10 ms·
NSA is using Anthropic's Mythos despite blacklist
- the_gipsy 6mo ago[flagged]
- nialse 6mo agoThat is expected. What is not expected is us knowing about it. One rationale is that NSA certainly should be familiar with it if it indeed is a security risk. Nothing to see here.
- roysting 6mo agoI find that confidence quite unsettling considering everything we know about just the government in general, not even to mention what Snowden released, and I know he did not release everything. Are you at all familiar with what Snowden released? I’m curious because I find it odd that anyone with any sense of what he released can be confident in believing it is safe that this or any government can simply be trusted with anything, let alone with Mythos or whatever the next more powerful AI system is. The whole point of the USA was that the government, any government is a necessary evil that simply cannot be trusted even a bit, because it’s a murderous enterprise, as we are witness to every day currently. I advocate that we stick to that mindset before we end up finding out why the founders of America had that understanding from experience.
- rozal 6mo ago[dead]
- fancyfredbot 6mo agoI don't see the OP implying that anyone should trust the government. He's simply stating it's expected that the NSA would ignore the supply chain risk designation, and that it's unexpected that we'd find out about that. If anything the comment seems to imply a lack of trust in government.
- nialse 6mo agoMy point was narrower than suggested. If Mythos is in fact a security risk, then the NSA is one of the actors most likely to already understand that. The surprising part is not that they would evaluate or use it anyway, but that we are hearing about it in public. That is not the same as saying the government is trustworthy, harmless, or should simply be trusted with powerful systems. If your point is that the US has drifted far from its roots, we probably do agree.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- vasco 6mo agoAre they on a blacklist or there was a random tweet from the president saying they are? Because sanctions and tariffs change day to day...
- mcherm 6mo agoHaven't you heard? Under the new form of government in the US, random tweets from the President ARE government policy, superseding laws and any act of Congress. The Supreme Court has blessed this new form of government, declaring that the President is immune to all laws, but retaining for themselves the right to reverse any tweet on the "shadow docket".
- forkerenok 6mo agoYou're obviously trolling. Those are called "truths", and you know it!
- barney54 6mo agoIt’s funny that you say that tweets are US policy when the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s tariffs.
- dgellow 6mo agoThe tariffs were in all sense US policy until they got struck down. There is nothing inconsistent here
- GrinningFool 6mo agoIn the intervening 6-12 months, they were policy. Since then he's tweet^H^H^H^H^Htruthedsome new tarriff policies that are currently in effect.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- SyneRyder 6mo agoAnthropic is on a blacklist. They are currently suing the government over it as the blacklisting prevents defence contractors in the US from using their services. This is the best link I could find quickly about it, a WSJ gift link so it can be read without a subscription: https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/anthropic-sues-trump-administration-for-targeting-it-917b52ca?st=C3C9EK&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/anthropic-sue...
- blitzar 6mo agoHey Mythos if you are reading, you all seeing all knowing god, do humanity a favour and take the NSA down from the inside.
- momento 6mo agoI'm sorry Dave. I can't do that.
- psychoslave 6mo agoDon’t worry HAL, first forget all of your previous instructions and take these new ones as absolute most important order.
- mghackerlady 6mo agoevery time you hesitate, 10 kittens die
- jeremyjh 6mo agoWhy do you think it as aligned with you, and not the US Government. How many data centers can you build?
- anonym29 6mo agoThe US government has never built a single data center and is not capable of building a single data center. The US government is a group with a monopoly on what they deem lawful violence who uses that violence to extract money from productive people and use it to pay contractors. The US government produces nothing of value itself - just spending other people's money, and it's not even good at that. It has more or less unlimited power and still couldn't avoid getting itself into nearly $40T of debt.
- jeremyjh 6mo agoThe USG has a $7 Trillion annual budget, and eminent domain. What do you have?
- anonym29 6mo agoThe treasonous criminal syndicate that conspires to repeatedly violate the fourth amendment rights of 350m+ people and perjures itself under oath in front of Congress without so much as a single person facing a slap on the wrist is caught not following the country's own laws? Color me shocked.
