  - LoganDark 9mo ago
    It's always DNS!
  - Zanfa 9mo ago
    It’s not. They’ve blocked some countries entirely.

bm3719 9mo ago

This is the trade-off to connectivity and removing frictional barriers (i.e., globalism). This is the economic equivalent of what Nick Land and Spandrell called the "IQ shredder". Spandrell said of Singapore: Singapore is an IQ shredder. It is an economically productive metropolis that sucks in bright and productive minds with opportunities and amusements at the cost of having a demographically unsustainable family unit. Basically, if you're a productive person, you want to maximize your return. So, you go where the action is. So does every other smart person. Often that place is a tech hub, which is now overflowing with smart guys. Those smart guys build adware (or whatever) and fail to reproduce (combined, these forces "shred" the IQ). Meanwhile every small town is brain-drained. You hometown's mayor is 105 IQ because he's the smartest guy in town. Things don't work that great, and there's a general stagnation to the place. Right now, AI is a "capital shredder". In the past, there were barriers everywhere, and we've worked hard to tear those down. It used to be that the further the distance (physically, but also in other senses too, like currencies, language, culture, etc.), the greater the friction to capital flows. The local rich guy would start a business in his town. Now he sends it to one of the latest global capital attractors, which have optimized for capital inflow. This mechanism works whether the attractor can efficiently use that capital or not. That resource inflow might be so lucrative, that managing inflow is the main thing it does. Right now that's AI, but as long as present structure continues, this is how the machine of the global economy will work.

dyauspitr 9mo ago
What’s the alternative. Keep the smart physically separated, can never collaborate to make anything paradigm shifting and we just prod along with small town paper mills and marginally better local government?
- deleted 9mo ago
  [deleted]
- WillAdams 9mo ago
  California had a great mechanism for this in their land grant colleges, which back before the protests of the Vietnam War were required to offer the valedictorian of nearby high schools (or the person with the highest GPA who accepted) full tuition and room and board --- then Governor Ronald Reagan shut down this program when the students had the temerity to protest the Vietnam War --- it was also grade inflation to keep students above the threshold necessary for a draft deferment which began the downward spiral of American education.

bix6 9mo ago

RIP Washington Post.

dev1ycan 9mo ago

I don't think these companies buying realize how much animosity they're creating with literally everyone until it explodes on their face.

deadbabe 9mo ago
These companies play a long game. Eventually generations of people just grow up with this being the new normal, no reason to be angry. The people who are angry are the ones who had their cheese moved.

semanticpop 9mo ago

[dead]

stego-tech 9mo ago

This is another facet of the fierce opposition to AI by a swath of the population: it’s quite literally destroying the last bit of enjoyment we could wring from existence in the form of hobbies funded through normal employment. Think of the PC gamers, who first dealt with COVID supply shocks, followed by crypto making GPUs scarce and untenable, then GPU makers raising prices and narrowing inventory to only the highest-end SKUs, only to outright abandon them entirely for AI - which then also consumed their RAM and SSDs. A hobby that used to be enjoyed by folks on even a modest budget is now a theft risk given the insane resale priced of parts on the second-hand market due to scarcity. And that extends to others as well. The swaths of folks who made freelance or commission artistry work through Patreons and conventions and the like are suddenly struggling as customers and companies spew out AI slop using their work and without compensation. Tech workers, previously the wealthy patron of artisans and communities, are now being laid off en masse for AI CapEx buildouts and share pumps as investors get cold feet about what these systems are actually doing to the economy at large (definite bad, questionable good, uncertain futures). Late stage capitalism’s sole respite was consumerism, and we can’t even do that anymore thanks to AI gobbling up all the resources and capital. It’s no wonder people are pissed at AI boosters trying to say this is a miracle technology that’ll lift everyone up: it’s already kicking people down, and nobody actually wants to admit or address that lest their investments be disrupted to protect humans.

