Jcampuzano2

4 ms·

1.
by Jcampuzano2 5d ago
Agents don't click through or interact with ads or get influenced by things like lightning deals, snap promotions, "others who bought X bought Y" and such the same way a human does. This is likely a large portion of the reaso
2.
by Jcampuzano2 5d ago
Cursor never added Astra to its consumer subscription plans. And it's likely exactly because of this announcement. Why would they add support for a model they would have to remove shortly after?
3.
by Jcampuzano2 5d ago
The point of Cursor Bench is to show how models perform in Cursor. If 99% of their users won't be able to access a model unless they go out of their way to include setup an API key for it (which would be insanely expensive with Astra),
4.
by Jcampuzano2 5d ago
The chart is cursorbench though and they asked about the "deceptive graph"
5.
by Jcampuzano2 5d ago
https://openai.com/index/our-decision-on-cursor-following-it... This explains why. Mentioned in another comment, but cursorbench explicitly tests with Cursor as the harness, and OpenAI doesn't allow them to use As
6.
by Jcampuzano2 5d ago
https://openai.com/index/our-decision-on-cursor-following-it... Its because of this. You can't use Astra in Cursor, and cursorbench uses cursor as the harness. They can't actually benchmark it using their har
7.
by Jcampuzano2 8d ago
This whole article can basically be summarized as "why is anybody building anything that already exists" gatekeeping. Despite the fact that the entire premise is incorrect since the author of the language clearly has been shown to
8.
by Jcampuzano2 11d ago
To be fair, I wish the whole world was much "worse" at warfare in the same way as they are. We'd probably be a much happier world overall. Or at the very least less destructive.
9.
by Jcampuzano2 13d ago
I tend to agree that when used correctly, a surveillance system like this could have benefits at a societal level. The problem is the many stories we already have of misuses of this equipment, showing that people in power are not mentally c
10.
by Jcampuzano2 14d ago
> Audio used for wake-word detection is processed locally on the TV and, if no wake word is detected, audio is not converted to text, stored, or transmitted. Voice-recognition results and related technical logs may be generated as part o
11.
by Jcampuzano2 14d ago
If anything, his entire argument leads to the eventual premise that AI labs need to nationalize. He is already arguing that commercial competition creates dangerous incentives, and that labs cannot slow down because competitors may overtake
12.
by Jcampuzano2 14d ago
If someone is genuinely afraid of this, they wouldn't IPO in the first place. All the talk in the article about commercial incentives means nothing when the company plans to IPO and become beholden to investors.
13.
by Jcampuzano2 14d ago
> Crack down on unauthorized distillation by companies in authoritarian countries. Distillation of frontier models allows lagging companies to narrow the gap using a fraction of the cost it would take to develop their own AI independentl
14.
by Jcampuzano2 16d ago
This is also one of those scenarios similar to subscription or membership cancellation where we should not allow accepting/signing up for something require using an entirely different method of communication to cancel/opt out. Req
15.
by Jcampuzano2 16d ago
Your access to a digital product you have "purchased" should not be tied to the continued existence of the store you also bought it from. Similar to physical products. If I bought a game at GameStop we aren't required to cont
16.
by Jcampuzano2 16d ago
> In the digital age, it is not plausible to allege that reasonable consumers believed they were obtaining "ownership" of a digital game. So their argument really is that it is unreasonable for anybody to believe they own any o
17.
by Jcampuzano2 23d ago
2 things can be true at once. Plenty of software/tools that we use are as good as they are despite being run by entitled pricks. Some would even argue that in certain cases (apple being the biggest example I can think of from the past
18.
by Jcampuzano2 24d ago
I'm confused what your surprise is here. It's plain and simple right to the point wording. I don't see the wiggle room at all.
19.
by Jcampuzano2 24d ago
I'm not an expert but I agree with your statement on the lower reasoning levels. Lots of models seem to just allow the model to "bloatmax" tokens in order to get bumps at high/max reasoning levels. Many of the max reason
20.
by Jcampuzano2 25d ago
I agree and wonder whether its either people who basically never use the model complaining or people who used it once a long time ago and haven't touched it since. We have access to Fable at our company on our enterprise plans and most
21.
by Jcampuzano2 25d ago
They haven't really mentioned practically anything about Haiku in quite a while so I imagine nobody except for people inside Anthropic will have any indication. Maybe it'll come out eventually but they don't even include it o
22.
by Jcampuzano2 27d ago
Big difference is when you use a calculator or other tools, you still have to interpret and know what to enter. With modern AI, you basically just ask for something and what used to be days worth of work magically appears, you didn't r
23.
by Jcampuzano2 27d ago
At the very least, I do encourage people who are working on personal projects for explicitly learning and studying purposes to purposefully not use AI. Of course, if the purpose of the project is to learn AI, then that rule is allowed to be
24.
by Jcampuzano2 27d ago
Realistically, what do you actually get from viewing people's sessions? I honestly don't really understand why people care. The specific model used can't be important because theres a new trending one every couple weeks nowad
25.
by Jcampuzano2 27d ago
The way I see it, the conversation transcript is the important part. The specific link to claude.ai nor the model itself is important to me. Otherwise we'll all just be linking out to 10 different AI model providers websites to see his
26.
by Jcampuzano2 28d ago
Yes, any Cursor sub includes a separate tier of usage for Cursor/SpaceX first party models separate from usage of third party models. I have a $20 Cursor sub still personally and would say that the usage for Grok models is much higher
27.
by Jcampuzano2 28d ago
Because anthropic is beholden to SpaceX for the time being due to their compute restraints. Its actually very tone deaf to even pipe up and say anything about this given they did this already to Windsurf themselves, and they previously bann
28.
by Jcampuzano2 29d ago
The way I read the article was that they will continue providing their current models, but won't let them use any newer ones announced even between now and the end date. But I might be wrong. > we’ve decided to hold the contract can
29.
by Jcampuzano2 29d ago
It was honestly just a matter of time, given all of the bad blood there is between Sam and Elon and Elon basically admitting under oath they were distilling other companies models. I wonder if Anthropic will follow suit given their campaign
30.
by Jcampuzano2 1mo ago
Genuine question but who do you put as the "three" in big three. Because I genuinely can't tell if you mean Google or SpaceX/X.ai lol.

More ›