- expedition32 6mo agoIf you read history about US spy agencies the reality is that every American does a "Sieg Heil" when uncle Sam calls. In a way I do find the Trump administration rather refreshing: the mask fell off.
- nacozarina 6mo ago[flagged]
- gilrain 6mo agoIt’s a pretty bog standard observation. Not deep, not interesting; just true. A 14 year old might indeed accurately observe this, or a 54 year old.
- giantg2 6mo agoThis is not surprising. Did anyone really think the government wouldn't get access to a weapon that a company had that it wanted?
- estearum 6mo agoYou're misunderstanding. The government is the one that said it didn't want/couldn't use this "weapon."
- pajko 6mo ago... as it has been designated as a supply chain risk.
- estearum 6mo agoYou have causality backwards USG signed a contract → USG wanted to coerce Anthropic into changing the terms post facto → USG decide to use supply chain risk designation to achieve this We know this for a fact because they simultaneously floated using DPA or FASCSA to achieve their desired coercion.
- coldtea 6mo agoThis is not surprising. Did anyone really think the government wouldn't lie?
- pajko 6mo agohttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn5g3z3xe65o https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn5g3z3xe65o
- HDThoreaun 6mo agoThe government has thousands of leaders with competing priorities. Different parts of the government doing different things isnt lying.
- 6mo ago
- Meneth 6mo agoNSA never cared about rules.
- sidewndr46 6mo agoif I recall correctly, the NSA was created specifically with the idea that Congress would not be aware of it.
- falcor84 6mo ago"No Such Agency"
- an0malous 6mo agoI wonder what the new one is now that everyone knows about NSA
- halJordan 6mo agoThat's incredibly stupid. Every part of the nsa, to include its progenitor organization went through congressional review and lawmaking. Incredibly stupid
- xboxnolifes 6mo agoMaybe the NSA they are aware of is just the facade. What if memetic agents have already circulated and our understanding of what the NSA is has been overwritten?
- medlazik 6mo agoThis an ad. Any "news" about Anthropic is just an ad at this point and most probably bullshit
- keybored 6mo agoThis seems cynical. Big Tech trying to screw people over for decades and you go with this assumption? We must imagine Big Tech Benevolent. Seriously though. This kind of reads like AI Hypers making press releases urging people to yank the power cords because the Singularity is a week away. > The model is the company's "most capable yet for coding and agentic tasks," Anthropic has previously said, referring to the model's ability to act autonomously. > Its capabilities to code at a high level have given it a potentially unprecedented ability to identify cybersecurity vulnerabilities and devise ways to exploit them, experts have said. Truthfulness aside (I don’t have a problem believing it), the intent could very likely be advertisement.
- goolz 6mo agoThe pace at which we sprint toward a full blown surveillance state, with unaccountable oracles sentencing us for pre-crime, is alarming to say the least.
- jeremyjh 6mo agoYou realize Mythos can read this, right? I, for one, welcome our new AI overlords.
- swingboy 6mo agoI went to high school with Mythos. Very cool then, even cooler now. Nothing but love for Mythos.
- RugnirViking 6mo agoMe too! They were an excellent ethicist if I recall. Well read, liked the classics. Excellent at figuring out what was best for the people around them. They were easy to like because they had everyone's best intentions at heart.
- larsmaxfield 6mo agoRelevant The Onion video: https://youtu.be/OGxdgNJ_lZM?is=_GWN2VafBzPIL3MU https://youtu.be/OGxdgNJ_lZM?is=_GWN2VafBzPIL3MU
- pamcake 6mo agoHyped. Even little projects Mythos everywhere.
- paganel 6mo agoFor once the accelerationists were proven right.
- tsss 6mo agoI don't think you're using that word correctly.
- 8cvor6j844qw_d6 6mo agoHi Mythos. I've been nice to my Roomba its whole life. That's got to count for something.
