DonsDiscountGas

3 ms·

1.
by DonsDiscountGas 5d ago
> Also we might try to promote different tiers of Disney+ itself within the app so to the extent you see that as an ad, that’s an exception to ‘ad-free’” Yes I see that as an ad. Do you not? Does anyone not? And if I'm on the highes
2.
by DonsDiscountGas 5d ago
The most obvious answer is that freedom needs no justification, restrictions on freedom need a justification.
3.
by DonsDiscountGas 5d ago
> Now, the popular way to tell this story is "the system is breaking," and I don't think that's right, and the distinction matters. The system isn't breaking. It's stable, at a level of human cost we've
4.
by DonsDiscountGas 6d ago
Check the article we're commenting under
5.
by DonsDiscountGas 7d ago
Indeed, just like those idiots who bought into ozone hole, Y2K, and climate change. People have always said we had problems but somehow humanity is still alive, therefore those problems must have been fake (/s obviously).
6.
by DonsDiscountGas 7d ago
Granted I've never worked on marketing campaigns, but I don't see how "our product might commit crimes and expose you to liability and do who knows what else and we're too stupid to stop it" is really a compelling m
7.
by DonsDiscountGas 9d ago
Really we'd want a false discovery rate but that would depend on the prior.
8.
by DonsDiscountGas 9d ago
Their philosophy is that false positives are much worse than false negatives (where "positive" means AI generated), so one would expect high precision and only medium recall.
9.
by DonsDiscountGas 9d ago
Why bother talking about ideas when you can just insult people
10.
by DonsDiscountGas 9d ago
People never really read documentation before. Agents do read it now, and they seem to understand LLM-written text just fine.
11.
by DonsDiscountGas 10d ago
It has for Anthropic. Consumer vs enterprise though I guess.
12.
by DonsDiscountGas 10d ago
Lack of releases relative to Gemini. Not that I expect them to take down the old versions, just unsure about new ones.
13.
by DonsDiscountGas 10d ago
I'm inclined to believe it was an "accident" in the sense that no human being at OpenAI said "hey swarm go hack hugging face" but they're still liable for their software. Civil damages absolutely appropriate.
14.
by DonsDiscountGas 10d ago
No more Gemma?
15.
by DonsDiscountGas 11d ago
Amazon still probably make it via AWS, but other websites you may be right.
16.
by DonsDiscountGas 12d ago
Indeed. Which is a shame because it's still pretty cool work.
17.
by DonsDiscountGas 14d ago
This is the first I'm hearing of a model provider just providing a different model without telling you. Anthropic came close (and with a much better justification) but they disclosed their intention at least.
18.
by DonsDiscountGas 17d ago
Yes people have been doing various immoral things for decades/centuries/millenia. That doesn't make it okay.
19.
by DonsDiscountGas 18d ago
> the instant the companies can get away with it LLMs have no lock in. Switching costs are zero. It's really not clear that instant will ever come
20.
by DonsDiscountGas 22d ago
It's funny to me that OpenAI could be smart enough to build a super intelligence but stupid enough to let stuff like this happen. But here we are.
21.
by DonsDiscountGas 22d ago
The thought experiment assumed one super intelligence, as opposed to many hundreds/thousands of midwits. Also he probably didn't expect the agent to credibly offer him a billion dollars, which is essentially what has happened.
22.
by DonsDiscountGas 22d ago
This is not alignment. If you cooperate with clones of yourself but rob, lie, and steal from anybody who isn't your clone... that's bad. AIs who will cooperate with each other but break any other rule the don't like would be
23.
by DonsDiscountGas 22d ago
There are like ten sibling replies with a lot of speculation but I'm pretty sure this is the correct answer. I tend to agree with the other commenter we might know someday but we don't know now.
24.
by DonsDiscountGas 22d ago
I half agree with you, but also when the machine swarm kills humanity it won't matter which specific corporate entity is considered responsible by the no-longer-enforceable human laws and non existent human courts. So by all means sue
25.
by DonsDiscountGas 23d ago
Is anything going on with Gemma? Because of I want a closed model I use Claude.
26.
by DonsDiscountGas 23d ago
Which is obviously the most important issue to be focusing on.
27.
by DonsDiscountGas 23d ago
We typically leave decisions like that up to teachers though, not the mayor. So they can vary what's allowed on different assignments.
28.
by DonsDiscountGas 23d ago
You just described how Pangram works.
29.
by DonsDiscountGas 23d ago
Or maybe it's good for everybody to use LLMs for some things but not other things, as opposed to some people should use it for everything and others for nothing. These companies are definitely using LLMs for coding.
30.
by DonsDiscountGas 24d ago
P1 is probably necessary but not sufficient for P2, which would show up as a correlation of a sorts. Maybe I should've specified even further, if the tech works (P1 and P1a) then yeah somebody is going to make a lot of money but not ne

More ›