19 ms·

Ask HN: How do you prevent the impact of social media on your children?

• paulcole 2y ago
  You don’t need to worry that much. Most people turn out pretty OK despite their parents screw-ups and best intentions.
  • aristofun 2y ago
    That is pretty dangerous position to take. “That much” is a very vague line. It is more true that more kids turn out to be fine when their parents care, than when they don’t.
    • paulcole 2y ago
      But I’m not saying “don’t care.” I’m saying that if you screw up sometimes but generally have good intentions your kid is probably going to be fine. But it is also your right to try to figure out the perfect thing to do in every situation.
      • aristofun 2y ago
        Fair enough
  • more_corn 2y ago
    lol, take a quick peek at your home’s Internet access logs. You’ll almost certainly find opportunities for some parenting / teaching moments.
    • paulcole 2y ago
      Isn’t the teachable moment to realize your kids are going to see those things no matter what I do? Kids on the internet see all sorts of stuff and almost all of them end up fine.
      • oldandboring 2y ago
        If you don't mind me asking... do you have kids?
        • paulcole 2y ago
          no im a junior in high school and they gave me a bag of flour to tote around for a week and i think i got the gist of it
      • ta1243 2y ago
        Teachable moments is things learning about things like DNS, vpns elsewhere, man in the middle attacks, etc.
      • jacobgkau 2y ago
        I would've ended up a lot more "fine" if my parents hadn't given up on parental controls almost immediately after I learned to circumvent them. Some of the things they'd have had to tell me would've been embarrassing for all parties involved, but I genuinely believe it would have improved my socialization and overall happiness during critical parts of my development, with ramifications continuing to this day. Instead, they took the opposite approach and praised me as "good with computers" when they failed to impart either voluntary discipline or mandatory access controls on my computer usage. I do appreciate your overarching message, but I also agree with others that there is a ton to worry about, and I think it can be a disservice to assume things will work out "fine" when they could potentially work out better if parents make different choices. Things "working out fine" is more how to get to sleep at the end of the day when not everything has gone to plan, as opposed to the first line of defense.
• aristofun 2y ago
  My take is to defer them having an unlimited internet access as much as reasonably possible + build trust. I don’t believe blocking things from a position of authority would work well for the most kids longterm.
• codingdave 2y ago
  We don't micromanage their online access, but we do try to encourage being online in healthy ways: We did no smartphones before high school. (Have had zero problems with that in terms of their social acceptance) Also, no computers in their rooms - everything is done in more shared space, with monitors facing the rest of the room. We talk about what kinds of content to watch out for, how to think critically about it, and what kinds of content or people are more serious, that they need to let us know if they run into. (Stalkers, scammers, other such actively harmful stuff.) That does give them enough freedom once they hit high school to be more secretive about what they do. But we feel that is also more appropriate as they grow older. There have been problems. When they occur, we talk openly about them and help them both resolve the problems and learn from them. We are big believers that wisdom comes from experience, and experience comes from doing, so we try to focus on letting them expand their autonomy as they grow up, while at the same time minimizing harm when mistakes are made and learning from them.
  • RhysU 2y ago
    > Also, no computers in their rooms - everything is done in more shared space, with monitors facing the rest of the room. Seconded. I saw an older friend have a dedicated computer room for the desktops of everyone in his family. It was a family space where any family member could plunk down at any time. We approach the same via a communal laptop in the kitchen.
    • Rendello 2y ago
      I was a preteen getting into computers and programming when Anonymous were the 'cool kids' and all over the news. I remember being on their Wikipedia page, then following to the Wikipedia page for 4Chan. My elder cousin walked in behind me, looked at the screen, and said: That website... Don't go on that website. And I didn't!
• Desafinado 2y ago
  A good start is to avoid giving them a smartphone until they're in high school. And once they have a smartphone require them to get permission from you before installing any social media apps, with consequences if they don't follow the rules (take the phone away). Make the consequences known up front, rather than reactive so they know the guidelines regarding their phone use. And whatever you do DO NOT give your child a handheld device (tablet or smartphone) before they're in high school. My wife and I are seeing parents give their two year olds a tablet which is absolutely detrimental to their development.
  • muzani 2y ago
    There's apps like Google Family Link which basically gives you and the child a contract and enforces that contract. Screen times on what days. What they install. The kind of media they can view on the YouTube on the device. Even if you change the policy, the child is informed.
  • more_corn 2y ago
    I’ve got a friend who did this. His 13yr old daughter craved instagram and snuck access. The story sounded like parents of the previous generation catching their kids smoking and drinking. I’m pretty sure the prohibition didn’t work and added the spice of forbidden. I don’t know the answer, but I suspect full prohibition isn’t it.
    • Desafinado 2y ago
      I've got a brother who did this. His son is about to graduate med school in the 98th percentile. More seriously, it's not beyond the pale to introduce them to the internet. The more important thing is to put off handhelds for as long as possible.
    • jimbob45 2y ago
      You're not going to be able to stop your kids from doing anything unless you shackle them up nightly. However, you can stop them from doing it while under your roof and that significantly curtails their ability to take anything too far.
• muzani 2y ago
  They don't really have any interest in social media as we use them. It's likely there will be some other new form of social media, probably something more metaverse like Roblox or Minecraft. As a kid, I remember we had these things on TV and people would dial on phones just to have messages show up on TV. It seems kind of the same with Gen Alpha and YouTube. There's all these things like Discord, but they feel more like being lonely in a group.
  • tra3 2y ago
    > They don't really have any interest in social media as we use them. This seems misleading, even if it's true. My kids keep asking for TikTok/Instagram etc access. Because their friends have these apps. Seeing certain messaging will them have a similar impact that it does on older individuals.
    • more_corn 2y ago
      Yeah, I find it completely implausible that kids wouldn’t have interest in social media. Perhaps the OP is using a very restrictive definition that excludes TikTok and instagram.
