17 ms·
What is the main use case for X these days? Is it still as popular as it used to be? Clearly the exodus that happened when Musk took it over didn't kill it but
by NoboruWataya 1mo ago
What is the main use case for X these days? Is it still as popular as it used to be? Clearly the exodus that happened when Musk took it over didn't kill it but I do seem to see fewer links to it than I used to.
Whenever I do see it linked on here it seems to be because one of the big tech CEOs has said something on it.
- cdrnsf 1mo ago[flagged]
- abawany 1mo agoI made the mistake of searching it yesterday via a proxy while trying to search for local police news (why do our govts use these mechanisms to publish first) and ran into threads calling for ethnic cleansing of south asians from Texas. Not a great read.
- cdrnsf 1mo agoI'd love to see public agencies or anyone making any sort of significant public announcements use any other platform. FTP a text file to a server for all I care, but I'm not risking a search of a platform that openly encourages extremism and discourages moderation.
- brunoarueira 1mo agoI think Mastodon or something similar would be really good, without a central moderation.
- kalleboo 1mo agoThey could literally just post to a WordPress blog with the ActivityPub plugin, and then people can either just read it on the website, or follow it from a fediverse/mastodon account.
- dylan604 1mo agoWhere else do you suggest they post? Publishing to the socials casts the widest net form them. If they operate their own website and post there, a number approaching zero would see the posts. Do you expect a new app per municipality to be a solution? Or one app to become a new platform just to interact with gov't agencies that the other platforms already provide? You have the question, but have you spent any time coming up with answers/suggestions?
- cdrnsf 1mo agoA municipal website? A text file on a file server? Not a login-gated social media platform owned by the world's richest edgelord.
- matsemann 1mo agoIn Norway most withdrew from X. Norwegian police made a webpage, an rss feed, some push system and an API. So others have made bots that repost on various social media, but the source is no longer in a walled garden.
- abawany 1mo agoMulti-publish is a thing that is managed by numerous publishers. Right now, most govt sites ime no longer publish at all on their sites or rss but instead update one of facebook or twitter, depending on their preference. If they can afford to buy 70k usd suvs at taxpayer expense, they should also be able to figure out how to publish on mechanisms without walls, such as rss or their own site.
- jerlam 1mo agoMy locale uses Nixle to send people alerts: https://www.everbridge.com/products/nixle/ https://www.everbridge.com/products/nixle/
- dwedge 1mo agoLike all social media, your feed depends partly on who you follow and partly on behavioural cues their algorithms can determine about you (such as who you interact with, sites you visit). It may be skewed one way or another more than other social networks, but even so, you should be careful saying a social media is a racist bigoted right wing echo chamber because it can sound not like a recital of popular media but more personal experience
- cdrnsf 1mo agoGiven who controls the algorithm, I don't think there's anything inaccurate about the statement.
- snailmailman 1mo agoOne of the many reasons I stopped using the platform is because after Elon took over, my carefully tuned algorithmic feed stopped showing me content I was interested in and instead promoted bigots and nazis into my feed. Nearly all of the accounts I followed promptly went elsewhere instead of having to endure the platform. I only check literally one account occasionally, and via xcancel. The last post I looked at on the platform was vaguely supportive of the LGBT community- all top replies were all blatantly homophobic and had slurs in them. It was via xcancel so I wasn’t logged in. That’s not a personalized algorithm showing me bigotry that’s just what the platform is now.
- naasking 1mo agoLinking to X is less useful than it used to be.
- g-b-r 1mo agoIt's actively harmful to many people, copy and paste the text if there's no other source
- bee_rider 1mo agoIIRC you can’t even read a single post without an account, it is equivalent to posting a link to a private Facebook group or whatever from an outsider point of view.
- naasking 1mo agoYou can read posts you link to directly, but no comments. That's what makes it less useful.
- iamnothere 1mo agoThey changed this slightly, and 1-3 “top” comments are now sometimes visible, but you can’t dig into the thread. And if you click anything you get popups asking you to log in.
- delecti 1mo agoWhat's difficult is reading threads, or more broadly replies. But single posts? Absolutely fine, in fact it's about the only thing that is totally functional without being logged in.
