nonethewiser

4 ms·

1.
by nonethewiser 5d ago
But if it was always an option and they didnt do it then they didnt think it was in their best interest
2.
by nonethewiser 5d ago
> Yes I see that as an ad. Do you not? You are implying something false. That he’s suggesting thats not an ad. Hes not suggesting that at all. What he’s suggesting is that that’s very different from Disney gating or interspersing movies
3.
by nonethewiser 5d ago
They always had the option to do that
4.
by nonethewiser 5d ago
Isn’t this the same as just telling it the goal directly but with more steps?
5.
by nonethewiser 6d ago
The original comment was not correct. The federal government has not shrunk. Further comments revealed that they conflated federal government with federal workforce which is clearly false. Are executive orders part have the federal governme
6.
by nonethewiser 6d ago
Why is men being hopeful presented as strange? The author could have written: “I encountered a predominantly male crowd that was unusually enthusiastic about Bitcoin.” But instead the journalist made a psychological diagnosis. “lost boy,” “
7.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
I disagree with you that OpenAI and Anthropic are slave traders. But I think we agree that there are regulated industries built around systems which we don’t fully understand.
8.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
Because the federal government’s footprint is not it’s workforce. Domain of influence, spending, etc. Has the spending increased? Do we have more programs? Have more string been attached to state funding? Are there more executive orders?
9.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
No. Again, it required Danish agreement and was contingent on the North Atlantic Treaty. From 1951: > “ In order that the Government of the United States of America as a party to the North Atlantic Treaty may assist the Government of the
10.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
Usually when someone threatens you they should get less, if anything.
11.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
>The US has been in Greenland, and have had complete military control with it, for many decades. Not quite. They needed authorization from Denmark for establishing bases and the agreement was contingent on the North Atlantic Treaty. This
12.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
>Denmark never denied an approval, so it has no meaningful difference. Sure there is a difference. The old agreement required Danish agreement for new defense areas. They forfeited that control. Its like saying an API requiring authoriza
13.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
Also, the previous deal didn’t let the U.S. expand its military presence without Denmark approval. And it was contingent on the North Atlantic Treaty. The new deal is permanent. I dont know why people think this isnt more permissive for the
14.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
>And the poor human is still stuck inside the dataset, none the wiser. HELP
15.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
>Leaving aside the quality of the different posters here, I think the interesting question is where did the default AI generated style come from? This is what I find interesting too. Claude’s writing style too. It’s quite unique and real
16.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
>Like my friend Coda says all the time: "the textual nature of prompts leads us to take the intentional stance towards systems which aren’t conscious, and thus miss the essential nature of their non-meaning." What does this mea
17.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
>The radical shrinking of the federal government under Trump has happened at a speed and on a scale that is unprecedented. Citation needed
18.
Opus 5 has a Noun Problem(reddit.com)
6 points by nonethewiser 7d ago|1 comments
19.
by nonethewiser 7d ago
Its great to see some of the Claude writing weirdness properly diagnosed. Now I wonder why it happens. Not at all what youd expect.
20.
by nonethewiser 8d ago
Sure… but being wrong doesnt necessarily make it a hallucination: >It was only just before the planned operation that officials dug deeper into the report put together by a special operations command analyst and found it had been generat
21.
by nonethewiser 8d ago
> Isn’t it convenient that nobody understands? How could we possibly regulate something that isn’t understood? You mean like the human body? The brain?
22.
by nonethewiser 8d ago
But isnt the point that it did roll a 17. And no one knows exactly how (in the case of LLMs)? Therefor any description of the conclusion should be thought of as an anology. Decided, randomly accessed, etc.
23.
by nonethewiser 8d ago
I always wonder how people can suggest LibreOffice over Word or Google Docs. Its much worse. Either people are just extremely motivated to use it or they don’t actually use it. You are exactly right that it is not an open source success. I
24.
by nonethewiser 9d ago
This is an interesting claim since their cameras dont seem to capture video. Just still images.
25.
by nonethewiser 9d ago
>The dream was that you could separate content from presentation and content Yeah. And you cant effectively do that. Even this project proves it. You have to know which CSS features never to use. You know, like CSS3, which started in 19
26.
by nonethewiser 9d ago
Do you grant that there are poorly written laws? Are you defending PPWR? Not in spirit but actual implementation? It will never get so-far as the judge because the EU has already admitted the law cant be followed and arent going to be takin
27.
by nonethewiser 9d ago
So ... what? Dictation? Neuralink thought-to-text?
28.
by nonethewiser 9d ago
But we're talking about Claude right? Not some bespoke app powered by AI? The interface cant only be wide enough to rent cars.
29.
by nonethewiser 9d ago
You know
30.
by nonethewiser 9d ago
Trying to impose this kind of structure on the agent workflow creates more work and decreases quality. It's an illusion of control.

More ›