anon48293

3 ms·

1.
by anon48293 5d ago
GitHub clearly didn’t use his left pad
2.
by anon48293 5d ago
Since the potential error increases with N, I suggest spawning N different models and let them fight it out instead.
3.
by anon48293 5d ago
Then please enlighten me. What else do you want except what neural activity is necessary and sufficient for a conscious experience?
4.
by anon48293 6d ago
Substrates of consciousness? You mean the neural correlates of consciousness which we already have?
5.
by anon48293 6d ago
Immersion is key. Get a basic vocabulary going, then go to meet-ups, listen to music and watch tv shows in the language.
6.
by anon48293 6d ago
That knowledge is already available and generally people don’t build bombs or bioweapons. Otherwise they could still go to university and learn all that if they so wish
7.
by anon48293 7d ago
No. Watch the simple made easy talk. Just more I/O isn’t more complicated nor a bigger risk. More entanglement is more complicated.
8.
by anon48293 8d ago
Try onlyoffice
9.
by anon48293 8d ago
True, but susceptible in different manners. As for a source which appears “trustworthy”, such as an LLM spewing out data, low IQ are more susceptible as per this study https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325733310_
10.
by anon48293 8d ago
Funny. The end of copyright and patents is by far the best thing about AI to me. All of it is nonsense. Great that you drew a picture of a mouse once, I really fail to see why I couldn’t draw it and sell it either. It was moronic from the g
11.
by anon48293 8d ago
It will (hopefully) move towards things like Lean
12.
by anon48293 8d ago
That sounds like a brilliant idea. First get all your bases in the Middle East destroyed, then pull out of Europe. And there goes your global power projection.
13.
by anon48293 9d ago
Paywall
14.
by anon48293 10d ago
Nice reference
15.
by anon48293 11d ago
No, the problem was OpenAI not implementing proper sandboxing or safeguards, and telling the AI exactly to hack things. Thats what exploitgym is, and the task they were given. This is 100% on OpenAI.
16.
by anon48293 12d ago
Comment from the developer of the smartube the person I replied to said he used.
17.
by anon48293 12d ago
I certainly won’t be wearing Nike anymore because of it. I’m clearly not the target audience.
18.
by anon48293 12d ago
In case you weren’t aware: “ My development environment was infected by unknown malicious software, as a result of which a few builds may have been affected. Once the issue was detected, I secured everything with a full disk wipe, restored
19.
by anon48293 13d ago
But they did say that? "LG TVs process voice data only when the voice button on the remote control is pressed and held, or when a wake word such as 'Hi LG' is recognized after the user has activated the Far-Field voice recogn
20.
by anon48293 14d ago
Yes. Both having different causes, just at similar times.
21.
by anon48293 15d ago
Great to see the AI ecosystem finally mature /s
22.
by anon48293 15d ago
Kind of, with trickery. https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLig...
23.
by anon48293 15d ago
They don’t confuse them, he says both have the same issue. Perhaps you are the AI slop?
24.
by anon48293 18d ago
Yes, and that’s exactly what I believe they are doing
25.
by anon48293 18d ago
Someone linked a ranking site in the comments here. Apple weather is one of the most accurate ones.
26.
by anon48293 19d ago
Then again neither is peer review. Reproducing research is the only way to prove reproducibility and thereby lend credibility to the claims.
27.
by anon48293 22d ago
I don’t know about the US, but in my country the loan for mortgage is tied to your income. So you could afford 200/month more, but they won’t lend it to you if your max mortgage is 300 and not 350.
28.
by anon48293 22d ago
Annoying AI slop article
29.
by anon48293 22d ago
It didn’t read AI generated to me. I also love the irony of then using AI to generate a summary
30.
by anon48293 22d ago
Then they probably shouldn’t have used a stable atom..

More ›