- bee_rider 1mo agoOh, weird. I didn’t think there was a way to get rid of the pop-over that hides the post on iOS Safari. But it turns out that there’s a button to close it, just, completely disconnected from the pop-over and hanging out with a bunch of unrelated UI.
- spike021 1mo agoI've made a lot of friends in Japan through shared interest communities that are mostly on twitter. Most are people I've actually met whenever I am in Japan.
- q8zd3 1mo agoIt's a social experiment about [variable] universal basic income
- rogerrogerr 1mo agoCan you expand on this? I'm not tracking.
- nemomarx 1mo agoThey have those payouts for check marks? A lot of people post click bait for views to bring in small amounts of money, usually from a poorer country I think
- q8zd3 1mo agoVerified profiles get money based on engagement rate of their posts, only from other verified profiles; I don't think I need to tell you the quality of said posts, AI slop included. They are literally getting money (not making) without producing anything and that aligns with Elon's world view of a jobless civilization driven by AI and robots.
- rogerrogerr 29d agoAre they not producing anything? I agree that I place no value on slop, but my grandparents sure do. Maybe what they're producing is net negative value at the societal level, but (unfortunately?) they're not producing nothing.
- giancarlostoro 1mo agoThere's people from all walks of life and all corners of the internet on there still, good and bad. Twitter was always a darned mess, the only difference now is you can't just report people and bully them off the site. Contrast to me trying to open BlueSky, and seeing death threats and other insane things. I've also heard (though never personally seen, nor do I want to) that BlueSky has a CSAM problem. Those two factors alone kept me from even trying it out. What's really weird is there were a ton of claims that disappeared, about how X was full of bots, but X is the opposite of full of bots. Maybe there's one or another, but they're highly under the radar, X has improved their bot problem drastically. Edit (tweaked some words, and wanted to add): Then there was Threads, I am not in any way interested in "New Twitter" by Mark Zuckerberg, no thanks.
- utopiah 1mo ago[flagged]
- tolerance 1mo agoI would love to see a visual representation of what you think those sort of people look like.
- davidw 1mo agoProbably pretty ... banal, like Hannah Arendt pointed out.
- utopiah 1mo agoFiction would led us to believe they look ugly or gorgeous... history has shown us they look very banal.
- tolerance 1mo agoRight. All that's left is for us to figure out how to specify the type of banality you and I and our sibling commenter are imagining.
- gdulli 1mo agoThe biggest social networks can only die slowly. They have too much momentum for the the type of sudden exodus that was possible when the internet had not yet absorbed the entire population.
- dredmorbius 1mo agoUnless they're shut down. G+ comes to mind. (Several billion profiles, tens of millions active. Shut down 1 Apr 2019. Yes, April Fools' Day.)
- tokioyoyo 1mo agoDepends on the algos. My jp account sees none of that, mostly news, jokes and some random what’s happening in parts of Japan. NA tuned account has more of what you said.
- rootsudo 1mo agoThe algos aren’t language neutral yet. Yet. Japanese twitter users are a reflection of who they are, etc etc Doesn’t mean there isn’t toxic stuff though.
- tokioyoyo 1mo agoAfter some time, and muting/skipping through the usual japanese race-content, it’s more bearable. Fastest way for me to find the reason why a train line is down and etc. Like last week my feed was all about Chiba flooding. Very relevant.
- anonzzzies 1mo agoGuess one has to, because there are just too many people on there. I don't like it but what can I do. What I hate the most is that states/countries, prime ministers and kings post on there. And that the emergency services of some countries have that as primary channel. I understand cross posting to the most popular social channels, but primary? That SHOULD be a local channel, not some dystopian shit hole you could be banned from randomly.
- angoragoats 1mo agoI have not used Twitter since 2022 (nuked my account) and I have not missed it even once. You should give it a try.
- 23asfdnb 1mo agoAll journalists and politicians are there, including left wing. If you want to know e.g. what the Prime Minister of Pakistan really said instead of some news spin, you have to read his tweets. It is an elite club, and Musk wants you to pay for it. I don't know why it is legal for EU politicians to use this walled garden for important messages. Someone outside of the US jurisdiction (China?) has to keep xcancel.com running.
- TitaRusell 1mo agoBreaking news. If a bomb goes off or a plane goes down people post it to X.
