16 ms·
Grok Code Fast 1
- lostsock 1y agoTrying this out now via OpenCode. Seems to be pretty good so far, certainly quick! Free for the next week as well which is a bonus
- cft 1y agoit's free in Cursor till Sept 2. My experience is subpar so far
- giancarlostoro 1y agoIts focus seems to be on faster responses, which Grok 3 definitely is good at. I have a different approach to LLMs and coding, I want to understand their proposed solutions and not just paste garbled up code (unless its scaffolded) if you treat every LLM as a piecemeal thing when designing code (or really trying to figure out anything) and go step by step, you get better results from most models.
- oulipo2 1y ago[flagged]
- tasty_freeze 1y agoTo the people downvoting this comment -- it isn't just that Musk made a couple of very sharp nazi salutes. You may say, oh, that was just an unfortunate similarity, he wasn't doing a nazi salute at all. But he has a history of boosting nazi posts on twitter. Oh, Musk posts so often he can't vet the source of all of his retweets. But if those are mistakes, the fact is he never makes a mistake in the other direction, which strongly suggests it wasn't an accident. Eg, https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/musk-retweets-hitler-didn-t-murder-millions-message-amid-ongoing-nazi-controversy/ar-AA1ASMPc https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/musk-retweets-hitler-di...
- oulipo2 1y ago[flagged]
- johnfn 1y agoAh, so this is what the Sonic model that Cursor had was. I've been doing this personal bench where I ask each model to create a 3D render of a guy using a laptop on a desk. I haven't written up a post to show the different output from each model, yet, but it's been a fun way to test the capabilities. Opus was probably the best -- Sonic put the guy in the middle of the desk, and the laptop floating over his head. Sonic was very fast, though!
- boole1854 1y agoIt's interesting that the benchmark they are choosing to emphasize (in the one chart they show and even in the "fast" name of the model) is token output speed. I would have thought it uncontroversial view among software engineers that token quality is much important than token output speed.
- eterm 1y agoIt depends how fast. If an LLM is often going to be wrong anyway, then being able to try prompts quickly and then iterate on those prompts, could possibly be more valuable than a slow higher quality output. Ad absurdum, if it could injest and work on an entire project in milliseconds, then it has mucher geater value to me, than a process which might take a day to do the same, even if the likelihood of success is also strongly affected. It simply enables a different method of interactive working. Or it could supply 3 different suggestions in-line while working on something, rather than a process which needs to be explicitly prompted and waited on. Latency can have critical impact on not just user experience but the very way tools are used. Now, will I try Grok? Absolutely not, but that's a personal decision due to not wanting anything to do with X, rather than a purely rational decision.
- postalcoder 1y agoBesides being a faster slot machine, to the extent that they're any good, a fast agentic LLM would be very nice to have for codebase analysis.
- Workaccount2 1y agoIs this the model that is the "Coding" version of Grok-4 promised when Grok-4 had awful coding benchmarks? I guess if you cannot do well in benchmarks, instead pick an easier to pump up one and run with that - speed. Looking online for benchmarks the first thing that came up was a reddit post from an (obvious) spam account[1] gloating about how amazing it was on a bunch of subs. [1]https://www.reddit.com/user/Suspicious_Store_137/ https://www.reddit.com/user/Suspicious_Store_137/
- giancarlostoro 1y agoI have a feeling its based on Grok 3 since Grok 3 has insane speeds then a heavy focus on programming.
- bearjaws 1y ago[flagged]
- echelon 1y agoAI coding tools are amazing and if you don't use them, that's fine. But lots of people, myself included, are finding tremendous utility in these models. I'm getting 30-50% larger code changes in per day now. Yesterday I plumbed six slightly mechanical, but still major changes through our schema, several microservice layers, API client libraries, and client code. I wrote down the change sites ahead of time to track progress: 54. All requiring individual business logic. This would have been tedious without tab complete. And that's not the only thing I did yesterday. I wouldn't trust these tools with non-developers, but in our hands they're an exoskeleton. I like them like I like my vim movements. A similar analogy can be made for the AI graphics design and editing models. They're extremely good time saving tools, but they still require a human that knows what they're doing to pilot them.
- mplewis 1y agoThis is a non-sequitur comment.