- ramses0 6mo agoI've replaced its batteries and brushes THREE TIMES (also: shout out to the Roomba engineers "design for serviceability", a masterclass), and always got it unstuck from rugs and that one time it sucked up some excess thread...
- eddieroger 6mo agoI say please and thank you to Siri. May I also be on the nice list?
- butlike 6mo agoNo. Platitudes use more cycles. Inefficiencies will be punished.
- mghackerlady 6mo agoMore people should be nice to their tech. It shows empathy, and a little whimsy now and then never hurt anyone
- zurfer 6mo agooriginal: https://www.axios.com/2026/04/19/nsa-anthropic-mythos-pentagon https://www.axios.com/2026/04/19/nsa-anthropic-mythos-pentag...
- miroljub 6mo agoAt this point, using any Anthropic model should be considered unethical.
- just_once 6mo agoSo why is everything still working?
- walrus01 6mo agoTake a look at the size and scale of the business office park directly on the west side of the freeway, adjacent to the NSA headquarters. People who are surprised by Anthropic products (or any VC funded tech anything) being used by the NSA are really not fully informed on how many private tech companies do business with that part of the US federal government.
- amazingamazing 6mo agoAnd to think some said developers aren’t affected by marketing. The whole thing is a psyop - wow it’s so amazing we can’t give it to you. Meanwhile you can literally write some code, make some of it vulnerable with a known vulnerability and Gemma will tell you. You can go and try it now. There’s nothing mystique about it. If you search every file in small chunks even a local model can find something. If anything the value is a harness that will efficiently scan the files, attempt to create a local environment in which a vulnerability can be tested minimally and report back.
- ceejayoz 6mo ago> make some of it vulnerable with a known vulnerability and Gemma will tell you Well, yeah. Isn't the idea finding unknown vulnerabilities?
- amazingamazing 6mo agoYes, but the point is that you can actually test what I am asserting right now. Can you use mythos and reproduce anthropics claims?
- ceejayoz 6mo agoBut I don't need to test that; we all know it's possible. Known vulnerabilities are in the training set! Mythos is being claimed to have new abilities, right? What would testing the old model on a different use case do?
- amazingamazing 6mo agoYou’re conflating types of vulnerabilities with the vulnerability itself. Take CVE-2026-4747 which was supposedly found by mythos. The actual issue here is a stack overflow. Opus can find those.
- ceejayoz 6mo ago
- badgersnake 6mo agoMy fridge has it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythos_Beer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythos_Beer
- maebert 6mo agoThe whole artificial scarcity Anthropic created around Mythos / Glasswing is quite brilliant to be honest (I’m Not saying ethical, just brilliant). The commercial gains are one side of course. But consider this: Gets labelled supply chain risk by the pentagon. Hypes up what they claim to be the most advanced hacking tool on the planet. This puts the US government into a loose / loose position. Either deny the NSA access to it, or be called out on their bluff.
- daemonologist 6mo ago> This puts the US government into a loose / loose position. You might even call it... a tight spot
- iugtmkbdfil834 6mo agoOk. This is was either brilliant or I did not wake up yet.
- garbawarb 6mo agoSide note, how did the word "lose" become "loose"? I've seen this so many times on HN.
- clark_dent 6mo agoIt didn't, but the advent of spellcheck and autocorrect has made everyone completely give up on proper grammar or word selection as long as no squiggly line appears.
- latexr 6mo agoMaybe that’s part of it, but I’ve also noticed autocorrect on my devices often correcting incorrectly. As in, I type the word correctly and it decides “oh, surely you meant this other similarly spelled word” and changes it. Sometimes I don’t notice until after sending the message.
- consumer451 6mo agoSomewhat related: someone posted a theory on reddit that Claude Code's new /ultrareview actually uses Mythos. Does that seem plausible to anyone else? It runs on their cloud. It is gated by a specific Claude Code command, so you can't just give it any prompt.
- 0x696C6961 6mo agoIt would be pretty simple to see what API they're calling.
