Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ralfd
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ralfd
5d ago
Lots of suboptimal play though in base setup. I wonder if a top player could beat Pluto if they could train against this bot and find weaknesses. Edit: The bot also maphacks
2.
▲
by
ralfd
5d ago
> but unless someone--a human--can verify and understand it Why though a human? Mathematical proofs are very ivory-towery, but if OpenAI would solve a subkind of Cancer, without mortal humans understanding, cancer is still be healed.
3.
▲
by
ralfd
6d ago
I go against the grain and say that I dislike the egg. It is spiritually stupid and heretic and morally fake enlightened.
4.
▲
by
ralfd
12d ago
Maybe to protect the project from internal politics?
5.
▲
by
ralfd
12d ago
Come on, be honest, what did you do?
6.
▲
by
ralfd
15d ago
> humans are social animals. True, but the driver is a stranger to me. Herd animals like cattle/horses, are highly suspicious of, and stressed by, strangers. And imagine how uneasy two chimps could react when meeting for the first t
7.
▲
by
ralfd
16d ago
> The original iphone was full of tradeoffs that made it not a great phone at launch. Hard disagree. It was a great phone. The only disadvantage was battery life, if you were a heavy phone user you needed to charge it to get through the
8.
▲
by
ralfd
16d ago
Zero alcohol
9.
▲
by
ralfd
17d ago
How is a researcher quitting a PR stunt?
10.
▲
by
ralfd
17d ago
https://xcancel.com/hilbertspaess/status/2097476208908972230... From Jacob: > A common response is “if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?” At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the
11.
▲
by
ralfd
17d ago
The idea in AI Risk circles is that the first true Scary Intelligence wins, as it can recursively advance itself and exponentially outgrows/hack any following (weaker) B or C intelligence.
12.
▲
by
ralfd
18d ago
No. Public Law 80-242 applies strictly to terrestrial geography. Outer space and celestial bodies fall outside the jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior.
13.
▲
by
ralfd
18d ago
This is just intellectually lazy. Do you think Google has a team to maximize law breaking?
14.
▲
by
ralfd
24d ago
> Apple's App Store centralized despite trillions of dollars in ostensible market damage Please. The Androidfication of iOS with malware/scamware would cost quadrillions in market damage.
15.
▲
by
ralfd
24d ago
Quick question: Did you use AI for that post?
16.
▲
by
ralfd
26d ago
Furthermore: The Eiffel Tower was planned to be temporary, it only still stands because it was used as a radio tower.
17.
▲
by
ralfd
28d ago
Even if it is a publicity stunt it was not lobbied by Elon Musk. Also Jeff Bezos Blue Origin got more money for the Artemis program.
18.
▲
by
ralfd
1mo ago
That link is from 2022 presumably about the twitter purchase. People like the guy in the link thought Twitter would go offline hard after firing almost all of the company, instead Elon was right and there was so much fat to cut.
19.
▲
by
ralfd
1mo ago
That is a modern phenomena though. Classic scifi was optimistic and utopian. But today even Star Trek has to be bleak/gritty/depressing.
20.
▲
by
ralfd
1mo ago
Brazil and Portugal being different doesnt seem stable. I guess Brazils usage will win out?
21.
▲
by
ralfd
1mo ago
“Squirting” was ridiculed at the time and the word itself scaring away women. Jobs killed it then in an interview with a classic quote: Microsoft = Cold tech and Apple = Humanity. MS scares her away, Apple gets the girl. > QUESTION: Micr
22.
▲
by
ralfd
1mo ago
But other users are not aligned to me, other people are the worst and potentially highly dangerous. Im serious, not sarcasm.
23.
▲
by
ralfd
2mo ago
What sloppy slop is that? > Labor is a resource, like water, and yet we do not drain the oceans with the same fervour as we employ people, trying to find a job for every drop. This analogy doesn't make any sense! It is fake-poetic n
24.
▲
by
ralfd
2mo ago
That is stupid ranting. RSS (and Atom) were too nerdy and the mainstream did and does not care for it. Google did not „destroy“ it
25.
▲
by
ralfd
2mo ago
Yes. The game was already hurt this world cup with the flow destroying „hydration breaks“ to sell more ads.
26.
▲
by
ralfd
2mo ago
There is not much rocket debris in Boca Chica. If you do find something sell it on ebay.
27.
▲
by
ralfd
2mo ago
I dont get the irony. Google respects if one doesnt want to get indexed by the crawler: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/...
28.
▲
by
ralfd
2mo ago
Cant you in this case point out that obviously it is an old twxt and there is no copyright?
29.
▲
by
ralfd
2mo ago
I dont think it will generate much discussion. Maybe if it were Google, certainly if it were Apple, but with Microsoft people will just shrug and go „eh, what did you expect“.
30.
▲
by
ralfd
2mo ago
Context?
More ›