      • muzani 2y ago
        I meant as we use them. Exclusionary of the [HN crowd]. I don't think most of the ones we use market to children anyway. And social networks rely on a network effect to be useful. They will certainly find a way to socialise on the internet, but unlikely in the form we're used to. I'm saying it's like giving antibiotics to viruses; most of the solutions we have will be ineffective because the next generation will be doing something different. Many kids will have Roblox and learned to interact in worlds with others without texting, posting, or commenting. If you play mobile games, most even disable typing because of toxicity/language/app store restrictions, and they rely on emoting to communicate. There's one way stuff like this, which don't resemble most of today's social media: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1070710/Kind_Words_lo_fi_chill_beats_to_write_to/ https://store.steampowered.com/app/1070710/Kind_Words_lo_fi_... I wouldn't be surprised if a new app emerged where they'd poke each other without typing any words. Those are the ones I'd watch out for.
• n2dasun 2y ago
  Device time limits and prerequisites, and periodically check-ins (hey, what are you doing/watching?) Even with all this, it's obvious that the influence is very strong
• codegeek 2y ago
  So we compromised on giving them devices/phones (with restricted access) but in return, got them to agree that they will not use social media of any kind at least until 18. I think it is very difficult in today's world to prohibit completely. It may create more rebellion down the road and I like to be open with my kids. A little bit of device is not end of the world as long as you control it which we do.
• gunian 2y ago
  i cast a shielding spell if you believe in religion can plug
• asimpleusecase 2y ago
  We have limited access to devices for under ten. Even educational apps on tablets have strict time limits. Initially there is an emotional reaction to limits and we talk to them about who is in control. Them or the technology. We want them to have mastery over the tech so that they can put it down. Only when you can put it down and move on to a real world activity are you the one in control. Personal tech is a tool, a dangerous one. We would not hand car keys to a 5 year old and let them teach themselves how to drive. Recently my 13 year old asked for a blow torch to do some metal work. We explained the danger and over see the tool. He is totally absorbed in his craft, he has not asked for a phone. In a chat with a neighbour we mentioned the blow torch and said “ we find it to be less dangerous than social media on a smart phone. They stopped and said “yes, that is absolutely right.” We just got our 16 year old a smart phone but with limits. He needs the tool for work, orchestra communication and for maps of public transport. We are in a constant dialog about gaining personal freedom and responsibility. We have friends whose children are self harming due to bullying they have experienced on social media. It has been a deep discussion in their home. They are carefully walking their way forward but they regret not having more safety rails and discussion 2 years ago. I’m of the opinion that we need to think of smart phones like power tools. And that there ought to be significant training and oversight and demonstrated understanding of risks and how to use the tool safely.
  • theoreticalmal 2y ago
    I’m just reflecting, I have scars on my hands and arms from power tool accidents, misuse. I wonder what scars are on my psyche from device use? Certainly some. Harder to pinpoint
• getwiththeprog 2y ago
  Give kids more - teach them media and how to use a computer. Help them find quality programming from a young age so when they are teens they can make informed choices. Discuss with them values, your and other peoples. Make time for them IRL, and do things together so they don't have to find fulfilment in digital arms.
  • trinix912 2y ago
    While it might sound backwards, it's probably more effective than banning and hard rules in the long run. Yes, you can isolate them from social media at home, but you have to acknowledge that it also means they will be missing out, won't be invited to things planned on there, will live under constant tension of "what are others talking on there?", all of which might actually stunt their (social) development more than just being on social media with no restrictions. You can take alternative approaches along the lines of "let them use computers first, then phones", but then you're no better than the parents forcing kids into a certain sport because of a personal preference. I'm not saying don't ever tell them to go offline, just saying dialing down the restrictions a bit and actively providing alternatives-spending time with them-should go a long way. Spend time engaged with them, just generally show them the way-show them sports, activities, ... they can do with or without friends, offline. Lead by example is the term here. To end this, I also know quite a few cases where the restrictions have backfired to the point the kid feels like they need to use up all precious daily screentime allowance, even tho they might have better things to do, just because it's so limited.
• let_me_post_0 2y ago
  Make sure they are living full lives and have many offline occupations to fill their time with. Social media addicts are just bored teenagers who have nothing else better to do, or teenagers who feel as though they cannot be part of the local social groups so they retreat to the online world.
• markus_zhang 2y ago
  This is a question I keep asking myself. My in-laws live in until May and they give free reins of social media time to my 4-years old so I keep pulling him off. And we tightly control what he watches on TV (only downloaded videos, no YT, no network actually). So far it's OK. But I don't know what happens when he goes into primary school and his friends start using social media because some parents just don't care. I honestly have no idea. I'll probably ask him to text using a dumb phone instead. Worst case I'll keep a secret smart phone just for baking/maps but use a dumb phone for daily drive. Probably best for me anyway. Social media is a nuclear blast for any mind who is not strong enough and doesn't have any hobbies. My father-in-law literally live in Tiktok and Red note. He is watching it when he goes to bed, when he is taking a dump, when he is exercising... it's just part of the body I guess. So much brain rot.
• idermoth 2y ago
  Our kids? Hell, my wife and I don't use social media, except in very limited doses for work reasons. Our kids have zero access to it and never will. Their device usage is kept at a minimum and used for mostly educational or quality conversational purposes. I hate how many people now, whenever we're around them everyone has their phones out scrolling through 30 sec videos. They want to show you things which aren't funny, aren't entertaining, aren't informative... it's damn near Idiocracy levels of content consumption. [Insert video of someone badly dancing with caption that says "me."] Personally, I find it bizarre and extremely boring.
  • strix_varius 2y ago
    Every week since she was about six months old, I've taken my daughter with me to get groceries. She's absolutely fascinated by the grocery store: the rolling cart, the colors and textures of produce ("ta-to!"), the other shoppers, the illustrations on packaging ("bear!"). I hand her items and give her their names. She shakes them, rotates them, repeats their names back to me. But every time we go, I see at least one child my daughter's age or younger staring mindlessly at a phone or tablet, oblivious to their environment and the parent pushing their cart. It just seems sad.
    • tmn 2y ago
      Ahh I just had to share that my 1 year old daughter also loves the grocery store. She doesn't want to leave the cart when it's time to go. Thanks for the comment.
      • jorts 2y ago
        Especially if they have a cart that’s a car or train.
