Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
g-b-r
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
g-b-r
11d ago
If the money was guaranteed to only be used to pay the costs, there probably wouldn't be any problems
2.
▲
by
g-b-r
13d ago
A whole bunch of assumptions and beliefs passed off for truths. LLMs have very little to do with engineering, unless you let a pair of dice decide how you build a house. Cars are not built by AIs, they're built by extremely precise rob
3.
▲
by
g-b-r
13d ago
You mean by vibecoding? Don't call that programming, for God's sake
4.
▲
by
g-b-r
13d ago
If yoyohello13 says so it must be true
5.
▲
by
g-b-r
15d ago
Pixel 9s are very different from Pixel 10s, in any case
6.
▲
by
g-b-r
15d ago
It freezes a Pixel 10 on Chrome, Webviews and Brave..! I tried several webview-based browsers, Chrome, and Brave, with them the phone completely freezes (except that the audio keeps going for a bit). I tested webview browsers because by cha
7.
▲
by
g-b-r
16d ago
That Wikipedia article seems to have no bearing on the issue; there's not even any log on a normal user's computer of having or not having clicked a checkbox. > If they made it impossible for you to prove that you clicked a che
8.
▲
by
g-b-r
16d ago
If you have the TLS session with all the keys, that's signed with the server's key, so it's basically certified by them themselves. They could only claim that it's been faked by claiming that you stole their TLS private
9.
▲
by
g-b-r
16d ago
You can obtain a cryptographic proof by recording the tls exchange, including the keys You need to use a tls intercepting proxy for that. I couldn't find any ready-made tool unfortunately, there's tlsnotary.org but it seems far fr
10.
▲
by
g-b-r
17d ago
If you believe that compilation proves that the code is good, and that the only thing you should care about a program is if "it works", I don't think you're a great code reviewer. And in any case, if the code you had exp
11.
▲
by
g-b-r
17d ago
I'm praying that you're not a developer
12.
▲
by
g-b-r
17d ago
It reaches the usage limit after adding a cookie banner above the button
13.
▲
by
g-b-r
17d ago
Achieving a high score requires focus and effort. There's little reason to aim for a score a lot higher than the current best; and when getting close to the score you're aiming for, it's easy to get agitated and make a mistak
14.
▲
TIL POSIX specifies a tool designed to assist you with generated code
(reddit.com)
4 points
by
g-b-r
18d ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
by
g-b-r
22d ago
Before any other consideration, I love love LOVE the record-short terms. I'll bookmark it just for that.
16.
▲
by
g-b-r
24d ago
Unfortunately Google doesn't return a waiting time, and the limits are probably high enough to be irrelevant for normal users (although I've seen articles of it happening on the Play Store, over the years).
17.
▲
by
g-b-r
24d ago
Maybe you've been lucky, unless a user's location or activity plays a part in the issue
18.
▲
by
g-b-r
24d ago
Things along that line could indeed be a way to lessen the problems
19.
▲
by
g-b-r
24d ago
What are you talking about??? How could an account from a completely different company let you login to Google's Play Store??? You probably mean a Google account that uses your Proton mail address?
20.
▲
by
g-b-r
24d ago
The software and many parts of the project are bad, but I don't see how you can't understand its reason to exist. You're sure you understand what it does?
21.
▲
by
g-b-r
25d ago
What the hell are you talking about? Proton accounts to access the Play Store?
22.
▲
by
g-b-r
25d ago
With anonymous login?
23.
▲
by
g-b-r
25d ago
Nominal being 5.000$ a year, if you mean the Play Catalog access program ( https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ... )
24.
▲
by
g-b-r
25d ago
An official API is an API described in official documentation and explicitly open to the public, an unofficial one is one not documented publicly and only meant for the company's products.
25.
▲
by
g-b-r
25d ago
No API changed. They just, almost for sure, decreased their rate limits. It affects using Aurora Store "anonymously" because that means using shared accounts, so far higher activity per account. It's possible they're als
26.
▲
by
g-b-r
25d ago
They'd cripple older versions of the Play Store if they did that, very unlikely
27.
▲
by
g-b-r
25d ago
For a while as in more than a few weeks, when the current issues began? Have you looked for help? It sure isn't because of any Google component being disabled
28.
▲
by
g-b-r
25d ago
Even in the last days? If you use anonymous accounts it seems to affect everyone, when it works it only works for a few downloads
29.
▲
by
g-b-r
27d ago
You can both use a separate account and have Claude co-sign its commits. > In the context of $DAY_JOB, I don't think it matters anymore I meant mosyly for open-source projects, but if in your $DAY_JOB you (occasionally) use AI much
30.
▲
by
g-b-r
27d ago
I don't think it's common for human developers to confidently state made up stuff. They may be incompetent, but they're unlikely to lie too brazenly. Yes, you should always declare when you're pasting something from th
More ›