doc_ick

4 ms·

1.
by doc_ick 5d ago
Still better then Microsoft.
2.
by doc_ick 6d ago
Oh go ahead and damage random parts to your system if you want, just let the majority of non-tech or non-risk users benefit from some strong defaults.
3.
by doc_ick 6d ago
Ahhhh, that makes more sense. Academic fraud may not always be used to boost the reputation of an academic, it could boost the reputation of a science/technique/medicine. If you see 30 authors with 1,000s of citations saying x is
4.
by doc_ick 6d ago
Blanket bans are better the no bans at all. I would agree we need genuine and granular regulation, though I don’t think it’s wise to ask kids what they think is best for them. Not a parent but a parent might have some concern for letting ki
5.
by doc_ick 6d ago
Could you please expand? I don’t believe I understand the question.
6.
by doc_ick 7d ago
Oh no I fully agree with that. We just have to find a medium that people can easily use but can’t abuse. The constant cat and mouse security problem given non-infinite money. In-person defense would solve this but I think the cost is too hi
7.
by doc_ick 7d ago
I really, really, really want this to take off. I love this idea.
8.
by doc_ick 7d ago
True, and thanks to llms are of those are being “exploited” exponentially more. “In a system that rewards production over all else, people are naturally going to be incentivized to cut corners.” That sounds like the human condition and or c
9.
by doc_ick 7d ago
The CV of an applicant is definitely different. For a job application where a cv were used, that’s a slower/paid process where attention should be paid to details. However what’s a difference to a conference with a “young upcoming auth
10.
by doc_ick 7d ago
It likely is, but that’s also on the assumption every author has to be in association with an institution and it’s quick to verify that. What good reason is there for trust in authorship to be low? I would likely agree for if it’s related t
11.
by doc_ick 7d ago
“Are we prepared to sacrifice everything on the altar of scalability?” If the performance of verification isn’t great, it won’t get adopted. Just general acceptance timelines, look at how long it took for Python 2->3, https 1.2, us real-
12.
by doc_ick 7d ago
Legal names aren’t 1:1 with author names. If they were, who’d verify that?
13.
by doc_ick 7d ago
“Requesting feedback is useless, as the article points out”, I would agree post llm availability. Before that (~pre 2023 I suppose), this wouldn’t have been as large of a concern. “You need to get the author to do an oral defense to verify
14.
by doc_ick 7d ago
I disagree for academia using papers as an easy medium for verification and providing more knowledge. Llms always short circuit everything, so how would you fix academia?
15.
by doc_ick 7d ago
That would fail, humans and agents could create new “author” accounts by the swarm or have paid author accounts.
16.
by doc_ick 7d ago
I’d agree it’d be a funny proposal, wouldn’t have worked back then but funny.
17.
by doc_ick 7d ago
Not in a direct interview style, but most us conferences can request additional information or feedback. If they conditionally accept or reject a paper, that conditional relies on feedback from the author(s). Interviews like this are intere
18.
by doc_ick 7d ago
Please cite claude or llms when they write code. “Most existing open-source SAST tools rely on regex patterns or LLMs”, this may be the case with new tools in the last 7 months but before then has definitely not been. (Bandit, semgrep, blac
19.
by doc_ick 9d ago
Some stuff the reviewers do could easily be automated. I’m off the mindset everything the reviewers do shouldn’t be automated however, as llms do hallucinate and are still susceptible to ghost prompts. At the infinite app review scale (some
20.
by doc_ick 10d ago
“Coding wasn't the hard part.” I would hope not since astra did that. Above saltiness aside, are you worried Microsoft will see this?
21.
by doc_ick 10d ago
Definitely not exclusive, though I believe they are related enough to not tank one for the other. If a review is 2 seconds and done, then the circle for figuring out the mvp slop app is pretty slim.
22.
by doc_ick 10d ago
Apple has some “trust” for vetting things, and with the wave of slop-apps it fine with a slight delay so the App Store doesn’t become riddled with slop like the android store.
23.
by doc_ick 11d ago
Don’t worry, that’s almost every other page on the feed
24.
by doc_ick 12d ago
Don’t worry, just give them a year and infinite tokens and they can make windows me. Just have to view their “trust me bro” rating.
25.
by doc_ick 12d ago
HR loves this one trick…
26.
by doc_ick 12d ago
CTO and CEO as a service, I can’t wait to import that into my agents and now see some people sweating.
27.
by doc_ick 12d ago
Unfortunately that seems like bad history. I’ve only had good experience with wsdls, internally and externally, but they were generated with the services and readily available.
28.
by doc_ick 16d ago
Ontop of this, including a photo edit history in a photo including the original photo would increase the size of a photo to be completely unusable or unshareable.
29.
by doc_ick 16d ago
Unfortunately theres no thanks to the suppliers of training data. US courts made sure there’s no recompense for them, and likely never will be. Seems similar to eminent domain, but without limitations.
30.
by doc_ick 16d ago
100%

More ›