ares623

3 ms·

1.
by ares623 5d ago
I am finished. I can't tell if the author is sincere or not.
2.
by ares623 5d ago
I think it goes beyond money now. A future where AI does not destroy the world means a world where the people who work at these companies are just like everyone else.
3.
by ares623 5d ago
They're a small bootstrapped startup, give them some grace.
4.
by ares623 5d ago
Yes, except this way they can say it's not their fault nuh-uh mom said I don't have to pay you.
5.
by ares623 5d ago
Here's a preview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGwz1s1E1aw
6.
by ares623 6d ago
if that's treason then what is dismantling US global hegemony?
7.
by ares623 6d ago
Wouldn't it be more efficient to use an LLM to write the rules for actual linters?
8.
by ares623 6d ago
> Our business is vertically-integrated and therefore highly capital-intensive, and we will require additional capital to fund our business and support our growth, and any inability to generate or obtain such capital on acceptable terms,
9.
by ares623 7d ago
I believe the point is that there is no baby in this bathwater
10.
by ares623 7d ago
This is only tangentially related but is Jev trained on the same kind of data as the rest of the LLM world? (i.e. unethical) At a glance it addresses two out of three of my "load bearing points" against AI, which is the cost to ru
11.
by ares623 7d ago
I wonder how the Big Tech co's who kissed the ring are feeling about this.
12.
by ares623 7d ago
In the face of such incredulous hate, one must try to find some meaning to try and rationalize it.
13.
by ares623 8d ago
> Furthermore, search companies aren't even pursuing text-to-SQL anymore (several have talked to me)... they made up their minds during the traumatic 2024 text-to-sql days. They were just too early. Can you expand on this? Is text-t
14.
by ares623 8d ago
Do they need to? As an outsider, my view is that they already "won".
15.
by ares623 8d ago
I gave it a choice of "Foo" and "Bar" and it scored "Foo" at 98% percent. Why not 0% for both?
16.
by ares623 8d ago
strong traces of ~~spice~~ slop
17.
by ares623 8d ago
Personally I think that means they want access to the raw data so they can load it in excel or whatever and run their own reports.
18.
by ares623 9d ago
I can't bear all this load anymore
19.
by ares623 9d ago
In this case, a local on-prem backup in your office-that-is-not-an-aws-datacenter would've worked and satisfy the law right? (or an AWS Outpost thingy, assuming those things work even if the mothership is down)
20.
by ares623 9d ago
"We've been a naughty company and need to be punished."
21.
by ares623 10d ago
"Daddy, where were you when the flames reached our house?" "I was in the office, reviewing Terraform plans"
22.
by ares623 10d ago
Well I guess this excuse is finally gonna become obsolete soon with all the "pacing" nonsense.
23.
by ares623 11d ago
I think you should consider the gigawatts of heat generated to create the LLM model to make it a more fair comparison.
24.
by ares623 12d ago
Bart & Lisa are OpenAI and Anthropic. Homer is Meta/Microsoft/Google/AWS. Marge is Nvidia. Maggie is Apple.
25.
by ares623 12d ago
I might be alone in this, but 10% chance of humanity being wiped out in the next 10 years is a small price to pay if it means I can avoid writing YAML config by hand ever again. Look, I love my kids and all, but c'mon... 30+ years more
26.
by ares623 12d ago
It takes two to tango
27.
by ares623 12d ago
It's like Google without Ad/SEO incentives. All it took was trillions of dollars of investment.
28.
by ares623 13d ago
Uhh, until recently, didn't those three undergo exactly the same kind of scrutiny and have had the regulations we are talking about here put in place for them? Of course, all that existing regulation is being undone, thanks in part to
29.
by ares623 13d ago
I prefer calling it the "Simpsons defense" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZSoJDUD_bU
30.
by ares623 13d ago
> so does that mean we should be up and arms about the mamdani campaign? No, we should be up and arms about TikTok.

More ›