hyperhello

3 ms·

1.
by hyperhello 5d ago
It introduced vocabulary well enough though? I get that the specifics were all apocryphal.
2.
by hyperhello 6d ago
> March: ok, let’s also get everyone else onto Claude Code or Claude Cowork every single day May I ask what you’re making that somehow is improved by turning everyone into chat bot controllers?
3.
by hyperhello 7d ago
Well, why did you?
4.
by hyperhello 7d ago
I had to talk back, but if insults and down votes solved anything there would be no insults or down votes.
5.
by hyperhello 7d ago
That’s exactly what I meant. I was only replying to the question as posed.
6.
by hyperhello 7d ago
“Absorbs” volatility might be more accurate.
7.
by hyperhello 7d ago
> The San Francisco Onion Futures Company is not a board of trade, defined as an "organized exchange or other trading facility". I hate to argue but then what would they define this as, if not an organized exchange or other tra
8.
by hyperhello 9d ago
IM?
9.
by hyperhello 9d ago
Once you have the concept down of not doing anything to further itself but merely existing in the time and place, which is called reflection, you can expand (not travel) to contemplation, a different experience.
10.
by hyperhello 9d ago
Are we still talking about testing for autism?
11.
by hyperhello 10d ago
Artificial intelligence is a lot like alternative medicine, if it was the thing it said it was it wouldn’t need a name.
12.
by hyperhello 11d ago
How much land, time, and money, per citizen, would it take to put down enough solar cells to generate each person's basic electrical supply? Is it less than $5K?
13.
by hyperhello 11d ago
I doubt it will ever be cost effective for the foreseeable future. The AI companies have astonishing amounts of compute and they’re effectively dumping it on the market.
14.
by hyperhello 12d ago
For can have another set of variables in the header too. You can simulate it more readably even if you need to call the lambda.
15.
by hyperhello 13d ago
> But AI breaks that correlation, for the same reason it separates the two notions of proof. So, even genuine solutions would not satisfy us. This is not moving the goalposts but recognizing that any specific goalpost is inadequate. If m
16.
by hyperhello 15d ago
Why does everyone hate this comment? Attitude? I can’t figure out the wavelength here. I’m just commenting.
17.
Can Grindr stay up during RNC conventions?(irishstar.com)
16 points by hyperhello 16d ago|0 comments
18.
by hyperhello 16d ago
USPS Successfully Mishandles Specific Ballots
19.
by hyperhello 16d ago
We don't need novelty accounts here.
20.
by hyperhello 16d ago
Where do the extra numbers come from? Are they stored as decimal polar coordinates that get converted to themselves times pi?
21.
by hyperhello 16d ago
Also could use analysis of dependencies to see what can happen in parallel. Or for that matter, some real benchmarks.
22.
by hyperhello 17d ago
I sympathize but you're literally looking at something an hour old and demanding that the economic and political realities that produced it change entirely.
23.
by hyperhello 17d ago
What is with the bold sections? Is this just AI or are you trying to make sure I didn’t fall asleep reading the bland plaintext?
24.
by hyperhello 17d ago
Does this do the tokenization? Could it be expanded to parse the whole structure of the language?
25.
by hyperhello 18d ago
Good god, sorry I participated in any way. Apparently there’s a quantum physics colloquium I’m disturbing.
26.
by hyperhello 19d ago
Well, yeah. Perhaps if this experiment was expanded for a chain or a filter of cause and effect then it could be shown that one event affects another.
27.
by hyperhello 19d ago
Unfounded speculation, but is it possible that every particle could have a different individual light speed, and the one we know is just the average speed that they have to drop or speed up to, the way a car needs to travel at the same spee
28.
by hyperhello 19d ago
I don’t think it’s fair to call {}-> injective just because no two inputs map to the same output. That’s vacuous.
29.
by hyperhello 19d ago
Maybe they were but the compromise they accepted was Indians not taxed, so unless there’s some pretty surprising evidence…
30.
by hyperhello 22d ago
Isn’t there some theorem that any sufficiently complex mathematical languages will have statements that can’t be proven? :)

More ›