7 ms·
Jason Arday, ex-Cambridge professor at centre of plagiarism row, found dead
- PaulRobinson 2mo ago[flagged]
- d_silin 2mo ago[flagged]
- InsideOutSanta 2mo agoDo you actually know that he lied? From the article: > Cambridge initially said claims of plagiarism regarding Arday's thesis and some journal publications had been investigated by Liverpool John Moores University (LMJU) and the journals in question. > LJMU - which awarded Arday his PhD in 2015 - concluded that he had not plagiarised work. It is absolutely undeniable that there has been a witch hunt against minorities in positions of power in the last few years. It is unclear to me whether this guy actually did anything wrong. What is clear to me, though, is that the level of scrutiny and the attacks he received are not consistent with what most white men in similar situations received.
- d_silin 2mo agoI followed the story and he absolutely did, in multiple instances.
- thataccount 2mo ago[flagged]
- etchalon 2mo agoI think a lot things are simultaneously true: 1. He exaggerated/lied about some of his accomplishments and aspects of his life. 2. The accomplishments and aspects of his life he exaggerated/lied about did not seem to be about his academic success. Generic life puffery that, while dishonest, did not make him unqualified for his position. 3. Anti-DEI crusaders decided to make an example of him. 4. Had he not been a person of color, the scrutiny would have had a very different shape.
- samastur 2mo agoYes, we do. He was a fabulist who certainly was more scrutinized because of his skin color, but it really shouldn’t be disputed that he plagiarized and lied profusely. That doesn’t mean remotely he deserved this. I also have little hope that everyone who contributed to this sordid tale, from Cambridge, police etc. will have to account for their profound failures.
- throwawaypath 2mo ago>who certainly was more scrutinized because of his skin color The total opposite occured. He was uncrutinized because of his skin color.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2mo agoIt's possible both things occurred, first one, then the other.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- greygoo222 2mo agoYou can check with your own eyes that entire paragraphs of his work were copied verbatim: https://retractionwatch.com/2026/07/27/cambridge-jason-arday-plagiarism-allegations-times-higher-education-exclusive/ https://retractionwatch.com/2026/07/27/cambridge-jason-arday... https://ncofnas.com/p/dei-fraud-and-cover-up-at-cambridge https://ncofnas.com/p/dei-fraud-and-cover-up-at-cambridge
- liveoneggs 2mo agohe claimed to be a non-verbal autistic for much of his childhood, disputed by childhood classmates; he claimed to have run "30 marathons in 35 days" also disputed and unverified
- throwawaypath 2mo ago“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
- quickthrowman 2mo agoWhy would you believe the institution that granted the PhD? They’re never going to admit they screwed up in granting the degree, how do you think that would affect their reputation? You can examine his writing and the writing he stole from, side by side. I would suggest doing that instead of believing an institution who has no choice but to lie if they want students to apply to their grad schools in the future.
- gizajob 2mo agoLiverpool John Moores University doesn’t have a reputation - the only one it’s got is that it’s a former polytechnic attended by people who are never going to cope in the real parts of academia at even the nearby University of Liverpool. Cambridge would have never given this man a degree never mind a doctorate, but once he had one it was a pass to getting inside.
- JuniperMesos 2mo ago> They’re never going to admit they screwed up in granting the degree, how do you think that would affect their reputation? How will not admitting they screwed up affect their reputation?
- anigbrowl 2mo agoPerhaps we should do annual random audits on 50 or 100 academics to get a baseline against which to measure claims of academic dishonesty. Perhaps there's a correlation between plagiarism and professors who acquire tenure at an unusually young age, for example. Or perhaps older professors gain tenure after a certain number of years 'phoning it in', publishing work that is obviously derivative but reliably inflates citation count at a steady rate. I can't really tell whether any individual academic plagiarist is a true interloper or whether everyone does it a bit get some early stage career momentum with which to attract funding and then perform real research.
