Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
tuesdaynight
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
5d ago
Surprised. I thought Apple would sell more, specially in USA, where the price is not that high because of the purchasing power
2.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
5d ago
Problem? Aren't they selling like cake because of how good their MacBooks are? Other companies aren't that good and I imagine they don't sell as many laptops as Apple does.
3.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
6d ago
I remember how negative were the comments in your last submission here. They were unnecessary and I never understood why. I hope you get better comments now.
4.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
8d ago
Damn, I was not expecting Dan Abramov when I read the title.
5.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
8d ago
They have a lot of compute, so I think it makes sense to spray and see what works. Anthropic is limited in that regard, and focused in coding/tech, but OpenAI don't need to do the same. They even got the lead without having to foc
6.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
8d ago
It's really a hard time for freedoms, huh?
7.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
8d ago
You had a shitty childhood, I'm sorry. About the rest, I guarantee you that it's just not for you. No problem in that, but don't be mad that other people like the lifestyle. There's nothing unhealthy in that. You can be
8.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
9d ago
Why? Wouldn't being part of a famous pedophile social circle impact a person's seriousness perception?
9.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
9d ago
I don't think that's true. It's hard to argue that Elon Musk, the richest person and spokesperson of tech for a lot of people, never participated in SV sex parties or had weird sex behaviors. Or Trump, the president of the US
10.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
9d ago
Amazing how people come with all these rationalizations instead of just accepting that they are not the kind of people who like casual sex. There's nothing wrong or unhealthy about casual sex, it's just not for you. You can have y
11.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
9d ago
How having lot of sex would cause harm to my neighbours?
12.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
9d ago
You didn't explain why it's illegal or why distillation is bad.
13.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
11d ago
I don't agree with using your credentials to show your code quality, but I don't doubt you have better standards than most developers. That said, stop trying to change their minds. Antirez was a good at programming until he starte
14.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
11d ago
What is the game?
15.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
12d ago
Good luck trying to argue that with people nowadays. Culture war mentality is perfect for wishful thinking, and it's hard to avoid falling into the trap. Google, Apple, Facebook, etc, had their woke phase with tremendously growth, and
16.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
12d ago
If you open an office in another country and hire people there, is that outsourcing? If so, would big tech have to close their "international" offices if they don't want to pay the 25% tax? I ask that because I'm seeing
17.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
14d ago
Yes? I mean, I'm not saying that they are necessarily wrong about the risks, but it's pretty hard to ignore how conveniently their positions align with a regulation capture that their companies are going for. If they all left, tha
18.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
16d ago
Yes. There were cases already where a person asked about killing someone and then Anthropic/OpenAI warned the police about it. If I'm not mistaken, it was not in the USA only
19.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
16d ago
If you plan to be an employee at some company, you will need to use LLMs. If you plan to go self-employed, then you can avoid LLMs as long as possible. I wouldn't do that, but I'm not you. However, I urge people that avoid LLMs en
20.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
17d ago
I agree with you, but have you tried talking to people in real life about it? Almost nobody cares. If someone asks about it, I give them what I believe. I don't want them to take my words as truth, but I hope that it makes them researc
21.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
17d ago
You are trying to decode their answers as rational, but they are being just as emotional as the doomers people. Rationalization of emotional responses are very common in tech. They will say that GPT Sol does not work for X, which will proba
22.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
22d ago
Even if that is the case, the current models are already revolutionary. We would spend years discovering all the capabilities of these things. And that is considering that the plateau would last for years. And I didn't say that nobody
23.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
22d ago
In my useless opinion, most people are not aware of how big AI is and how bigger it will be in 3~5 years. It's not worthy to be worried about it, because it will be a global problem, but there are people who are completely blind about
24.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
23d ago
I'm sorry if I made it sound like I was accusing you of something. My comment was about the AI overview result. It didn't explain what is the reference, just giving what I said in the previous comment. I was confused until I hover
25.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
24d ago
Not necessarily related with the subject, but I was not aware of the patriots reference. So I decided to search on Google about it, and the AI overview was "Yes, they are behind everything, from the military to the economy", with
26.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
24d ago
I'm not saying that you should jump on the apocalypse wagon, but you need to remember that some people NEVER concede. You can see that in politics. Something unacceptable is done every day until it becomes the normal. So a model hackin
27.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
25d ago
I don't think that it will happen in the next decades, but adults cannot imagine a world where humans are not required for most (if not all) jobs. I say adults because kids kind of live in that world if they don't live in a very p
28.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
25d ago
Didn't OpenAI hire him? I thought it was not a secret that OpenClaw was the biggest influence.
29.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
26d ago
Have you tried talking to people in real life? At least most people here have some knowledge about it. In real life, nobody cares. I understood that 5 years ago, and now I act accordingly
30.
▲
by
tuesdaynight
29d ago
Same. I was in the doom AI crowd ~2 years ago, then I realized how many problems could be mitigated or solved by having these local models, and I became part of the cautiously excited crowd
More ›