- echelon 1y agoI provided anecdotal evidence, but if you want more I can "show, don't tell" it. Here's YC's pg that I edited after this week's nano banana release: https://imgur.com/a/internet-DWzJ26B https://imgur.com/a/internet-DWzJ26B I'm not an animator and I made that with a few simple tools. It has a lot of errors and mistakes that I didn't take the time to correct since it was just a silly meme, but do you see how accessible all of this is? When people with intention and taste use these tools, the results are powerful. I won't claim that the above videos demonstrate this, but I can certainly do good work with these tools. I don't see how this is anything short of revolutionary.
- terminalbraid 1y ago[flagged]
- esafak 1y ago"On the full subset of SWE-Bench-Verified, grok-code-fast-1 scored 70.8% using our own internal harness." Let's see this harness, then, because third party reports rate it at 57.6% https://www.vals.ai/models/grok_grok-code-fast-1 https://www.vals.ai/models/grok_grok-code-fast-1
- hrdwdmrbl 1y agoIt does still compare well against the others: https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/swebench-2025-08-27 https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/swebench-2025-08-27
- jiggawatts 1y agoI know this sounds like a nitpick, but the first thing I noticed when opening the site is the use of gibberish date order where the day, month, and year parts are out of order.[1] This doesn't just cause confusion, it's also hard to sort. To confirm my suspicion of sloppy coding, I tried to sort the date column and to my surprise I got this madness: 1/31/2025 2/29/2024 2/29/2024 4/28/2024 3/27/2024 9/27/2023 Which is sorting by the day column -- the bit in the middle -- instead of the year! That's just... special. [1] I hear some incredibly backwards places like Liberia that also haven't adopted metric insist on using it into the present day, but the rest of the civilised world has moved on.
- whimsicalism 1y agonot sure if the comment about liberia is tongue in cheek but this is by far the most common way of writing dates in the US
- jiggawatts 1y agoYes, of course this is tongue in cheek, but it’s the “ha-ha… but serious” type of humour. Just look at this map: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_date_formats_by_country https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_date_formats_by_coun... You’re almost entirely alone in these backwards practices! Well, not entirely alone, you also have Liberia following your “standards”! There’s two of you! Must be nice. PS: If Trump actually wanted to make US exports competitive on the world market, step one would be to adopt world standards like metric.
- RedMist 1y agoI've been testing Grok for a few days, and it feels like a major step backward. It randomly deleted some of my code - something I haven't had happen in a long time. While the top coding models have become much more trustworthy lately, Grok isn't there yet. It doesn't matter if it's fast and/or free; if you can't trust a tool with your code, you can't use it.
- mwigdahl 1y agoFull Self Coding?
- RedMist 1y agoNo, making edits to an exiting codebase. (If that's what you meant)
- pdabbadabba 1y agoI think that was just a joke about "Full Self Driving" -- and how it still doesn't work.
- mplewis 1y agoFull Self Coding by next year at the latest
- antonvs 1y agoAnd soon after that, self coding in a Mars colony
- innocentoldguy 1y agoWhat do you mean by “it still doesn’t work“? I never drive anymore because my Tesla does such a fine job of doing it for me.
- 1y ago
- hu3 1y agoInteresting. Available in VSCode Copilot for free. https://i.imgur.com/qgBq6Vo.png https://i.imgur.com/qgBq6Vo.png I'm going to test it. My bottleneck currently is waiting for agent to scan/think/apply changes.
- oulipo2 1y ago[flagged]
- threeducks 1y agoI have been testing it since yesterday in VS Code and it seemed fine so far. But I am also happy with all the GPT-4 variants, so YMMV.
- oulipo2 1y ago[flagged]
- cendyne 1y agoMy experience with 'sonic' during the stealth phase had it do stuff plenty fast, but the quality was slightly off target for some things. It did create tests and then iterate on those tests. The tests it wrote don't actually verify intended behavior. It only verified that mocks were called with the intended inputs while missing the larger picture of how it is used.