- shermantanktop 1mo agoPersonally I have zero interest. If it's a big enough deal, it'll get to me somehow. Knowing about it 15s after it happened and then seeing a flood of uninformed speculation would be stressful. Others do value that, no judgment, but for me it's be a net negative.
- vatsachak 1mo agoYeah browsing every stressful piece of news on X was unironically increasing my cortisol levels
- stephen_g 1mo agoYeah, I used to watch things like this, I stopped using Twitter the second it became called 'X' and actually find I don't miss it including the major event live-tweeting. Since then I've had a look on XCancel when there have been major events once or twice and yeah, most of the flurry of real time updates turn out to be misinformed or just plain wrong later anyway... I don't miss it.
- shermantanktop 1mo agoLiterally the next thing that happened after I posted this yesterday: my kid texted me that Dolly Parton had died. That’s how some news gets to me—- it’s important to someone I know. It turns out that that is both a good filter and fast enough propagation.
- asdff 1mo agoI mean, if it is real it's on every wire service there is too, with slightly less hysteria.
- derbOac 1mo agoThey post it other places also in my experience. Twitter doesn't have the monopoly on that it used to.
- vaylian 1mo agoThere is a lot of Ukraine war reporting on twitter.
- cmrdporcupine 1mo agofwiw a lot of the key accounts for this now also post to both Bluesky and Mastodon
- senderista 1mo agoI don't follow the war anymore but I used to follow twitter OSINT accounts supporting both sides; I find it hard to imagine pro-Russian accounts posting on bsky or fedi?
- KingMob 1mo agoDunno about fediverse, but there's definitely a bunch on bsky. Or there were, at least; I've blocked a bunch, and my feeds don't show me more, so maybe they're gone.
- senderista 1mo agoHuh, I'm not on bsky so I wouldn't know. To be clear, I was not talking about troll accounts, but about OSINT accounts that generally try to present accurate info and happen to be pro-Russian. E.g. when I was following this stuff there was a medical student in the Dominican Republic who was running such an account. And of course there are many pro-Russian Telegram channels who are highly critical of the government and military (often for being insufficiently hawkish).
- dopa42365 1mo agoThose are all telegram reposts, barely anyone in the former combloc uses twitter.
- dwedge 1mo agoThis is only tenuously related but every single Mac app I see advertised on X by verified accounts is malware. I reported one last week to them, they said it's not malware. I appealed it and said the install link is copy and paste obfuscated base64 into your terminal, and they said after review it doesn't break their terms. So whatever else they do, they take money to knowingly promote malware.
- jerlam 1mo agoIt's not just Mac apps. A Twitter ad is a negative indicator, and makes me less interested in the product.
- zahlman 1mo ago> the install link is copy and paste obfuscated base64 This doesn't make it malware, as likely as it is that malware would hide itself like that. base64 encoding avoids issues with quoting and escaping in the terminal, and is an easy way to include a bit of binary data that might be needed by a command (or even just written directly to disk somewhere). "Obfuscated base64" is only saying something if you decoded the base64 and still got an obfuscated result. Install-time code execution is more dangerous in the sense that you can't review between installation and program execution; but custom installers come from the same source as the program, so it's the same number of parties to trust. For that matter, PyPA still maintains bootstrap.pypa.io so that Python users can get current versions of pip by downloading and running a Python script that loads a base85 string, decodes it and writes a wheel file based on that. (It even duplicates some of the standard library `ensurepip` logic.) If you want a malware report to be taken seriously, in general, you should expect to roll up your sleeves and be able to provide an analysis of concrete malicious behaviour.
- dwedge 1mo ago> If you want a malware report to be taken seriously, in general, you should expect to roll up your sleeves and be able to provide an analysis of concrete malicious behaviour. I reported them all the Cloudflare and Cloudflare took them down. One moved away from Cloudflare, and Twitter kept them up. I reported another to NiceNIC and they asked for: 1. Verifiable malicious download file or sample hash 2. Screenshot or screen recording with the full URL visible 3. Evidence of malicious scripts, obfuscated code, or download chain 4. HTTP response, redirect chain, headers, or packet capture data 5. Third-party security verdict tied to the specific URL or file I just ignored them. I don't work for them and if they want to host illegal content then it's not my business decision. This one in particular had the download in base64, piping into Javascript and running a binary as a fake Apple Updater script. But I am sick of this attitude that it's my responsibility for a malware report to be taken seriously. If they introduce malware bounties then ok, but otherwise I'm doing them a favour by reporting it and if they want to continue to host it after reasonable being made aware of its existence, they should be legally responsible.
