fennecbutt

4 ms·

1.
by fennecbutt 6d ago
I agree that it shouldn't be paid. What connection do people today really have to those things back then? Sure, it could be claimed that it allowed certain groups to get ahead of others but it would be difficult to prove that; there ha
2.
by fennecbutt 6d ago
That's a very closed definition of grieving. So by your definition a future perfectly simulated human brain cannot grieve because no chemicals are involved? Lmao.
3.
by fennecbutt 6d ago
You don't even need quantum imo. On a personal meatbag level emotions are magical and something ineffable. From a scientific stance, chemical make brain go happy or sad and there's nothing special or magical about that. Every emot
4.
by fennecbutt 9d ago
Well most likely consensual noncon given the amount of vetting present in that chart. It's surprisingly common in women, or just a desire for general "gentle roughness". And idk why it's really worth mentioning anyway, a
5.
by fennecbutt 10d ago
Ah, you've been downvoted by the holier than thou "nyeeeh!" crowd. You are correct though, especially fast food places using air brushed and photoshopped food photos are the inedible food object has been carefully set up. And
6.
by fennecbutt 10d ago
Think of it like a paper. You wouldn't ask why a paper was so long. Also you can now ask AI to summarise it for you and even probe with questions pertaining to your specific interests.
7.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
Okay, now use preview editor to add text...with an outline colour. ;)
8.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
Are you serious. As a left handed person apparently I'm like a witch or something and can't use Apple's folding phone anyway. You call that perfect? And by your logic where do you draw the line. Apple do not have control over
9.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
The author never intended their article as a review. So why not look up "xteink x3 review"? You're on HN ffs...
10.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
Lmao, pop music.
11.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
"Designed" is a stretch here, lmao.
12.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
Why, the users will blame anyone but Apple, of course.
13.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
So basically do what they have always done for decades? Apple Intelligence was an outlier in how they historically operate. I mean they literally just put out a folding phone after waiting what, a decade, for others to perfect it first.
14.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
Yes, it's very Gibson. That's what I was hoping for with Taalas, ultimately ending up with a microsd-ish card that's hot swappable intelligence.
15.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
Tbf that's where many of the phones stolen by muggers in western countries ultimately end up.
16.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
Well, plus a generally technologically illiterate customerbase who believe the time Apple did something was the first time it's ever been done.
17.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
Lmao. Okay let me just install a tool to do that because the OS doesn't usually have it built in in 2026. Oh, it's riddled with ads. Oh it's paid for. Etc. It's the same thing with the recent opening of knowledge thanks
18.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
I mean that's pretty much the current welfare system.
19.
by fennecbutt 12d ago
Attention is all you need. And there's only so much attention to go around.
20.
by fennecbutt 19d ago
Disagree, not for serious work if you're a developer aka requiring loads of iterations tool calls etc. But for other tasks it's relatively fine.
21.
by fennecbutt 23d ago
Prompt blooms into verse I count syllables, not rain— Whose noticing? Generative Pretrained Transformer 5.
22.
by fennecbutt 23d ago
I think because we have handicapped them with a set of tokens from human language. But (at least I think so) thought happens outside of language. So more tokens/variability and slow or fewer tokens and fast. There seems to be a thresho
23.
by fennecbutt 23d ago
They are the primary service for this. That comes with an audience and a lot of data.
24.
by fennecbutt 23d ago
Data. Loooads of data for Nvidia. And an audience.
25.
by fennecbutt 26d ago
"But it was hotter in 1976" The above is a serious threat though. What do you do, in a democracy, with people who are dangerously uninformed?
26.
by fennecbutt 1mo ago
Tbf the majority of harnesses for frontier models do not allow the agent to do this (gut instinct) and instead get it to search, and for good reason.
27.
by fennecbutt 1mo ago
I was hoping model architecture would migrate towards something like this, perhaps it still might. Sparse models seem like they're getting more popular. I'd always thought we'd eventually hotload loras or MoE experts. It woul
28.
by fennecbutt 1mo ago
Via "Endless growth" baybeeeee
29.
by fennecbutt 1mo ago
To party? Awesome.
30.
by fennecbutt 1mo ago
I mean, it's pretty damn reliable now. Has been for simple high contrast Q&A for a while now. I've just been doing research and experiments for work related stuff. Typically we've used plain embeddings for a lot of high c

More ›