9dev 9mo ago
I think this started a lot earlier actually. A few generations back, many people played an instrument, or at least could sing. It didn't matter that none of them was a Mozart, because they didn't had to be. For making music or singing together in a family or a friend group, it was wholly sufficient to be just good, not necessarily great. But when everyone has access to recordings of the world's best musicians at all times, why listen to uncle Harry's shoddy guitar play? Why sing Christmas songs together when you can put on the Sinatra Christmas jazz playlist on Spotify?
- stego-tech 9mo ago
  That’s definitely part of it as well, this sort of general distillation into a smaller and smaller pool of content or objects or goods that cost ever more money. Like how most of the royalties Spotify pays out are for older catalogue stuff from “classic” artists, rather than new bands. Or how historical libraries of movies and films are constantly either up for grabs (for prestige) or being pushed off platforms due to their older/more costly royalty agreements. With AI though, it’s the actual, tangible consumption of physical goods being threatened, which many companies involved in AI may argue is exactly the point: that everyone should be renters rather than consumers, and by making ownership expensive through cost and scarcity alike, you naturally drive more folks towards subscriptions for what used to be commodities (music, movies, games, compute, vehicles, creativity tools, TCGs, you name it). It’s damn depressing.

Kon5ole 9mo ago

It's hard to comprehend the scale of these investments. Comparing them to notable industrial projects, it's almost unbelievable. Every week in 2026 Google will pay for the cost of a Burj Khalifa. Amazon for a Wembley Stadium. Facebook will spend a France-England tunnel every month.

nine_zeros 9mo ago
[dead]
bogzz 9mo ago
Haters will say Sora wasn't worth it.
- jsheard 9mo ago
  Incredible how quickly that moment passed. Four months on it's barely clinging to the App Store top 100, below killer apps such as Gossip Harbor®: Merge & Story.
- mimischi 9mo ago
  Ok I’ll bite. Was it worth it? What have people missed that haven’t used it.
  - deleted 9mo ago
    [deleted]
- askl 9mo ago
  What is Sora?
  - ge96 9mo ago
    If you see a video of a cat running away from a police traffic stop
  - cogman10 9mo ago
    One of many AI video generators that are filling up all video social media with rage bate garbage.

kkfx 9mo ago

Is there really for the ML boom, or is it just a way to make computers more and more expensive to push people towards mobile? Because looking around, that's the effect I'm seeing, regardless of the causes. I see a future where most people will buy tablets to save money and the desktop will be for only a few, a very few, just when self-hosting is becoming trendy and people are saying "it's time for GNU/Linux to take Windows' place"...

mystraline 9mo ago

The current LLMs are not constantly learning. They're static models that require megatons of coal to retrain. Now if the LLMs could modify their own nets, and improve themselves, then that would be immensely valuable for the world. But as of now, its a billionaires wet dream to threaten all workers as a way to replace labor.

throwaw12 9mo ago
> if the LLMs could modify their own nets ... then that would be immensely valuable for the world. Not sure :) I expect different things, don't think Wall Street allows good things to happen to ordinary people
simianwords 9mo ago
How would you have done it differently? It’s clear that even if this builds up more billionaire wealth, it still benefits everyone. Just like any other technology? So would you rather stop billionaires from doing it?
- bigstrat2003 9mo ago
  > It’s clear that even if this builds up more billionaire wealth, it still benefits everyone. That is by no means clear. I have yet to see any benefit from AI. I have no doubt in my mind that I'm not alone. So how is "everyone" benefiting from this trend?
reducesuffering 9mo ago
Think bigger, think of the entire system outside of just the single LLM: the interplay of capital, human engineering, and continual improvement of LLMs. First gen LLM used 100% human coding. Previous gen were ~50% human coding. Current gen are ~10% human coding (practically all OpenAI/Anthropic engineers admit they're entirely using Claude Code / Codex for code). What happens when we're at 1% human coding, then 0%? The recursive self-improvement is happening, it's just indirectly for now.
- 9mo ago

lvl155 9mo ago

Sign me up to be an electrician. The line for that is pretty long and gatekept.