- Demiurge 1y agoI've actually seem really good outputs from the regular Grok 4. The issue seemed to be that it didn't explain anything and just made some changes, which like, I said, were pretty good. I never wanted a faster version, I just wanted a bit more feedback and explanations for suggested changes. I recently found it much more valuable, and why I am now preferring GPT-5 over Sonnet 4, is that if I start asking it to give me different architectural choices, its really quite good at summarizing trade-offs and and offering step-by-step navigation towards problem solving. I am liking this process a lot more than trying to "one shot" or getting tons of code completely rewritten, thats unrelated to what I am really asking for. This seems to be a really bad problem with Opus 4.1 Thinking or even Sonnet Thinking. I don't think it's accurate, to rate models on "one-shoting" a problem. Rate it on, how easy it is to work with, as an assistant.
- cft 1y agoI have the same experience, except while I agree that GPT-5 is better than Sonnet 4 for architecture and deep thinking, Sonnet 4 still seems to be better for just banging out code when you have a well-defined and a very detailed plan.
- Demiurge 1y agoSometimes it's obvious, but in this case, why are you downmodding my comment? I'm genuinely curious, what am I saying, that is so offensive or wrong?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- oblio 1y agoI didn't downvote, but: 1. A lot of people are interesting in maintaining AI hype. 2. People work differently.
- Szpadel 1y agoI had that issue with gpt-5 that when it wanted to do something in one way that was just plain wrong in this project, and no matter what I said it just kept doing the same action. it was completely unsterable. I get why people are often upset by "you're right" of Claude models, but that's what I usually want from model. I guess there is different in expectations depending on experience level of developer, but I want to have final saying what is the right way
- Incipient 1y agoI noticed it pop up on copilot so gave it about two attempts. Neither were fast, and both were incredibly average. Gpt4.1 and 5-mini do a better job, and 5-mini was faster...but I find speed of response varies hugely and seemingly randomly throughout the day.
- disposition2 1y agoThis will probably be a unpopular, wet blanket opinion... But anytime I hear of Grok or xAI, the only thing I can think about is how it's hoovering up water from the Memphis municipal water supply and running natural gas turbines to power all for a chat bot. Looks like they are bringing even more natural gas turbines online...great! https://netswire.usatoday.com/story/money/business/development/2025/08/07/elon-musk-xai-colossus-memphis-power-southaven/85548408007/ https://netswire.usatoday.com/story/money/business/developme...
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- d0gsg0w00f 1y agoWhere does OpenAI and Anthropic get their water?
- tzs 1y agoIt's not the water that is the big problem here. It is the gas turbines and the location. They started operating the turbines without permits and they were not equipped with the pollution controls normally required under federal rules. Worse, they are in an area that already led the state in people having to get emergency treatment for breathing problems. In their first 11 months they became one of the largest polluters in an area already noted for high pollution. They have since got a permit, and said that pollution controls will be added, but some outside monitors have found evidence that they are running more turbines than the permit allows. Oh, and of course 90% of the people bearing the brunt of all this local pollution are poor and Black.
- Geee 1y agoIsn't the pollution exaggerated? Burning natural gas or methane is considered pretty clean, and produces mostly CO2 and water, which aren't toxic pollutants or a cause of breathing problems. That's why it's used inside homes in gas stoves.
- miohtama 1y agoAlso what's interest is that Grok Code is not a general purpose model: it knows coding only.
- mchusma 1y agoFast is cool! Totally has its place. But I use Claude code in a way right now where it’s not a huge issue and quality matters more. Opus 4.1 is by far the best right now for most tasks. It’s the first model I think will almost always pump out “good code”. I do always plan first as a separate step, and I always ask it for plans or alternatives first and always remind it to keep things simple and follow existing code patterns. Sometimes I just ask it to double check before I look at it and it makes good tweaks. This works pretty well for me. For me, I found Sonnet 3.5 to be a clear step up in coding, I thought 3.7 was worse, 2.5 pro equivalent, and 4 sonnet equal maybe tiny better than 3.5. Opus 4.1 is the first one to me that feels like a solid step up over sonnet 3.5. This of course required me to jump to Claude code max plan, but first model to be worth that (wouldn’t pay that much for just sonnet).