    • deleted 2y ago
      [deleted]
    • qwerpy 2y ago
      I used to judge parents who resorted to tablets to keep their children quiet. I don't really anymore. You don't know how exhausted the parents might be or how many hours they've already spent trying to entertain their kids in a more wholesome manner. I've taken a 2 year old on vacation and some of that time is spent going to unique restaurants that take a couple of hours for a meal. My toddler would get bored and squirmy and would quickly ruin dinner for the entire restaurant. Same thing for airplanes. Of course I don't resort to it immediately but if talking, interacting, and other toys don't do the trick, iPad is a very useful tool in the arsenal. A carefully curated list of educational, offline content is acceptable in my opinion. Grocery store, or any other short errand? Sure, that's too much.
• noufalibrahim 2y ago
  No phones or SM accounts for kids till they turn 18. Yes, there's a "fear" of being an outcast but they work their way around that quickly and if they have other things to spend time on, they'll be fine. The "need" for social media is mostly FOMO.
  • deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
  • ta1243 2y ago
    Do you have kids in double digits? Our senior schools (from age 11, "6th grade" in US term) literally mandate a phone (not a computer, an actual phone) for school, both to use in class and to receive homework assignments.
    • iforgot22 2y ago
      That's ok, they can borrow a parent's phone.
      • firejake308 2y ago
        In class though?
        • noufalibrahim 2y ago
          I'd be very concerned if a school relied on a smart phone even for class work.
          • ta1243 2y ago
            Yet it's quite normal - at least in the three schools I know about
    • noufalibrahim 2y ago
      Yes. I have kids. I'm not in the US. My kids school sends homework using an app. I get it on my phone, take printouts etc. and my kids get the work done.
• scop 2y ago
  Four thoughts: 1. I've developed a analog->digital path for my kids. Before they can get a music player, they get a CD player. Before they get video games, they get board games. And then, for video games, before they get Super Mario Odyssey they get the original Super Mario Bros. Each of these "first they get" is a long period. Years long. Give them something that has limitations so they can truly explore it. Find the nooks and crannies of something. Make up their own weird little things within that limitation. And then, back to music, I want my kids to know what a musical album is, know how to savor the highs and the lows, how sometimes certain tracks mean more to you based on your mood or life-stage, then just an endless playlist of newness. 2. The gorilla in the room is that most adults can barely handle online media. 3. The other gorilla in the room is porn. Again, see #2. 4. The classic philosophers placed Prudence as the queen of virtues. What is prudence? It is essentially the ability to grasp reality. Why did they say that was most important? Because you couldn't use any of the other virtues if your didn't have a good grasp of reality (e.g. fortitude would be foolhardiness if you ran into a ill-conceived death thinking you were being brave). You need to make sure you and your kids are able to grasp reality, not just the appearance of it.
  • mrnaught 2y ago
    "analog->digital path" thank you!
  • ta1243 2y ago
    How far along this path are your kids?
  • ozim 2y ago
    Gorilla in the room are other f*ng parents. You can prevent as much as you want but then kids go to school nd everyone else has accounts they should not have or devices they should not have and your kids are angry at you because now you are the bad guy.
    • ceejayoz 2y ago
      Yup. "Why didn't my kid get invited to that birthday? Oh, it was organized on Snapchat..." We have a no phones in the bedroom and no phones past a certain time rule, but disconnecting entirely makes one a social pariah.
• GiorgioG 2y ago
  Screen Time (iOS), and teach them to think for themselves. It really depends on what kind of personality your kid(s) have too. Our son is a rule-follower, so it's generally not an issue once he gets past the initial annoyance of not being allowed to do/have something.
• turtlebits 2y ago
  - Understands responsible use. - Writes a log of when they use "screen time", including what they plan on doing (purpose + which sites/apps) and for how long. (with a max time limit per day) - They only can use it in our common areas when we are around, with no expectation of privacy. - Sets a timer and can self stop
  • trinix912 2y ago
    > They only can use it in our common areas when we are around, with no expectation of privacy. Sorry, but this just feels completely off-putting and I can tell you myself, if I were your kid, I'd find a way to get myself a phone, connect to some nearby Wi-Fi and use it all the time when you're not looking. Sure, regulate it time and content-wise, but mandate they have absolutely no privacy doing things and it will likely backfire.
• Carrok 2y ago
  I was an outcast as a kid, and this was years before social media. I think I turned out alright regardless. Your social status as a pre-adult doesn't really matter at all once you join the real world. That and I think kids not having any social media will become more and more common, so it's not going to be that big a deal.
  • anon115 2y ago
    but your competency and how you communicate does.
    • Carrok 2y ago
      Are you implying that children need social media to develop competency and communication skills?
      • tokioyoyo 2y ago
        If all of your peers are talking about the stuff they saw on YouTube, but you’re not allowed to, this will naturally make you an outcast in that topic. Now, if almost everything they talk about in the internet, and you cannot relate to it at all, it will hinder your interpersonal skills, because you just don’t talk to your peers. I hate how we got here, but watching my nephews go through this stuff made me realize you can’t cut the kids off completely. Ideally, you would live in a community where all parents have agreed on the social media limits, and slowly get the kids see how others function through it as well.
        • NoMoreNicksLeft 2y ago
          >I hate how we got here, but watching my nephews go through this stuff made me realize you can’t cut the kids off completely. Mine are turning out fine. I don't want them to be like those other children, and I've kept them away from those children. Doesn't seem to have been a problem. >Ideally, you would live in a community where all parents have agreed on the social media limits, This is a matter of who you choose to socialize/fraternize with, not one of geography. But if you opt for public school, then you have no real choice in the matter.
• iskander 2y ago
  Lots of practical but low impact suggestions in this thread. I think the only real answers involve large scale decoupling from the rapidly changing social norms. Can you cobble together a social group that will go Luddite with you? If not, can you join one?
  • AstralStorm 2y ago
    A good cheater in such a group will prosper heavily due to being better informed and connected. Game theoretically it's a loser proposition. Even with an intense price of shunning. It's happened in Amish communities many a time.
• cbeach 2y ago
  At my kids' school (UK, ages 5-11), many parents have signed an online pact to agree not to give smartphones to their children: https://smartphonefreechildhood.co.uk/ https://smartphonefreechildhood.co.uk/ The website lists the number of pacts, broken down by school and year group. My kid is in year 1 (age 5) and the website received pacts on behalf of 42 out of approx 60 children in this year group. Hopefully with a little more publicity, the remainder will agree to sign the pact too.