- shevy-java 1mo agoActually I retired from twitter before Musk, because twitter started to censor me. But of course once Musk took over, constantly raising his right arm, I knew twitter was dead. Here in Europe nobody wants to see selfish and ruthless right-wing nuts control ecosystems. Billionaires pulling the strings does not work; the USA need to learn this lesson first.
- slater 1mo agoAre you gonna tell us how Twitter started censoring you, or is this a "which opinions, mf-er" goose meme situation?
- kotaKat 1mo agoYou know what, I'll throw my hat into the ring on Shitter censorship: Once enough 'big' accounts block you for any arbitrary reason they like, your account is heavily downweighted enough to send your replies, posts, and everything into yet another class of shadowban that isn't a shadowban. I've never interacted with the ilks of people like a16z and yet their Twitter block definitely causes a heavier algo downrank impact just 'being' there.
- veeti 1mo agoTerminally online, infighting and purity testing leftist weirdos who never have and never will achieve anything politically continue to push "nazi bar" rhetoric, but actual people just don't give a shit. Here's some far right nazis for your reference: https://x.com/vonderleyen https://x.com/vonderleyen https://x.com/ZelenskyyUa https://x.com/ZelenskyyUa https://x.com/liandersson https://x.com/liandersson https://x.com/AmnestyEU https://x.com/AmnestyEU
- janejeon 1mo agoI'm surprised people didn't mention this, but I find it to be unbeatable in these two areas: 1. Japanese community 2. Porn (good god, so much porn)
- bluecalm 1mo agoA lot of interesting people who do interesting things post on X. You can follow them and have interesting feed. You don't get it on FB/Insta or Tiktok. >>Whenever I do see it linked on here it seems to be because one of the big tech CEOs has said something on it. Yeah just a big tech CEOs posting (or an author of a big project, or an engineer working for a top lab), nothing to see here. On to another dancing teenager on TikTok. Let's watch some pranks or a "beauty influencer" on Insta where we are at it instead.
- fg137 1mo agoFrom what I can tell, most Twitter users outside English speaking countries don't care about who is the CEO at all. Business as usual.
- miladyincontrol 1mo agoThats sorta my situation, a scene I'm rather involved in has most the international users there, as such thats where things still live. Every other alternative has failed to gain enough traction for one reason or another. Its usually either limited features, regional accessibility issues, or platforms like metas' just basically trading one big bad organization for another.
- shaky-carrousel 1mo ago[flagged]
- notthemessiah 1mo agoEnglish is still the lingua franca of Europe. I find that users in all parts of Asia still use Xitter heavily (though some artists in East and Southeast Asia fled when the Grok edit button was added), and only nazis and campist communists still use Xitter in the US.
- cbeach 1mo ago[flagged]
- timmytokyo 1mo agohttps://bsky.app/profile/artcandee.bsky.social/post/3lgdvykc5yc27 https://bsky.app/profile/artcandee.bsky.social/post/3lgdvykc...
- cbeach 1mo agoThat Bluesky link is sign-in-walled. Ironic, given how many people criticise X.com for its sign-in requirements.
- rascul 1mo agoThere's lots of US sports content. That's all I use it for.
- archagon 1mo ago[flagged]
- pessimizer 1mo agoMusk is who you engage with on twitter. You're one of the people who makes his account the most engaged with. I follow tons of stuff on twitter, and have no idea what Musk is doing unless it gets in the mainstream news.
- archagon 1mo agoI'm not on Twitter at all because it doesn't feel good to use a social media platform owned by an ardent white supremacist directly responsible for the deaths of thousands in the third world. Blood money, blood attention.
- pessimizer 1mo ago[dead]
- iamnothere 1mo agoSibling comment (now dead) is correct. “No ethical consumption under capitalism,” amiright? Polemic aside, there’s a better anti-imperialist/global South cadre on X than on any other platform, including the Fediverse. (If you actually care about following the struggles of people on the ground, rather than virtue signaling.) That will be a bit harder to read now though... I am sure an international nitter mirror will pop up eventually.
