tjpnz

3 ms·

1.
by tjpnz 5d ago
If your business requires the use of one of these platforms in order to exist I would question its viability. Willingly giving a single company that much power over you is a horrible position to be in. Maybe it does put food on the table th
2.
by tjpnz 10d ago
Too much potential for revealing the identities of others there.
3.
by tjpnz 12d ago
So security through obscurity.
4.
by tjpnz 16d ago
M4 Pro but there are still builds for Intel based macs.
5.
by tjpnz 16d ago
I'm mostly down to one. It's called Daddyflix (Jellyfin, actually) and runs on a Mac Mini in my home office. Costs close to zero, is accessible everywhere and there's no ads or other bullshit.
6.
by tjpnz 16d ago
It should be said that being on a US sanctions list doesn't appear to carry the same weight it once did. A Japanese citizen was added to one this month and her bank was able to effectively ignore it, not sure about options where credit
7.
by tjpnz 16d ago
Also no layoffs, ever. Who would've thought that providing your people stability would lead to a better product.
8.
by tjpnz 16d ago
Probably better than most given how quickly they're able to push out updates this big.
9.
by tjpnz 19d ago
Do transparent faraday cages exist?
10.
by tjpnz 20d ago
The raping a thirteen year old girl and seemingly getting away with it game?
11.
by tjpnz 20d ago
Google needs to be broken up.
12.
by tjpnz 29d ago
I'm also grossed out by what he's said to have done to his now ex-wife. Icky, icky stuff all round.
13.
by tjpnz 1mo ago
Every single person who's ever worked for that piece of shit company shares some blame. The CEO is just the most visible.
14.
by tjpnz 1mo ago
The only practical measure you can take is to wipe your devices before travel.
15.
by tjpnz 1mo ago
Paywalls fucking suck. No I'm not going to subscribe to your publication just so I can read one fucking article. I would however pay 5-10 dollars a month to get access to a variety of news sites (ad free of course - albeit less of a pr
16.
by tjpnz 1mo ago
>Some patients seek low, non-therapeutic doses of medication instead. “A lot of people would benefit from having amphetamines. You feel better, you can focus better, you can do more. But there hasn’t been a debate that this country shoul
17.
by tjpnz 1mo ago
As someone who doesn't utilize LLMs for writing production code I'm looking forward to starting a consultancy and reaping the rewards.
18.
by tjpnz 1mo ago
Sounds like a fantastic waste of compute. The future of private AI is local inference rendering this application of it pointless.
19.
by tjpnz 1mo ago
Pretty sure we've seen Elon there.
20.
by tjpnz 1mo ago
Does stealing from a thief still amount to theft?
21.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
My understanding is that it only comes on when they're recording.
22.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
The problem is that even when they're not recording they're still beaming data back to Meta. Which is why I'll continue being a PITA to anyone wearing them where I'm in their field of view. I made a choice long ago that
23.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
They're not going to sell 25+ million more units when there's a very real threat of being assaulted while wearing them.
24.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
I think the location of everyone wearing the pedo glasses nearby should be available in a separate app. If wearers of the pedo glasses are concerned for their own privacy they might consider leaving the pedo glasses at home.
25.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
Epstein Glasses is also a good name for them. Glasses for people who don't do consent.
26.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
How to opt-out of sharing your NHS health records with Palantir: https://www.nhs.uk/using-the-nhs/about-the-nhs/opt-out-of-sh...
27.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
And Paula Vennells continues to escape real consequences.
28.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
In the 90s/2000s people also used to shorten cybersex to cyber. I guess if they wanted to have fun with it they could add a "Wanna Cyber?" in place of the usual "Try <x>".
29.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
Google should've been broken up eons ago.
30.
by tjpnz 2mo ago
Adblockers for cars?

More ›