  • cbeach 2y ago
    Given the website shows all the data for pacts by school, I ran it past ChatGPT o1 to look for any correlations. https://chatgpt.com/share/6786bc74-9e18-800d-b474-d57ef2c107b3 https://chatgpt.com/share/6786bc74-9e18-800d-b474-d57ef2c107... “Large, well-attended primary schools in more populous or affluent areas tend to have higher numbers [of pacts], whereas small primaries, grammar/secondary schools, or independent schools with fewer total pupils often appear with lower numbers.” I definitely see a relationship in the data whereby affluent areas have a higher number of pacts. I wonder if this is due to stronger societal cohesion / shared norms in affluent areas? Whereas in deprived areas in the UK there's more unassimilated immigration from cultural groups that self-segregate.
• elforce002 2y ago
  I have a kid (5~8 range) and what we did was to limit PC consumption, avoid getting our kid a tablet and cellphone. It has been really good and my kid still has his/her innocence intact. Hopefully this will continue until adolescence. We're also trying to put the kid in different outdoor activities as well as playing with him/her (chess, uno, etc...). It's not easy, but is doable.
• rbjorklin 2y ago
  Maybe try pushing your community towards adopting https://www.waituntil8th.org/ https://www.waituntil8th.org/
  • iforgot22 2y ago
    8th grade was when all this stuff became mainstream for me. That was the iPhone 3GS release year. Social life went to crap very quickly for everyone. Should be "wait until 18th."
    • Rastonbury 2y ago
      I was of similar age then, before that it was nokias and Bluetooth, Facebook was where you could upload stupid shit and not go viral and people's walls were just rage and 9gag memes. With tiktok I think teenage social media and addiction and the self esteem stuff is a different beast. Many people talk about screen time and age limitations, if a parent doesn't want to go that far there should to be algorithmic limits like block celebrities/gaming/onlyfans type of content
      • iforgot22 2y ago
        It's definitely different (and worse) today, but even back then I felt like it was robbing everyone of their childhoods. Kids spent an enormous amount of time there, they were on phones in school or in social settings, and the "bathroom wall" gossip thing was big.
• garrickvanburen 2y ago
  I've 4 kids, the youngest is 11. The rule in the house is; 1) no social media accounts until 13 and 2) one of your parents will be your 'friend' on that account. This is actually a pretty great expression of "kids keep you young." But, right now is right now and how kids communicate with each other is constantly changing - social media or not. So, if you're not a parent to a tween or teens now - I'd say you have little to actually worry about as the landscape will be completely different in a decade.
  • giarc 2y ago
    >I'd say you have little to actually worry about as the landscape will be completely different in a decade. Could be a lot worse though. Imagine if VR/AR does take off and your social media feed is in your eyes 24/7 rather than just when you take out your phone.
    • garrickvanburen 2y ago
      VR/AR won't take off. It'll get better, if only in that our moral panic about it will evaporate as it did for comic books and video games. Kids prefer being IRL with other kids w/ or w/o screens.
      • wvenable 2y ago
        > Kids prefer being IRL with other kids w/ or w/o screens. Who are these kids you speak of?
      • giarc 2y ago
        Grab any teenager from the street and ask to see their screen time usage on the phone. I bet when you subtract sleeping and school hours (assuming their school has banned phones in classrooms) it will still be nearly double digit hours.
        • garrickvanburen 2y ago
          So? There was a time when all the phone-based activities were separate objects and devices. But today, conveniently they’re all in a single device. Aggregate screen time is a useless measure and discrete screen time only matters to help diagnose when something has done wrong. If the kid is wildly successful what doors screen time matter?
• francisofascii 2y ago
  Delay, Deny, Defend Don't let them have a smart phone until high school. Do not allow unlimited use. Do not allow certain apps. No phones in room at night. Continually have to "defend" and argue about it.
  • jryan49 2y ago
    How are they going to learn how to control themselves when you're not around though?
    • javier123454321 2y ago
      Just because you're strict in one area doesn't mean that you're completely mistrusting everything. You can (and should) still teach responsibility in the same way that generations have before social media.
  • deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
• NoMoreNicksLeft 2y ago
  >However, it's undeniable that at that age it's all about fitting in and it would likely make them feel like a bit of an outcast if I were to limit them from being a part of it, l Should homeschool. The elimination of peer pressure makes alot of these choices dead simple. "But all the other 11 yr olds are going to the 3am tattoo orgy" just isn't a counter-argument I'll ever hear in my household. The real trouble is that you're constantly running around playing whackamole with the router, there must be 3 or 4 dozen social media platforms I have to police. And Youtube, like it or not, is probably essential, so it can't be blocked really... my daughter is using it today to learn to sharpen knives (wasn't a boy scout, never learned it myself). Though, last week I expected that she'd want to use it for cheesemaking, but she worked from a written-word recipe (was kind of proud of that). Best advice for Youtube is to just try to keep an eye on what they gravitate to when watching and steer them away from the garbage.
  • trinix912 2y ago
    > The elimination of peer pressure makes alot of these choices dead simple. Except you're not really eliminating any peer pressure unless you also lock them in your house for their entire childhood life. The moment they go out (alone or in your company), the peer pressure will kick in simply because "oh look they're all on those phones and I'm not".
    • NoMoreNicksLeft 2y ago
      My son's best friend goes to the same judo class he does. We're invited over there for holidays and other celebrations quite often. He doesn't have a phone either. They have a few chickens and some rabbits. He likes going out and seeing the animals. We simply don't hang out with the same sort of people, nor do we let our children do so, as you do.
  • OkayPhysicist 2y ago
    Homeschooling without a ton of extracurriculars with interaction with children their age makes your kids weird. It completely stunts their ability to socialize. I did fencing as a kid. It was basically a 50/50 split between homeschooled kids and private school kids. It was immediately obvious which were which, and the friend groups that formed were made almost exclusively of the private school kids and the smattering of public school kids. If you're restricting your children's social life sufficiently to avoid peer pressure, you're causing irreparable harm.