ares623 9mo ago
You and 100,000 other software engineers will make that line pretty short in no time I bet! It's amazing how South Park has better economic sense than HN (or maybe not actually)
- grumple 9mo ago
  There's a shortage of over 500,000 tradesmen in the US right now, expected to reach a shortage of 2 million by 2030. And if you've ever tried to get somebody out for a repair: it's hard. They are expensive, and the tradesmen are often not good, and often pretty dumb, even about their own field. Add to that the regulatory gatekeeping, where it takes 5 years minimum of working under someone else to be able to work independently in some fields, and the low initial pay and poor treatment causing people to drop out... there's going to be a shortage for a long time. And even if their wasn't - the people in those fields now would be relatively easy to outcompete imo.
- lvl155 9mo ago
  Electricians make more money than an average developer. A commercial one will be like being a staff level dev. This is why it is gatekept in most municipalities. To be fair, being a good electrician is not easy.

mandeepj 9mo ago

It’s definitely not causing shortages of people, with tens of thousands and more getting laid off every month! The AI boom is just like a conference- where new and shiny seems to do wonders, but when you come back to workplace, none of that seem to work or fit in!

erikerikson 9mo ago
The article was specific about where the jobs shortages are. Electricians, construction, mathematicians (?)(wasn't aware the was a lot of dedicated math work in a data center design and build). Lay offs have been in software, design, and elsewhere.
roysting 9mo ago
Yes, because the bigger issue is that the whole American system has been so dominated by the rapacious and parasitic mindset of the blob that may be grouped as the PE/investor class (which I also belong to and have benefited from, even though it’s been deliberately secondarily), which has been extracting/monetizing value and cutting real, human, long term investment in lieu of short term, quick, unsustainable outsourcing and resource extracting methods for so many decades now that it has now left America in a tight spot. Unfortunately, though it has left mostly the Europeans, but all American vassals in an even worse position as the vampiric fake American ruling class, devours America like Saturn devouring his son, as famously depicted by Goya. The parasitic American empire is in a bit of a panic and it is pulling out all the stops to make everyone else pay for its failures, evil, and detrimental activities. That comes in the form of extracting value from Europe and damaging their economy in order to make them even more dependent vassals who still think they can rebel like a toddler threading to run away from home, and dominating the Americas that are effectively helpless in the face of Americas overwhelming position over them. The anxiety and panic among the American ruling class is palpable among the clubhouse chatter. The empire is in a bit of a panic to sustain itself, just as much as it is also trying to devour what little value is left among the American pension funds and people to save itself; Saturn devouring his son for fear of the prophesy that his child would overthrow him.
- dmix 9mo ago

mschuster91 9mo ago

It's time that societies act against this cancer. When everything else suffers because the cancer is stealing all sorts of resources, a human would go to a doctor and have the cancer killed chemically or excised.

jopsen 9mo ago
Relax, before you drafted regulation and rolled it out this bubble will have peaked. Unless your rolling out dumb reactionary regulation like forbid AI or crypto coins, etc. It's annoying right now, but on a timescale of 5-10 years ram/gpu prices will be back to normal. Could we regulate investors reduce risk of bubbles maybe, but it's hard. Probably easier to limit the impact of bubbles on humans with a social safety net.

drnick1 9mo ago

> Smartphones are expected to get pricier for potentially years to come. "Smart" phones have ceased to be smart years ago. They are now instruments of mass surveillance, and the tech industry has convinced people that 1) you need one not to be a social outcast, 2) you need to upgrade it every year, 3) not having root access is for your own good. I'll stick to my Pixel 9a running Graphene for the forseeable future.

goalieca 9mo ago
Well, the article touched on how smaller phone makers and middle tier startups, are being squeezed out. Big tech and their surveillance economy is only going to tighten their grip now.

