Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ErroneousBosh
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
5d ago
> what would happen if you were to break that law? like im talking enforcement here not whats on the books. In the UK, nothing. There are far more important laws to enforce. You will get some fat whiny old guy bitching about it to anyone
2.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
5d ago
Gaelic only has 18 letters (and W isn't one of them) but the vowels have diacritics - grave accents - that mark them as being longer. This makes some things a bit of a nightmare because words can have different meanings based on those
3.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
5d ago
"V" for "W" and "F" for "V" in German isn't really accurate, it's just "here's how to get closer to it with the English fricatives you already know".
4.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
6d ago
> given how committed Capcom is to making sure RE4 is ported absolutely everywhere Heh. I was just looking at the RE family on Steam. Nothing over a fiver. I guess they really did make it more convenient than piracy.
5.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
6d ago
> How long would it take for NSA to crack them if they had say the equivalent of a million GPU's? (either GPU's or crypto tuned ASICs) Something I've often wondered is where the curve between "shit encryption / n
6.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
7d ago
That many? Are you sure?
7.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
7d ago
I wonder how many different species of cat are just called "cats" in the local language of wherever they're found? We have just got normal house cats, that we call cats. They're very cuddly and they're great for kee
8.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
7d ago
Given that the US's economy is utterly dependent on tourism, do they just not want to have money any more or something? Because who in their right mind is ever going to travel there at the moment?
9.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
8d ago
Thanks, I didn't know that and now I do.
10.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
8d ago
I mean don't modern CPUs basically just run an x86_64 emulator on a RISC machine anyway? Like there's a layer between the microcode and the actual x86 instructions already.
11.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
8d ago
I hate that you're being downvoted for asking a perfectly reasonable question. Guys, if you don't like the premise of the question, reply and say why, don't downvote. I think it's a good question, and my guess for the an
12.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
9d ago
I wish I'd never given away my MIPS R2000-based DECStation 3100.
13.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
9d ago
RISC desktop computers were common-ish in UK schools by then. Of course if you count the 6502 as a RISC chip (if you squint a bit, Page Zero RAM sure does look like 256 8-bit registers to me!) then UK schools had RISC desktops for over a de
14.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
9d ago
And all signals are analogue, if you're paying enough attention to the transients ;-)
15.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
9d ago
> TLDR; bounds checking was missing leading to potential memory corruption. ... if you hold it just right, and let the light of the full moon shine through it on a particular day, while you send a carefully-crafted packet through the rig
16.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
9d ago
> In fact, this vulnerability was born so long ago (way back in 1994) > That was so long ago that RISC was still a distant dream. Yeah ARM would like to have a word with you. I'd been using RISC on the desktop for about five year
17.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
10d ago
You're not fine, you're in the shit and have deleted the evidence that says it was someone else's problem all along.
18.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
10d ago
> "Our standard process is to only retain logs when legally required to, either due to being notified about a litigation or through legally mandated periods" is a fully complete sentence. And for some of that, the "legally
19.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
10d ago
> It can't be discoverable if it doesn't exist ... That's great, and for some things the court can ask you "Well *why* haven't you got it?" and then you're fucked. Now you're explaining in front of
20.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
10d ago
You're not actually answering the question. You are claiming that compiling with LLVM will make jitter worse than with GCC, but you're not actually explaining why you think that or demonstrating how it happens. Can you show me how
21.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
10d ago
You don't? For some stuff, I've got logs going back to 1993...
22.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
10d ago
One of the things I discovered a while back is that even fairly crude trig approximations don't put that much error into your position, over a small enough distance. To calculate things like straight-line range from where you are now t
23.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
10d ago
> If you look at any other recent/modern car, ICE or EV, you'll find few brands have kept the "quality" interior that was characteristic of premium cars in ~2010 (yes, even German brands). Teslas are sub-Dacia build q
24.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
10d ago
I don't use Rust, it's a waste of time. I know about scheduling and latency. Can you explain why you think that using one compiler is likely to make the latency worse than a different compiler? Can you show Proof of Concept? Can y
25.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
10d ago
> People seem upset for some reason, but one may want to check out Analog Devices training documentation as a student. =3 You're making some pretty interesting and unusual claims. Can you show a Proof-of-Concept of what you're
26.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
11d ago
This is amazing, thanks!
27.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
11d ago
I've driven a couple of Teslas and I can't say I'm a fan of the interior. I mean, I'm not a fan of Elon Musk either, but let's leave that aside for now. They feel really cheap and flimsy inside, definitely not an 80
28.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
11d ago
I have never driven an ICEV with them, but I take your point. My current daily driver is a 30-year-old Range Rover that has none of the annoying beepy flashy distract-o-trons. It's far safer for other road users than the Kia because th
29.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
11d ago
Mmm. This sounds like you either know a hell of a lot more about the subject than me, or a hell of a lot less. If I point you at an example github repo, can you devise a coherent and repeatable test for this "jitter"? Edit: > T
30.
▲
by
ErroneousBosh
12d ago
> In general, any llvm compiled language is going to have persistent unpredictable jitter related issues. So if I compiled my own SDR software written in C with LLVM/Clang, it would suddenly have jitter issues? Can you explain why?
More ›