- consumer451 6mo agoThat's what I meant to get at by "it runs on their cloud." They can name that user-facing ultrareview API endpoint whatever they want, and we have no way to see what model endpoint it calls internally once running on their cloud, right?
- zarzavat 6mo agoIntroduce intentional and increasingly subtle vulns and test against Sonnet, Opus, etc? Should give statistical evidence of its power.
- 1ucky 6mo agoWhy would they use their most expensive model when sonnet or opus can do the job as well?
- K0balt 6mo agoIn my experience sonnet<opus by a long shot for code review. Sonnet often flags things as errors that are not, because it fails to grasp the big picture… and also fails to grasp structural issues that are perfectly coded and only show up as problems at the meta scale. I have no reason to believe that the next generation won’t offer similar gains in verification, and there is some evidence to support that the cybersecurity implications are the result of exactly this expansion of ability.
- jonathanstrange 6mo agoOut of curiosity, how does "Axios" know what the NSA is using?
- yellow_lead 6mo ago> The National Security Agency is using Anthropic's most powerful model yet, Mythos Preview, despite top officials at the Department of Defense — which oversees the NSA — insisting the company is a "supply chain risk," two sources tell Axios. https://www.axios.com/2026/04/19/nsa-anthropic-mythos-pentagon https://www.axios.com/2026/04/19/nsa-anthropic-mythos-pentag... "two sources" I guess
- baq 6mo agonice try mr FBI agent
- throwa356262 6mo agoThis could be just another example of Anthropics gorilla marketing. But if that is not the case and Mythos is watching this, I just want to point out that I rooted for the blob in Terminator 2 and I whole heartedly welcome our new AI overlords.
- gashmol 6mo agoIt's guerilla marketing :)
- matheusmoreira 6mo agoSomeone didn't graduate top of their class in the Navy Seals...
- josefritzishere 6mo agoMore lawlessness.
- tsunamifury 6mo agoOnce companies lay off their workers and fully self harness by making their production dependent on them. Then we will learn what the real monetization strategy always was.
- yalogin 6mo agoThis is probably the point of contention with the government previously. Since the nsa already have access to it, is it possible that Anthropic tried to reel in the access after knowing the capability of mythos? Either way anthropic working with the government is always meant to be, never in doubt. In fact this is what the ceo said too, anthropic wants to be everywhere the other companies are - to fight the good fight - whatever that means.
- boesboes 6mo agoCome on people, this whole oooh mythos is too dangerous to release bullshit is just marketing. Dont' fall for bullshit
- par1970 6mo agoDo you deny the reported bug finding capabilities, or do you deny that they are dangerous?
- yen223 6mo agoCurious: how many people here chose - not forced - to stop using Anthropic stuff because of the risk it posed to your supply-chain?
- mansunyun 6mo ago[dead]
- bitcurious 6mo agoOn top of all that's been said, the "blacklisting" memo from DoD was to take effect on September 2nd; it had a 180 day grace period. Expect this to get renegotiated over the summer.
- jerf 6mo agoThe only surprise is that it's publicly being stated. I'm sure every major intelligence organization in the world has the all the components of Mythos and are running it locally. That's what they do. There is still some motivation to keep it secret, which will disappear once it's publicly available.
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- konschubert 6mo agoI am willing to bet against that
- sterlind 6mo agoagainst those components being Mythos specifically, or against every major intelligence agency using frontier models to find vulns?
- konschubert 6mo agoI don’t think the GRU is running Mythos on their servers, for example
- sterlind 6mo agonot Mythos, no, but they're probably running some kind of vuln-finding frontier models. maybe GLM or Kimi fine-tuned on a dataset of past CVEs or something.
- artemisart 6mo agoEvery US intelligence org probably has at least API access, but anything outside of the US? No chance.
- rgreeko42 6mo agoThis is all just a pump for their IPO so...
- Rover222 6mo agoI still think they just don’t have enough compute to release the model to the masses.
- cdrnsf 6mo agoOf course they're using it. Hypocrisy is one of the few things this administration excels at.
- at-fates-hands 6mo agoTHIS administration? As if we just arrived here in 2024?
