Dylan16807

4 ms·

1.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
That sounds bad to me! The TOS argument was so awful it deserves some kind of bonus loss, but let's put that aside for now. Let's say I paint a fence, and my neighbor complains I ruined a particular segment that shouldn't hav
2.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
They make it slightly easier to find the end of a sponsor segment, while still requiring me to manually interact with the video. As an ad blocker I score that either F+ or D-.
3.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
The point is that "unified architecture" is a buzzword unrelated to what actually makes things fast.
4.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
Yes, some do. So similar bandwidth to a Max but with lots of slower cores. Half as much as an Ultra.
5.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
I don't expect China to be a particularly large competitor in the next year or two affected by the decision in the article, but they'll help a lot in the long run. Micron's NY fab had a press release two months ago that they
6.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
> You said: That wasn't me. Also they're talking about the short to medium term. On that time scale they're not wrong. The market is so far from fixing it right now, it's going in the opposite direction. The market
7.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
No, this article is not about new fabs.
8.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
What specifically did that say that you think is wrong? Supply is currently moving the wrong way. Supply and demand for consumer DRAM will get even worse, even if it will "definitely fix this" in the long run. And the fact that
9.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
Can you link a specific benchmark? Keep in mind that non-Pro threadripper is still only 256 bits wide and Pro is 512. And the memory is 30% slower than with an M5. So an M5 Ultra has 3x the memory bandwidth of the best threadripper.
10.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
Scale and experience almost entirely share between HBM and normal memory. And they're both in large-enough scale production to not have a big difference on availability; if you're willing to pay HBM prices you should find even mo
11.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
> Compare that to the 128 bit wide bus of a modern CPU. Or 256-512 bits on medium to high end consumer CPUs if you're apple. At least DDR6 is probably widening things 50%.
12.
by Dylan16807 5d ago
Not really? It's just trying to make an honest ranking.
13.
by Dylan16807 6d ago
Is there a significant reason to want those to use the same address space as the normal internet? Especially with the layering, I would think you could put this in a routing header? > Yggdrasil subnet addresses only have 56 bits of crypt
14.
by Dylan16807 6d ago
The first comment was kind of iffy when it was also talking about buffers and characters, and focusing on code points is mostly a bad focus. It's worth bringing up so nobody thinks fixed width at a single layer is particularly useful,
15.
by Dylan16807 6d ago
No worries, that would use female sign, not woman.
16.
by Dylan16807 6d ago
Good luck defining "expected" for most of the more complex cases.
17.
by Dylan16807 7d ago
Well it's not bigger ...
18.
by Dylan16807 7d ago
> Once it's established that person A has given _any_ details to person B, the upper bound on "expected cost of an effective defense" is dramatically higher. Yeah but that's what clean room is . You said "A cle
19.
by Dylan16807 7d ago
If we were running out of cheap coal anyway then we would have been better off without the surge in natural gas. Higher prices would promote a faster shift directly from coal to solar (or nuclear if the price works out). And there was alre
20.
by Dylan16807 7d ago
While worth understanding, it's a completely different topic from the article.
21.
by Dylan16807 7d ago
If you could remove a gigaton of usable coal from the world and replace it with an equivalent amount of natural gas, that would be a nice improvement. When the natural gas is displacing coal by being cheaper, that's pretty bad in the l
22.
by Dylan16807 8d ago
> This is tautological, “mathematician” being defined in the modern world as someone paid to do mathematics… Note that I'm including all the ones that a normal definition would not call paid, but your definition does. But yes when
23.
by Dylan16807 8d ago
What you just did is come up with a better reason. But I would suggest replacing "seems" with the best numbers available.
24.
by Dylan16807 8d ago
The best backup method doesn't need any computer knowledge, it's writing down or printing a few passwords and putting that piece of paper in the same box as your taxes or birth certificate.
25.
by Dylan16807 8d ago
I think by that definition every mathematician in the current day is funded, mission accomplished.
26.
by Dylan16807 8d ago
Big Mac 580 calories, Whopper 680 calories. At least based on the first official numbers in each google search. They both have a variety of sizes but it's a similar range and they have similar contents.
27.
by Dylan16807 8d ago
> And if calculus was the only useful thing to come out of 1600s mathematical research, it would have been worth it. The other dead ends don't need to justify themselves. Getting one thing of this magnitude justifies it all It would
28.
by Dylan16807 8d ago
Yes you have to allow people to pursue these things. That's not a compelling argument for funding, especially when nobody was funding the people that did invent calculus.
29.
by Dylan16807 8d ago
Assuming I understand what you mean by "people", then this comment sounds completely correct and contradicts your last comment. Your last comment said person B could be sued for copyright infringement. But the essence of clean-
30.
by Dylan16807 8d ago
> There is no extra code between the parens. You have a plus and an exponentiation in there. That's code. var n = 2**55 + 1 console.log(n) isOdd(n) n is 36028797018963970. isOdd(n) is giving you the right answer. Put

More ›