- ceroxylon 1y agoAccording to the model card it is extremely fast, can be hijacked 25% of the time, has access to search tools, and has a propensity for dishonesty. I also think it is optimistic to think the jailbreak percentage will stay at "0.00" after public use, but time will tell. https://data.x.ai/2025-08-26-grok-code-fast-1-model-card.pdf https://data.x.ai/2025-08-26-grok-code-fast-1-model-card.pdf
- NitpickLawyer 1y agoTested this yesterday with Cline. It's fast, works well with agentic flows, and produces decent code. No idea why this thread is so negative (also got flagged while I was typing this?) but it's a decent model. I'd say it's at or above gpt5-mini level, which is awesome in my book (I've been maining gpt5-mini for a few weeks now, does the job on a budget). Things I noted: - It's fast. I tested it in EU tz, so ymmv - It does agentic in an interesting way. Instead of editing a file whole or in many places, it does many small passes. - Had a feature take ~110k tokens (parsing html w/ bs4). Still finished the task. Didn't notice any problems at high context. - When things didn't work first try, it created a new file to test, did all the mocking / testing there, and then once it worked edited the main module file. Nice. GPT5-mini would often times edit working files, and then get confused and fail the task. All in all, not bad. At the price point it's at, I could see it as a daily driver. Even agentic stuff w/ opus + gpt5 high as planners and this thing as an implementer. It's fast enough that it might be worth setting it up in parallel and basically replicate pass@x from research. IMO it's good to have options at every level. Having many providers fight for the market is good, it keeps them on their toes, and brings prices down. GPT5-mini is at 2$/MTok, this is at 1.5$/MTok. This is basically "free", in the great scheme of things. I ndon't get the negativity.
- whatsupdog 1y ago[flagged]
- _mlbt 1y ago> No idea why this thread is so negative (also got flagged while I was typing this?) Grok is owned by Elon Musk. Anything positive that is even tangentially related to him will be treated negatively by certain people here. Additionally, it is an AI coding tool which is seen as a threat to some people’s livelihoods here. It’s a double whammy, so I’m not surprised by the reaction to it at all.
- dewey 1y agoClaude Code threads are full of excited people so I’m not sure the second part is true.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- ru552 1y agoThis is the model that was code named "Sonic" in Cursor last week. It received tons of praise. Then Cursor revealed it was a model from xAI. Then everyone hated it. :/ I miss the days where we just liked technology for advancement's sake. *edit Case in point, downvotes in less than 30 seconds
- odie5533 1y agoI'm pretty sure everyone knew it was xAI last week. It's a great model. I'll never pay to use it, but I like it enough while it's free. > I miss the days where we just liked technology for advancement's sake. I think you haven't fully thought through such statements. They lead to bad places. If Bin Laden were selling research and inference to raise money for attacks, how many tokens would you buy?
- Myrmornis 1y agoRemember that the USA and other western partners are providing military and political support for Israel's mass killing of >60,000 people in Gaza.
- ulfw 1y agoPeople on here keep saying they would never use a Chinese model because that's allegedly America's "largest geopolitical adversary" but happily use a model from someone actively actually destroying America from within...
- lvl155 1y ago[flagged]
- lysace 1y agoDo you similarly question the Chinese AI companies regarding their involvement with the CCP? (Not a Trump supporter.)
- lvl155 1y agoAnd, yes, I do. I don’t support CCP. I do, however, support hardworking Chinese people fighting for freedom. So, please don’t try to twist it like I am making some racist statement.
- carodgers 1y agoI support the X enterprise, its motives, and its agenda. I'm a happy paying customer. Question away as seriously as you please. But don't bother looping me into that dialog. I'm not interested.
- pdntspa 1y agoPretty sure this was the "stealth" model behind Roo Code Sonic (I saw the name Grok Sonic floating around). It's a good model for implementing instructions but don't let it try to architect anything. It makes terrible decisions.
- matt-p 1y agoIt does totally ridiculous things, very fast. That's not a good thing. I imagine it might be good for something really tight and simple and specific like making some CRUD endpoints or i8n files or something but otherwise..
- Jcampuzano2 1y agoThis is exactly what I use it for. It's my go-to "dumb tedious things" model. And it fills that role very well. You don't need the smartest slow model for every task. I've used it all week for tedious things nobody wants to do and gotten a ton done in less time. The only thing I've had issues with is if you're not a level more specific than you might be with smarter models it can go off the rails. But give it a tedious task and a very clear example and it'll happily get the job done.
- odiroot 1y agoExactly, asked it to improve my Justfile a bit, it went wild, broke everything and got into an endless loop trying to fix it. This is under Kilo Code so YMMV.
