Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
unified101
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
unified101
5d ago
Its written like it's making a praiseworthy point, but mostly comes across as luddites.
2.
▲
by
unified101
5d ago
My follow up would be - how many are unemployed vs employed. From what I do know, most linux devs also work someplace, so either directly or indirectly have the means for a 20-100 dollar subscription a month. More than that, I've not s
3.
▲
by
unified101
5d ago
Seems low. 80% people are manually typing in things? In my circle it's close to 0% code written manually. Do linux devs live in a completely different microcosm?
4.
▲
by
unified101
6d ago
News piece with unnecessary annoying editorializing. I think the idea of plasma widgets and rails fully being customized per user giving them material control on ones desktop is a good idea. We need good ideas to counter and take on the oma
5.
▲
by
unified101
7d ago
I apologize to GPerson for needlessly trying to convince him to my point of view. He seems to be an smart person deeply affected by how LLM are affecting his vocation and work. It was wrong of me to do this and I will take a break from this
6.
▲
by
unified101
7d ago
It will. you lack imagination, and have a unnecessary high opinion of yourself.
7.
▲
by
unified101
7d ago
I cheer for a path that opens up the future wider for knowledge.
8.
▲
by
unified101
7d ago
This job based pursuite of knowledge is impure. Drop it.
9.
▲
by
unified101
7d ago
It will. you just lack imagination.
10.
▲
by
unified101
7d ago
The direction of continue shotting will develop a new culture that lead to a much more wider understanding for humans in the field of math. Find a way to accept this new culture and you'll thrive.
11.
▲
by
unified101
7d ago
Jobs will come and go. I'ts their nature. What makes you treat job over pursuit of knowledge. It is lowly and unbecoming.
12.
▲
by
unified101
7d ago
What's this obsession with credit. From elsewhere in the thread: > people spending their lives trying to promote humanity What does this even mean? Become a monk? They are credited with helping humanity.
13.
▲
by
unified101
7d ago
WTF? Have some humility towards someone who took the time to talk about their work. And made intellectual progress. Air your LLM greviences someplace else.
14.
▲
by
unified101
9d ago
Knowledge wants to be free.
15.
▲
by
unified101
9d ago
I personally don't think there's a correct concept of money. Money describes how happy I feel, and the correct money I should have is whatever describes my current mood. So what can we collective do with money so I feel most happy
16.
▲
by
unified101
10d ago
Sadly, you will have to choose another profession, and as your example shows, the better paying ones need 10 years of gruntwork to get there.
17.
▲
by
unified101
10d ago
I'm curious - how do you explain the fact that as you look all around you, lesser number of devs are having fun?
18.
▲
by
unified101
10d ago
That's like saying don't agent your mom and dad. is anyone? A reprot for your boss? or code? we're past that.
19.
▲
by
unified101
11d ago
For those looking: Fig 4a, the right 2 designs are the winner. https://academic.oup.com/view-large/figure/512223725/pgaf087... I do recall there was another story of putting a "target" at the right
20.
▲
by
unified101
11d ago
I don't get this. There's one post. Are we saying AI is not fair use and let's save copyright from it's ongoing trivialization? I vote no.
21.
▲
by
unified101
11d ago
Serious question - what's so special about personal merit anyway? In hunter gatherers it was might, in current age it's brain, but either are equally arbitrary. I prefer a world that's equalocracy, with a focus on specific pe
22.
▲
by
unified101
12d ago
So is walmart. If you can understand that system, the answer to your question is revealed.
23.
▲
by
unified101
12d ago
I don't think you'll find this community welcoming the idea of lower pay (and hence a more volatile employment). Overall if in the next 12 months I fully expect compensation on average to be down 30-50%. It's impossible for i
24.
▲
by
unified101
12d ago
Only python?
25.
▲
by
unified101
12d ago
I think this will go hand in hand with tech compensation and jobs falling off a cliff. In the AI world too, we can't have our cake and eat it.
26.
▲
by
unified101
12d ago
Your water supply is administered online. Your land records, taxes, revenue are online. Stock market is online. Power systems are online. Nuclear power reactors are (kind of) online. Money to bribe people to do work is online
27.
▲
by
unified101
13d ago
I'll be blunt rather than couch it: all the things you've listed will make you a ralph loop target in the org. You are adding human in the loop where the industry is moving in the opposite direction. This is generally true across
28.
▲
by
unified101
15d ago
The loss of identity is quite destabilizing, and our industry is not doing enough to address it. For example, one thing we could do is move identity to value to the user, in a structured way. It is possible, but hardly any team is thinking
29.
▲
by
unified101
15d ago
I'm all ears for a solution. But all I hear is some workers want to bar other workers (H1B, seniority, etc) from working. I hear nothing about organizing. Class warfare is nice to write about, but there's been 0 credible approache
30.
▲
by
unified101
15d ago
Work competitor is also your colleague.
More ›