throwaway27448

3 ms·

1.
by throwaway27448 5d ago
> The issue with iCloud is that before you even know it, you're paying $9.99/mo. Sounds like the issue is you.
2.
by throwaway27448 5d ago
> Until you need to install an app through the App store. Do you have an example of needing to go through the app store? There's apple's apps, I guess.
3.
by throwaway27448 5d ago
Comparing apple intelligence to a service that records your screen without consent feels extremely disingenuous.
4.
by throwaway27448 5d ago
Is there evidence of this anywhere on the internet? I couldn't find anything with ten minutes of searching, and I don't use little snitch, and I'm not going to put the effort in to remediate this just to figure out if this co
5.
by throwaway27448 5d ago
Well, thankfully we have formal languages too that vaguely model the universe and provide a stronger model of coherent thought.
6.
by throwaway27448 5d ago
> No thanks to the "macos value add" that forces you to use Metal while Valve customers frolick in Protonland. Crossover works on macos, too. So does moltenvk, so does vanilla wine, etc etc. You can run most games without a hit
7.
by throwaway27448 5d ago
...did you mean profit? I don't think they're manufacturing iphones just on the hope they delight you. This is also true of Google et al. I don't get these weird parasocial emotional attachments/beefs people have with br
8.
by throwaway27448 5d ago
If you seriously think apple products are nothing but a status item, you're deluding yourself and probably have been for decades.
9.
by throwaway27448 5d ago
A) the macos value add is enormous if you have any investment in the ecosystem, B) for me at least a GPU is completely useless for anything but being a token generator.
10.
by throwaway27448 6d ago
It stopped having meaning a few decades ago when "open source" started to be used interchangeably with "free, libre, open source software". It's all vibes now—did you release anything aside from a strictly commercia
11.
by throwaway27448 6d ago
Human language is poorly-suited for describing a coherent universe because you can construct all sorts of incoherent propositions (e.g. "what existed before time"/"what exists outside of reality" etc etc); philosoph
12.
by throwaway27448 6d ago
How meaningful is this actually? Is this a measurable distinction, or a conceptual one with the same semantics?
13.
by throwaway27448 7d ago
We really need to ban tech people from using the word "open".
14.
by throwaway27448 7d ago
> Firefox is no longer part of most browser compatibility matrices, what ease? What would be the point of a browser compatibility matrix then?
15.
by throwaway27448 7d ago
Either way we're still stuck with it.
16.
by throwaway27448 7d ago
> advocating for chromium. Advocating for chromium to do what?
17.
by throwaway27448 8d ago
> People have been doing that all the time for every kind of codebase. It's just part of the business. What is your ecosystem where this is true? Embedded or industrial, maybe? I'm guessing you assume other people also use the
18.
by throwaway27448 11d ago
I mean we shouldn't hear the end of it. Humanity is theoretically capable of learning. I have my doubts but the liberals assure me
19.
by throwaway27448 15d ago
That's not proof of interest so much as proof of commerce. It could easily be a money-laundering mechanism. Mostly nobody cares about professional chess. The number of people who are actually interested in today's game and not the
20.
by throwaway27448 15d ago
If you care about smooth interactions, the browser even in 2026 is not the most straightforward route, nor the route any reasonable small company takes.
21.
by throwaway27448 15d ago
There is little indication of inclination or tendency this way. Sadly. I'd much prefer public universities own data centers than private corporations.
22.
by throwaway27448 15d ago
You're looking too closely. Whether or not mathematicians are actually outraged makes little difference to how this article plays. Hell, lying would likely INCREASE revenue.
23.
by throwaway27448 16d ago
> Not sure why someone would say it was a wrong decision. Writing almost anything with javascript sucks ass to begin with. Writing native code with it is even more painful. Most javascript engines don't even have any decent model of
24.
by throwaway27448 16d ago
So—the widget doesn't function normally until the phone is unlocked? I don't want to flex but that seems worth acknowledging from every perspective
25.
by throwaway27448 16d ago
I have deep faith you can find the imagination with in you to understand
26.
by throwaway27448 16d ago
> The main appeal of RN was being able to leverage your web devs for mobile dev. There's nothing remarkable about the skill set of either party; the appeal here is re-use of code. how the labor markets itself is irrelevant
27.
by throwaway27448 16d ago
The software can read from the phone without unlocking it?
28.
by throwaway27448 16d ago
I don't see the distinction—the core pitch of gemini is the very fact that it's not tied to any of these technologies.
29.
by throwaway27448 16d ago
I'm a little too lazy to experiment, but it wouldn't surprise me if that widget didn't function normally until the phone is unlocked.
30.
by throwaway27448 16d ago
I think it's less about pie charts and more that weather apps can be very eyecandy-heavy. This sort of marketing works well for both consumers and board members.

More ›