- kijashdkujdfhas 1mo ago[flagged]
- angoragoats 1mo agoThis. Stop going to the Nazi bar, or else you too are effectively a Nazi.
- lazzlazzlazz 1mo agoIncredibly unpopular opinion on Hacker News, but X remains the center of many circles, including tech. There is almost nothing posted on Hacker News that I haven't seen on X first, with better commentary.
- Melatonic 1mo agoExamples ?
- kyle-rb 1mo agoI haven't left because there are still circles of people I follow that haven't bailed. Once a large enough majority move to Bluesky, I'll start browsing that app more. On the other hand, I might start posting on Bluesky more because as of a week ago, I'm shadowbanned on X. I know people throw that term around, but nobody on the site can see any of my reply tweets, even me (unless I scroll my account's 'replies' tab); people who've followed me for years are asking why their tweet has a ghost reply. I don't think X has that much of an incentive to filter out bots while keeping around accounts like me (200 followers, will never pay for Premium). The slightly higher effort bots that glaze tech CEOs will be basically indistinguishable from the real people glazing tech CEOs because they're wannabe founders trying to network/cloutfarm. And that style of dead internet is fine with Elon.
- sillysaurusx 1mo agoThat sounds infuriating. I hope you can recover your account.
- kyle-rb 1mo agoMy initial suspicion was that my account was flagged because I only used the web version (the PWA experience on mobile is pretty good) so I've been using the Android app the last few days, and I'll see if that has any signal on my account. In another view days I'll try filing a support ticket, maybe claiming something like "I was mass-reported by DSA leftists for my right-wing views"; things along those lines have gotten some peoples' permanent suspensions lifted.
- pessimizer 1mo ago> as of a week ago, I'm shadowbanned on X. I know people throw that term around, but nobody on the site can see any of my reply tweets, even me This is honestly the real value of nitter far beyond anti-Musk shriekers being obsessed with and addicted to X but not wanting to log into X. Nitter seems to simply give you everything - and you can plainly see which tweets are getting huge distribution and which ones nobody is seeing.
- antonvs 1mo ago
- Brendinooo 1mo ago>What is the main use case for X these days? I use it to follow people who either have ideas I find interesting or do stuff I find interesting, and typically I'm looking for accounts that are small enough that I know they will at least see my replies, and often interact with them. (Something like 3K-15K followers for most of them, I think.) I also think it's indispensable for real-time commentary and niche commentary on current events: always requires grains of salt but there's just no better place on the Internet for that sort of thing, in part because... It's the one major social network I'm on where it is easy to view only posts from the people I follow, in reverse chronological order. A feed I TRULY control (and, if you follow the right people, insulates you from much of the nonsense on the site). And every once in awhile, some insane viral nonsense pokes in that makes you say "how could I ever quit this site". There's a certain genre of satirical accounts that is very entertaining as well. Definitely a guilty pleasure component to it all! >Is it still as popular as it used to be? A quick search roughly aligns with my perception: it bottomed out a couple of years ago and has gradually recovered, though not to where it was pre-X.
- kemayo 1mo ago> It's the one major social network I'm on where it is easy to view only posts from the people I follow, in reverse chronological order. Oh weird, I'd rate X as medium-hard for that amongst the microposting sites I look at. Mastodon and Bluesky both default to almost-that, varying mostly in whether you need to jump through hoops to not see reposts. X was always the one that (a) doesn't default to it, and (b) would keep "forgetting" and pushing you back to the algorithmic feed.
- Brendinooo 1mo ago>amongst the microposting sites I look at "major" was doing a bit of work for me. Facebook, Instagram, Reddit were more in mind when I said that. >would keep "forgetting" and pushing you back This hasn't happened to me in awhile. Dunno if it was a transient thing, an app thing, or something that has been reversed.
- 1mo ago
- Marha01 1mo ago> What is the main use case for X these days? There are lots of interesting people/orgs on X from AI/ML circles, as well as Ukraine war OSINT accounts and UA army helpers. I stay on X pretty much for these two topics.
- frereubu 1mo agoIn a UK context, journalists are on there because politicians are on there... and politicians are on there because journalists are on there. It's politicians that need to pull the plug - if they left en masse the journalists would go where they went, even if they stayed on X too - but nobody has the balls to do it. (Aside from one politician who for all practical purposes seems to do absolutely nothing: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyrx1ee2r4o https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyrx1ee2r4o).