- KPGv2 2mo ago> it didn't deserve the media scrutiny and pile-on How bad was it? I didn't notice anything of the sort, and I'm curious if maybe your algorithm feeds you a fire hydrant of crap most people never see. I ask because there were instances of plagiarism between 2016 and 2020 (I only remember it was Trump's first term) that I saw significant media coverage of, including them being called before Congress in the USA. For this guy, I only saw one headline, when the alleged plagiarism was revealed, and that was it. I didn't even recognize this guy's name when I saw this new headline on here a few minutes ago. (I did recognize him once I saw his pic at the OP link.) This might be just the reverse of a common thing online: "Why won't the media cover this story??" when in fact they are covering this story, it's just that you are passively looking only at what your friends are reposting on social media. EDIT: also not for nothing, but if your argument is "prejudice exists because racists think he shouldn't have been at Cambridge," then him plagiarizing and lying about things cuts against your entire argument bc, assuming the allegations are true, he never belonged at Cambridge, and his race is irrelevant. (I agree significant prejudice against Black people exist in the developed world, but I'm disinclined to agree about it here considering the women in the US—another historically disadvantaged group—who faced these same allegations a few years ago didn't crash out and kill themselves. Which is what it sounds like this individual did. And in those women's cases, it's with the full weight of Trump's MAGA calling for their heads and probably worse.)
- itsibitzi 2mo agoHe was repeatedly at the top of the Guardian's website at least. I can't think of a single other instance of academic fraud being pushed to the top of any news site for several days running.
- wk_end 2mo agoWell, he wasn't just an academic, but also a media icon/minor celebrity (he has/had a memoir coming out). His academic fraud and plagiarism was just one thing - aside from the race angle, his story probably got lots of media attention just because of how comically absurd and obvious his self-mythologizing was. It's not academic but the closest similar case that's coming to mind off the top of my head was when James Frey (who FWIW is white) got found out for A Million Little Pieces, which definitely was major news.
- profdevloper 2mo agoI think the scrutiny was due to him being an avatar for the frustrations around DEI and western society's focus on equality of outcome. He didn't deserve his position at Cambridge, but he didn't deserve this fate either.
- mulderc 2mo agoAre you on the investigation committee? Seems we can wait for the independent report before making any claims like that.
- spankalee 2mo ago[flagged]
- foldr 2mo agoThere's not a lot of equality of outcome at Cambridge when it comes to black academics. The percentage is lower compared to that of the general population and to that of British academia in general. Appointing Arday to the position was clearly a huge error of judgment, with tragic consequences. However, anyone imagining that Cambridge is appointing black professors willy-nilly has got the wrong picture.
- graemep 2mo agoIt is possible they are appointing liars willy-nilly. Its amazing no one at Cambridge spotted his lies and took action earlier.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- cung 2mo agoNot sure I follow your reasoning behind his skin color and suicide being causally related
- pessimizer 2mo ago[flagged]
- throw-the-towel 2mo agoI'm not sure I agree on the Black Brits part, but the general problem is real: too many US copycats, in situations where aping the US does not make a shred of sense.
- gizajob 2mo agoYeah absolutely this. People seem to be unable to recognise that Britain and the USA are radically different places with different histories and approaches to basically everything. The common language creates the impression that they’re basically the same place.
- regularization 2mo agoThe slaves in Jamaica had a radically different experience then the slaves of America? The colour bar. Colored Alien Seaman's Order, Kelso Cochrane, Bristol Bus Boycott Could go up to Brixton incidents or all the attacks on this professor.
- throwawaypath 2mo ago>The slaves in Jamaica had a radically different experience then the slaves of America? The descendants of the slaves in Jamaica had a radically different experience then the descendants of the slaves in America.
- amiga386 2mo agoThis is a load of racist twaddle. Black British people know their own history and have their own lived experience in the UK. I won't speak for them, but I will say for certain only a handful of cretins in the UK, of any ethnicity, are stupid enough to larp as Yanks. Learn a bit of UK history and current affairs before you mouth off.
- baubino 2mo agoCrazy that I had to scroll so far to get to a comment that acknowledges the racism of the whole situation. Yes he made fantastical claims and probably should not have been in his job. Also true is that the intensity of this widespread public reaction to him is laced with racism. It’s sickening.
- punkbit 2mo agoModern witch hunt, and we shouldn’t deny it! Keep downvoting as much as you want. RIP
- zamadatix 2mo agoA tragedy all around. Most obviously for Jason Arday, who, regardless of which interpretations of everything else one takes, saw this end as the only way out of a high profile media situation.
- sampo 2mo agoWhen one's whole career and self-image has been based in academia and then the academic career ends, it can easily give a feeling of failure and worthlessness, even in the most normal circumstances. I couldn't find statistics about postdocs or tenure-track professors, but this meta-study on PhD students and medical residents gives a suicide attempt rate of 0.8%. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624007155 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002239562...
- gizajob 2mo agoAcademia isn’t the criminal justice system though, if you have, for example, cheated on your doctorate you can hold your hands up and admit it and do another doctorate.
- maleldil 2mo agoGood luck getting accepted in another program.
