Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
imtringued
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
imtringued
5d ago
You forgot to add the necessary context to make your comment less abrasive: The draw the rest of the owl meme is not meant to be insightful at all. This makes it sound like you're trying to tear the author down. You are comparing them
2.
▲
by
imtringued
5d ago
The expert swapping architecture is very nice. Have you considered doing nested reinforcement learning where you use the nesting as a sort of low pass filter? The concept is as follows: You train a critic to mimic the datastream and then yo
3.
▲
by
imtringued
5d ago
If LPDDR6 PIM ever becomes a thing then the advantage of HBM will shrink. I'm not saying LPDDR6 PIM will make HBM obsolete in the datacenter or where it is currently shining, I'm saying that large volumes have their own charm and
4.
▲
by
imtringued
5d ago
Nah his point is a bit simpler. Vector units can process a limited amount of data per time unit. Memory can load a limited amount of data per time unit. If you have infinite memory bandwidth you just move the bottleneck back to compute so b
5.
▲
by
imtringued
5d ago
Classic DRAM stacks up to four wafers on top of each other and then is packaged with BGAs. The manufacturer can check the DRAM chips independently. Soldering the DRAM onto a PCB is such a reliable process that there is almost zero risk of d
6.
▲
by
imtringued
5d ago
Correct and that is why bash coding agents like pi.dev got things completely backwards with their anti-minimalist bloated core tools. No, giving the agent access to every single command on the system is not minimalist. It is actively detrim
7.
▲
by
imtringued
5d ago
https://github.com/google/ax/blob/main/docs/concepts.md >A Model is not a model. It is a named model configuration: ... Remember kids, a model is not a model.
8.
▲
by
imtringued
6d ago
So you're saying the person you are responding completely failed to make their point clear? Why use a for loop with a bound as an example instead of while loops with linked lists? He or she can prompt an LLM for a better example so laz
9.
▲
by
imtringued
6d ago
Your explanation is completely insane. > but Turing tought us that is indeed a hard task! Analyzing whether a bounded loop terminates is impossible, got it. >Or it could decide to apply it by default and accept that in those cases the
10.
▲
by
imtringued
6d ago
You don't know what an editor or LSP is, if you genuinely believe that.
11.
▲
by
imtringued
7d ago
No the math is correct and that is how I understood it as well.
12.
▲
by
imtringued
7d ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent Computing * Agent architecture, a blueprint for software agents and control systems * Agent-based model, a computational model for simulating the actions and interactions of individu
13.
▲
by
imtringued
7d ago
You just took Boeing adding a secret system that can cause a plane to crash and then blamed the pilots who were unfortunate to be a victim of malfunctioning sensors and then put all the blame on them because pilots who didn't want to d
14.
▲
by
imtringued
7d ago
I haven't posted anything on this HN submission yet, but all I'm claiming is that Twitter was so successful under Elon's management that he thought it was better to roll it into SpaceX than to keep it independent. Kind of lik
15.
▲
by
imtringued
7d ago
Splitting a linked list is an O(n) operation. You can slice up arrays in O(1). The default type is incredibly clear to me.
16.
▲
by
imtringued
8d ago
You're trading it away at a 50:1 ratio though. The point of the example is that with the first choice you have 5% legitimate customers and 5% malicious "customers" and by letting all of them in aka all 10%, you get maximum cu
17.
▲
by
imtringued
8d ago
Looks good for HPC but the AI performance is only good against other CPUs. Even Intel GPUs can beat the quoted numbers within that power envelope.
18.
▲
by
imtringued
9d ago
It looks to me like it is an AI optimized HPC CPU and while HPC CPUs are actually quite fast, they are not particularly well suited for transformer based neural networks. It's weird that they don't give out any of the interesting
19.
▲
by
imtringued
9d ago
Nothing forces developers to write a complete specification of the algorithm. You want to have it both ways. If developers keep the spec concise but incomplete, then you say the spec is incorrect so now you have to prove that the spec is co
20.
▲
by
imtringued
9d ago
The developers of pi.dev are geniuses. They add a --tools flag, which can only add tools onto the built-in tools, so if you wanted to sandbox pi.dev by adding sandboxed versions of the existing tools you will have to run pi.dev via pi
21.
▲
by
imtringued
9d ago
This is correct. People seem to get the wrong idea about why agentic coding is even a thing in 2026. The naive AI techno optimist which has basically displaced the vast majority of opinions on HN, thinks that the models got "smarter&qu
22.
▲
by
imtringued
9d ago
That would require vendors to either stick with a single backwards compatible ISA like intel did for x86 or document how their graphics cards work. CPUs manage this by changing the internal micro-architecture, but historically GPUs only nee
23.
▲
by
imtringued
10d ago
>How do you test and monitor outbound access against program that adapts itself to get around things? Current generation LLMs don't do that. Also you can just prompt it to not hack systems on the internet and the model follows that
24.
▲
by
imtringued
10d ago
CORBA had the concept of distributed objects which is a terrible idea in practice.
25.
▲
by
imtringued
11d ago
You can't know if he is an outsider so your argument runs into nothing. If you kept explaining why AI won't remove the CUDA moat and doubled down on that, then swerner would have kept silent, meanwhile your comments would stay so
26.
▲
by
imtringued
11d ago
It's really sad that they are only a few years away from making backpropagation completely obsolete.
27.
▲
by
imtringued
11d ago
>There's nothing deterministic about weather, so hopefully you're not just being disingenuous. You're the one being disingenuous. Look at what you wrote. > Is AI less deterministic than an airline dealing with weather?
28.
▲
by
imtringued
12d ago
>What sort of robot would you need to load and unload a dishwasher, collecting and storing the crockery etc.? What sort of robot would you need to load and unload the laundry, fold and store the clothes? https://www.inceptivem
29.
▲
by
imtringued
12d ago
Correct, when you think about it, all the "world is designed for humans" statements inherently assume that humans are still needed for the specific task to be automated. For example, we bolt robot arms on tables, so that the work
30.
▲
by
imtringued
12d ago
This is something people in this discussion don't seem to understand. It's not the LLM that is cheating or misaligned, it's OpenAI and Anthropic.
More ›