9 ms·
GPT‑5.3 Instant
- aurareturn 7mo agoHow do I know if I'm using GPT5.3 Instant on ChatGPT? I don't see it in selections.
- zamadatix 7mo agoWhenever they say "available today" I take it as "hopefully I'll start seeing it in the app UI by tomorrow" rather than "I should get my hopes up it's there now". When they do push the update to the app UI to me I expect 5.2 Instant will be moved under the legacy models submenu where 5.1 Instant is currently and the selection of Instant in the menu will end up showing as 5.3 Instant on close (and it'll be the default instant at that point).
- re-thc 7mo agoIt should load instantly.
- drcongo 7mo ago[flagged]
- mhitza 7mo agoFrom one example > Many people in SF are: > Highly educated > Career-focused > Transplants > Used to independence Is "transplants" a San Francisco slang for relocators?
- denalii 7mo agoIt's not specific to SF but more or less yes
- forbiddenvoid 7mo agoThis has been common parlance in much of the US for a long time. I would hesitate to even call it slang at this point. It's a pretty commonly used term.
- arvid-lind 7mo agoLots of transplants in Colorado too.
- runako 7mo agoInteresting question. I've never heard "relocators" used in this context, only "transplants." And I am familiar with that usage across cities etc.
- Sohcahtoa82 7mo ago"Transplants" is a common term nationwide. In Oregon, we often refer to people moving from California as transplants.
- ViktorRay 7mo agoGPT‑5.2 Instant’s tone could sometimes feel “cringe,” coming across as overbearing or making unwarranted assumptions about user intent or emotions. Strange way to write this. Why use the Gen Z cringe and put it into quotation marks? Wouldn’t it be better to just use the actual word cringeworthy which has the identical meaning? My guess is that the article was originally written by some Gen Z intern and then some older employee added the quotation marks to the Gen Z slang.
- Neywiny 7mo agoWhat an Ohio take. Not skibidi. Very chopped, unc.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- mynameisvlad 7mo agoThe slang definition of "cringe" is present in most dictionaries. Languages evolve over time.
- seanhunter 7mo agoAgree. Use of "cringe" is cringeworthy in itself.
- tux3 7mo agoNo, sincerely calling things cringe is a millennial marker. Cringe was thrown around a lot in 2010's, but that was a decade and a half ago. Nowadays you'll hear that cringe is cringe, let people enjoy things, be cringe and be free, etc etc
- tempaccountabgd 7mo ago[dead]
- dwringer 7mo agoThe scare quotes around words that don't warrant it, or are unnecessarily idiosyncratic, are something I get pretty often in response text from Gemini.
- empath75 7mo agoGPT-5.2 has been such a terrible regression that I have cancelled my OpenAI account. It's possible I might not have noticed it if Claude wasn't so much better, though.
- Flux159 7mo agoI'm a bit confused by this branding (never even noticed that there was a 5.2-Instant), it's not a super fast 1000tok/s Cerebras based model which they have for codex-spark, it's just 5.2 w/out the router / "non-thinking" mode? I feel like openai is going to get right back to where they were pre GPT-5 with a ton of different options and no one knows which model to use for what.
- TrainedMonkey 7mo agoWill need to wait for real benchmarks, but based on OpenAI marketing Instant is their latency optimized offering. For voice interface, you don't actually need high tok/s because speech is slow, time to first token matters much more.
- tedsanders 7mo agoYeah, for a while ChatGPT Plus has been powered by two series of models under the hood. One series is the Instant series, which is faster and more tuned to ChatGPT, but less accurate. The second series is the Thinking series, which is more accurate and more tuned to professional knowledge work, but slower (because it uses more reasoning tokens). We'd also prefer to have simple experience with just one option, but picking just one would pull back the pareto frontier for some group of people/preferences. So for now we continue to serve two models, with manual control for people who want to choose and an imperfect auto switcher for people who don't want to be bothered. Could change down the road - we'll see. (I work at OpenAI.)