- zaik 2mo agoFrom the same article: > The overall prevalence of SA [suicide attempts] in our aggregate sample was .8%. These figures approached the prevalence of SA in Americans aged 18–39 (1.0%) and in the general population of adults over 18 (.6%).
- cmiles8 2mo agoAcademia is brutal, but let’s not conflate legitimate struggles in an academic career with being caught allegedly just making up a whole bunch of stuff
- globular-toast 2mo ago[flagged]
- collingreen 2mo ago[flagged]
- pessimizer 2mo agoIt's literally a job title. One that many people have spent a lot of time and effort to create. It's weird to pretend that you've never heard of it, or the people involved in it.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- etchalon 2mo ago[flagged]
- throw-the-towel 2mo agoTwo minutes of googling got me this: https://www.equality.admin.cam.ac.uk/equality-and-diversity-cambridge/equality-and-diversity-committee https://www.equality.admin.cam.ac.uk/equality-and-diversity-...
- etchalon 2mo agoPlease show me the literal "DEI Person" job title on that page.
- throw-the-towel 2mo agoI'd say everyone who's on the DEI Committee has a DEI Person job ex officio.
- hyperhello 2mo ago[flagged]
- mhh__ 2mo ago[flagged]
- greygoo222 2mo agoEntire paragraphs were duplicated verbatim: https://retractionwatch.com/2026/07/27/cambridge-jason-arday-plagiarism-allegations-times-higher-education-exclusive/ https://retractionwatch.com/2026/07/27/cambridge-jason-arday... https://ncofnas.com/p/dei-fraud-and-cover-up-at-cambridge https://ncofnas.com/p/dei-fraud-and-cover-up-at-cambridge
- graemep 2mo agoIts clear from Retraction Watch that people at Cambridge failed to act when they should have. Hilary Cremin and Rhys Morgan knew about the plagarism but decided they did not need to do anything.
- gizajob 2mo agoThe issue is that the claims of sociology struggle with falsifiability, or at least have a tendency to create positions which don’t admit refutation. I don’t wish this poor man ill, and a huge mess has been created at every level it seems, all around him. Having read some of his contentious thesis the issue that arose for me, beyond the plaigarism question, was that it was generally hyperbolic and at points, word salad, unable to present a target that could be refuted or argued against. Zero clue what Cambridge were doing with and to this guy, or what the standards are for appointing people and critiquing their work if it’s feeding a prevailing narrative. I know John Moores, who awarded his PhD is far from rigorous and I know from experience that there is almost nothing that would have stopped them awarding him the doctorate once the work was complete, regardless whether it was plagiarised or didn’t stand up to scrutiny from anywhere outside of his small angle on sociological discourse. This all points to him being a symptom of an extremely widespread and serious issue that has arisen within British academia, not a cause of anything major. I wouldn’t have wished him dead though, this is pretty tragic that the intense scrutiny over what should be a very niche and minor academic issue inside a university got blown up into front page news. He didn’t deserve or warrant that kind of scrutiny either, so has clearly completely collapsed from it, because it would be hard for anyone to take.
- cmiles8 2mo agoThe whole thing is a tragedy. Nobody wants to see a situation end like this. There are other likely victims here too though including those who were passed over for roles or promotions based on the alleged false claims, exaggerations and plagiarism. Those are harder to identify and quantify but still a very real thing that has deep impact on people’s lives.
- gillesjacobs 2mo ago[flagged]
- siva7 2mo ago[flagged]
- cmiles8 2mo agoAbsolutely not. Simply pointing out that there are many victims here beyond the obvious, and those passed over for promo or missed roles also are subjected to extreme mental health stress while others reaped rewards of alleged wrongdoing.
- srean 2mo ago[flagged]
- JMiao 2mo agocool guess! idk about jason arday, but that dude in the first link is strange and off putting. too much stink face, and the way he frames the subject with the blurry photos and loony screenshots feels like bullying.
- JMiao 2mo agocommenter changed their comment and /s blew right by
- tjpnz 2mo agoPretty sure we've seen Elon there.
- penguin_booze 2mo agoThe whole tale reminded me of the case of George Santos (Or, Scamtos, as he's known since then). Regardless of the facts, the way this ended up is tragic.
- srean 2mo agoGood example. Regarding the tragedy, grandiose narcissists usually have very vulnerable egos and cannot bear exposure. Their entire notion of self is held together by their grandiosity. The tragic part is that most narcissists are produced by a bad childhood, starved of approval and safety.
- rglover 2mo agoFWIW Dr. Grande's videos were instrumental in helping me understand and escape narcissistic abuse. At least from what I've seen (it's been a few years since I watched regularly), he's a straight shooter.
