unsupp0rted

5 ms·

1.
by unsupp0rted 5d ago
Yes, but the other ones we don't like for ethical reasons, rather than religious reasons.
2.
by unsupp0rted 5d ago
To put what I said another way, math may be infinite in principle, but the creatures in our universe can only conceive of or perceive so much of it: a finite amount. We (or our constructs) can plausibly mine all there is and then there&#x27
3.
by unsupp0rted 5d ago
The history of math was done on human scales. Same as the history of chess.
4.
by unsupp0rted 5d ago
There are lots of thoughts you’re not biologically capable of thinking. That means the list of thoughts you’re capable of thinking is finite. That means the amount of math you’re capable of discovering, even if you lived forever, is finite.
5.
by unsupp0rted 5d ago
Because the bounded universe creates bounds on what the intelligences within it can conceive of as mathematics. We can conceive of lots of mathematics that our own universe doesn't necessarily support. But only that much and no more: w
6.
by unsupp0rted 5d ago
The universe imposes strict limits on the math that can exist within it, and certain broader limits on the math the creatures and well-organized sand within the universe can conceive of in the first place, whether or not it can maybe exist
7.
by unsupp0rted 5d ago
Same reason Gary Kasparov and Lee Sedol started their morning in one universe and ended their evening in another. Brute Force or not, the game is being played and won without them all of a sudden, and even worse: at a level of output far be
8.
by unsupp0rted 5d ago
There probably is a finite amount of math to be done The universe is bounded by rules, as far as we can tell, and not a lot of them
9.
by unsupp0rted 6d ago
The value of this to me would be breaking up a 12 ~ 16 hour flight into multi-day stopovers instead, so that any given flight leg isn't more than say 5 hours. I can spend a day or three somewhere before I'm ready to fly onward. If
10.
by unsupp0rted 7d ago
They do make decisions: we present them with options and they decide We might override them or ignore them or whatever, but they make decisions as much as anybody else or anything else does
11.
by unsupp0rted 10d ago
He asked for phase 1. It would be foolish not to expect phase 2
12.
by unsupp0rted 12d ago
I’m an elevator operator. You tell me what floor you’d like and I press the button or control the switch. I also make casual conversation about the weather and yesterday’s sports highlights, which automatic elevators can’t do. Can I join?
13.
by unsupp0rted 15d ago
I remember those days! And Elixir/Phoenix had to be hyped in every 5th post.
14.
by unsupp0rted 16d ago
It’s pretty okay- I’m not testing really weird engine specific stuff. Just need to do a manual sanity check in the browser
15.
by unsupp0rted 16d ago
Lately I leave my MacBook Pro at home and Codex remote for everything. It’s a dream. But what’s missing is manual in-browser testing, on the go. This solves that.
16.
by unsupp0rted 16d ago
A live presentation fail could take 5~15% off their stock price in minutes, for no good reason at all. People’s life savings are at stake.
17.
by unsupp0rted 17d ago
It's not really a thought-terminating cliche. Concrete issues (e.g. iPads in the classroom result in worse tested recall) retain plenty of space. It's the vague repetitive "man yells at cloud" gripes that get auto-termin
18.
by unsupp0rted 17d ago
It's cliche because every generation has said the exact same thing about the previous generation. Everything that was considered fancy and high-culture when I was in my formative years is fancy and high-culture now and everything after
19.
by unsupp0rted 17d ago
And they're not quoting poetry at each other anymore. It's a great loss.
20.
by unsupp0rted 17d ago
That's an entirely different question
21.
by unsupp0rted 17d ago
I'm fully sure that if ASI doesn't "solve death" then neither will anybody else. It's either AI or I get very sick and die, so my money is (literally) on AI, and the faster the better.
22.
by unsupp0rted 18d ago
Yes but he was right
23.
by unsupp0rted 18d ago
> I don't understand why we're not seeing a MASSIVE clamor for a pause in the further development of AI strength. Because some of us don't want to die, old and decrepit, at age 70~90
24.
by unsupp0rted 23d ago
Reddit thinks Astra will be released today (Thursday/Friday)
25.
by unsupp0rted 23d ago
I'm annoyed my (US-bought) Meta glasses still block me from using the AI features, months after moving back to a country where it's generally enabled.
26.
by unsupp0rted 23d ago
I'm invested because I "know" it'll pop and I also "know" it'll eventually work and revolutionize everything. What do I have to lose? I'm just going to get decrepit and die anyway if it doesn't w
27.
by unsupp0rted 24d ago
My recollection is a couple years before it popped everybody (except tech CEOs going public or investing tens of millions in dog food delivery infrastructure) was in disbelief it hadn't happened yet
28.
by unsupp0rted 24d ago
That will successfully prevent 200% of market multipliers: bubbles and just plain sudden rapid value creation. It's like cutting out the prostate from all men at age 30 to prevent nearly 100% of prostate cancer.
29.
by unsupp0rted 24d ago
Predicting things 5 years too early is often as useless as not predicting anything. You can say "AI will be able to _____" and be right 99.9 times out of 100, but the question is when. You can say "The AI market will go to 0&
30.
by unsupp0rted 24d ago
It's because GPT Sol is equally good and established a price ceiling

More ›