- lxgr 7mo agoThank you for confirming! I've long suspected as much, but I always found the API model name <-> ChatGPT UI selector <-> actual model used correspondence very confusing, and whether I was actually switching models or just some parameters of the harness/model invocation. > One series is the Instant series, which is faster and more tuned to ChatGPT, but less accurate. That's putting it mildly. In my experience, the "instant/chat" model is absolute slop tier, while the "thinking" one is genuinely useful and also has a much more palatable tone (even for things not really requiring a lot of thought). Fortunately, the latter clearly identifies itself with an absurd amout of emoji reminiscent of other early chatbots that shall not be named, so I know how to detect and avoid it.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- nickandbro 7mo agoWonder when 5.3 thinking will be released?
- naiv 7mo agoIt won't. They will go straight to 5.4 for thinking: https://x.com/OpenAI/status/2028909019977703752 https://x.com/OpenAI/status/2028909019977703752
- 9ersaur 7mo ago[flagged]
- ern_ave 7mo agoSince the page mentions: > Better judgment around refusals Has any AI company ever addressed any instance of a model having different rules for different population groups? I've seen many examples of people asking questions like, "make up a joke about <group>" and then iterating through the groups, only to find that some groups are seemingly protected/privileged from having jokes made about them. Has any AI company ever addressed studies like [1] which found that models value certain groups vastly more than others? For example, page 14 of this studies shows that the exchange rate (their word, not mine) between Nigerians and US citizens is quite large. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.08640 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.08640
- hereonout2 7mo ago> only to find that some groups are seemingly protected/privileged from having jokes made about them I'm not sure what specific groups you mean, but is this not a reflection of widely accepted social norms?
- LoganDark 7mo agoThey don't have to mean specific groups; I feel discussing specific groups here is likely to be counterproductive. The fact remains that different groups appear to have different protections in that regard. Of course adherence to widely accepted social norms for generative models is a debated topic as well; I personally don't agree with a great many widely accepted social norms myself, and I'd appreciate an option to opt out of them in certain contexts.
- hereonout2 7mo agoFeels like a big ask, I'm not sure where an option to allow ChatGPT to make socially unacceptable jokes would fit into OpenAI's strategy.
- LoganDark 7mo agoWhere did I ask about ChatGPT? I'm fine using alternative models or providers for autistic purposes.
- EthanHeilman 7mo agoHow likely is that they dropped this now to push the news story about quitGPT out of the headlines?
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- 1f60c 7mo agoNot super likely, I would say. We knew 5.3 was coming for a while and sama cannot stop talking about the current situation on X.
- mattnewton 7mo agoseems more likely it's coinciding with gemini 3.1 flash lite
- jpgreenall 7mo agoIs nobody else unsettled by the example? Strange timing to talk about calculating trajectories on long range projectiles?
- teraflop 7mo agoUnsettling, yes, but not strange at all. Given that OpenAI is working with and doing business with the US military, it makes perfect sense that they would try to normalize militaristic usage of their technologies. Everybody already knows they're doing it, so now they just need to keep talking about it as something increasingly normal. Promoting usages that are only sort of military is a way of soft-pedaling this change. If something is banal enough to be used as an ordinary example in a press release, then obviously anybody opposed to it must be an out-of-touch weirdo, right?
- jpgreenall 7mo agoInteresting take. Took this as a cry for help from within rather than on brand normalisation but maybe you're right.
- jonas21 7mo agoIt's basic physics, the sort of example you might find in a high school textbook.
- jpgreenall 7mo agoSure. But do we think the topic was chosen at random?
- BeetleB 7mo agoWhen primed, people will see things that aren't there.
- Imustaskforhelp 7mo ago
- jpgreenall 7mo agoUnsettling that the example talks about trajectories in long range projectiles given recent events..
- johnnyApplePRNG 7mo agoIndeed, it's a rather obtuse blunder.
- ibejoeb 7mo agoWas there a recent archery incident?
- hungryhobbit 7mo agoOpenAI just took a major US military contract from Anthropic because Anthropic had morals and wouldn't let the US military use Claude to surveil or attack US citizens ... ... and OpenAI didn't. The military said (effectively) "we need to be able to use AI illegally against our own citizens", and OpenAI said "we'll help!"
