17 ms·
Gemini 3 Pro Model Card [pdf]
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- fcanesin 11mo agoGreat stuff, now if could please do gemini-2.5-pro-code that would be great
- rvz 11mo ago> The training dataset also includes: publicly available datasets that are readily downloadable; data obtained by crawlers; licensed data obtained via commercial licensing agreements; user data (i.e., data collected from users of Google products and services to train AI models, along with user interactions with the model) in accordance with Google’s relevant terms of service, privacy policy, service-specific policies, and pursuant to user controls, where appropriate; other datasets that Google acquires or generates in the course of its business operations, or directly from its workforce; and AI-generated synthetic data. Well don't complain when you are using Gmail and your emails are being trained to develop Gemini.
- patates 11mo agoIt says "pursuant to user controls, where appropriate". We can now sleep peacefully with the knowledge that Google will give us the tools to disable this where it's not inappropriate.
- rvz 11mo agoSo that's why Google is getting sued for Gemini being enabled by default in Gmail and analyzing emails and our data; completely going against whatever privacy policy they came up with. [0] I don't expect them to follow their own privacy policies. [0] https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/google-sued-over-gemini-ai-151508072.html?guccounter=1 https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/google-sued-over-gemini-...
- surrTurr 11mo agogone now; wayback machine still has it: https://web.archive.org/web/20251118111103/https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-Pro-Model-Card.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20251118111103/https://storage.g...
- lifthrasiir 11mo agoFor the veracity of the link itself: https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/* https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/* has been used by DeepMind itself (e.g. "View tech report" in https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/ https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/) so it is a genuine leak.
- meetpateltech 11mo agoit was accidentally pushed a little early, and now it has been taken down. here’s the archived pdf: https://web.archive.org/web/20251118111103/https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-Pro-Model-Card.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20251118111103/https://storage.g...
- TheAceOfHearts 11mo agoThey scored a 31.1% on ARC AGI 2 which puts them in first place. Also notable which models they include for comparison: Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and GPT-5.1. That seems like a minor snub against Grok 4 / Grok 4.1.
- kranke155 11mo agoGrok seems extremely prone to hallucination in my experience. It also constantly asserts certainty on fuzzy topics.
- buildfocus 11mo agoMy impression is that Grok is very rarely used in practice outside of a niche of die-hard users, partly because of very different tuning to other models, and partly the related public reputation around it. https://firstpagesage.com/reports/top-generative-ai-chatbots/ https://firstpagesage.com/reports/top-generative-ai-chatbots... suggests 0.6% of chat use cases, well below the other big names, and I suspect those stats for chat are higher than other scenarios like business usage. Given all that, I can see how Gemini might not be focused on competing with them.
- ohyoutravel 11mo agoI don’t know anyone who uses Grok, but in my peer group everyone uses 1-2 paid services like Gemini or Clause or ChatGPT. They’re probably not as “extremely online” as I am, so I can’t generalize this thought, but anecdotally my impression has been that Grok is just very “right wing influencer” coded.
- npn 11mo agowell, there are 3 kind of usages for grok: - using grok inside X/Twitter: most people interacts with Grok this way. - using grok on its website: this is really annoying, as you get delayed by cloudflare everytime you access the site. As grok does not provide serious advantage over other services, why bother - you can also use the app, but it is not as convenient as other services. it is understandable that grok is not popular.
- 11mo ago
- surrTurr 11mo agogood benchmark stats except for coding where it looks similar to other SOTA models
- aurareturn 11mo agoBenchmark suggests it is a resounding win for Gemini 3 Pro as the top model.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- margorczynski 11mo agoIf these numbers are true then OpenAI is probably done, Anthropic too. Still, it's hard to see an effective monetization method for this tech and it clearly is eating Google's main pie which is search.
- Sol- 11mo agoWhy? These models just leapfrog each other as time advances. One month Gemini is on top, then ChatGPT, then Anthropic. Not sure why everyone gets FOMO whenever a new version gets released.
