catigula

4 ms·

1.
by catigula 9d ago
I made an argument of inference that underpins all philosophy. You made an argument to solipsism, which historically means you aren't worth discussing philosophy with.
2.
by catigula 10d ago
I’m not interested in having conversations with people who are bad-faith, deliberately or indiliberately obtuse or otherwise non-responsive to logic.
3.
by catigula 10d ago
You’re mistaking what is evident from what is philosophically knowable. It isn’t knowable to you that I am conscious. However, it is evident.
4.
by catigula 10d ago
I basically accepted that LLMs could not possibly be conscious when a simple reductio was posed: “My dog is zero percent persuasive regarding its conscious experience. However, it’s evident that my dog has conscious experience.” It’s obviou
5.
by catigula 10d ago
I largely agree that this claim is likely correct, but as far as I understand the science, this specific claim; >They do not have innate preferences or underlying motivations Is incorrect unless you’re being extremely pedantic in an inte
6.
by catigula 10d ago
Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life. This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just
7.
by catigula 10d ago
It’s a little intellectually disingenuous to compare something you don’t like wearing during a niche sub categorical activity to a category of tracker you CANNOT wear during a categorical activity.
8.
by catigula 11d ago
I can't think of any known moral system where "willingness and persistence to execute various clever scams and accrue resources" is identified as a value worth prioritizing or protecting. I've actually gone through the r
9.
by catigula 11d ago
If the rules technically allow a loophole that allows a minority group to accrue wealth over the majority, why would the majority agree or consent to be in that system? A minority oppressing a majority is classically a definition of tyranny
10.
by catigula 11d ago
>A group's lack of movement is not unjust if their groups actions do justify a movement upward. I assume you mean "do not justify" and the bottom line is that this type of thinking is fundamentally erroneous. We agree to l
11.
by catigula 11d ago
A health and fitness tracker that cannot be worn during a common health and fitness activity seems highly problematic as a form factor, especially since competing form factors do not have this problem.
12.
by catigula 11d ago
The idea that they’re genetically smarter than Europeans beggars belief.
13.
by catigula 14d ago
Can we get some insight into why Dario seems more scared now than before, do we think he’s being transparent?
14.
by catigula 14d ago
The public discourse on this is incredibly poisoned, but the naked reality is: 1. Artificial intelligence is clearly a vastly dangerous technology with plausible potential for human extinction. 2. This scares people.
15.
by catigula 16d ago
>More than 60 fatalities have been linked to Tesla’s driver-assistance systems. Talk about something that could put a dent in your image! That seems pretty low? Driving is extremely dangerous.
16.
by catigula 21d ago
I just can’t believe we’re still paying engineers to be Claude wrappers. This is ending soon, right?
17.
by catigula 22d ago
An AI safety company!
18.
by catigula 22d ago
It also suggests they might turn everything into paper clips, metaphorically speaking.
19.
by catigula 23d ago
They’re really, really scared because of the Mythos controversy. Skynet will be under hyped.
20.
by catigula 26d ago
China will eventually do similar things if they're allowed to become a unitary supplier, but while they're establishing their foothold obviously they can't.
21.
by catigula 26d ago
Aren't they printing unlimited money from this? I'm sure the chip shortage lasts as long as they're capable of extending it without falling to competitors. That's the problem with monopolies.
22.
by catigula 29d ago
I had a particular feeling about it and I looked into his other posts and he appears to constantly say explicitly "I'm an American, I'm from America, as an American" (a sentence I've probably never once said in my
23.
by catigula 1mo ago
It's just a strange comment; feels off. Like you're an Easterner imitating an American or something. Very odd.
24.
by catigula 1mo ago
The Biden administration kept the Trump tariffs. His own policy-makers, technocrats, said that they were a necessary geopolitical tool, cited China's extensive use of tariffs (amongst other states), and noted that they must be used to
25.
by catigula 1mo ago
Half of them are from India or China. Racial diversity is known to be detrimental to unionization. In fact, Amazon used this exact strategy to bust nascent Somali unions. https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252481961&#x
26.
by catigula 1mo ago
Expert economists working in both the Biden and Trump administration support tariffs. The difference is the dumb way Trump is doing them and a smarter way of doing them. Obviously, this comic completely misses that nuance and promotes a pse
27.
by catigula 1mo ago
That's a pretty unhinged idea you've presented; feels completely autobiographical.
28.
by catigula 1mo ago
0% chance you're getting a plot of land and happily ever after in the world as described.
29.
by catigula 1mo ago
Working in the US is a privilege, not a right.
30.
by catigula 1mo ago
>AI will replace you ahahahahahaha!!!!! hahaahaha! Seems like this policy is a long time coming? Why do we need workers?

More ›