bitpush

4 ms·

1.
by bitpush 8d ago
How are you this confident about the future?
2.
by bitpush 9d ago
> To be clear, all the payments so far have come from my own agents. No search crawler is turning up and paying me. The payments also use testnet USDC, which means the tokens have no real monetary value.
3.
by bitpush 10d ago
Good observations. Even if this doesnt become _the_ project, hopefully this takes few steps forward which then inspires something else .. and the dream goes on.
4.
by bitpush 10d ago
Havent been to Tokyo but are there no yellow cab / black taxi service over there?
5.
by bitpush 11d ago
I thought the blog was pretty reasonable until I came across "One caveat keeps the speed numbers honest" which was the one obvious tell for me. Otherwise I thought it was pretty straightforward to read. Curious, what were the tell
6.
by bitpush 11d ago
I took a look at the code, and it seems the author info was in pyproject.toml which is not license. if there was a comment that said // TODO(username) and google removed all comments, is that violating any license?
7.
by bitpush 11d ago
What if you had to sit through a presentation of their cool products before you can see the product? Or imagine, showing you short movie clips (call it trailers) before they show you the movie you paid to watch?
8.
by bitpush 11d ago
> It means exactly that: it has near-monopoly on search. On mobile the situation is close to to complete monopoly. Would you say HackerNews is a monopoly? Any activity that the user has a choice to use something else cannot be a monopoly
9.
by bitpush 11d ago
I'm trying to make sense of this and the best analogy I can find is using an example of physical products. 1. I can walk into Apple Store and buy Apple device (this is similar to me opening the browser and accessing amazon.com 2. If I&
10.
by bitpush 13d ago
> Google has a near-monopoly on search. What does that mean? I use kagi, ddg etc. Nobody is forcing anyone to use Google. Woudl you say HackerNews has a monopoly on tech chatter? Sure seems dominant, but nobody is forcing anyone to use H
11.
by bitpush 14d ago
I see where you are coming from but the argument would be stronger is Google Chrome refused to open illegal streaming sites etc. AFAIK, there's no such restriction. (I dont agree to this but ...) using your argument of " If you us
12.
by bitpush 14d ago
Do you have any source outside of the Ed Zitron article (which is highly specualtive?)
13.
by bitpush 14d ago
> There are still illegal streaming sports and movie sites everywhere (who knew) and all other seedy corners of the internet that have been neatly erased by Google This is such a strange position to take. Apple doesnt allow all sorts of
14.
by bitpush 14d ago
> You pay more, have less, and reduce taxable labor incomes into demand deficient classes. This will not end well for people even if LLM are recognized as mostly hype. =3 Depends on how you view efficient market hypothesis. Computers and
15.
by bitpush 15d ago
> 1. Corporations misappropriating $9Tn of opensource human works to sell isomorphic plagiarism tokens is not progress, but rather an unsustainable ectoparasite people will not tolerate very long. I think about this a lot when I look at
16.
by bitpush 15d ago
Two things can be true at the same time. 1. It is clear that many people, including the person in the video, has strong identities tied to a certain skill that they have spent years honing and perfecting. The sudden loss of agency and democ
17.
by bitpush 16d ago
isnt this running iOS browser and not the desktop version?
18.
by bitpush 17d ago
There's an entire field of math phds working on figuring out accidental and malicious clicks. Fun fact, your touch screen (and even your keyboard) uses a rudimentary version of such algorithm to figure out whether you tapped/click
19.
by bitpush 18d ago
I wasnt around when this happened. Who did CyanogenMod partner with and what happened?
20.
by bitpush 20d ago
Source? It's a welcome thing but very much not like Apple.
21.
by bitpush 20d ago
> In the pre-cloud days, open source worked - authors distributed their software, and everyone "hosted" it for themselves (i.e. ran it on their own PC) This is just rose tinted vision of the past. None of the software of the pa
22.
by bitpush 21d ago
> They gave AI access to terrorists and criminals as much as they did to independent researchers. That's an odd hill to die own. Lots of despicable people use iPhones. Does that Apple is somehow complicit?
23.
by bitpush 24d ago
Isnt that updated by some national database and google just pulls that data? Apparently Apple Maps will also get it in a few days, since they get the data from them as well.
24.
by bitpush 24d ago
Motorola is not a big Android phone maker.
25.
by bitpush 24d ago
Isnt that part of the deal of uploading to YouTube? YouTube promises distribution and in return they show ads to make up for lost {storage,bandwidth} etc. I'm surprised that YouTube doesnt ask $100 per year and then also show ads. Like
26.
by bitpush 25d ago
Why do these creators use YouTube then? Why cant they host it on s3 and the have you directly compensate? Surely the creator is getting some value from YouTube and YT expects to be compensated for that?
27.
by bitpush 25d ago
A bit hyperbolic dont you think? Even if you disagree with the politics, you'd agree that updating a random restaurant's opening hours is different from updating a national landmark. For instance, I checked Nepal area and Google M
28.
by bitpush 25d ago
Apple updates maps slowly. We saw this with Gulf of America. Google Maps just happens to update things faster. I dont think it is upto Google and/or Apple.
29.
by bitpush 25d ago
Apologies if this is obvious but I'm not following it. > as long as there's working IP connectivity. Dont you need to be on a network to get 'IPs'. It is usually a router's job to setup the network, and also prov
30.
by bitpush 26d ago
Hows this different from htmx?

More ›