- remus 11mo agoI think google is uniquely well placed to make a profitable business out of AI: They make their own TPUs so don't have to pay ridiculous amounts of money to Nvidia, they have a great depth of talent in building models, they've got loads of data they can use for training and they've got a huge existing customer base who can buy their AI offerings. I don't think any other company has all these ingredients.
- gizmodo59 11mo agoWhile I don’t disagree that Google is the company you can’t bet against when it comes to AI, saying other companies are done is a stretch. If they have a significant moat then they should be at the top all the time by then which is not the case though.
- remus 11mo agoAgreed, too early to write off others entirely. It'll be interesting to see who comes out the other side of the bubble with a working business.
- adriand 11mo agoAnthropic has a fairly significant lead when it comes to enterprise usage and for coding. This seems like a workable business model to me.
- patates 11mo agoIt says it's been trained from scratch. I wonder if it will have the same undescribable magic that makes me spend an hour every day with 2.5. I really love the results I can get with 2.5 pro. Google eventually limiting aistudio will be a sad day. Also I really hoped for a 2M+ context. I'm living on the context edge even with 1M.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- dahcryn 11mo agobuy a pixel and you get it basically unlimited for free for a year ;)
- sohpea 11mo agoor a Chromebook is a good choice too considering price
- JacobAsmuth 11mo agoAIStudio now accepts an API key. Unlimited usage :)
- laborcontract 11mo agoIt's hilarious that the release of Gemini 3 is getting eclipsed by this cloudflare outage.
- senordevnyc 11mo agoIt hasn't been released, this is just a leak
- amarcheschi 11mo agoOn reddit I see it's already available on cursor https://www.reddit.com/r/Bard/comments/1p093fb/gemini_3_in_cursor/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Bard/comments/1p093fb/gemini_3_in_c...
- senordevnyc 11mo agoInteresting, it doesn't show up for me in Cursor yet.
- Despacito2019 11mo agoyou need to manually add the custom model gemini-3-pro-preview
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- yen223 11mo agoCoincidence? Yes
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- Traubenfuchs 11mo agoSo does google actually have a claude console alternative currently?
- rjtavares 11mo agoGemini CLI
- muro 11mo agohttps://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli
- itsmevictor 11mo agoNoteworthily, although Gemini 3 Pro seems to have much benchmark scores than other models across the board (including compared to Claude), it's not the case for coding, where it appears to score essentially the same as the others. I wonder why that is. So far, IMHO, Claude Code remains significantly better than Gemini CLI. We'll see whether that changes with Gemini 3.
- decster 11mo agofrom my experience, the quality of gemini-cli isn't great, experiencing lot of stupied bug.
- spwa4 11mo agoGoogle is currently constantly laying off people. Everyone who really exceeds has jumped ship, and the people who remain ... are not top of the class anymore. Not that Google didn't use to have problems shipping useful things. But it's gotten a lot worse.
- BoredPositron 11mo agoGemini performs better if you use it with Claude Code than with Gemini cli. It still has some odd problems with tool calling but a lot of the performance loss is the Gemini cli app itself.