- ibejoeb 7mo agoOk. What does that have to do with archery?
- bengale 7mo agoOr OpenAI decided to allow democratically elected leaders to make defence decisions rather than have some corporatocracy to step in and start deciding what actions are moral. Even if you agree with Anthropic's moral stance I would hope people could see that allowing corporations to take on a role like that is a dangerous path.
- mmaunder 7mo agoThis kind of metalinguistic quotation from 5.2 right now drives me nuts! ```That kind of “make it work at distance” trajectory work can meaningfully increase weapon effectiveness, so I have to keep it to safe, non-actionable help.``` I'm really hoping all their newer models stop doing this. It's massively overused.
- ModernMech 7mo ago> The clear answer to this question — both in scale and long-term importance — is: Hmmm, I haven't seen AI use that kind of em dash parenthetical construction before.
- hallvard 7mo agoWhere’s the performance specs? Or is it simply a guardrails-release?
- visarga 7mo agoLooks like another bullet machine, the cheapest way to present a response.
- upmind 7mo agoI wonder when / if GPT will stop with the emdash.
- mihaelm 7mo agoNever, it’s a very effective punctuation mark. While it may not have been common in day-to-day messaging, it’s very common in writing of all sorts.
- derefr 7mo agoEm-dashes — always coming in pairs, like this — exist to clarify the shade of meaning of the thing that comes directly before the first em-dash of the pair in the sentence. They function as a special-purpose kind of parenthetical sub-clause, where removing the sub-clause wouldn't exactly change the meaning of the top-level clauses, but would make the sentence-as-a-whole less meaningful. (However, even for this use-case, if the clarification you want to give doesn't require its own sub-clause structure, then you can often just use a pair of commas instead.) ChatGPT mostly uses em-dashes wrong. It uses them as an all-purpose glue to join clauses. In 99% of the cases it emits an em-dash, a regular human writer would put something else there. Examples just from TFA: • "Yes — I can help with that." This should be a comma. • "It wasn’t just big — it was big at the right age." This should be a semicolon. • "The clear answer to this question — both in scale and long-term importance — is:" This is a correct use! (It wouldn't even work as a regular parenthetical.) • "Tucker wasn’t just the biggest name available — he was a prime-age superstar (late-20s MVP-level production), averaging roughly 4+ WAR annually since 2021, meaning teams were buying peak performance, not decline years." Semicolon here, or perhaps a colon. • "Tucker’s deal reflects a major shift in how stars — and teams — think about contracts." This should be a parenthetical. • "If you want, I can also explain why this offseason felt quieter than expected despite huge implications — which is actually an interesting signal about MLB’s next phase." This one should, oddly enough, be an ellipsis. (Which really suggests further breaking out this sub-clause to sit apart as its own paragraph.) • "First of all — you’re not broken, and it’s not just you." This should be a colon. You get the idea.
- 7mo ago
- simlevesque 7mo agoThey want to be Claude so bad.
- dainiusse 7mo agoOpenAI again making confusion with names...
- hmokiguess 7mo ago> why can't i find love in san francisco amazing how that's where we are now, coming from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Left_My_Heart_in_San_Francisco https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Left_My_Heart_in_San_Francis... in the 60s
- butILoveLife 7mo agoI unsubbed because ChatGPT was no longer SOTA. They def got cheap. Reminds me of that graph where late customers are abused. OpenAI is already abusing the late customers. Claude is pretty great.
- mediaman 7mo agoIt's odd because I no longer really like ChatGPT. For chat-type requests, I prefer Claude, or if it's knowledge-intensive then Gemini 3 Pro (which is better for history, old novels, etc). But GPT 5.3 Codex is great. Significantly better than Opus, in the TUI coding agent.
- reedlaw 7mo agoI don't know about Opus, but Codex suddenly got a lot better to the point that I prefer it over Sonnet 4.6. Claude takes ages and comes up with half baked solutions. Codex is so fast that I miss waiting. It also writes tests without prompting.
- butILoveLife 7mo agoMay be trying Codex on your suggestion. I was recently let down by its regular thinking.