utopiah 9mo ago

Good thing that I don't need a : - bigger TV, my "old" not even 4K video projector is enough - faster phone with more memory or better camera, my current one as "just" 5G, is enough - faster laptop/desktop, I can work on the laptop, game on desktop - higher resolution VR headsets (but I'll still get a Steam Frame because it's more free) - denser smart watch, I'm not even using the ones I have ... so, the situation is bad, yes, and yet I don't really care. The hardware I have is good enough and in fact regardless of AI I've been arguing we've reached "peak" IT few years ago already. Of course I wouldn't mind "better" everything (higher resolution, faster refresh rate, faster CPU/GPU, more memory, more risk, etc). What I'm arguing for though is that most "normal" users (please, don't tell me you're a video editor for National Geographic who MUST edit 360 videos in 8K! That's great for you, honestly, love that, but that's NOT a "normal" user!) who bough high end hardware during the last few year matches most of their capabilities. All that being said, yes, pop that damn bubble, still invest in AI R&D and datacenters, still invest in AI public research for energy, medicine, etc BUT not the LLM/GenAI tulip commercial craze.

benjiro 9mo ago
Your forgetting a little detail ... While you do not need a lot of new stuff, companies need buyers. A lot of companies work on rather thing margins and losing potentially 10 a 20% sales can result in people getting fired, or companies shutting down. Remember, its not just about "O, X big brands sells less, they can deal with it". But a lot of brands have suppliers who feed that system. Or PC component makers like ... heatsinks, Fans, Cases ... seeing a 20% less sales because people buy less new PCs. People do not realize how much is linked in the industry. Smaller GPU card makers are literally saying that they may be forced to leave the industry because of drops in sales and the memory prices making the products too expensive. We can live a long time on old hardware but hardware also limits. Hey, the wife's laptop is from 2019, just before Covid (2020 when a lot of people bought new laptops). The battery is barely holding on. Replacement? None (reputable) ... So in a year that laptop is dead. How about phones? Same issue ... battery is the build in obsolete maker. You see the issue. It goes beyond what what most people realize. Wait when a recession hits when the whole AI bubble bursts and cascades down the already weakened industry. Unlike previous bubbles, the hardware being build is so specialized, that little will hit the normal consumer market. So there will not be a flood of cheap GPUs or memory being dumped on the market.

techblueberry 9mo ago

Bezos must have forgot to censor this post before it published.

dehrmann 9mo ago

Does anyone know the high-level breakdown of where the money's going and how long that part (energy production, energy transmission, network, datacenter, servers/GPUs) lasts?

vaxman 9mo ago

Almost positive 'ol Bessent has by now warned Trump that there is an issue with the AI queens breaking 1930s securities reform laws. Last week's stock market and crypto moves have all but sealed the fate of the Bozo No Bozos. They will take down the people involved with the funky purchase orders quietly, except inside of the closed door meetings where they get handled. https://youtu.be/y_z9W_N5Drg https://youtu.be/y_z9W_N5Drg

loeg 9mo ago

> Good luck finding an electrician My local (urban) residential electricians aren't even busy -- they are booking less than a week out. By contrast, just last year they were booking six weeks out. The fall in EV infrastructure demand due to eliminated incentives might be impacting them more than additional data center demand.

mixologic 9mo ago

It's caused a massive shortage of interesting content that isn't related to AI.

cheschire 9mo ago
Remember when AI were closer to just purpose-built neural networks and not always LLMs? I miss reading about that kind of “AI”
macguyv3r 9mo ago
[flagged]
- DeepYogurt 9mo ago
  Him and everyone upvoting him
dmix 9mo ago
The best part is every single thread on HN now has someone accusing the author of using AI.
journal 9mo ago
many users here are not willing to try anything new that might give it a chance. even if i show someone a better alternative, they still wont use it because no one else is using it. people need to be told what to do. initiative has been beaten out of you all.