- scrlk 11mo agoBenchmarks from page 4 of the model card: | Benchmark | 3 Pro | 2.5 Pro | Sonnet 4.5 | GPT-5.1 | |-----------------------|-----------|---------|------------|-----------| | Humanity's Last Exam | 37.5% | 21.6% | 13.7% | 26.5% | | ARC-AGI-2 | 31.1% | 4.9% | 13.6% | 17.6% | | GPQA Diamond | 91.9% | 86.4% | 83.4% | 88.1% | | AIME 2025 | | | | | | (no tools) | 95.0% | 88.0% | 87.0% | 94.0% | | (code execution) | 100% | - | 100% | - | | MathArena Apex | 23.4% | 0.5% | 1.6% | 1.0% | | MMMU-Pro | 81.0% | 68.0% | 68.0% | 80.8% | | ScreenSpot-Pro | 72.7% | 11.4% | 36.2% | 3.5% | | CharXiv Reasoning | 81.4% | 69.6% | 68.5% | 69.5% | | OmniDocBench 1.5 | 0.115 | 0.145 | 0.145 | 0.147 | | Video-MMMU | 87.6% | 83.6% | 77.8% | 80.4% | | LiveCodeBench Pro | 2,439 | 1,775 | 1,418 | 2,243 | | Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 54.2% | 32.6% | 42.8% | 47.6% | | SWE-Bench Verified | 76.2% | 59.6% | 77.2% | 76.3% | | t2-bench | 85.4% | 54.9% | 84.7% | 80.2% | | Vending-Bench 2 | $5,478.16 | $573.64 | $3,838.74 | $1,473.43 | | FACTS Benchmark Suite | 70.5% | 63.4% | 50.4% | 50.8% | | SimpleQA Verified | 72.1% | 54.5% | 29.3% | 34.9% | | MMLU | 91.8% | 89.5% | 89.1% | 91.0% | | Global PIQA | 93.4% | 91.5% | 90.1% | 90.9% | | MRCR v2 (8-needle) | | | | | | (128k avg) | 77.0% | 58.0% | 47.1% | 61.6% | | (1M pointwise) | 26.3% | 16.4% | n/s | n/s | n/s = not supported EDIT: formatting, hopefully a bit more mobile friendly
- oalessandr 11mo agoTrying to open this link from Italy leads to a CSAM warning
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- Fornax96 11mo agoCreator of pixeldrain here. Italy has been doing this for a very long time. They never notified me of any such material being present on my site. I have a lot of measures in place to prevent the spread of CSAM. I have sent dozens of mails to Polizia Postale and even tried calling them a few times, but they never respond. My mails go unanswered and they just hang up the phone.
- koakuma-chan 11mo agoHave you tried Europol?
- Fornax96 11mo agoNot yet. I also thought about reaching out to the embassy, but have not had the time for it yet.
- koakuma-chan 11mo agoAs far as I know, Europol can route your report to appropriate local authority.
- Fornax96 11mo agoThanks, I'll give them a call tomorrow. The website only lists a dutch phone number, which is convenient, I'm dutch as well.
- driverdan 11mo agoDon't use your ISP's DNS. Switch to something outside of their control.
- embedding-shape 11mo agoCuriously, this website seems to be blocked in Spain for whatever reason, and the website's certificate is served by `allot.com/emailAddress=info@allot.com` which obviously fails... Anyone happen to know why? Is this website by any change sharing information on safe medical abortions or women's rights, something which has gotten websites blocked here before?
- amarcheschi 11mo agoThat website is used to share everything including pirated things, so that's the reason maybe
- Fornax96 11mo agoCreator of pixeldrain here. I have no idea why my site is blocked in Spain, but it's a long running issue. I actually never discovered who was responsible for the blockade, until I read this comment. I'm going to look into Allot and send them an email. EDIT: Also, your DNS provider is censoring (and probably monitoring) your internet traffic. I would switch to a different provider.
- zozbot234 11mo agoCould it be that some site in your network neighborhood was illegally streaming soccer matches?
- Fornax96 11mo agoI have my own dedicated IP range. And they specifically blocked my domain name, not the addresses. I don't know what the reason is. I have been trying to find out since the start of this year.
- embedding-shape 11mo ago> EDIT: Also, your DNS provider is censoring (and probably monitoring) your internet traffic. I would switch to a different provider. Yeah, that was via my ISPs DNS resolver (Vodafone), switching the resolver works :) The responsible party is ultimately our government who've decided it's legal to block a wide range of servers and websites because some people like to watch illegal football streams. I think Allot is just the provider of the technology.
- transcriptase 11mo agoThere needs to be a sycophancy benchmark in these comparisons. More baseless praise and false agreement = lower score.
