tw04

4 ms·

1.
by tw04 12d ago
I would imagine if there is oil in the electric motors that is “lifetime” but test really probably 300k miles, so if you drive the car into the ground, you probably would want to service that at some point, assuming they are serviceable wit
2.
by tw04 14d ago
TBH the president should primarily be relying on trusted, competent advisors that they’ve surrounded themselves with. They can’t possibly be experts in enough areas to make unilateral decisions. Which is probably why Biden didn’t attack Ira
3.
by tw04 15d ago
> you would hope OpenAI has very good tools for this, but a full data trail of all inputs is difficult to trace through. They have a financial incentive not to track any of this, so why would they? OpenAI’s entire business model is predi
4.
by tw04 19d ago
I won’t claim the A/B test is a good one, but I can say I canceled my blazer EV reservation when they announced it wouldn’t support carplay or android auto.
5.
by tw04 21d ago
The question isn’t whether prisoners work in other countries which I’m confident you know and dodged. The question is whether the prisons in Brazil are private, and are allowed to sell prison labor FOR A PROFIT, incentivizing both greater i
6.
by tw04 21d ago
And does Brazil have their own 13th amendment that allows them to use prison labor as their modern slave workforce?
7.
by tw04 23d ago
Good? The amount of just flat out wrong information the average LLM spits out makes it unfit for education IMO. I can’t imagine asking teachers to have to personally vet every single lesson plan to ensure an AI wasn’t hallucinating when pr
8.
by tw04 27d ago
> They chose to base their enterprise on the work of others, only to pull the ladder up behind them. This is literally why BSD exists in the first place. To allow companies compete freedom with the code, including freedom to not release
9.
by tw04 1mo ago
> but if you think the people selling lettuce at farmers markets or farm stands have any verified food safety or food handling expertise, they don't. I don’t think they have the oversight corporate farmers do. But I also don’t think
10.
by tw04 1mo ago
Yes, one side wants radical things like universal healthcare, collective bargaining, a ban on citizens united. The other wants to eliminate women’s suffrage, revoke citizenship because of skin color, and destroy pesky hindrances to business
11.
by tw04 1mo ago
We’re talking about the memory shortage that exists for all of us because AMAZON and all the other hyperscalers locked it down with long term commitments for huge purchases? Pardon my skepticism that amazon is facing the same shortage that
12.
by tw04 1mo ago
Yes? The US is currently running out of oil. The strategic reserve has been drawn so low it is in danger of failing. The US economy is being propped up by an AI bubble, and the folks currently in charge of Iran are even more tied to Russia
13.
by tw04 1mo ago
As I’ve said from the beginning, just ask yourself: what would Putin want? Every baffling, self destructive move Trump makes, basically always aligns to a long stated goal of Russia.
14.
by tw04 1mo ago
The announcement being made by a CEO that wasn’t born in America is just the cherry on top. Can’t wait for the complete surprise when his citizenship is revoked. I imagine it will be something about “I thought they were just targeting the b
15.
by tw04 1mo ago
Decade not decades. Which coincides with… Trump’s first term. https://statbase.org/data/chn-solar-power-generation/
16.
by tw04 1mo ago
I’m willing to bet AI made that website and nobody bothered to verify.
17.
by tw04 2mo ago
The fact the list ends at 2 women who were already named, when the men involved number in the hundreds and are still being protected, kind of ruins your point…
18.
by tw04 2mo ago
To be clear, you want me to articulate a point that you fabricated and then attributed to me? I think I’m going to pass, but feel free to continue the discussion with yourself about things I didn’t say.
19.
by tw04 2mo ago
The world would almost assuredly be a better place if 14 year olds were looking at playboy magazines instead of having easy access to every fetish under the sun. It has distorted many a young man’s ideas of intimacy and sexual relations.
20.
by tw04 2mo ago
No, not all. I can only assume you've never even taken an entry level poli sci course, because socialism has never required COMPLETE ownership by the state. Furthermore, as I linked previously, in China it is north of 70% ownership b
21.
by tw04 2mo ago
Correct, it was absorbed by crypto bros. And now many of them are attempting to offload to AI. Ban crypto datacenters and there’s plenty of additional capacity available. There’s a reason China did almost a decade ago now.
22.
by tw04 2mo ago
State ownership of companies is LITERALLY the definition of socialism. > a theory or system of social organization that advocates the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, capital, land, etc., by the communit
23.
by tw04 2mo ago
China doubled down, what on earth are you talking about? Every major corporation in China has a party member in a position of power to direct what the company does. And many of them have state ownership. https://sccei.fsi.stanfo
24.
by tw04 2mo ago
Given that after the advent of virtualization we had a glut of datacenter space, and then the crypto bros started buying them up to mine: do we actually need more datacenters? Or do we just need regulators to say things like: mining crypto
25.
by tw04 2mo ago
How is that “a problem with FIPS?” In layman’s terms that basically says if there’s a 0-day, patch first and we’ll worry about validation later. You could say that’s “an issue” with literally every software package that has a support contra
26.
by tw04 2mo ago
Joyent was founded in 2004. Bryan joined in 2014 - I doubt he had much, if any, say in the sale proceeding or not.
27.
by tw04 2mo ago
https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/iran-strikes-us-bases-mid... From a military standpoint, yes. You have to have your head buried in the sand to think we didn’t have significant loss of military assets in the region.
28.
by tw04 2mo ago
Minimal cost? We’re at about a billion dollars per primary target and rising. Not to mention north of 250 US casualties. I’d hardly call that minimal cost. Our ability to defend our allies in the region is non existent, and we lost almost
29.
by tw04 2mo ago
Given that all of the advisors who warned against starting something with Iran called this out as a risk (before hegseth cleaned house of anyone competent willing to speak up), why do you think this is so unbelievable?
30.
by tw04 2mo ago
If I can reinvest my profits to grow my business or pay most of it out in taxes I’m probably reinvesting it if there’s a long term gain to be had. Unlike trickle down economics, it’s not just a failed theory. It’s something we’ve seen in ac

More ›