- defrost 1mo agoA problem for the UK here is things like Rupert Lowe set to be paid as much for divisive posts on X as for being MP - https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/aug/24/rupert-lowe-restore-britain-earn-same-on-x-as-being-mp-elon-musk https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/aug/24/rupert-lowe...
- dom96 1mo agoThey could at least use both. I'm pretty annoyed with Andy Burnham. He's had a Bluesky account that has been pretty active... right up until he became a PM. Would it kill him to get a member of his team to repost his tweets to Bluesky?
- deleted 1mo ago[deleted]
- Leynos 1mo agoIt's mostly a porn site these days
- loeg 1mo agoThis is one of those situations where describing your algorithmic feed tells us more about you than about Twitter.
- Markoff 1mo agothat's my experience with using anonymous search on Nitter instance as well, so hardly anything about me using it without any account
- pessimizer 1mo agoBut that's got to be what you're searching for. I forget that there's any porn on X, and for a fairly long period I actually thought they had banned it.
- Markoff 1mo agoyeah right, if I search for "Prague" I am certainly looking for porn/dick pics, same with pretty much any city you search for this just says you never use search feature
- dkenyser 1mo agoYeah, this is such a tired lazy response by people and is definitely not true anymore. Spin up a new account on a fresh device on a network I've never been on. Click a random video and scroll. Usually the first 3 or 4 scrolls is porn or someone being killed. Anyone saying there isn't an insane amount of porn and worse on twitter is either lying or hasn't been on the site since it turned into the cesspool we have today.
- numpad0 1mo agoI think it must be that porn often ends up being the most likely relevant content in the randomized initial state for a lot of algorithms. It then shifts and focuses into your actual liking as it collects more data. That should explain a lot of these phenomenons.
- loeg 1mo ago> What is the main use case for X these days? The same as it ever was. Short-form gossip. News, discussion, jokes.
- runjake 1mo agoIt’s still fairly popular, but the statistics show that X usage is gradually declining. Elon claims that X is more popular than ever, but the platform doesn’t publicly release its own stats, and publicly available stats say otherwise. If you like AI and tech, there are some pretty thriving sub-communities. AI stuff, and a lot of tech stuff happens on X first. Claudebot/OpenClaw/Hermes all began on X months before I commonly saw them appear on other platforms.
- pyinstallwoes 1mo agoWhat public stats say otherwise?
- runjake 1mo agoSimilarweb shows a consistent ~15% YoY decline. It also shows growth beginning in early Summer, so this trend may be changing as of very recently. Sensor Tower shows a consistent ~10% YoY decline. DataReportal/Kepios shows a ~5.3% decline in ad reach. EU DSA Transparency repoorts shows ~10% decline Pew Research shows a >20% decline in the US. Regardless, I still use X and find a lot of value from the people I follow. I'm paradoxically optimist.
- KronisLV 1mo ago> What is the main use case for X these days? Is it still as popular as it used to be? No idea comparatively, but an artist friend of mine tried out Bluesky and then complained about how there's way more of a limited reach and engagement there compared to Twitter.
- csomar 1mo agoI rarely use it (you need an account, so I need to add cancel to the url) but last time I had a "guest" account was two years ago and it was pretty much all bots. That being said, some (important) people or companies still use it for announcement but these are usually linked and xcancel works just fine. I honestly have no idea if there are real people who actually use it daily. Who can read that stuff?
- yubblegum 1mo ago> What is the main use case for X these days? twitter/x remains the domain of intelligence agencies worldwide. It is a semi-open (the world first virtual leader, the ayatollah affirms he exists from there ..) psychological operations platform that permits the avatars of "world leaders" to speak to masses and also hosts a parasitical community of grifters ("opinion makers" and "influencers") that feed off of the festering fetid matter served up by the Spook International. a secondary purpose of the twitter/x is a reverse doomsday clock, based on above. As long as the ghost of this unprofitable "business entity" is kept alive by funny money and funny deals, we can sleep soundly at night knowing there won't be ww3 or any other such extreme negotiating tactics by global elite, since they are all 'playing their role' on twitter currently known as x.
- SwellJoe 1mo agoI don't believe the extremism engine of Xitter is reducing the risk of global catastrophe. I think it's accelerating that risk. Certainly it helped elect Trump, and no one can argue that's been good for advancing the cause of peace on earth or avoiding several other causes of mass death.
