Hizonner

4 ms·

1.
by Hizonner 6d ago
Lots of things aren't illegal... unless you do them for illegal purposes. I doubt antitrust would get anywhere on this RAM issue, but antitrust law is not defined in terms of either of those categories.
2.
by Hizonner 7d ago
Sure, Jan.
3.
by Hizonner 7d ago
Having lived many years prior to social media, I'm gonna say that "fundamentally warps people" is pretty damned overwrought language.
4.
by Hizonner 8d ago
You don't know what this group is, but you confidently spew statistics about it?
5.
by Hizonner 8d ago
This was a stupid waste of time the first time it was posted here.
6.
by Hizonner 8d ago
Invading Ukraine was idiotic on its own, and that happened. It's not irrational to notice that irrational actors do irrational things.
7.
by Hizonner 12d ago
That's a false concern, because the names the CAs are certifying are still DNS names. If your TLD reasssigns your DNS name out from under you, or even if your TLD starts returning false data on only selected queries, the CAs will be
8.
by Hizonner 12d ago
20 years ago would have been a great time for that one.
9.
by Hizonner 12d ago
Why would the Iranian government put such a constraint in its own root certificate?
10.
by Hizonner 14d ago
> If Anthropic has all this data that Claude was being used by the Houthis to develop a missile guidance system, why the fuck did they allow it? I know it may be complicated for you to understand, but sometimes you find out about things
11.
by Hizonner 14d ago
Filming them at work, or following them to the next job so you can film them at work, is not in any way, shape, or form "harassment".
12.
by Hizonner 14d ago
Yes, they should be different. In almost all cases, they should be less. But what I really wanted to mention is that flock is not the government , and flock's services are not exclusively available to governments . Same goes for thei
13.
by Hizonner 14d ago
People who know what both of them are (hello) still won't know which one the headline is talking about. The circuit one is definitely older, probably has more users, and is just as relevant in this forum.
14.
by Hizonner 14d ago
> doesn't want me opening the console Whoa. That's not even something it should be able to detect. What's the gaping security hole that lets it do that?
15.
by Hizonner 15d ago
> The compile can transform your code if the result of the computations it makes is the same (plus any ordering guarantees you've encoded with the correct primitives, etc.). "Interact with the outside world in exactly the same
16.
by Hizonner 15d ago
The compiler is allowed to transform your code if it can prove that the result would interact with the outside world in exactly the same way as your original code would, right? You can optimize on "I already checked the value of X&qu
17.
by Hizonner 15d ago
Lack of access to take a bus or permission to walk anywhere is another form of the same disease.
18.
by Hizonner 15d ago
Starlink has 12 million subscribers, or about 0.14 percent of the population of Earth. In addition to paying for Starlink, those subscribers are externalizing costs to everybody else on Earth... for instance by screwing up radio astronomy.
19.
by Hizonner 15d ago
That might be dispositive if we didn't already have almost everybody on Earth wired up without using satellites.
20.
by Hizonner 16d ago
> I really wish we could leave these types of decisions up to parents and parents only. Leave the companies and governments out of it. You do understand that in order to do that, something or somebody has (a) know that the person being d
21.
by Hizonner 16d ago
I'm a parent. I care about children. That's why I hate this wave of hysteria cutting them off from everything. It's way more damaging to children , and especially to teenagers, than any of the stuff it's supposed to p
22.
by Hizonner 16d ago
It's not just Claude. It's being cut off from every part of society except a carefully curated "child ghetto". In which you stay until the day you turn 18. At which point you're shoved out into the outside world.
23.
by Hizonner 16d ago
Another example of AV doing serious damage to the people it claims to "help". Must be a day ending in 'y'.
24.
by Hizonner 16d ago
Is that supposed to be bad?
25.
by Hizonner 17d ago
By "open models", do you perhaps mean the approximately trillion-parameter open models that have been getting released recently? Because basically nobody can actually self-host those. And even at that size it's debatable that
26.
by Hizonner 17d ago
... and the advantage of the frontier models over anything you can possibly self-host continues to increase at an even more insane pace.
27.
by Hizonner 17d ago
Sure it is. The question is whether maybe some people need more stress.
28.
by Hizonner 17d ago
Getting an unjustified drug approval would not be "victimless".
29.
by Hizonner 20d ago
If it's legal, you can do it. Figuring out whether it's legal is a giant error-prone jurisdiction-dependent pain in the ass. Even if it were illegal, you could have done it by releasing anonymously (on edit, and reworking the co
30.
by Hizonner 24d ago
If your Google account is precious, you've already done something wrong...

More ›