allarm

4 ms·

1.
by allarm 5d ago
It must be hard to be you. There are so many racists around.
2.
by allarm 9d ago
Oh, my, indeed! That's gonna traumatize the poor dude for life.
3.
by allarm 9d ago
But this isn't perceived as emphasis at all. If I wanted to emphasize something, I'd be more likely to use something like *bitch* or something along those lines. Replacing a letter with an asterisk comes across as self-censorship,
4.
by allarm 12d ago
You're just mixing up completely different things and thinking you're saying something meaningful. In reality, you're just confusing yourself and those around you.
5.
by allarm 12d ago
> Layer-3 only huh? 1.2.3.0/23 is a valid host address, it doesn't have to be Layer-3 only or whatever. it's just basic subnetting.
6.
by allarm 13d ago
Too late for that!
7.
by allarm 13d ago
E.g. Netflix doesn't let you to stream 4k video in browser afaik. So no, it's not a good option.
8.
by allarm 13d ago
I don't think we can do anything substantial. So I'm going to just use this "suboptimal" solution.
9.
by allarm 13d ago
Use Apple TV for that.
10.
by allarm 15d ago
Oh you don't say )
11.
by allarm 17d ago
Lol even after 6 days you haven't posted any supporting information, so who's misinforming here? :)
12.
by allarm 23d ago
That's also a sign of mental laziness.
13.
by allarm 24d ago
The purpose of reading is to challenge your mind, literally the cognitive load. If slang from 20 years ago is preventing you from reading a book, that’s a sign of mental laziness.
14.
by allarm 24d ago
That's true. And that's exactly why we should blame Google's employees - they are the ones to blame for what's happening.
15.
by allarm 25d ago
I don't disagree, but no one forces you to be a jerk. Don't act surprised when you receive a pushback for that.
16.
by allarm 26d ago
It didn't "came off that way". You literally decided to speak up about something that has nothing to do with you.
17.
by allarm 28d ago
I'm pretty sure there are some here on this forum as well. Fell free to log out and never come back.
18.
by allarm 1mo ago
Huh? From RFC1123: <quote> 2.1 Host Names and Numbers The syntax of a legal Internet host name was specified in RFC-952 [DNS:4]. One aspect of host name syntax is hereby changed: the restriction on the first character is rel
19.
by allarm 1mo ago
Oh my. Don't you think that code generated by an LLM has nothing to do with "hackers"? And once/if you realize that, don't you immediately see that they're right? Maybe not in the way they say it, but otherwise
20.
by allarm 1mo ago
It's pretty common right here on this platform to call such people "normies". I cringe every time I read it.
21.
by allarm 1mo ago
:)
22.
by allarm 1mo ago
You either don't use the f-word at all, or just write the whole word, uncensored. It's not that hard: fuck Chrome.
23.
by allarm 1mo ago
A good one probably. Because he's obviously correct.
24.
by allarm 1mo ago
Quoting it in full so you don't stealth-edit your comment: <quote> I'm glad they're doing this also and that more people are adopting it. Event sourcing [0] is the right way to represent informaiton like tool calls, use
25.
by allarm 2mo ago
That's a great comment - you couldn't make it up. It's the perfect illustration of the blog post.
26.
by allarm 2mo ago
> you wouldn't hire a 70 year old writer for your commercial project no matter how brilliant they are. And yet, practically all over the world, 70- to 80-year-old men are being hired for leadership positions to run the world. Regard
27.
by allarm 2mo ago
That's just your bullshit. Reputation exists and words have meanings, regardless of your opinion on that.
28.
by allarm 2mo ago
It's how Internet was supposed to work. NAT was a forced mistake, as well as the whole concept of "public" and "internal" address spaces.
29.
by allarm 2mo ago
> NAT is good. It isn't. Routing is good though.
30.
by allarm 2mo ago
There's a thing called reputation. It has nothing to do with prejudice.

More ›