• nofunphil 2y ago
  Going thru this now with an 11 yo and 14 yo. It’s a non-stop, swash-buckling battle to get them to put down their phones and do literally anything IRL. Their attention has been completely hijacked, their childhood robbed from them, and I feel like it’s pretty much a total parent fail on my part. But it’s the same with all their friends too. Shameful and sad and just wrong At the risk of ridicule, I think we need to incentivize kids/people to use social media less. Think, “Touch grass. Earn points.” Faroff dot fun
  • antisthenes 2y ago
    > It’s a non-stop, swash-buckling battle to get them to put down their phones and do literally anything IRL. What a bizarre statement. You are their parent. They are 11 and 14. You can physically take their phones away. If they accept it - give the devices back. If they keep throwing tantrums - don't. Obviously that is a last resort, but it seems like you've already tried other things and failed.
    • nofunphil 2y ago
      Do you have kids?
    • AstralStorm 2y ago
      As a former teen who had parents try this, we were wily enough to find the relevant computer power cables quickly. And it's harder today. You won't win this way. The kid will obtain a second device and you'll have both a screaming match and an uphill battle. Or they will mooch elsewhere and forget about seeing your kid.
      • iforgot22 2y ago
        My parents didn't let me have video games as a kid. Sure I could still play at a friends' house, but it was very different from having my own console or handheld.
  • AstralStorm 2y ago
    Competing with free enjoyment is pretty hard, yeah. I'd recommend IRL friends going out, good time to try is a holiday or two. Sports can also be reasonably fun. Kid parties are a thing. Etc.
• philshem 2y ago
  HN parenting thread… > Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.
  • slantaclaus 2y ago
    Better than just about every other social media platform if you ask me
• TacticalCoder 2y ago
  I can already see a big difference between "kids" that are now 20 and those that are 10: parents are now way more aware of how nasty and exploitative social media are. Ten years ago parents had zero issue handing their used phone to their kid when buying a new one. Now many parents have a "no phone whatsover until at least 13 years old" (some even pick an older age). Schools too: it's very common now to have school with a very strict "phone stays in the locker or you get disciplined" policy. I did buy my 10 y/o a "phonewatch" (I'm not calling it a "smartwatch" for it's really dumb). A real one, with its own SIM card (funnily enough it's a real, physical, SIM card, not an eSIM). So she can do what a phone what supposed to allow: give and receive phonecalls. Some people shall buy a dumbphone I guess. Works too. That watch's screen is so tiny and pathetic that it's impossible to anything with it: no TikTok. No Instagram. No nothing. (we're in control anyway, with an app on our phones, of what goes on the "phonewatch"). Kid knows that she won't have a phone before at least 13. Maybe 15. That's the deal. The thing is: as a parent, you are the boss and you set up the rules. A kid is not the boss. We're no luddite: she's also one hour of Nintendo Switch play per day. She can have fun solving "code monkey" coding puzzles on a computer. She's allowed to watch a few Minecraft vids. But mindless media consumerism no a smartphone at 10 y/o, like some of the other kids at school are doing as soon as they're not at school? No way. We simply don't allow that. > How do you prevent the impact of social media on your children? By being the boss. P.S: as a sidenote good luck bypassing the DNS blocker I put in place without an admin account. On my LAN, I'm the boss too. No SIM: no SIM to put somewhere else. SIM subscriptions with monthly allowed data usage set to 0 bytes works darn well too (we've got one such SIM).
  • iugtmkbdfil834 2y ago
    << No SIM: no SIM to put somewhere else. SIM subscriptions with monthly allowed data usage set to 0 bytes works darn well too (we've got one such SIM). Can you elaborate on that one a little? I wasn't aware of that option in US.
• nineplay 2y ago
  I don't think this is a good place to go in with hard and fast rules. Every kid is different, everything change. What your kid wants and needs may be different from everyone else. Having said that, my broad rule is to keep my kid from any social media where their peers rank them and give feedback. No FB, no Instagram, they can't host their own youtube channel, etc. That is where self-esteem goes to die. I don't think I allow real-name accounts. I'm hyper-sensitive to online predators since a girl I know got assaulted by someone she met on 'words with friends'. My kids are lectured to boredom about personal identifying information and what not to reveal on the internet. They are allowed Roblox and they spend a lot of time playing with their friends there. I'm happy with that, we do Roblox game night here ourselves.
  • AstralStorm 2y ago
    Or you could explain to them how people tend to lie on these sites about how they are. Throttling it for very small kids is a maybe. Real name and other anti-dox stuff is also a good practice. However you do need to also yeah kids that not everyone there is a predator or evil with examples, or they will get digital anxiety.
  • BriggyDwiggs42 2y ago
    I feel like a YouTube channel is different. They might learn to create stuff and be self directed
    • devsda 2y ago
      The problem with posting to YT is kids might seek validation of their content from peers or strangers and that always comes with risks.
      • BriggyDwiggs42 2y ago
        I seriously disagree that that is likely, and I think as a parent you could monitor the channel to make sure there’s no signs of that.
  • 2y ago
• bythreads 2y ago
  Pov: (denmark) No SoMe, no smartphones - until 5th grade (class agreement and school policy). No SoMe at all for kids under 13. No messaging after 20:00. 1.5 h screentime (ios) maximum a day. O.5 h enforced reading (actual books) from 17:30-18:00 (we make it a family thing - all reading together). No screens at all at playdates until 4th grade. No movies or media below age-level ratings without consent from parents. No phones in bed or while sleeping. Heavy utilization of screentime, unifi network blocks etc. Works well for us
• tylerc230 2y ago
  A lot of parents at our school signed a “wait until 8” pledge to wait until 8th grade before getting them smartphones. This way there will be less social pressure from their friends to be connected. My assumption is that without a smartphone they won’t use social media.
  • kridsdale1 2y ago
    Meanwhile I spent every minute of free time from 2000-2005 using phpbb, irc, and aim, on a big CRT and PC
    • deleted 2y ago
      [deleted]
    • baxtr 2y ago
      I did the same. But sometimes I wonder if that’s why I’m so unfocused today.
    • polski-g 2y ago
      The demographics of those online were probably more healthy than today.