- braebo 7mo agoI keep hearing this but I consistently get subpar results from anything other than Opus
- sothatsit 7mo agoChatGPT’s instant models are useless, and their thinking models are slow. This makes Claude more pleasant to use, despite them not being SOTA. But ChatGPT is still SOTA in search and hard problem solving. GPT-5.2 Pro is the model people are using to solve Erdos problems after all, not Claude or Gemini. The Thinking models are noticeably better if you have difficult problems to work on, which justifies my sub even if I use Claude for everything else. Their Codex models are also much smarter, but also less pleasant to use.
- sigbottle 7mo agoWell needed if the changes work as advertised. I realized from talking with 5.2 that the issue is not about being a yapper, or speaking too much about random factual tangents or your own opinions. That's easy to tune out, and sometimes it's helpful even. What's extremely frustrating is the subtle framings and assumptions about the user that is then treated as implicit truth and smuggled in. It's plain and simple, narcissistic frame control. Obviously I don't think GPT has a "desire" to be narcissistic or whatever, but it's genuinely exhausting talking to GPT because of this. You have to restart the conversation immediately if you get into this loop. I've never been able to dig myself out of this state. I feel like I've dealt with that kind of thing all my life, so I'm pretty sensitive to it.
- metalliqaz 7mo agoDon't use OpenAI models unless you want your full history to someday be shared with the US Government.
- yberreby 7mo agoThis applies to any US company. Have we forgotten everything we learned in 2012? If your data is shared with Google, Anthropic, Meta, Amazon, or any of their US competitors, it is within reach of the NSA. Whether or not a company provides support to the DoW is orthogonal to that fact.
- metalliqaz 7mo agoPerhaps, but recent developments have shown that OpenAI's "morals" are for sale and they are compliant with military goals.
- xXSLAYERXx 7mo agoRecent developments offer us evidence but did you really think this wouldn't be the case?
- metalliqaz 7mo agoAltman is a consummate liar so no, I didn't.
- Imustaskforhelp 7mo agoSome companies are more evil than others. OpenAI is more evil than Anthropic. Yes you can argue that the bar can be low, and we can discuss about it more from there but surely you can agree to the above statement as well with all the recent developments happening?
- bigyabai 7mo agoI think the distinction is pointless. If OpenAI and Anthropic both subscribe to a high baseline of evil, the difference in their principles or conduct isn't worth applauding. Anthropic's moral high-road means nothing contextualized with their Palantir partnership and preexisting DoD contract. It all feels reminiscent of Google and Apple fighting over who had the more secure ecosystem, when they had both already assented to hidden surveillance measures. Neither Anthropic nor OpenAI can be trusted for anyone that has even the slightest fear of the US government lashing out against them.
- jackfischer 7mo agoIs this only in ChatGPT proper and not in the API? Requests appear to 400 and it does not appear in `/v1/models`
- XCSme 7mo agoThey said it's available in the API too, in the blog post. EDIT: > GPT‑5.3 Instant is available starting today to all users in ChatGPT, as well as to developers in the API as ‘gpt-5.3-chat-latest.’ Updates to Thinking and Pro will follow soon. GPT‑5.2 Instant will remain available for three months for paid users in the model picker under the Legacy Models section, after which it will be retired on June 3, 2026.
- cyanydeez 7mo ago"Instantly believe, erroneously, that killing that suspect is correct" or "Instantly find confirmation bias for your illegal search & seizure of that ICE-protestor" os "Instantly tell yourself OpenAI is actually conformant with Open Source beliefs"
- c88224271 7mo agoWhat's the model ID? I tried `gpt-5.3-instant` but that does not work
- bob1029 7mo ago> GPT‑5.3 Instant is available starting today to all users in ChatGPT, as well as to developers in the API as ‘gpt-5.3-chat-latest.’
- c88224271 7mo agoWhat's the model ID? I tried gpt-5.3-instant but it says model does not exist Also don't see it on their model page
- timedude 7mo ago"GPT‑5.3 Instant is available starting today to all users in ChatGPT, as well as to developers in the API as ‘gpt-5.3-chat-latest.’ "
- dmix 7mo ago> GPT‑5.3 Instant also improves the quality of answers when information comes from the web. It more effectively balances what it finds online with its own knowledge and reasoning This is definitely something I've noticed GPT does much better than Claude in general. Claude preferences trying to answer everything itself without searching.
