bluecalm

3 ms·

1.
by bluecalm 5d ago
Elon posted on X that Grok 4.7 is behind Claude and OpenAI for agentic coding: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2102082011233931762?s=20 so it's likely about usage in Cursor specifically.
2.
by bluecalm 5d ago
My view on this: >>SpaceX, meanwhile, trades at 16 times that year’s revenue. Take that as the benchmark — they are both companies with wild aspirations and charismatic leaders — and Anthropic could in future be worth $5tn. SpaceX has
3.
by bluecalm 5d ago
>> But the real limit in a city is land. I am not sure how it is in Berlin. I haven't visited in a while. I think it's too general an assessment though. In many cities the limit is not land but permits - both being permitted
4.
by bluecalm 5d ago
Adding luxury housing helps with supply of affordable housing. Just a few citations I quickly googled: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00941... https://www.sciencedirect
5.
by bluecalm 5d ago
Building luxury condos help with housing market as well. I don't think this is controversial (there are tons of studies that support the conclusion). >>If you let the "market" decide on its own it will always decide on
6.
by bluecalm 5d ago
They use random numbers so the answers sounds a bit different but in my experience you won't be able to get a wrong answer to a simple question no matter how many times you try it.
7.
by bluecalm 5d ago
>>Okay but why do you feel 3 trials say as much as 10,000? I don't trust them so I've used 3 examples in incorrect questions/answers they have given and I got correct answers. I spend enough time with LLMs to know that
8.
by bluecalm 5d ago
So I downloaded that report which of course doesn't contain the most relevant information (the questions) but it contains some examples of wrong answers. I fed the first question to Grok (which they claimed they tested as well) and it
9.
by bluecalm 7d ago
It's their job to interpret but not to invent new laws or ponder which laws "make sense". In particular just because it "makes sense" to extend 4th amendment reading doesn't justify judges just going for it. Th
10.
by bluecalm 7d ago
Yes but it's still not the job of the judges to do that for them.
11.
by bluecalm 8d ago
>>The problem when you rely on unclear laws that haven’t been modified for 250 years is they haven’t been modified for 250 years. The Constitution gives you some rights but maybe not this one (to not be searched without warrant at a b
12.
by bluecalm 8d ago
I hold BRK stocks and I expect it to underperform the market on average (but also be a very good hedge in case of big downturn). BRK is in big part short term treasuries then a stock portfolio then a core business (insurance, energy, rail,
13.
by bluecalm 10d ago
>>So, easier to sell stuff, easier to buy stuff, free to just travel to/from Canada/EU and work there with no extra paperwork, free to buy and sell service from Canada to EU and vice versa. >>No Euro, no vote in EU, no
14.
by bluecalm 12d ago
Because LLM's output is not copyrightable?
15.
by bluecalm 12d ago
You have some secret sauce. The model trains on it. Your competitor is solving a similar problem. The model "advantageously" helps them. Your competitor is happy and continues to pay for the subscription. Sam and Dario just resold
16.
by bluecalm 12d ago
Trump rejecting Dario's call for regulatory capture. Speaker Johnson saying publicly Congress is less qualified than big tech so they should meet and establish safety rules among themselves. I wish every day brought so much sanity from
17.
by bluecalm 13d ago
Yeah but it was reality giving feedback to apes on their experiments not the apes themselves assessing themselves.
18.
by bluecalm 14d ago
Having an oracle that answers yes/no to mathematical questions is very valuable even if there aren't ever any explanation. I don't see how having an answer influences the process of making sense o it negatively. If anything i
19.
by bluecalm 14d ago
More attractive people marry, land jobs and enjoy more success in life in general. Isn't there anything interesting left to study? It looks like misallocation of resources to run this kind of study with as the conclusion is obvious.
20.
by bluecalm 16d ago
I think chess teaches a lot more. It teaches decision making and resource management. It's very important to consider your options and decide how much time you spend analyzing them. It teaches you things like elimination process (if yo
21.
by bluecalm 16d ago
Tesla is also able to save on components that are no longer needed: steering wheel and steering column, rear window mirror, control to change gears etc. I wouldn't be surprised if it's cheaper to make those cars than standard ones
22.
by bluecalm 16d ago
People kill and hurt others in cars for many reasons but the main ones are: -being dangerous on purpose (speeding, ignoring signs, tailgating etc.) -being inattentive (phones, screens in general, being tired, being sleepy) -road raging in m
23.
by bluecalm 18d ago
>>One problem with "we only want the illegal or 'imcompatible' ones to leave the country" is that right-winged people tend to get extremer sooner or later. Yeah it's a problem. That's why I am very bitter
24.
by bluecalm 18d ago
A huge result shadowed by a drama of them potentially training on the key idea. I guess the lesson is two-fold: if you have anything smart/unique make sure to not let their tools read it. The second part is that it's going to be m
25.
by bluecalm 18d ago
>>In 1933 the main problem for people was the Jews. Should the mainstream parties have "solved" the "Jewish problem" in place of the Nazis? Jews were citizens and residents, part of the society. Illegal immigrants
26.
by bluecalm 19d ago
I hope for that because there is little left. I am not surprised people vote for the only party that promises to solve the problems they care about. I am disappointed the rest of the political spectrum plays some kind of game or puts their
27.
by bluecalm 19d ago
Uncontrolled immigration (main point). High taxes. Too much benefits for non-working people. People feel this is unjust and working against them so they vote for parties that at least promise to change it.
28.
by bluecalm 19d ago
Mainstream parties went bananas so people desperately look for another option. I think this will happen in many other countries in EU. I will take far right over far left any day but it sucks nevertheless that we lost a reasonable common se
29.
by bluecalm 21d ago
What is that with this random hate? There are tons of decent people posting/reading X. I am sure most of them do it because they like the site. Maybe because random detached from reality hate comments like that don't get much enga
30.
by bluecalm 21d ago
Why would I doubt it? if you think they are deploying something else then it's quite a claim but it's you who need to show some evidence. It works great anyway. I get a lot of junk I don't want to see on FB/Insta. Reddit

More ›