- bonoboTP 1mo agoAI research, computer vision/machine learning academic projects and papers, conferences.
- xtracto 1mo agoIt's deplorable, but our president in Mexico recently was asked about some current affairs a d her answer was "ive written about it in X , go see it there" ... As if X was an official government publishing channel . WTH, they should publish it on they official government pages.
- autoexec 1mo agoThere should be laws that require all government statements to be published on an official government site and be forever archived there no matter where or however else they were published. That way politicians can take advantage of the reach of social media sites while not requiring anyone to use them and also providing a means for those statements to be verified and preserved.
- conception 1mo agoThere are in the US. Just the current administration doesn’t follow them.
- scientifik 1mo agoThis right here is the thing that shows how much influence big tech has. Everyone has their anecdotal story about porn, spam, malware or whatever flooding Twitter meanwhile your local city government treats it as an official communications channel.
- burningChrome 1mo ago>> What is the main use case for X these days? More of a political echo chamber than anything else. I mothballed my original account when things were getting spicy which was primarily focused on dev, UI/UX, and InfoSec news. I finally went back and have had some great interactions with people about technical stuff that interests me. Right now, the data center and AI discussions are getting intense along with Omarchy, lol. If you steer clear of the political stuff, you can find some good stuff still. >> Is it still as popular as it used to be? Probably not but it still ranks ahead of sites like Reddit. Its like the 13th, 14th most popular platform right now. I log on mainly just to see if I'm missing anything. Other than that, most of the engagement I have is curiosity and just fun stuff like seeing people posting retro games, stuff like that. >> Whenever I do see it linked on here it seems to be because one of the big tech CEOs has said something on it. X is now kind of the social media cul-de-sac . It used to be one of the go to places for breaking tech, popular cultural and political stuff. Now its usually two or three days late to the party on anything worthwhile. So the posts from the CEO probably made the rounds before you finally saw it on X. lol
- Melatonic 1mo agoIts main use for myself was that posts were public by default so lots of government orgs and whatnot posted real time status updates. I never really used it except for occasionally checking those. Now that more and more are going "walled garden" I don't get it at all
- Lammy 1mo agoMy feed is mostly people petting rabbits
- angoragoats 1mo agoI see many, many Twitter posts here. I flag every single one. Many of them are AI-related, and not something from a big tech CEO. It seems that many fans of AI don’t have any moral quandaries with using it. I will let you be the judge of whether that says anything about their moral compass in general.
- CamperBob2 1mo agoWhat is the main use case for X these days? Is it still as popular as it used to be? Yes, because influential, non-evil people who should know better just will not fucking leave. The vast majority of public-minded ML developers and researchers, including people who compete with xAI, being an obvious example. And because skilled, knowledgeable people who could create a replacement service just will not do so. At least not without finding new and innovative forehead-slapping ways to fail at it. Incredibly frustrating that Xitter is still as popular as it is.
- lemaomao 1mo ago> non-evil people > ML developers and researchers Brother in Christ, pick one.
- lynndotpy 1mo agoI'm an ML developer and researcher and I left X. A lot of us did and do believe neural networks can provide utility for humanity. There's just a lot of money in drinking the AGI LLM VC WN koolaid. Not everyone has drank that koolaid.
- CM30 1mo agoCompanies and celebrities are a major use case here. Lots of them (especially ones from non-English speaking countries) still use the site as their primary means of communication. For example, Nintendo doesn't have an official presence on Bluesky, Threads or Mastodon, just Twitter. There's a decent number of old school companies and creatives who either don't know/care about alternatives, or who tried them and went back to Twitter/X.
- j-bos 1mo agoIf you want alpha on things x is the place to be, aside from some discord servers. I've recently leaned off hn and onto twitter.
- Gigachad 1mo agoIt's become just another doomscroll content mill like the rest. Public figures and well known names have been replaced with random content creators and repost bots.
- lynndotpy 1mo agoFor one of the big use cases, you can look at the NCMEC's reports-by-ESP numbers. For example, X has 816K and X AI has 135K reports. Reddit, despite having 200M (36%) more MAU, only has 65K reports. OpenAI, despite having about 8x MAU than X.ai, has 182K reports.