tolerance

11 ms·

1.
by tolerance 4d ago
And in what ways do you differ on this matter?
2.
by tolerance 5d ago
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/atheist As opposed to an "AI atheist" that Doctorow refers to in the article.
3.
by tolerance 5d ago
It's ironic that real atheists like Richard Dawkins (whose work I believe inspired the title of this post) are public about their own degree of skepticism in favor for the "personhood" of AI. And I'm confident that there
4.
by tolerance 6d ago
I suspect that between the advice in this article and your own...people fear that thinking is the only thing they have left to do in order to write.
5.
by tolerance 7d ago
What this quite reasonable article has to endorse may be useless. I've read some decent articles both obviously and possibly authored with LLM-assistance and while they were well-structured and carried at least the gravitas of object
6.
by tolerance 9d ago
I can see this catching on in the US with a lot of cultural exceptions that would amplify the library as an either an ideological battleground or sanctuary.
7.
by tolerance 9d ago
> Then came a threat. An account with a much larger following DM'd her and told her to take down the sign, or they would post about it to their local artist community. The person offered to help her find an artist to pay to make a n
8.
by tolerance 11d ago
They appear to stand for nothing nor care for anything but the idea that everything to do with technology is terrible—with exception for pop science discovery.
9.
by tolerance 11d ago
Once there was a blackout in my neighborhood that affected commercial properties too. While driving down the street in total darkness the only structure that stuck out when my headlights pressed them was the local Mexican restaurant which i
10.
Against Waldenponding (2018)(contraptions.venkateshrao.com)
2 points by tolerance 11d ago|0 comments
11.
by tolerance 11d ago
Wow, really? Nothing ? Care to share why you think so? > “Neobrutalism” might be wrong in concept, but it was coined around 2023, that ship has sailed. Who cares. It's 2026 . All it takes to sink a sailing ship is a few determined
12.
by tolerance 12d ago
This is actually "Post-Corporate Memphis". Says me. These pages are closer to "neobrutalism" or what I would call "Cybermod" [0], I think... < https://webb.page > < https://garden.b
13.
by tolerance 13d ago
...which is to say that the current social condition belongs to the tail end of a continuum, the trajectory of which is less important to comprehend than the so-called " jetztzeit " is, which is supposedly incomprehensible itself?
14.
by tolerance 14d ago
What do you think this means?
15.
by tolerance 14d ago
Is there a Hacker News where there's submissions and talk about AI but it's just sort of like 7 guys in Chelsea boots while one of them doing Romanian dead lifts and squats off in the corner; the audio edition of The Origins of t
16.
You Are Not an Artisan (2013)(ribbonfarm.com)
1 points by tolerance 14d ago|1 comments
17.
Space Warfighting Environment 2040 [pdf](spacecom.mil)
6 points by tolerance 15d ago|0 comments
18.
by tolerance 15d ago
Right. But somewhere in between then and now the powers of the President expanded so that "the actual exercise of military force" in the name of defense ("preserving the freedom and independence of the United States and its
19.
by tolerance 15d ago
For evidence that Bluesky is a long-term living facility operating as a social media platform...look no further than how their users employ the word "skeet" to refer to "post".
20.
by tolerance 15d ago
I don't think that quote helps your case or detracts from the parent. Tangentially—and perhaps counterintuitively—it can be taken as an argument in favor of the name change. The statement also does little to address the ethical concer
21.
by tolerance 15d ago
Did you know that rivers contribute a significant portion to our atmosphere's moisture?
22.
by tolerance 15d ago
Nope! But I'm soaking all of this in and I appreciate these nudges. And after some thought I'm curious whether this means that LLMs ought to be adept at forming new metaphors as opposed to handling pre-existing ones.
23.
by tolerance 15d ago
I'm going to need a weekend or two to figure out what this means.
24.
by tolerance 15d ago
This may sound ignorant but it looks like ERSC intends to situate itself as a middle ground between tools that are supported by more general purpose protocols (i.e., Tangled and apparently, eventually, Forgejo) and tools that trying to main
25.
by tolerance 16d ago
This seems like a worthwhile listen. As it stands I think that LLMs sort of suck at this. Either that or I don't understand what analogous thinking is or people who use LLMs to facilitate this kind of thinking are bad at it too. But I
26.
by tolerance 16d ago
There's always hope for a Part II. Maybe on rhetoric; which is what I interpreted "The second most important thing" to be about. But the concepts introduced there are entirely new to me so I may be off.
27.
by tolerance 16d ago
> The structure of this post is a bit of a miss for me. Sorry about that. I wanted to write a short post about writing non-fiction but it turned out to be a bit longer than expected and I need to get to work now. I hope you enjoyed it. I
28.
by tolerance 16d ago
This is good blogging right here and sound advice for all writers on the web to follow. But I'm a little disappointed that one of those ink blot looking circles (preferably the big one on the left) did not lead back to the home page.
29.
by tolerance 18d ago
That's why I don't trust 'em neither!
30.
by tolerance 18d ago
Thank you for being able to point out and articulate these issues. LLMs have a habit of laundering pre-existing concepts per the interests (or input) of any given user.

More ›