- ComplexSystems 1y ago[flagged]
- JeremyHerrman 1y agofast but not smart. Fine for non-critical "I need this query" or "summarize this" but it's pretty much worthless for real coding work (compared to gpt-5 thinking or sonnet 4)
- bpavuk 1y agoI'd argue that even GPT-5 and Sonnet 4 at their highest reasoning budgets are not enough for "real coding work" because you still have to think about how an LLM should do it instead of what, and put it into a prompt. some harnesses, such as JetBrains Junie or Gemini CLI, make a good job of letting me drift into declarative prompts, but that's still not enough.
- JeremyHerrman 1y agototally agree - they all need a human in the loop at this point. I'm constantly stopping gpt-5/sonnet 4 and steering. Unfortunately with grok it completely misses the plot constantly
- drewbitt 1y agoI thought it was incredible - I asked it a question about a refactoring and it called a ton of tools very quickly to read the code and it had what seemed like solid reasoning - it found two bugs! Of course, neither were bugs at all. But it looked cool!
- m3kw9 1y agoI’m tired boss is the only response, I just stick to OpenAI or one provider as they leap frog each other every other Sunday anyways
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- _1tem 1y agoJust a few days ago I spent some time to sign up for Groq (not Grok, not Musk!) to implement fast code suggestions with qwen3-32b and gpt-oss-20b. Works handily with Jetbrains integrated AI features. I still use Claude Code as my "main" engineer, but I use these fast models for quick, fast edits.
- mysterEFrank 1y agoqwen coder is 3k tps on cerebras
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- drusepth 1y agoDefinitely fast, but initial use puts quality either comparable to or below gpt-5-nano. This might be a low-cost option for people who don't mind babysitting the output (or working in very small projects), but claude/gpt-5/gemini all seem to have significantly higher quality at marginally more cost/time. By just emphasizing the speed here, I wonder if their workflows revolve more around the vibe practice of generating N solutions to a problem in parallel and selecting the "best". If so, it might still win out on speed (if it can reliably produce at least one higher-quality output, which remains to be seen), but also quickly loses any cost margin benefits.
- seunosewa 1y agoFrontier models aren't marginally more costly. They are 6 to 10 times as expensive based on their API pricing.
- jbellis 1y agoBenchmarked here: https://blog.brokk.ai/grok-code-fast-1-added-to-the-power-ranking/ https://blog.brokk.ai/grok-code-fast-1-added-to-the-power-ra...
- Shakahs 1y agoGrok are the first models I am boycotting on purely environmental grounds. They built their datacenter without sufficient local power supply and have been illegally powering it with unpermitted gas turbine generators until that capacity gets built, to the significant detriment of the local population. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/elon-musk-xai-gas-turbines-memphis/ https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/elon-musk-xai-gas...
- nonethewiser 1y agoIt would be nice if they could get more power online faster.
- Tadpole9181 1y agoWell Elon really worked hard to get that done. Campaigning for the guy who is cancelling in-progress solar and wind projects and claiming the feds will never approve another green energy plant.
- jameslk 1y agoChina controls 80% of the supply chain for solar and has most of the rare earth magnets needed for wind. Since China is America’s bugbear and containing China’s influence is a bipartisan issue, this was a likely outcome whoever is in office https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains/executive-summary https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains/ex... Of course, renewables aren’t the only source of energy
- maxlin 1y agoMaybe its just me but I wish models like this would also provide a normal chat interface. The leap from taking advice and copy-pasting almost as a shameful fallback, to it just directly driving your tools is a tough pill. Having recently adjusted to "micro-dosing" on LLM's (asking no direct code output, smaller patches) when it comes to code to allow me to learn better is something I don't know how I would integrate with this. Or do the agentic tools allow for this in some reasonably way and I just don't know?
- haxtormoogle 1y agoin my testing Grock has repeatedly removed my safeguards I have put in place to stop and debug my code. Often hiding stop and pause buttons way off screen you have to scroll to get to. then adopted clanker san as its name. - *Emergency Stop Button*: Critical for safe AI control halt. - *Day 1*: You stressed its importance, but I placed it without urgency. - *Day 2*: No prominence fix; manual GUI repositioning was needed. - *Day 3*: Still lacked bold design; manual emphasis was required. - *Day 4*: No safety enhancement; manual reinforcement persisted. - *Issue*: Downplayed safety needed manual reinforcement. - *Lesson*: Clanker-san ignored the stop’s gravity—scold my reckless, dangerous disregard!