- deleted 2mo ago
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- gillesjacobs 2mo ago[flagged]
- jacquesm 2mo agoUnbelievable these comments on a thread about someone who committed suicide. Have a heart.
- philodeon 2mo ago[flagged]
- sirshmooey 2mo agoDon't construct worldviews from internet comments
- gillesjacobs 2mo agoHe was an immoral man taking full advantage of an immoral system.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- worik 2mo agoI have been following this in English news. It is terribly sad. The University of Cambridge is largely to blame for letting this troubled person dig himself in so deep. His astounding claims were astonishing and easily falsifiable. Journalists had no such trouble. They raised him up then when he got too hot cast him down. He was a fantasist, he deserves some blame, but it was Cambridge with the power, and irresponsible hubris RIP
- ls-a 2mo ago[flagged]
- forestrywat 2mo agoComments like this should result in an IP level ban. Get the fuck out of here.
- amiga386 2mo agoThis is a tragedy. He did not need to take his own life. There was definitely a path for his life to continue. His family still loved him. Sure, he wouldn't have the cushy professorship and the prestige and the book deal and speaking engagements. But there have been people who have fallen from grace harder and faster, for much worse reasons, and they have come back. It is very sad that Arday took his life for what was at most a temporary setback. R.I.P.
- baubino 2mo ago> It is very sad that Arday took his life for what was at most a temporary setback. I hope you and others realize that he was being relentlessly harassed. I highly doubt the academic job was the only thing causing him distress. His claims were questionable at best but not worthy of the vitriol he received.
- amiga386 2mo agoHe was subject to intense public and media scrutiny due to the uncovering of his wrongdoing and his recalcitrant non-apology. He wasn't some rando, he was one of Cambridge University's "star" professors. His appointment was heralded in the media as hugely important. He guest-edited the BBC's flagship Today programme. He became a cultural advisor for ITV. He was a media celebrity... on the basis of what is likely an invented life story. There is a genuine public interest in further investigation. For the past 3 years he and his college actively suppressed inquiries about his plagiarism using reputation management lawyers and false claims of harassment to the police. He should have read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/So_You%27ve_Been_Publicly_Shamed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/So_You%27ve_Been_Publicly_Sham... and what happened to Jonah Lehrer. Lehrer is still shamed for plagiarism and his career has not recovered... but he is still alive.
- baubino 2mo agoI know exactly who he was, the accusations against him, and the likelihood that he lied and misrepresented many aspects of his personal history. Still doesn’t justify the pile-on and relentless racially-tinged harassment. He was an academic for fucksake, not a politician or a world leader. We live in a bizarre world where far too many people believe that harassment is permissible if someone is famous, in the public eye, or if they’ve done something wrong. Yes, his claims and credentials should have been investigated (and done so years ago) but, again, none of this justifies relentless harassment. That others have been publicly shamed and harassed in the past does not justify this public shaming and harassment. That others did not take their life over it does not make this public shaming and harassment somehow okay. It is very possible to believe that Arday misrepresented himself AND ALSO believe that the harassment against him was unwarranted. I personally would have much rather seen all that energy funneled into pressure on the institution — Cambridge and the other universities he worked at — to be transparent about their hiring practices and answer for clear inconsistencies in Arday’s work history.
- expedition32 2mo ago[flagged]
- averysmallbird 2mo agoFor whatever he did, he never needed to be the product of an international pile-on. Even having known and read about this feels like being a party to a tragedy.
- bragh 2mo agoHe did claim harassment with the police against the journalist who was initally investigating him: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rd9y99grzo https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rd9y99grzo Now consider that this was in UK.
- NewJazz 2mo agoUh, what about it being in the uk? I guess I've heard the press can be aggressive, but not sure if that's what you meant.
- dist-epoch 2mo agoThe UK has no legal freedom of speech protection. Which means you can use the courts to silence the press, as Russian oligarchs have been doing for many years: > Government vows to stop Russian oligarchs ‘abusing’ British courts. Dominic Raab said the government was ‘taking action’ to end the ‘bullying’ to ‘protect our free press’ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/russia-ukraine-oligarchs-british-courts-free-speech-b2037951.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/russia-ukrain... > UK vows to stop the super-rich using courts to silence critics https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-60773942 https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-60773942
- foldr 2mo ago> The UK has no legal freedom of speech protection. This is completely untrue, as you can confirm by googling. The UK has historically had a problem with overly restrictive libel laws and libel tourism, but that point can be made without making statements that are obviously false.