- Wowfunhappy 7mo agoInteresting, I actually think Claude searches too much. (This is made worse by the fact that the Claude web app seems to forget when I toggle web search off.)
- dmix 7mo agoMaybe it's like the GPT sales pitch, needs to find a better balance. Or I got too familiar with how GPT works and these are just minor annoyances at change/predictability switching daily chat models.
- CryptoBanker 7mo agoI'd agree - even in claude-code it's always trying to search for very basic documentation that, when prompted, it admits that it already has
- dbbk 7mo agoAnecdotal of course but I've found Gemini best when it comes to web searching, I guess because they built their own AI index
- trilogic 7mo ago>why can't i find love in san francisco Because that´s the last thing going on your mind in San Francisco. You have long ago before going there manifest to get funding and make money, The rest is blank. No need to ask AI for that LOL
- kseniamorph 7mo ago> We heard feedback that GPT‑5.2 Instant would sometimes refuse questions it should be able to answer safely, or respond in ways that feel overly cautious or preachy, particularly around sensitive topics. Lol it won't solve the issue when ChatGPT treats me like a teenager and tells me to ask my parents about everything (I just don't want to provide my ID to OpenAI to verify my age). Btw that's why I stopped using ChatGPT in my everyday life
- saurik 7mo agoI love how they come out with this article about the new 5.3 Instant, comparing it to the old 5.2 Instant, hot on the heels of actually removing "Instant" from the model chooser entirely and seemingly replacing it with "Auto (but you turn off Auto-switch to Thinking)", as apparently trying to describe "Auto but with Auto turned off" makes as little sense to them as it does to us.
- mvdtnz 7mo agoI love how every AI announcement is "introducing our best model yet" with a description about how their previous best yet was just laughable garbage and this one solves every problem.
- ddtaylor 7mo agoI kind of chuckled when I read the headline "GPT‑5.3 Instant: Smoother, more ..." LLM companies starting to sound like cigarette advertisements.
- harmoni-pet 7mo agoGPT-5.3 Instant: It's toasted...
- DrewADesign 7mo agoSounds more like the tagline for consumer GPUs these days.
- nandomrumber 7mo agoGPT Super Mild
- nakedneuron 7mo agoGPT Mildly Interesting
- kokanee 7mo agoLLMenthols
- throwawa1 7mo agoGPT Crush.
- patrulek 7mo agoWaiting for THChat
- riazrizvi 7mo agoWhat a strange-to-me announcement. I just submitted my first feedback comment last night, after using the platform for two years, where I said the responses were too long and padded with dramatic phrasing, and if it shortened them I could guide it better. Then today they announce this. What a time to be alive.
- jjcm 7mo ago"Instant" is really going to age poorly as far as a brand name goes, especially with Taalas ( https://chatjimmy.ai https://chatjimmy.ai ) proving out that baked silicon models can be truly instant. I was literally posting about this earlier this morning[1], but all data indicates that we'll have models equivalent to Opus 4.6 / GPT 5.3 with a truly instant (ie > 10k t/s) response time by 2028. Small models are getting better faster, and their ability to be baked into silicon in a power and speed efficient way is likely going to completely disrupt things. [1] https://x.com/pwnies/status/2028831699736637912 https://x.com/pwnies/status/2028831699736637912
- ProjectVader 7mo agoSo glad I cancelled my subscription last month. It's just a joke at this point.
- apsdsm 7mo agoI would be more impressed if it could give a straight yes/no answer to a yes/no question.
- oxqbldpxo 7mo agoPpl actually still use chatGPT???
- IshKebab 7mo agoThe emoji at the end of that poem is kind of hilarious.
- XCSme 7mo agoGemini 3.1 Lite with no reasoning does better than Gpt-5.3 with no reasoning? https://aibenchy.com/compare/google-gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-none/openai-gpt-5-3-chat-none/?order=openai-gpt-5-3-chat-none%2Cgoogle-gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-none https://aibenchy.com/compare/google-gemini-3-1-flash-lite-pr...