- swalsh 11mo agoYou're absolutely right
- jstummbillig 11mo agoDoes not get old.
- Yossarrian22 11mo agoIt’s not just irritating, it’s repetitive
- falcor84 11mo ago"You know, you are also right"
- this_user 11mo agoI'm sorry, you are absolutely right. --- But seriously, I find it helps to set a custom system prompt that tells Gemini to be less sycophantic and to be more succinct and professional while also leaving out those extended lectures it likes to give.
- causal 11mo agoIt's a revolution in subtle humor. Well done.
- fumblebee 11mo agoIt’s not just irritating, it’s repetitive
- BoredPositron 11mo ago
- jll29 11mo agoHopefully this model does not generate fake news... https://www.google.com/search?q=gemini+u.s.+senator+rape+allegations&oq=gemini+u.s.+senator+rape+allegations https://www.google.com/search?q=gemini+u.s.+senator+rape+all...
- jll29 11mo ago[flagged]
- floppyd 11mo agoGemma is an open-weight version of Gemini and obviously much less capable probably even than 2.5 Flash. Also the story you are linking to is a complete nothing burger, models are still very much hallucinating, especially on some extremely niche topics, I don't see how another politician trying to capitalize on that is attention-worthy at all.
- lxdlam 11mo agoWhat does the "Google Antigravity" mean? The link is http://antigravity.google/docs http://antigravity.google/docs, seemingly a new product but now routing to the Google main page.
- dbosch 11mo agoI was asking myself the exact same question. No idea
- ceroxylon 11mo agoFound this demo with two views that was uploaded 18min ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8wEC6A5HQY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8wEC6A5HQY
- bobbylarrybobby 11mo agoLooks like a VSCode fork with gemini built in.
- Palmik 11mo agoArchive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20251118111103/https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-Pro-Model-Card.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20251118111103/https://storage.g...
- denysvitali 11mo agoTitle of the document is "[Gemini 3 Pro] External Model Card - November 18, 2025 - v2", in case you needed further confirmation that the model will be released today. Also interesting to know that Google Antigravity (antigravity.google / https://github.com/Google-Antigravity https://github.com/Google-Antigravity ?) leaked. I remember seeing this subdomain recently. Probably Gemini 3 related as well. Org was created on 2025-11-04T19:28:13Z (https://api.github.com/orgs/Google-Antigravity https://api.github.com/orgs/Google-Antigravity)
- jmkni 11mo agowhat is Google Antigravity?
- denysvitali 11mo agoI guess we'll know it in a few hours. Most likely another AI playground or maybe a Google Search alternative? No clue really
- Yossarrian22 11mo agoThe ASI figured out zero point energy from first principles
- zed31726 11mo agoMy guess is based on a gif tweeted by the ex CEO of windsurf who left to join Google of a floating laptop: it'll be a cursor/windsurf alternative?
- postalcoder 11mo agoCouple patterns this could follow Speed? (Flash, Flash-Lite, Antigravity) this is my guess. Bonus: maybe Gemini Diffusion soon? Space? (Google Cloud, Google Antigravity?) Clothes? (A light wearable -> Antigravity?) Gaming? (Ghosting/nontangibility -> antigravity?)
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- Bobaso 11mo agoInteresting to see on page 2 the reference to ML pathways [1]. Looks like a multi layer mixture of experts. Is this common ? [1] https://blog.google/technology/ai/introducing-pathways-next-generation-ai-architecture/ https://blog.google/technology/ai/introducing-pathways-next-...
- gaogao 11mo agoPathways, I understand, is more so these days just the name for their training orchestrator for doing distributed JAX stuff - https://github.com/google/pathways-job https://github.com/google/pathways-job
- catigula 11mo agoI know this is a little controversial but the lack of performance on SWE-bench is hugely disappointing I think economically. These models don’t have any viable path to profitability if they can’t take engineering jobs.