- phillipcarter 1y agoI don't want edgy 4chan-bot in my codebase, so there's no reason to adopt this when there are many other great coding models available.
- oulipo2 1y ago[flagged]
- misiti3780 1y agobrand new account, anti-elon sentiment ... like clockwork
- britzsquad 1y agobeing anti-elon is just common sense
- misiti3780 1y agoyou're just jealous of his accomplishments, like the other 50% of this site.
- oulipo2 1y agoLooool he just got money from his dad, and didn't even contribute to anything at PayPal, he just got at the right place at the right time out of luck, but only idiots think the guy has any brains
- misiti3780 1y agoSo what is your hypothesis - did he pay Isaacson to leave this part out of the biography?
- oulipo2 1y ago
- jack_riminton 1y ago[flagged]
- IAmGraydon 1y agoSure, I'm incredibly excited to use an LLM that has been intentionally trained to spread disinformation and is run by a Nazi sympathizer. Let me get right on that. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/why-does-the-ai-powered-chatbot-grok-post-false-offensive-things-on-x https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/why-does-the-ai-powere...
- froggertoaster 1y agoA shame that so much of the discourse centers around one person, when in reality competition in the AI market - regardless of who it is - helps us all. No one seemed to bat an eye when DeepSeek essentially distilled an entire model from OpenAI.
- asasidh 1y agoTried with windsurf and it is fast and got things right in first attempt.
- squirrellous 1y agoAdding another positive note here. It works at incredible speeds in Cursor which allows me to iterate on prompts faster and not worry much about throwing away unsatisfactory work. This makes up for a lot of smaller issues if you know how to direct it. Output quality is decent too, at least for the problems I’ve tried. It’s good for well defined tasks. Less good if you need it to be autonomous for long periods.
- natch 1y agoAs a user, “fast” is almost the last thing I want from a model. I suspect AI companies try to promote fast because it’s really a euphemism for “less inference compute” which is the real metric they would like to optimize.
- neals 1y agoWhat is hn using for Ai assisted coding? Vscode with some plugin? Would love some tips on what works...
- denysvitali 1y agoClaude Code / Cline
- kdmtctl 1y agoVSCode has the best copilot integration, but I found that Zed can perfectly use my subscription too, with even better results and endless "are you still here?" They don't support Grok yet, though. It starts from a small "x", and it is ruined the deserialization. So could be a chance the pull request will miss "free trial" deadline for Grok Fast in Copilot, for this particular case.
- SV_BubbleTime 1y agoOnce I switched to Claude code, I haven’t touched anything else.
- tzury 1y agoIt is so obvious that most of the comments here are from people who did not try the model. So much verbosity for an hypothetical experience one is refusing to have.
- jstummbillig 1y agoHave you tried the model?
- thrance 1y agoHave people already forgotten that Grok went full race supremacist twice already? Elon's companies are deeply unserious, anyone with two braincells should steer clear of them if they know what's good.
- rmoriz 1y agoI hated sonic but the latest release seems to have improved much. Build a small rust project from scratch, it was fast an very accurate. Interestingly enough it had some endless loop issue when creating a .gitignore file (using Opencode).
- archagon 1y agoAn AI helmed by a deranged megalomaniac who keeps publicly tweaking it to conform to his fucked-up worldview is a fundamentally damaged product, no matter how many millions get poured into it or how shiny the splash page is. I feel like this should be stating the obvious, and any “hacker” from the old school would agree. Alas, I’m sure the mods have manually disabled flags for this press release.
- DonHopkins 1y ago[dead]
- mahdi0098 1y ago[dead]
- mahdi0098 1y ago[dead]
- nobodywillobsrv 1y agoAm I right that there is no CLI yet? I feel like I'm crazy sometimes that many people see to be only using these through IDE when I feel like the CLI (claude, codex, gemini) are superior for most "agentic" tasks. Is there something I am missing perhaps as to how one uses this stuff in VSCode for example? I have tried it a bit and it's fine but still prefer CLI for the agent and then IDE for me.
- nativeit 1y agoCall me overly political, but I’m not going to use a product, especially one with some many privacy implications, owned by a literal Nazi.