- jadbox 7mo agoGemini is also far cheaper: Total Cost: $0.256 [Gpt-5.3] vs $0.011
- XCSme 7mo agoUnless you set Gemini 3.1 Flash-lite to HIGH, then it uses a crazy amount of tokens for reasoning (and also leads to a worse result, maybe it's bugged on high?)
- agentifysh 7mo agoseems like gemini 3 flash is still cheaper unless im reading that website wrong from the benchmarks , not sure exactly what use cases 3.1 lite will be for
- XCSme 7mo agoGoogle kept promoting the "speed" of the model, so I guess it will be useful for some close to real-time use-cases, maybe live chat/support (?)
- sunaookami 7mo agoThe single biggest issue for me with ChatGPT right now is how absolutely awful it sounds in every answer. "Why it matters", "the big picture", "it's not jut you", the awful emphasis, the quotations with rhetorical questions, etc.. I don't know if it's intentional so you can easily spot ChatGPT-generated content on the web? The very first GPT-5 version was good but they ruined it immediately afterwards with "making the personality warmer" and making the same mistakes as 4o. I see now that they even ruined Japanese even though it was one of the best languages supported by ChatGPT (under "Limitations" at the end). I don't use it anymore, immensely disappointed.
- nine_k 7mo agoI suppose they'll soon introduce a more expensive tier that does not sound pompous. There will be plenty of converts.
- hazyc 7mo agoIt's a somewhat annoying to me as well, but I'm now able to read it and take the valuable content without getting hung up on those repetitive phrases. It also forces me to not simply copy/paste. I read the LLM output, think about it, comprehend it in my own voice internally, and then I write what I want/need by hand, so it ultimately comes out in my own style and I don't propagate the LLM output onto others needlessly.
- hn_throwaway_99 7mo agoGlad I saw a comment like this. TBH, while I may find the output style somewhat infomercial-ly, I don't really get the hatred. ChatGPT IS NOT AN ACTUAL PERSON. Like why do people care so much? Like you said, I just ignore the "persona" phrases, and just use ChatGPT (or, used to anyway, before switching to Claude because OpenAI leadership can suck it) to get information and answer my questions. Seriously, though, just stop using ChatGPT in any case, there are very good reasons to boycott it and there are other alternatives. Not saying the alternatives are saintly, but they're not as awfully duplicitous as OpenAI.
- 7mo ago
- chermi 7mo agoHow is this on frontpage but not 3.1 flash-lite?
- magicarp 7mo agoThink about who runs this website
- XCSme 7mo agoIt also seems to do same or slightly worse than gpt-5.2-chat on my benchmarks. No wonder they didn't show any benchmarks in their blog post (?) https://aibenchy.com/compare/openai-gpt-5-2-chat-none/openai-gpt-5-3-chat-none/google-gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview-low/ https://aibenchy.com/compare/openai-gpt-5-2-chat-none/openai...
- lacoolj 7mo agoThe examples given in the video about "over-caveating" are more like bug fixes than enhancements to the model. You don't see those kind of responses on most newer models ("Sure! Let's look at your physics question, but remember - it can't be used for evil, so don't ask!!!") OpenAI, yet again, launching something so it can pat itself on the back. Just merge with Anthropic and kill ChatGPT.
- czk 7mo agoclaude models with 'extended thinking' toggled answer very quickly and the quality of the answer is far ahead of what gpt 5.2 'instant' provides. i wont even bother using the non-thinking version of chatgpt because the quality of the answers is awful and usually incorrect.
- r_singh 7mo agoIt seems they've dropped automatic chat branch creation with prompt edits (at least for the most recent ones) and opted for overwriting the response. I was used to assuming the branches would remain.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- laalshaitaan 7mo ago[flagged]
- AlexeyBelov 7mo agoHits different? Is this another LLM account?
- guerython 7mo ago[flagged]
- scrame 7mo agoWhat's the point in learning to work with these models when a new one comes out every 2 weeks?