- martinald 11mo agoI thought that but it does do a lot better on other benchmarks. Perhaps SWE bench just doesn't capture a lot of the improvement? If the web design improvements people have been posting on twitter, I suspect this will be a huge boon for developers. SWE benchmark is really testing bugfixing/feature dev more. Anyway let's see. I'm still hyped!
- catigula 11mo agoThat would be great! But AI is a bubble if these models can’t do serious engineering work.
- rfoo 11mo agoSWE Bench doesn't even test bugfixing / feature dev properly after you achieve roughly 70% if you don't benchmaxx it .
- camdenreslink 11mo agoIt seems the benchmarks that had a big jump had to do with visual capabilities. I wonder how that will translate to improvements to the workloads LLMs are currently used for (or maybe it will introduce new workloads).
- api 11mo agoReally? If they can make an engineer more productive, that's worth a lot. Naive napkin math: 1.5X productivity on one $200k/year engineer is worth $100k/year.
- mikert89 11mo agoPeople generally dont understand what these models are doing to engineering salaries. The skill level required to produce working software is going way down
- mohsen1 11mo agoThis model is not a modification or a fine-tune of a prior model Is that common to mention that? Feels like they built something from scratch
- scosman 11mo agoI think they are just indicating it’s a new architecture vs continued training of 2.5 series.
- irthomasthomas 11mo agoNever seen it before. I suppose it adds to the excitement.
- mynti 11mo agoIt is interesting that the Gemini 3 beats every other model on these benchmarks, mostly by a wide margin, but not on SWE Bench. Sonnet is still king here and all three look to be basically on the same level. Kind of wild to see them hit such a wall when it comes to agentic coding
- tosh 11mo agoThis might also hint at SWE struggling to capture what “being good at coding” means. Evals are hard.
- raducu 11mo ago> This might also hint at SWE struggling to capture what “being good at coding” means. My take would be that coding itself is hard, but I'm a software engineer myself so I'm biased.
- Squarex 11mo agoIt is just Python and Django. It might indicate qualities in other technologies, but it is not very good benchmark.
- HereBePandas 11mo ago[comment removed]
- Palmik 11mo agoThe reported results where GPT 5.1 beats Gemini 3 are on SWE Bench Verified, and GPT 5.1 Codex also beats Gemini 3 on Terminal Bench.
- HereBePandas 11mo agoYou're right on SWE Bench Verified, I missed that and I'll delete my comment. GPT 5.1 Codex beats Gemini 3 on Terminal Bench specifically on Codex CLI, but that's apples-to-oranges (hard to tell how much of that is a Codex-specific harness vs model). Look forward to seeing the apples-to-apples numbers soon, but I wouldn't be surprised if Gemini 3 wins given how close it comes in these benchmarks.
- bemmu 11mo agoI saw this on Reddit earlier today. Over there the source of this file was given as: https://web.archive.org/web/20251118111103/https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-Pro-Model-Card.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20251118111103/https://storage.g... The bucket name "deepmind-media" has been used in the past on the deepmind official site, so it seems legit.
- onlyrealcuzzo 11mo agoPrediction markets were expecting today to be the release. So I wouldn't be surprised if they do a release today, tomorrow, or Thursday (around Nvidia earnings).
- fraboniface 11mo ago> Developments to the model architecture contribute to the significantly improved performance from previous model families. I wonder how significant this is. DeepMind was always more research-oriented that OpenAI, which mostly scaled things up. They may have come up with a significantly better architecture (Transformer MoE still leaves a lot of room).
- msp26 11mo agoIs flash/flash lite releasing alongside pro? Those two tiers have been incredible for the price since 2.0, absolute workhorses. Can't wait for 3.0.
- omidsa1 11mo agoTL;DR: expected results, not underwhelming.So far scaling laws hold.