    • iforgot22 2y ago
      Those aren't the same, but even those weren't good. I was on that stuff too, big waste of time that I wish I had back.
    • mc3301 2y ago
      none of those were specifically engineered with the attention-economy in mind.
    • phatfish 2y ago
      Same, and most of it was wasted time. But at least it didn't follow me to school, or bed, or well everywhere. I'm not sure completely shielding your child from screens is the best approach. I'll be attempting to have a visible space in the house where a laptop or tablet can be used. But they stay there.
• Trasmatta 2y ago
  Sometimes I feel grief about the fact that I will almost certainly never have kids, but then I also feel immense relief that I don't have to navigate the extremely complex challenge of raising them in the modern world.
  • garrickvanburen 2y ago
    once moral panic is subtracted out, it's not actually that complex.
    • Trasmatta 2y ago
      How does moral panic factor into this? I don't think being worried about the effects of technology on children is a moral panic.
      • snowwrestler 2y ago
        No one participating in a moral panic thinks it is a moral panic. They all think they are addressing a real pressing issue. That is why moral panics work. The easiest key is the focus. Am I worried about my kid? Not a moral panic, that is literally my job as a parent. Am I worried about society in general because of all the shoddy parenting about screen time? (Or risky play, or being home alone, or riding public transportation, etc) Then it might be a moral panic. Along those same lines: am I worried about what all those worriers will say about me? This is what the above comment is referring to. A lot of the stress of parenting is amped up by other adults (parents or not) who have lots of opinions about whether you’re doing everything right. Much of this is some combination of moral panic and/or self-righteous busybodies. If you can learn to tune a lot of that out, parenting is less stressful and less complex.
        • Trasmatta 2y ago
          > No one participating in a moral panic thinks it is a moral panic This argument feels like a Kafka trap
        • 2y ago
• cdme 2y ago
  My kids are too young to use it and I'm hoping all said companies have failed by the time they're of age.
• tootie 2y ago
  My kids aren't interested but as far as I can tell it doesn't have a huge impact on kids. And I don't believe there's any convincing research to support it's dangers. I tell my kids to not believe everything they see online but that's about it.
  • zht 2y ago
    what research have you done to lead you to the conclusion that it doesn't have a huge impact on kids?
    • AlexandrB 2y ago
      Good question. I feel my smartphone having a huge impact on me. I don't get how kids would be somehow exempt.
    • tootie 2y ago
      I don't do research, I'm saying there isn't any academic research to back it up. And some decent research saying it doesn't have much effect at all. And it's such a hot topic and subject to so much research, and there's been very little conclusive data to say much of anything. I'm pretty comfortable that it's not worth worrying about. My kids don't have screen time limits. They are not without their issues, but they are generally healthy and happy and doing well in school. https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/teens-social-media-use-does-not-raise-risk-depression-study https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/news/teens-social-medi... https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/no-evidence-screen-time-is-negative-for-childrens-cognitive-development-and-well-being-oxford-study/ https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/news-events/no-evidence-screen-time...
• slothtrop 2y ago
  I'm thinking ahead of this myself for my kids' sake. Some approaches I'm considering: - NextDNS with device rules/filtering (primarily for adult and malicious content). This also has monitoring capability, don't think I'll use it though. - Social media restriction in the early years, but eventually allow access through a notebook. This is a more useful creative tool and will mediate passive consumption, as they won't carry it everywhere with them. Instead it's a log-in at home, when time permits. - I can't imagine a scenario where my kids "need" a phone, but if so, dumbphones are an option Some parents I guess will opt for overscheduling kids as an offset, but I think unstructured time is important. Just so long as it's not entirely spent on media consumption. Mostly, right now I should be setting by example. In instances where kids are playing alone and I don't have to be hovering over them, I'm avoiding excessively reaching for the phone and instead pick up a book. Or do nothing.
• dmje 2y ago
  Ours are now a bit older - 17 and 20. So - on the one hand, I have no experience of kids who have lived an "always-digital" life. On the other, I feel I've learned quite a lot about how to think about this in a feasible / managed kind of way, and I think (?!) that we've emerged with two reasonably balanced kids who have both "real" and "digital" lives and a somewhat realistic world view. As a concerned nerd I've also been on the case from the beginning, worrying about it, trying different approaches, etc. My strongest opinion is probably about the age that kids are exposed to this stuff, and the role that parents take (or - more often - don't take) in defining what is ok and what isn't ok. The headline here is that kids have too many gadgets and too much exposure to the online world, and they have this too young. IMO, it is not ok for a kid of 7 to be spending all their time looking at screens, let alone a kid of 3 or 4. I mean, really, I don't think it's ok for my son of 20 to be spending all his time looking at a screen either - but in that I now have limited (no) control :-) In this - sorry - but parents of younger kids are often complicit. Granted, we all face huge pressure from all corners and I totally take on board that social media and the digital world in general is built in order to make us addicted, and our individual power is limited. But... parents often don't say no enough. It's understandable - they're tired, the kid is kicking off, pop a screen in front of them, job done. But - parenting is hard, and it's always been hard, and you have to work at it - whether it's learning to read, fixed bed times, eating vegetables. Letting your kid get away with stuff is going to bite you / them on the ass at some point. A screen is not a golden bullet, and as we all know it's also often actively harmful. So, sometimes you'll have to say no, and the kid will cry, and you'll be the bad guy - but that's ok. It's always been ok, it's not abusive, it's about setting sensible boundaries. The thing is, you're not going to stunt your kids' social life or anything else by not letting them have a phone until they're 13 or 14. And - tough if they say "all my mates have them" - that's been the argument since I was a kid and Matt over the road had a Grifter and I didn't. My mum didn't take that shit back then and nor should parents now. The "but all their friends are on there, it's how they communicate now" thing - I mean, yeh. But - if I'd spent 20 hours a day talking to my mates on the phone or even in person my mum would have (rightly) freaked out. It's not ok, and until they're 16 or 17, and even beyond! - it's ok to express your opinion and apply pressure as much as you can within the constraints of your world / network. After all, you're (probably) in charge of the PiHole, their phone payments, whatever - so you do have an element of control. And as the old trope says - "while you're living under my roof, you play by my rules"... In practical terms - no phones in bedrooms, limited screen time, no screens (ever) at the table during mealtimes, some parental monitoring of what apps are installed, keeping tabs on email inboxes for younger kids. All the usual stuff. Finally - lest I sound like a loon - all of this should be done with open dialogue, even from a very young age. Talking about access to pr0n, safeguarding, why unfettered access to social media isn't great, what harms this stuff may do, why you know better as a parent - all of this is best done in an open, friendly way. Open and friendly does not equal "parents are a pushover" - but this works best in my experience when you're very honest about why you have concerns and are applying the controls that you're applying. Good luck out there.
