the_gipsy

5 ms·

1.
by the_gipsy 5d ago
You misunderstood. I'm not arguing for authoritarianism.
2.
by the_gipsy 6d ago
Suspiciously sounds like they need an escape out of the profitability lie. /tinfoil-hat
3.
by the_gipsy 6d ago
I never set my AC to lower than 25°C. Why would you need below 20°C? Is it something about having only a single unit for the hole house/office, where it's then uncomfortably freezing in one area, just to have a normal temperature
4.
by the_gipsy 6d ago
Yes. But if you give up all intel, then you have no intel at all, and soon this model of government will be undermined by the foreign actors. There is a gray line somewhere between surveillance state and revealing all intel, which can serve
5.
by the_gipsy 6d ago
Beautiful on paper, in practice you surrender national security to foreign actors. I agree on the philosophical part, letting our governments act opaquely under the veil of national security, inevitably leads them to turn on their citizens.
6.
by the_gipsy 6d ago
Weird way to frame this argument as a question. The domestic government holding a monopoly on information is a threat, and foreign information can be a relief, yes. Foreign misinformation is also a threat, and domestic government shutting i
7.
by the_gipsy 6d ago
Ok but what about "being directly interfered with by foreign actors"? This is what's happening right now in Spain. Foreign interference (Ceuta, Dept. Of Homeland evidence...), followed up by foreign social media manipulation
8.
by the_gipsy 7d ago
With the "let's stop AI now" statements, can it really be said that they're rushing to an IPO?
9.
by the_gipsy 10d ago
Do you really think the USA could annex anything but (maybe) Cuba, after seeing how the Iran war is playing out?
10.
by the_gipsy 10d ago
The true treasure is the friendship we made along the way.
11.
by the_gipsy 12d ago
Seems pretty clear that "embargo" means "could/would sell for a profit" but doesn't for fear of WG's reaction, which is not the case for the USSR. It's not explicit in the article, but I would guess t
12.
by the_gipsy 13d ago
> why cant people here just read this for face value? Why should we? Yes, reading the comments, it seems like the IT (or maybe it's just the AI) community has taken up an attitude of simply believing our Dear Tech Leader's by t
13.
by the_gipsy 15d ago
Short-term benefits seem to be good enough for America in this new age.
14.
by the_gipsy 17d ago
> mismanages its access to sensitive personal data > interactions being used to train Facebook's AI models Yupp, the only "edge" Facebook could possibly have, is user data.
15.
by the_gipsy 25d ago
This is the earliest evidence of such fantasy we have. It's not that this piece at this time was the earliest human fantasy, but there is a cutoff line somewhere between humans and our last common ancestor chimpanzees.
16.
by the_gipsy 28d ago
#define bug dog
17.
by the_gipsy 28d ago
Exactly, so you just got distracted on the steering wheel, happens to the best of us.
18.
by the_gipsy 29d ago
I think you just have a different interpretation of how you "see" things. Sounds just like any other anecdote of getting distracted on the road, those can be dramatic, but nothing here points to actual visual hallucinations.
19.
by the_gipsy 1mo ago
Had to google his name. Welcome to the Egghead's lair, Mr. Bond.
20.
by the_gipsy 1mo ago
It took a long time to cross that desert, and no sane company would want to get stuck in a desert, unless it's specifically an R+D "desert crossing" company.
21.
by the_gipsy 1mo ago
> Rather than sticking to the facts or the law, the states have instead decided to chase an outlandish payout. Those evil states!
22.
by the_gipsy 1mo ago
Meta is Facebook, forever.
23.
by the_gipsy 1mo ago
They absolutely do not have AI-heads with PhDs writing the apps and general infra. I've met a guy that worked at Anthropic, and he was "just an engineer", so exactly that: a top guy, but not specifically AI focused, doing reg
24.
by the_gipsy 1mo ago
Oh yea, that's what I meant, sorry for not being clear. And we do have all kinds of disasters, but the state not only effectively intervenes, but also supports the aftermath and reconstruction. In America there are some crazy examples
25.
by the_gipsy 1mo ago
So someone predicted Greece will default, because they had an abnormal amount of debt, and they did default (albeit in a controlled manner) after the 2008 crisis. And because of that you think Spain and Portugal will default? No, and with a
26.
by the_gipsy 1mo ago
Strictly an American fantasy, that you're left on your own in the face of any kind of disaster.
27.
by the_gipsy 2mo ago
Isn't the folk intuition that "words come after thoughts"? I agree that a stroke cannot isolate language exactly, it's not an ideal approximation of "languagelessness". I think you will find this report interes
28.
by the_gipsy 2mo ago
> adults who reported low levels of inner speech
29.
by the_gipsy 2mo ago
So what is it, then? Some mystical thing?
30.
by the_gipsy 2mo ago
I'm not saying it is text. But it's not an image.

More ›