- nilayj 11mo agoCurious to see the API pricing. SOTA performance across tasks at a price cheaper than GPT 5 / Claude would make mostly everyone switch to Gemini.
- __jl__ 11mo agoSame here. They have been aggressively increasing prices with each iteration (maybe because they started so low). Still hope that is not the case this time. GPT 5.1 is priced pretty aggressively so maybe that is an incentive to keep the current gemini API prices.
- Deathmax 11mo agoBad news then, they've bumped 3.0 Pro pricing to $2/$12 ($4/$18 at long context).
- 827a 11mo agoWhat is Google Antigravity?
- danielcampos93 11mo agomums the word on Flash?
- ethmarks 11mo ago> TPUs are specifically designed to handle the massive computations involved in training LLMs and can speed up training considerably compared to CPUs. That seems like a low bar. Who's training frontier LLMs on CPUs? Surely they meant to compare TPUs to GPUs. If "this is faster than a CPU for massively parallel AI training" is the best you can say about it, that's not very impressive.
- Workaccount2 11mo agoIt's a typo
- ethmarks 11mo agoDoes Google's team not proofread this stuff? Or maybe is this an early draft that wasn't meant to be released?
- camdenreslink 11mo agoIt was generated by an LLM like everything else these days.
- astrange 11mo agoLLMs don't make typos.
- silveraxe93 11mo agoThis is a leak, yeah. Though come on... Even with proofreading, this is an easy one to miss.
- babl-yc 11mo agoI don't know if you can generally say that "LLM training is faster on TPUs vs GPUs". There is variance among LLM architectures, TPU cluster sizes, GPU cluster sizes... They are both designed to do massively parallel operations. TPUs are just a bit more specific to matrix multiply+adds while GPUs are more generic.
- Taek 11mo agoOne benchmark I would really like to see: instruction adherence. For example, the frontier models of early-to-mid 2024 could reliably follow what seemed to be 20-30 instructions. As you gave more instructions than that in your prompt, the LLMs started missing some and your outputs became inconsistent and difficult to control. The latest set of models (2.5 Pro, GPT-5, etc) seem to top out somewhere in the 100 range? They are clearly much better at following a laundry list of instructions, but they also clearly have a limit and once your prompt is too large and too specific you lose coherence again. If I had to guess, Gemini 3 Pro has once again pushed the bar, and maybe we're up near 250 (haven't used it, I'm just blindly projecting / hoping). And that's a huge deal! I actually think it would be more helpful to have a model that could consistently follow 1000 custom instructions than it would be to have a model that had 20 more IQ points. I have to imagine you could make some fairly objective benchmarks around this idea, and it would be very helpful from an engineering perspective to see how each model stacked up against the others in this regard.
- machiaweliczny 11mo ago20 more IQ would be nuts, 110 ~ top 25%, 130 ~ top 2%, 150 ~ top 0.05% If you ever played competitive game the difference is insane between these tiers
- Taek 11mo agoEven more nuts would be a model that could follow a large, dense set of highly detailed instructions related to a series of complex tasks. Intelligence is nice, but it's far more useful and programmable if it can tightly follow a lot of custom instructions.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- DeathArrow 11mo agoI hope cheaper Chinese open weights models as good as Gemini will come soon. Gemini, Claude, GPT are kind of expensive if you use AI a lot.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- Topfi 11mo agoAdditional context from AI Studio including pricing: Our most intelligent model with SOTA reasoning and multimodal understanding, and powerful agentic and vibe coding capabilities <=200K tokens • Input: $2,00 / Output: $12,00 > 200K tokens • Input: $4,00 / Output: $18,00 Knowledge cut off: Jan. 2025
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- koakuma-chan 11mo ago> Gemini 3 Pro was trained using Google’s Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) NVDA is down 3.26%
- CjHuber 11mo agoIf it’s because of that, then honestly it’s as insane as the deepseek thing where all the info was released weeks before but the markt got nervous only when they released an app. I mean info about Gemini 3 is out quite a while now and of course they trained it using TPUs, I didn’t even think that was in question.