- heftykoo 7mo agoOpenAI's naming convention is slowly converging with Gillette razors. Can't wait for GPT-5.3 Instant Turbo Max Pro. Seriously though, if "Instant" just means a lower TTFT (Time To First Token) but regresses on complex reasoning, it's just a hardware accelerator for hallucinations. Fast wrong answers are still wrong answers.
- swordfish69 7mo agoWith enough prompt skill, you could write a tense and passable 10000-word short story with o1. I just tried 5.3 and it gave me headings every 200 words. Absolutely infuriating.
- notepad0x90 7mo agoI'm really curious how people take to OpenAI after the DoW fiasco. I know consumers are mini-revolting, but will it stick? Devs ultimately decide their B2B revenue. But most don't have a choice in the matter I suppose.
- shirro 7mo agoIn 30 years the only sort of novel idea anyone has come up with for making money out of tech that has got any real traction is harvesting people's data. Web search - data harvesting. Social media - data harvesting. LLM as a service - data harvesting. Is that because the same money people keep betting on the same sorts of ideas from the same sort of graduates from the same cultural background? There was crypto coins but pyramid schemes have been around forever. Why would anyone with a shred of awareness want to subscribe to any LLM service. Particularly a foreign one where that data could potentially end up in the hands of business competitors, political enemies, extortionists or others. That goes for all of the cloud really. Like WTF people. Why do you do this?
- danielparsons 7mo agoBecause it's useful... I do wonder if all this extra user data will be of much use. I suppose it could make commerce frictionless, recommending the exact product/service to you at the ideal moment, before you've even heard of it. But the nature of innovative products and services is that most people don't know how to use them yet, and therefore they can't be recommended based on user data. So idk...
- rambojohnson 7mo agosuper mild. Instant, as in... ?
- sbinnee 7mo agoI am always confused with the gpt names. So, via API, it's called "gpt-5.3-chat-latest". I haven't used their web UI for a while. Would this mean that this is the default model for their chat UI?
- ai-christianson 7mo ago[dead]
- agenthustler 7mo ago[dead]
- month13 7mo agoChatGPT kicked off with 3.5, now this is the reverse. Would be fun to drag race these against each other, the harbinger of a revolution against now the fast path serve billions model.
- rimeice 7mo agoDon’t know about anyone else, but I find OpenAI irrelevant now. I bought an anthropic pro account to get Claude code and now just use Anthropic for everything. I can’t see anything drawing me back to OpenAI ecosystem. What am I missing?
- Jean-Papoulos 7mo agoThis malformed awful website redirects me to the French version no matter what I do. I even changed the url to en-US and it still does. Stop treating me like a child, OpenAI.
- sunaookami 7mo agoSame for my language, you have to change it at the bottom...
- motbus3 7mo agoWow. Will they also use this to kill people?
- eliteeee 7mo agoits cool I guess
- lanejohnson 7mo agoDennis Taylor Roger epperson Jason Steele Kim car dash e on Kathy smith Robyn brockman Larry brockman Jacob beall Brad Morris Silas Holloway troy matheson Ian Greene Jared Larson Aubrey Larson Landon Larson Dave Wagner Jeff Wagner bua construction billy Kirk billy Griffiths billy Lancaster .....James Becky Ben Hector Vasquez Millie Taylor mindy brewer
- lanejohnson 7mo agoBrad Morris Jake beall Jared Larson Aubrey Larson Landon Larson Dave Wagner Jeff Wagner bua construction billy Kirk billy Griffiths billy Lancaster troy matheson Ian Greene Jared Larson ken panko Katherine Cain Roger epperson Jesse epperson Carmen epperson Shane McCabe Justin McCabe terror squad Rico gang members
- lanejohnson 7mo agoCall the FBI these people are using military grade weapons of mass destruction trying to control everything every time and smith VICK Vasquez Millie Taylor Ryan Taylor Erickson construction Arizona something gotta give
- lanejohnson 7mo agoThose people have elevator phone lines at NORAD in the springs Chucky miller Patrick Pipkin military guys stealing secrets check it out
- lanejohnson 7mo agoAlex Herrera Cindy shipp Margaret shipp William kenderes Oroville California