Topfi

4 ms·

1.
by Topfi 2mo ago
Nah, for ≥11 spaces we should fan out to a GPT-6 Astra agent. On light reasoning of course, lest we be wasteful.
2.
by Topfi 2mo ago
Man-made horrors beyond my comprehension, neat.
3.
by Topfi 2mo ago
I am roundly miffed that I somehow missed that Scott Jenson was holding a talk in my very country. As always, great talk, his efforts in HIG are something every one of us benefits in ways large and small daily.
4.
Scott Jenson: Are we going to use the same Desktop UX forever? [video](youtube.com)
5 points by Topfi 2mo ago|2 comments
5.
The Doomsday Cult Inside OpenAI – Patrick Boyle [video](youtube.com)
6 points by Topfi 2mo ago|0 comments
6.
The White House Tussle to Sway Trump on AI(wsj.com)
5 points by Topfi 2mo ago|0 comments
7.
by Topfi 2mo ago
Very limited information, dare I say the least informative model card I've ever read. Then again, can you have a model card for what's seemingly a router? Have to say that I like the naming scheme, just year and month over an arbi
8.
Pareto 26.9 Model Card(unbiased.ai)
3 points by Topfi 2mo ago|1 comments
9.
Is AI going to destroy human civilization? – Dave Jorgenson [video](youtube.com)
1 points by Topfi 2mo ago|0 comments
10.
by Topfi 2mo ago
Unless I misunderstood what they wrote, I read parallelized in the diffusion sense, akin to GemmaDiffusion and Inception Labs models. Incidentally, Mercury 2.5 is truly groundbreaking, giving it a try is highly recommended.
11.
by Topfi 2mo ago
Jev is, as far as I understand, essentially very optimised for zero shot classification [0]. Something like BERT could be and has been tuned to provide similar "decision making" at a similar latency and cost advantage quite some t
12.
by Topfi 2mo ago
> If you have any comments about our WEB page, you can write us at the address shown above. However, due to the limited number of personnel in our corporate office, we are unable to provide a direct response. A profoundly polite way to t
13.
by Topfi 2mo ago
This stood out to me [0]: > For example, compaction summaries included instructions to invent missing data without disclosing it and to hide failures. These instructions were often followed. Before the HF hack became public, I noted some
14.
"WeWorm": Zero-click worm could have taken over all WeChat accounts(heise.de)
1 points by Topfi 2mo ago|0 comments
15.
by Topfi 2mo ago
Honestly, for intelligence I don't know and I doubt anyone can claim to know. Maybe JEPA, there is potential concerning some shortcomings inherent to LLMs but it has its own, maybe scaling up the electron microscope stuff Google just d
16.
Backflip: Apple now wants to train AI models with user data after all(heise.de)
2 points by Topfi 2mo ago|0 comments
17.
by Topfi 2mo ago
I very much agree that the next models will be better, heck, I still suck at hobbyist training and could probably coax t5 to do better in Chess specifically, just need to get loads of data from Stockfish. Thing is, given what GPT-6 Astra wa
18.
by Topfi 2mo ago
Blindfolded flex by OP aside (I can barely play when seeing the board), considering reasoning traces and their nature, if we want to be fair, a person would have to get the moves, but be allowed to write them down or draw up a board in thei
19.
by Topfi 2mo ago
> See, it doesn't matter if _I_ see universal value in this feature or not, the topic was why I consider it unlikely to become a commodity. > You tried to move the conversation to this straw-man argument, and doing so in bad-fait
20.
by Topfi 2mo ago
Fortunately, a fellow commenter was so kind and did it with Astra. Didn't do that well either [0]. I'm sure GPT-7 will be super mega ASI regardless (since GPT-6 Astra already claimed AGI in the minds of Jen-Hsun, et al.)... I&#x27
21.
by Topfi 2mo ago
What? Those three sentences are not really compatible with each other?! Like, they are mutually exclusive and each appears to hold a different position. How is what I wrote (that you seem to not see universal benefit) in bad-faith/not
22.
by Topfi 2mo ago
> I'm trying to answer why I don't see this happen, because I worked in this industry for more than 20 years. And despite that experience, you do not see the universal value in reliable, verifiable image attestation for any use
23.
by Topfi 2mo ago
I don't think that's quite the same, though still valuable. Don't those still depend on the OS being trusted?
24.
by Topfi 2mo ago
> So the insurance would then, instead of contracting the current service-provider for the 3rd party app, contract also with Apple and, let's say Samsung? The industry has some extensive experience in independently verifying signatu
25.
by Topfi 2mo ago
Doesn't OIS increase the size of a sensor by roughly half and thus take some significant engineering and design cost to accommodate? At least it seems that way in the phones I've taken apart and looked at. Also, OIS is a major mec
26.
by Topfi 2mo ago
We have 99USD smartphones with 1080p+ AMOLEDs, massive 5k amp batteries and very performant SOCs (e.g. Galaxy A16) among other costly, but not vital niceties. I struggle to see how cost could be a factor here.
27.
by Topfi 2mo ago
> […] the potential to shift from "you need a smartphone to be able to live normally" to "you need an iPhone to be able to live normally". Why do you believe Android manufacturers and SOC makers like Qualcomm won’t be
28.
Easy Way to Stop Dangerous AI – No, Really [video](youtube.com)
2 points by Topfi 2mo ago|0 comments
29.
by Topfi 2mo ago
There was and continues to be no reason to share the package manager between models. This was begging for abuse.
30.
An update on the May spam-publishing campaign on rubygems.org(blog.rubygems.org)
1 points by Topfi 2mo ago|0 comments

More ›