macguyv3r 9mo ago

Good. Gen pop can diversify its skillset, become more independently self sufficient as a result, rely on/require less money overall, and realize they don't really need to listen to rich tech CEOs which will implode their value politically. SaaS jobs were about little more than agency control and now they're losing that control.

rossdavidh 9mo ago

"JPMorgan calculated last fall that the tech industry must collect an extra $650 billion in revenue every year — three times the annual revenue of AI chip giant Nvidia — to earn a reasonable investment return. That marker is probably even higher now because AI spending has increased." That pretty much tells you how this will end, right there.

robotnikman 9mo ago
The future is not looking bright at all.... I only have a meme to describe what we are facing https://imgur.com/a/xYbhzTj https://imgur.com/a/xYbhzTj
- weavie 9mo ago
  As someone in the UK for whom that link is blocked, I wonder if that meme is doubly apt.
  - cedws 9mo ago
    Children successfully protected. Nevermind the child groomers on Roblox.
- butterlettuce 9mo ago
  I was expecting to see Mark Baum on the phone saying "hey, we're in a bubble".
- the-wouter 9mo ago
  [dead]
- dmix 9mo ago
  > The future is not looking bright at all.... The tech industry going through a boom and settling back down at a higher place than before isn't the end of the world. They all start merging together soon.
  - 9mo ago

luxuryballs 9mo ago

So where is the electrician? Busy at an AI data center being built?

croes 9mo ago

If AI can what it promises most of its big customers become useless but who else could pay enough to make them profitable?

1vuio0pswjnm7 9mo ago

Alternative to archive.ph, no Javascript, no CAPTCHAs: x=www.washingtonpost.com { printf 'GET /technology/2026/02/07/ai-spending-economy-shortages/ HTTP/1.1\r\n' printf 'Host: '$x'\r\n' printf 'User-Agent: Chrome/115.0.5790.171 Mobile Safari/537.36 (compatible ; Googlebot/2.1 ; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)\r\n' printf 'X-Forwarded-For: 66.249.66.1\r\n\r\n' }|busybox ssl_client -n $x $x > 1.htm firefox ./1.htm

WarOnPrivacy 9mo ago
> Alternative to archive.ph, no Javascript, no CAPTCHAs: The other tld have been kinder to me (no captcha). https://archive.md/J8pg5 https://archive.md/J8pg5 https://archive.fo/J8pg5 https://archive.fo/J8pg5
1vuio0pswjnm7 9mo ago
Anonymous middleman that could potentiallly collect browsing histories, serves CAPTCHAS, requires Javascript, maybe in crosshairs of authorities, unreliable according to some commenters (YMMV). NB. Nothing about "honeypot", just observations (cf. "accusations") Someone recently noticed an apparent DDOS attempt on some blogger using Javascript fetch function The site used to include a tracking pixel containing the visitor's IP address Also used to ping mail.ru Would need to look at the page source again to see what it contains today It's a crowd favorite People love it
- dmix 9mo ago
  Are you accusing archive.today of being a honeypot for the feds because they use Cloudflare? That's a bit much don't you think?
  - MallocVoidstar 9mo ago
    Archive.today don't use Cloudflare, the admin mimics their captcha page because he hates them. He also used to captcha-loop anyone using Cloudflare's DNS resolver because they don't send the IP subnet of clients to upstreams. I don't think it's a honeypot, though, it's not like he's learning much about me other than I like not paying for news sites.

themafia 9mo ago

AI "boom?" Where's the "boom?" Doesn't that imply a bunch of people are getting rich off of new business? Where are those?

alecco 9mo ago

What a low quality article with zero new information or insights. WaPo is dead.

xantronix 9mo ago
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/04/business/media/washington-post-layoffs.html https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/04/business/media/washington...