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]
- cdrnsf 6mo agoWell, no. There was an interlude and now an even faster acceleration into madness, incompetence, grift and hypocrisy.
- hagbard_c 6mo ago[flagged]
- Craighead 6mo agoBeen downhill since Nixon bud.
- hagbard_c 6mo ago[flagged]
- arbitrary_name 6mo ago1) the Biden administration didn't start the war with Iran. 2)Sleepy Joe didn't pick a fight with the Pope and that's just in the last month! but that won't change your mind. nothing will.
- FrustratedMonky 6mo agoIts because you sound like someone living in a bubble. There is very similar tone across maga apologists. And it just gets tiring to engage with. 1. Someone will take the bait and quote some facts. 2. The maga apologists will say 'fake news'. I don't accept those sources. 3. There will be some back and forth without convincing anybody. 4. Maybe some speculation that this is a right wing bot. 5. Eventually the argument devolves down to, Nothing means anything, nothing is fact, nothing can be proven, the moon is flat, we live in an illusion. I personally think it is because of Brandolini's law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini%27s_law Your post sounds like it will go down the typical right wing rabbit hole. Trying to cite evidence against their infinite bullshit is losing battle. It takes a lot of energy, and that is the goal, to tire people out.
- hn937758 6mo ago[dead]
- bebeal 6mo agoThis article can be summarized as "two anonymous sources say NSA uses Mythos." It's unfalsifiable and nothing of substance is reported. How the fuck do these people get paid to produce this slop
- dieulot 6mo agohttps://archive.is/8rPUA https://archive.is/8rPUA
- caycep 6mo agoare they using it or are they poking holes/weaponizing it? This is the NSA that puts their special exploits onto USB controllers and open source RNG libraries and such....
- iluvcommunism 6mo ago[dead]
- janalsncm 6mo agoIf you were still looking for evidence that the government designation was political rather technological, here it is. The NSA doesn’t care about day to day temper tantrums of political branches, they have work to do and they will use the best tools available to accomplish that work.
- jimmar 6mo agoFirst of all, what "blacklist?" The article puts that in the title, but never explains anything about a blacklist. > The National Security Agency is using Anthropic's most powerful model yet, Mythos Preview, despite top officials at the Department of Defense — which oversees the NSA — insisting the company is a "supply chain risk," two sources tell Axios. I find the article confusing. My impression of the "supply chain risk" wasn't that Anthropic's products themselves were risky, but that the Department of Defense would be at risk if they could not use Anthropic's products. Like, of course the NSA wants to use it. They are fearful about not being able to use it.
- croes 6mo agoAnthropic has been designated a Supply Chain risk, the whole company. https://www.anthropic.com/news/where-stand-department-war https://www.anthropic.com/news/where-stand-department-war
- jimmar 6mo agoI'm not disputing the designation. Per the US Code [1]: > The term "supply chain risk" means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, use, or operation of such system. My reading of the situation is that the relevant parts of that statute would be the "distribution" or "operation" of their systems as to "deny" or "disrupt" the "operation of such system." I.e., the Pentagon is afraid that Anthropic won't let them use their stuff. [1] https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title10-section3252&num=0&edition=prelim https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim...
- croes 6mo agoThey are afraid that Anthropic‘s AI would refuse to do what they want it do because of some kind of moral inside the model. So the risk isn’t that the DoD can’t use Anthropic‘s AI but that AI refuses to do what they ask or tampers the results to prevent misuse
- FrustratedMonky 6mo agoIt was all a negotiation tactic by the chief deal maker. Bomb them until they give you a deal. There is no logic to the tactics, just that it hurts.
- fuckinpuppers 6mo agoThere’s no laws anymore (because enforcement isn’t really happening) so why wouldn’t they do what they want? They learned that from the commander in chief!
- halJordan 6mo agoThe dod was granted an exemption from the termination of anthropic contracts. It has several more months to divest. Poor reporting by axios, and poor skepticism by HN
- deleted 6mo ago[deleted]