ilaksh

4 ms·

1.
by ilaksh 5d ago
I would be okay if you shared it as a potential idea and possibly interesting early result, but the language you are actually using to characterize it is misleading or delusional. Please get a model to the point where it seems like it has s
2.
by ilaksh 5d ago
You can't claim it "works" if it hasn't produced any coherent responses and is still early in your first training attempt.
3.
by ilaksh 5d ago
Actually I'm mad that I wasted my time looking at it based on the claims. He implies it is trained and uses the term "AGI" and "continuous learning". He never finished a single training run or enough that he conside
4.
by ilaksh 5d ago
If you actually scroll through the transcript he links to, you will see that something that looks like it could be training is happening, but no coherent responses are coming out at any point. At least not that I saw skimming through. That
5.
by ilaksh 11d ago
OpenAI just released the new full duplex mode to the API as gpt-live-1 or something like that. Very realistic.
6.
by ilaksh 12d ago
yeah but for 386?
7.
by ilaksh 12d ago
yeah but the PSRAM is going to cause a delay
8.
by ilaksh 12d ago
I don't know if they have some kind of magically genius caching system but the chip only has 512kb of SRAM and a little cache and the rest has to be managed by flash memory which is like 30+ times slower so I dunno about the performanc
9.
by ilaksh 12d ago
The problem is PC programs assume 640kb of RAM and the RP2350 has 512kb + 16kb cache SRAM so anything that goes past that has a sudden 40 cycle access delay. So even if you account for the RP2350 being 6 times faster than the RP2350, I thi
10.
by ilaksh 13d ago
Click on the Recollections page, it has a bunch of real vintage Unix (etc.) computers you can log into.
11.
by ilaksh 15d ago
Just pretending that AI doesn't exist or doesn't matter is one way to go. I think we might be getting close to an era where some people section off areas of land or the internet and ban AI and humanoid robots in that area. I know
12.
by ilaksh 15d ago
Maybe check out Mastodon, Matrix, (new) Freenet, etc.
13.
by ilaksh 15d ago
1. Popularity != Merit and this site is not different. A lot of worthy posts get ignored. 2. Even though I find most of the AI posts interesting, I agree that tags and the ability to filter by tags would be really great. But it's proba
14.
by ilaksh 16d ago
He was extremely skeptical of the capabilities of AI for years but eventually came around to calling it truly capable after testing advanced LLMs. He is still an AI skeptic in as many ways that he can reasonably be, but doesn't deny th
15.
by ilaksh 21d ago
Try Qwen 3.8 27b or the antirez ds4 0731 quants Can run on MacBook m5 or new m5 studio or m5 studio ultra or rtx 6000 pro.
16.
by ilaksh 21d ago
It's over $100k.
17.
by ilaksh 21d ago
This is really interesting and a fun read, but the way they mix in dated psychology around this historical figure in a serious way without much reference to subsequent work adds up to pretension.
18.
by ilaksh 21d ago
They're not weird at all given his worldview. It's Nazism. From his book to his public statements and actions, he consistently expresses this. The only thing he does not do is use the literal language that is not accepted. But the
19.
by ilaksh 21d ago
peeling an orange and cracking an egg already demonstrated. Figure 02 worked on BMW's actual Spartanburg production line for about 1,250 hours running 10-hour shifts. keep paying attention, you will see how wrong you are about it bein
20.
by ilaksh 22d ago
What task do you think that humanoid robots can't do? Also, we don't need fully equivalent touch to get useful performance. If you look you will see a really broad range of tasks accomplished already, including thing like manipula
21.
by ilaksh 22d ago
There is rapid progress in generality in humanoid robotics though. I think within the next year or less we will get the ChatGPT moment for humanoid robots. If you look at progression of capabilities such as the recent Skild AI demos.
22.
by ilaksh 22d ago
I agree that LLMs are unlikely to be the final form for AGI, but what you are talking about is orthogonal to the IQ and for most cases general utility. It's like looking at a savant chained to a workstation reading tasks from a conveyo
23.
by ilaksh 23d ago
Gemini 3.8 which just came out sounds like it's very good and a great deal though.
24.
by ilaksh 23d ago
One big issue actually is that HF has the llama.cpp team, which is (was?) arguably the biggest threat to Nvidia's dominance through it's closed CUDA software.
25.
by ilaksh 26d ago
Edited to say "I think". I think that because I have been looking hard for developments in humanoid robotics generalization and new impressive demos and capabilities keep popping up all the time. For example the recent Skild AI fa
26.
by ilaksh 26d ago
Unless the model watermarks text, it will become increasingly difficult to tell the difference between human legalese and AI legalese. Especially if they make it illegal, that will create a strong incentive to find-tune to imitate human law
27.
by ilaksh 26d ago
They can use human writers and also LLM-based multi-step scoring systems with analytical guidelines.
28.
by ilaksh 26d ago
They just haven't got to it yet. It's not a high priority but eventually they will make a solid effort on easier style guidance and more humanization. They will probably drop the most worn ou constructs like "not X, not Y, bu
29.
by ilaksh 26d ago
I think the ChatGPT moment for humanoid robotics is coming within a year or two.
30.
by ilaksh 28d ago
It's just a really fascinating topic in general and in a well known publication so the article gives us a good excuse to discuss it despite it's flaws. Maybe the flaws make it more engaging because it's less intimidating.

More ›