• tartoran 2y ago
  My 7 year old gets access to YouTube and that is about 4 hours per week, split between Saturday morning and Sunday morning. His content is of his choice but we make sure he watches something interesting and we have discussions about what he watches: some cartoons and science shows or instructional videos. As far as social media goes, we try to keep it as far away as possible and instead fill his time with a lot of activities and sports and daily time spent outdoors. I noticed when screen time exceeds 4 hours a week he feels bored and having some minor mood issues.
• frenchmajesty 2y ago
  If you are fortunate enough, put your kid in private school where smartphones tend to be banned in elementary and sometimes up to middle school. Beyond that, I don't intend to give my kids a device until they are 10. (Heavily restricted smart phone) and won't be allowed to social media until they are 13-14.
  • slantaclaus 2y ago
    My home state of South Carolina just placed a statewide ban on smartphones for our public schools, which is a good thing because the private schools in my area are worse than the public ones
• NetOpWibby 2y ago
  I wish I had something helpful to add. My teenager has been involved with inappropriate texting with an assuming friend and the textual contents were, quite frankly, disturbing. Therapists say that this is normal these days. Our teen has refused to stop being friends with this person and even suggested that we just get over it. To that end, her phone is locked down with ScreenTime limits but she's somehow getting more time. The influence of other classmates cannot be underestimated. Hearing from therapists and other parents that we're doing the best we can is super fucking frustrating because our best isn't amounting to jack shit. Every kid is different though. Our youngest doesn't seem like he'll be much of a problem but we'll see. I guess I'll end this mini rant with: good luck and godspeed.
  • jacobgkau 2y ago
    Therapists can be super hit-and-miss. Like schoolteachers, they may seem like they should be domain experts, but they're often just normal people working a job. And it's extremely frustrating to think you're doing the right thing by going to get help (be it for yourself or others), only to be told that there's nothing to be done, not even a suggestion. I wish you and your family luck!
    • NetOpWibby 2y ago
      Thank you, we’ll take all the luck we can get!
• deejatsplit 2y ago
  I'd recommend the stuff on this web site and the related book. https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/ https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/ Lots of good research backing this up with some guidance for communities to change the environment for their kids.
• INTPenis 2y ago
  I don't think you can prevent it anymore than you can prevent the impact of advertising billboards, or the news. Parents should lead by example. Easier said than done I know, but parents need to be the idols in their children's lives. Not influencers. If a parent leads by example they will win in the long run because influencers are fake and shallow while you're real and always there for them. Children who seek out other role models are children who didn't, or couldn't, look up to their parents. This has always been going on. Before social media we sought out role models in school or in the streets.
• MrMcCall 2y ago
  They have never had unmonitored access to the internet. Now that they're older, the <18yo boy has a dumb phone for communication, and our >18yo daughter has an older iPhone she only uses for comms and directions. They have also not ever had access to drugs, alcohol, or modern cinematic fiction, because that would have similarly negative effects on their development as compassionate human beings. They have also not hung out with children raised in this compassionless media landscape. Remember, people, that your tech overlords don't give a sh_t about any of you, except insofar as they can make a buck off of you. They don't care one bit about your happiness or the misery their products cause; they only care that you can't prove that they caused those harms. They don't care that their "bitcoin"s are burning up our already-overheating Earth. They don't care that their LLMs are consuming massive amounts of water and electricity. They have sold our children's future for a small price. And they have the temerity to call us "woke" for waking up to the fact that our world is run by callous, unscrupulous scoundrels. Compassion is the essense of humanity. Without it, we are just very talented animals perpetuating dumb pack warfare amongst packs and within our pack, often for a buck.
  • tzs 2y ago
    What do you mean by modern cinematic fiction?
    • MrMcCall 2y ago
      Modern TV shows and movies. We watch some older movies, occasionally, but no TV, except for the old Jeremy Brett Sherlock Holmes episodes from the 80's and 90's. They haven't been inundated with adult shows with their sexy content/jokes and/or violence and bad folks of various degrees. They have gotten the flavor of the kinds of bad people can be from the Sherlock Holmes bad guys and women. They don't need Hannibal Lecter or his ilk and those kinds of movies that I grew up with. Our daughter works on her crafts and our son on his chess. And we watch European football (soccer) highlights, where they get plenty of over-acting from those guys ;-) We also watch some select YouTube videos from time-to-time.
• jpm_sd 2y ago
  I have 3 daughters. This is kinda working for us, with ongoing negotiation. - No phones before 8th grade - Phones start out locked down (talk/text only) - Enable select apps (e.g. Camera, Duolingo) with proven responsible behavior. - No social media apps or accounts - Youtube and similar are blocked at the router at home - Computer (Chromebook) use is supervised, mostly - No phones when you have a group of friends over. Yes I will confiscate them.
  • Aeolun 2y ago
    > No phones when you have a group of friends over. How does this work with the whole, lets instead go to my friends place so my phone doesn’t get stolen?
• TriangleEdge 2y ago
  You don't. I have a baby and a teenager and the teenager is pretty mind-rotted even tho mild restrictions were in place. Kids don't exist in a vacuum and you will only have strong influence over them until they turn 12 or so in my experience. The environment they are in matters a lot. Other kids, etc.. I am very worried about the future of my baby. My main concern is that he'll have a hard time being useful since automation looks like it'll do everything soon enough. Purposeless people are not good.
• mansilladev 2y ago
  When kids were young (< 13), kept them off it for as long as possible. In fact, it was forbidden. Friends/colleagues thought I was a tyrant (and some thought I was an idiot) for trying to shield my kids this way, but those were the rules. Eventually, I had to capitulate. But even now, I regularly check in with the now much older kids to discourage worthless hours of doom-scrolling.
