Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
GrinningFool
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
GrinningFool
5d ago
I think the license was the best tool available for the ideology around ownership.
2.
▲
by
GrinningFool
10d ago
All of this is true - yet in between calls of the loop, they don't exist.
3.
▲
by
GrinningFool
10d ago
Taking this a step further: so in the theoretical future we reach a point where a model can modify its own weights in real time. Now it's no longer stateless - but still, when it stops running, it's done until it's prompted t
4.
▲
by
GrinningFool
10d ago
> Unfortunately, there’s a growing chorus of people who argue that AIs could now be, or may soon become, conscious. Wait, is there really? I didn't think people were serious when they said that. They models are stateless. After the
5.
▲
Show HN: Review agent changes locally before pushing
(github.com)
2 points
by
GrinningFool
10d ago
|
0 comments
6.
▲
by
GrinningFool
11d ago
https://www.recordinglaw.com/party-two-party-consent-states/
7.
▲
by
GrinningFool
11d ago
> My friend, if there's a reporter standing behind you, it could end up on the nightly news It's a matter of scale. Now everybody with a device is a reporter.
8.
▲
by
GrinningFool
11d ago
AI-generated article starts with the premise that personal sites are making a comeback, but doesn't support it; and overall doesn't say anything beyond they never left, and the tech is all the same. The styling may be intended to
9.
▲
by
GrinningFool
11d ago
I mean, no. When I em-dash -- or double-hyphen -- I always surround it with spaces; seems wrong not to.
10.
▲
by
GrinningFool
11d ago
Personally I have no problem with ads if they're based on the content. But your post inadvertantly sums the problem: tracking and ads have become inseparable. If you talk about removing tracking, people come out of the woodwork and s
11.
▲
by
GrinningFool
13d ago
Contractual obligations carry teeth. Scraping the internet is relatively risk-free.
12.
▲
by
GrinningFool
14d ago
You should probably look closer at unemployment numbers in IT vs other spaces. Gains elsewhere are making up for IT losses, but it's a safe bet the people losing their tech jobs aren't career shifting into healthcare and hospital
13.
▲
by
GrinningFool
14d ago
GP's point was not that manufacturers must use github - that was an arbitrary "for instance". They saying if the mfg is not going to open source their software, then they should be required to document it.
14.
▲
by
GrinningFool
14d ago
That all makes sense - I'm not involved enough in local politics so I can't comment knowledgebly. But that doesn't mean the people trying to prevent change have (only) invalid reasons. Voting is critical, but it still lags be
15.
▲
by
GrinningFool
14d ago
Since you're using it for Netflix, etc I assume it has unrestricted Internet access. With that and microphone access, you're giving tacit permission to capture and upload basically whatever it wants, to whoever it wants. That se
16.
▲
by
GrinningFool
14d ago
You'd think if that was all they recorded for, they would be saying it very loudly to end the speculation that weasel-wording leads to.
17.
▲
by
GrinningFool
14d ago
Well. I sure am relieved.
18.
▲
by
GrinningFool
15d ago
Seems to me public review is a failsafe - an acknowledgement that laws and regs can't always keep up with real life harms.
19.
▲
by
GrinningFool
15d ago
"The brands and publishers’ point is the stronger half, and it deserves engaging with. " Just one example. It's odd to me that people are willing to put their own byline on obvious slop.
20.
▲
by
GrinningFool
17d ago
With that many accidents, I'd assume bankruptcy if she didn't. re: 2) yes that was the point. She'd have to be paying multiple thousands in an assigned-risk pool policy with that record of at-faults.
21.
▲
by
GrinningFool
17d ago
It says a lot that 3 of the 4 options you gave involve cars.
22.
▲
by
GrinningFool
17d ago
How is she able to get insurance coverage?
23.
▲
by
GrinningFool
17d ago
Any chance we'll see this for linux?
24.
▲
by
GrinningFool
18d ago
Logs are great. Interactive debugging is great. Both of these can also help build an understanding of the code and systems involved. But they're just debugging tools, and they should rarely be /required/ to find a bug. I am
25.
▲
China-Based AI Companies Using Distillation at Scale Against US AI Companies
(cisa.gov)
4 points
by
GrinningFool
18d ago
|
0 comments
26.
▲
by
GrinningFool
19d ago
The thing is it's a hypothetical 50 humans a day killed by the same driver.
27.
▲
by
GrinningFool
19d ago
I'm actually not complaining. I coach them through it, but the primary help I give is showing them how to walk through the code, and break the dependency on logs/repro scenarios.[1] In addition, if you find the issue in the code -
28.
▲
by
GrinningFool
19d ago
> You can't debug something just by reading the code. You are doing those junior engineers a disservice with this message. I'm usually trying to go in the other direction with them - you don't need to be able to reproduce
29.
▲
by
GrinningFool
20d ago
Then maybe they shouldn't be released to customers? There are other options here than always forward.
30.
▲
by
GrinningFool
20d ago
Your statement intrigues me, for I have always found it impossible. I dabbled in short-hand some years ago, and still couldn't keep up. I type very quickly and still can't always keep up. How does this work, especially the "
More ›