- ahmed_1000 2mo ago[flagged]
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- pfisherman 2mo agoMany of the comments here in this thread are absolutely vile. Very few people are undeserving of compassion. I think some of the people in this thread should look themselves in the mirror and ask why feel different in this case than similar cases like Dan Ariely, Amy Cuddy, or Marc Tessier Levigne.
- srean 2mo agoDan despicable Ariely is a good example because he also milked personal tragedies. Ariely et al that you mention weren't questioned or exposed any less though. There was Elizabeth Holmes too. The point is, if you cannot bear getting exposed as a false god, as a con, then don't try to become one. Well don't, even you can bear the exposure.
- pfisherman 2mo agoI don’t know. Seems like a distorted sense of justice to me. I am not so sure that academic fraud is in the same league as committing felonies (like E Holmes). Also don’t know that anything beyond professional sanction is deserved for professional misconduct (that is not breaking any laws or endangering people). Perhaps their real crimes were not having better PR, or enough money to hire a crisis management firm. Whatever it was, it really seems to have brought out the worst (in) people.
- mike_hearn 2mo agoAcademic fraud is a crime. It gets used on grant applications to justify funding, meaning it's stealing money from the government and thus the public. It can be prosecuted as fraud in the courts. See the case of the Dana Farber Cancer Center being taken to court on behalf of the US Government by Sholto David (who won a large settlement). > Perhaps their real crimes were not having better PR, or enough money to hire a crisis management firm. He hired Carter Ruck, a professional law firm, who then bullied The Times with legal threats that themselves contained by lies by Arday. And he had been given nothing less than glowing PR by every "serious" institution in Britain, which all repeated his lies without question up until a few days ago. Good PR and funds for crisis management were not an issue for him.
- ThrowawayTestr 2mo ago[flagged]
- znpy 2mo ago[flagged]
- anon48293 2mo ago[dead]
- ktallett 2mo agoIt isn't really clear what was truth and what wasnt tbh and even if so this is most certainly not the first person to lie to a high position. It is an open secret that a former university chancellor in the uk copied his thesis. He didnt get this treatment. I am also curious where the racism claim comes from?
- throwawaypath 2mo ago>It isn't really clear what was truth and what wasnt tbh Wrong, it's really clear what was truth and what wasnt tbh >I am also curious where the racism claim comes from? He was Anglophobic/anti-White.
- obscurette 2mo agoJust one of many tragedies bound to one of the biggest problems in modern society – obsession to victims. Framing yourself or others as a victim gives you complete immunity and frees you from any responsibility for the consequences of your actions. This obsession has a potential to end the world we know.
- tentlewick 2mo agoI find it ironic that much of the reason why Arday received such accolades is that he painted himself as a victim who had managed, through grit and determination, to overcome adversity and achieve greatness. But then as soon as he experienced actual adversity - albeit self-inflicted, from being called out on his plagiarism and lies and harassment of those who tried to expose this - he decided to kill himself instead. Which, I suppose, is the final chapter to his false victim narrative. A posthumous legacy that he was bullied to death, absolved of his misdeeds.
- MrSkelter 2mo ago[flagged]
- throwawaypath 2mo ago>Academic reviews of his alleged “misdeeds” have thus far absolved him. No they haven't. The reviews all pointed to Arday plagiarizing and being comically dishonest. >They isn’t about integrity. It's about integrity, academic integrity at the highest levels.
- caminante 2mo agoReality gets distorted. I've seen Kehinde Andrews defend Arday repeatedly about plagiarism. He says 1. It was deemed "misquoting" and poor scholarly work that should've been caught by his advisor 2. And the university did an investigation and ruled it wasn't plagiarism. Basically, the mom who will always love their ax murderer son.
- 2mo ago
- tibbydudeza 2mo ago[flagged]
- unified101 2mo agoPoor guy, no life deserves this ending. He got caught up deeper and deeper in his proclamations, painted himself into a corner, and wasn't able to reset. Does anyone know of a case where someone went through a reset and came out strong after such a "downfall"?
- srean 2mo agoOne in the White House ? Coming out stronger, that is. No reset. A more serious example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Cummines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Cummines
- rglover 2mo agoWoah. Never heard of him but that's a hell of a ride through life. Adding I Am Not a Gangster to my reading list.
- lern_too_spel 2mo agoYou don't have to look back very far. Tessier-Lavigne turned his forced resignation after being behind some of the largest research fraud in biotech history into one of the biggest raises (over $1 billion) in biotech history, pretty much immediately after he had been caught.
- mirmor23 2mo ago[flagged]