hedayet 9mo ago

A bubble doesn’t necessarily imply the underlying technology is useless. It implies that expectations and capital allocation have significantly outpaced realistic returns, leading to painful corrections for bulls. And with AI, a classic bubble signal is emerging: widespread exit-timing instead of deep, long-term conviction.

an0malous 9mo ago
The greatest critics of the AI boom like Gary Marcus and Michael Burry aren’t even saying it’s useless, that’s a strawman no one is arguing for
bdangubic 9mo ago
> widespread exit-timing instead of deep, long-term conviction. $500+bn in one year capex from largest and most profitable companies ever known to mankind seems like a deep and long-term conviction, no? you and I may not have conviction, the largest and most profitable companies on earth that have been carrying most of global economy do
- Lionga 9mo ago
  Do they have conviction or FOMO?
  - bdangubic 9mo ago
    I would bet against the Mag7 FOMO’ing around
- hedayet 9mo ago
  Tech companies buying computing real estate with surplus profit isn't conviction in my book.

baby-yoda 9mo ago

The token maximizer is a thought experiment illustrating AI alignment risks. Imagine an AI given the simple goal of maximizing token production. If it became sufficiently powerful, it might convert all available resources — including humans and the Earth — into tokens or token-producing infrastructure, not out of malice, but because its objective function values nothing else. The scenario shows how even a trivial goal, paired with enough intelligence, can lead to catastrophic outcomes if the AI's objectives aren't carefully aligned with human values. *written by AI, of course

cheschire 9mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Paperclips https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Paperclips

cyanydeez 9mo ago

I don't think that's the AI Boom. It's the de rigor Republican policies.

lo_zamoyski 9mo ago

Give it a couple years. Pursuit of trades among Gen Z has gone up 1500%. The big loser is the modern university.

jongjong 9mo ago

That's what you get when you have a centrally planned economy. This is just like communism. The software industry has been like this for over a decade and the effect started spreading to other industries. I've been warning of this for years. It has been a very painful decade for some. At least now millions of others are starting to feel the pain. More broadly distributed pain creates incentives for change which did not exist before. Pain is hope. Being on the frontline has been an excruciating and isolating experience.

deleted 9mo ago

[deleted]

geetee 9mo ago

All this disruption to every facet of society. For what? So you can roleplay as the next billionaire startup founder with your weekend project? All while the actual tech billionaires have a giant dick measuring contest.

exabrial 9mo ago

This is ok, let macroeconomics happen, and instead, enforce monopoly laws. The effect in 2-3 years will be a wider base of suppliers, cheaper goods, and solid supply chains.

coldtea 9mo ago

I wouldn't call inflating a bubble a "boom".

shmerl 9mo ago

Shortages and price hikes. So much "benefit to society".

wnc3141 9mo ago

We're disappointed that WaPo is flailing. Meanwhile we all post workarounds for the paywall

atleastoptimal 9mo ago

I feel like I'm caught in between two schizophrenically myopic perspectives on AI. One being: >Generative AI is a product of VC-funding enabled hype, enormous subsidies and fraudulent results. No AI code "really" works or contributes to productivity, and soon the bubble will burst, returning Real Software Engineers to their former peerless ascendency. And the other perspective: >The AI boom will be the last chance to make money, after which point your socioeconomic status circa 2028 will be the permanent station of all your progeny, who will enjoy a heavenly post-scarcity experience with luxury amenities scaled by your PageRank equivalent of social connections to employees at leading AI labs.

ricardobayes 9mo ago

Why does almost every thread have 200+, sometimes 500+ comments now? Back a few months or a year ago, most threads were sitting at 10-20 comments max.

consp 9mo ago
They stay on the front page longer. I've seen more stayin there for hours upto days.