- koakuma-chan 11mo agoI didn't know they only used TPUs.
- robert-zaremba 11mo agoThe strategic move to use TPU rather than Nvidia is paying well for Google. They are able to better utilize their existing large infrastructure, but also specialize the processes and pipelines for their own framework that they use to create and train models. I think a specialized hardware for training models is the next big wave in China.
- aliljet 11mo agoWhat's wild here is that among every single score they've absolutely killed, somehow, Anthropic and Claude Sonnet 4.5 have won a single victory in the fight: SWE Bench Verified and only by a singular point. I already enjoy Gemini 2.5 pro for planning and if Gemini 3 is priced similarly, I'll be incredibly happy to ditch the painfully pricey Claude max subscription. To be fair, I've already got an extremely sour taste in my mouth from the last Anthropic bait and switch on pricing and usage, so happy to see Google take the crown here.
- radial_symmetry 11mo agoSWE bench is weird because Claude has always underperformed on it relative to other models despite Claude Code blowing them away. The real test will be if Gemini CLI beats Claude Code, both using the agentic framework and tools they were trained on.
- __jl__ 11mo agoAPI pricing is up to $2/M for input and $12/M for output For comparison: Gemini 2.5 Pro was $1.25/M for input and $10/M for output Gemini 1.5 Pro was $1.25/M for input and $5/M for output
- bretpiatt 11mo agoPage 5, "The knowledge cutoff date for Gemini 3 Pro was January 2025." Still taking nearly a year to train and run post training safety and stability tuning. With 10x the infrastructure they could iterate much faster, I don't see AI infrastructure as a bubble, it is still a bottleneck on pace of innovation at today's active deployment level.
- camdenreslink 11mo agoBut if they spend 10x on infrastructure, and capabilities only improve 10%, then that still can be a bubble even if infrastructure is a bottleneck.
- eric15342335 11mo agoUpdate: it is available at https://aistudio.google.com https://aistudio.google.com now!
- amelius 11mo agoThese model cards tell me nothing. I want to know the exact data a model was trained on. Otherwise, how can I safely use it for generating texts that I show to children? Etc.etc.
- astrange 11mo agoThe data is everything you've ever heard of, and obviously contains things you wouldn't show to children, since that'd include NYT war journalism stories.
- morcus 11mo agoShouldn't you be carefully reading texts before you show it to children?
- amelius 11mo agoNo, I have an app that generates children's stories.
- butlike 11mo agoIt's over. I just don't care anymore. I don't care what a pro model card is. I don't care what a humanity's last exam is. I don't care if the response makes me feel good about the prompt I made. I don't care if it's sentient. I don't care if it's secretly sentient. I don't care if it's just a machine. I don't care if the gov't has appropriated a secret model. I don't care if this is the precursor to AGI, ASI, AGGI, AGGSISGIGIG....I just. Don't. care. And I really don't think I'm alone in this.
- charcircuit 11mo ago>TPUs are specifically designed to handle the massive computations involved in training LLMs and can speed up training considerably compared to CPUs Who is training LLMs with CPUs?
- Barry-Perkins 11mo ago[flagged]
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- ks2048 11mo agoWhy is this linking to a random site? Here is a link hosted by Google: https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-Pro-Model-Card.pdf https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Ge...
- Joshua-Peter 11mo ago[flagged]
- VeritySage07 11mo ago[dead]
- gardnr 11mo agoGemini 3 Deep Think gets 45.1% on ARG-AGI-2 Gemini 3 Pro gets 31.1% on ARG-AGI-2 https://arcprize.org/leaderboard https://arcprize.org/leaderboard
- wiz21c 11mo agoSWE-Bench is disappointing not because it is lower than Claude, but because improving on all other domains of knowledge didn't help. So does this mean that this is actually a MoE model in the sense that one expert doesn't talk to the other ?