int0x29 9mo ago

The article is primarily about how wild unrestrained AI spending is causing problems. For example it is hard to get an electrician, anything with memory in it is either significantly more expensive or unobtainable, and building of homes, factories, and hospitals is being depressed pushing down supply (Housing supply being potentially depressed by AI is both serious and alarming). The HN conversation about this article seems to instead be will Google, OpenAI, etc break even? The degree of disconnect in Silicon Valley between the tech industry and everyone else's problems is alarming.

zozbot234 9mo ago
These are the best kinds of problems to have, an economic recession would be far worse.

wundersam 9mo ago

The railway comparison is apt, but the pace is striking. JPMorgan calculates tech needs 650B in new annual revenue just to break even on ROI. That's an extraordinary bet.The shortage effects are real and measurable. But capital doesn't easily substitute — you can't just redirect 700B into infrastructure without immediately hitting bottlenecks in skilled labor and materials.I use LLMs daily for coding. They're helpful for scaffolding. But the gap between "useful tool" and "justify restructuring the entire economy" is massive. If this is a bubble, the legacy won't just be stranded GPUs — it'll be years of diverted resources and accelerated power consolidation. The railway boom left railways. What does an AI boom leave if the returns don't materialize?

ranguna 9mo ago

If this will pop sooner or later, where should I put my money on? All IT companies will go red The US economy will go red because IT companies will go red Banks will follow because their investments depended on the IT market Gold pumped but is falling now (maybe a good time to buy?) Crypto is crypto so no one knows (although we are close to the pump season where everything 10x in value, but it's still a bet) Europe is detaching itself from the US, so maybe there's something there? Maybe we can just buy non perishable essencial products now, because everything is going to blow up in prices? Still if I buy a 2£ can of beans, later sell it at 10£ because its market value increased to 15, I'm still losing. Not losing as much, but still losing, not to mention I need to find a buyer. I could buy a house and sell it, but the housing market is a micro bubble where I live that it might pop as well by the time I sell. So where do I put my money now, knowing that everything's going to blow up?

mentalgear 9mo ago
I think a lot of investors are looking at Europe/EU as a safe heaven, because it actually has strong democratic institutions that hold up the rule of law, and not some maddening kind that can tank your investments on his mere whim and a tech/fin oligarchy, eager to please and profit him while keeping the pyramid scheme going (while they build doomsday bunkers in New Zealand), until it all blows in the public's face.
- superze 9mo ago
  The rule of law only applies to the peasants here in the EU as well .
- DavidPiper 9mo ago
  At the risk of calling you on a deep-cut 2-step pun from your username, I think you meant "safe haven", not "safe heaven" :-)
- ranguna 9mo ago
  So you mean I should buy EU"s 2% gross bonds? That will be worth nothing when food increases by 10%. I'd rather lose the 1 point something net percent than do the song and dance of buying bonds.

jamesjolliffe 9mo ago

Another serious flaw with the modern American economy is that too much of our money is spent betting on whatever lottery ticket dream we are sold will grant the highest returns. For too long, we have been investing in software companies like Meta hoping for unicorn returns, paying no attention to the fact that many of these companies do little to materially improve the real world we live in, while our communities and infrastructure fall into disrepair. Who wants to invest in a lower-margin construction company, when there is a chance company some tech company X might come up with an addictive imaginary widget on our phone that has a marginal cost of almost nothing after the first one is built. Now, all this new hardware we're building is powering AI that is only proven to improve the quality of our software, and will likely displace many of the middle class "white collar" jobs we have left. Buckle up boys, we are in for a bumpy ride.

weare138 9mo ago

A 'boom' would imply AI is actually profitable.

thecoderpanda 9mo ago

Seeing a version of this from India. Every decent ML engineer is getting vacuumed into foundation model work or infra roles at hyperscalers. Teams building the actual application layer are struggling to hire. The stat about OpenAI needing 20% of the existing skilled trades workforce for their data centers is nuts. That's not a scaling challenge, that's a resource extraction problem. Anyone else noticing this hitting developer tooling and devrel budgets too? Everything that isn't "AI infra" is getting squeezed hard.