• jzer0cool 2y ago
  We can maybe borrow from some past generational issues, but it seems old forms of media and societal problems are growing worse (e.g bullying, self-esteem, harmful cliques, peer-pressure, etc), or are certain areas getting better (e.g. respecting different cultures and differences, etc.) 1990's: TV, Games (e.g. consoles), ... 2000's: Internet, TV, Games, ... 2010's: Social Media, Games, Streaming Content, ... 2020's: Social Media, Games, Streaming Content, ... I have to respect all the parents at this time learning to deal with such changes and no past to learn from with the technological changes. Was there ever a time destructive to "reading books too much" (e.g. bookworm)? Would love to hear thoughts (ideas?) for what ought to be done for a new generation of children being born. What can we learn from the past here and what are some ideas of the correct approaches? Not 100% convinced about banning devices until some later time since technology is being integrated also in classrooms, so I wonder if that hinders growth. Wondering all these things as a new parent.
  • Aeolun 2y ago
    Our strategy has been limited access, and I feel it’s not a great one. There’s a constant desire to be on a device and a large inability to think of what else they could be doing. Not helped by being a single child and papa not always feeling up to playing pretend Pokémon. At the same time, it could be far worse. Whenever there are other kids outside/to play with they really easily fall back into a pattern of pure play. We’ve had whole days of just playing basketball too. I’m largely resentful of my inability to play with devices when I was younger (see how well I turned out despite my parents saying I shouldn’t look at screens too much), and it affects the way I approach this thing.
    • jzer0cool 2y ago
      > what else they could be doing Great feedback. Makes me wanting to start building out a cheatsheet (or things to bring) by situation (e.g. restaurant -> coloring book). Same for daily conversation topics, without it being a bore / repetitive. Happy to get any ideas were successful (and not).
  • thijson 2y ago
• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• amelius 2y ago
  It's sad but teach them to use an LLM so they know where to find the best response when they are being bullied online.
• KoelnHome 2y ago
  [dead]
• sky1nax 2y ago
  [dead]
• the_other 2y ago
  It’s easy. Don’t let them have it.
• nytesky 2y ago
  Partly it’s having a constant discussion about society, the world, and news in general. We talk about how advertisers are trying to manipulate you, social media can be addicting and is also trying to manipulate you, etc. Not an angry way, a discussion, like how magnets work or how rain forms. Just the facts ma’am. As for permissions, my oldest avoided all social media except iMessage (because for her age that is essentially the phone line), and only got Insta at 16 — but I had the password not her, so she could give out her @handle to people to connect, but she would only go only into the fray once a week with us around (vs the zombie doom scroll scenario for instance). We will probably allow Snapchat soon since it’s becoming the new “basic” connection — I’ve not used it, so does it have a feed and likes? My younger kids all have iPads and the 13 year old had an iPhone — they use them for music and audio books so end up in their rooms even at night. I don’t love that, but I have on tight screentime so I hope that is helping a bit. I wish there was a good device for ONLY music and audio books, like a souped up iPod. I locked down enough I think her iPad is limited to that, but it’s not obvious. We tried Alexa devices but navigating audio books is impossible and even song selection was tedious. Kindles could almost do it but we are Apple Music family and don’t think there’s and app, and the audio book library app is finicky, and I find kindles pretty kludgy in general.
  • Nebasuke 2y ago
    There are good devices for only music / audiobooks, but they're often aimed at younger kids. For example Yoto players (https://yotoplay.com/ https://yotoplay.com/) or Toniebox (haven't used this one). Basically screenless, except for the number of the playlist. You can use an app/website to create and upload playlist and couple them to your custom cards (so you don't have to spend money on buying loads of cards).
  • jacobgkau 2y ago
    > We will probably allow Snapchat soon since it’s becoming the new “basic” connection — I’ve not used it, so does it have a feed and likes? Just an FYI, from the couple of times I've tried using it and been shown it by friends, Snapchat is essentially just as much of a feed-based social media as Instagram or anything else these days. It's not just a "basic connection" with DM'ing. Instagram also has a DM's page, and I know people who use the DM feature heavily, but that's obviously not the extent of Instagram. (Part of the problem with drawing that line is that even apps that started out as private messaging only, such as Telegram or LINE, often eventually add public channels and stories where it turns into more of a feed.)
• iforgot22 2y ago
  Having kids in the near future. Wife and I agreed to "just say no" until they're 17 or 18. We've also decided it's important to lead by example. I assume that any adult saying "kids need social media to not get bullied" or "we can't tell them no" is using it heavily themselves. We could be wrong, but we'll see.
  • mc3301 2y ago
    At a young age, have strict rules. Example: they can watch stuff on a phone/tablet only at the doctors or at an airport (or on a plane.) That works for us. Let them watch something in the car only ONCE, and they'll be sure to remind you that "watching in the car is ok."
• campak 2y ago
  You could try out the https://wisephone.com https://wisephone.com to see if that helps. It doesn't allow social media, but it does allow apps that are tools to get a job done. I think if you let your kids experience boredom, they'd be sad and potentially spiteful, but it's what they need. Kids need to experience boredom. That's when the best experiences and ideas happen.
• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• orochimaaru 2y ago
  It all depends on their peer group and their nature. I have one who doesn’t even like to be photographed. That one I have no problem with - there’s no way she’s posting stuff about herself. Also, I’ve told her stuff on the web lasts for ever. She doesn’t do social media but only private iMessage groups with friends. The younger sister is a “social butterfly” and wants to create “a lot of content”. Luckily she’s in a school program that keeps her real busy. So we haven’t had to deal with it yet. In short, kids understand when you tell them and more importantly you yourself keep off these apps. If you’re on there all the time, there is no way you’re convincing your child to not be on.
• alex_young 2y ago
  My son is 4. He's never used a screen in any significant way. No movies / TV / cellphones / iPads. My spouse and I read to him a lot. A chapter or two a night from one of the Oz books (there are dozens of them, we're on the 8th one) or something similar. Results so far? He has a very wide vocabulary, loves learning about the world around him and has almost zero interest in screens. I hope that by the time he reaches social media age (whatever that is) that the fad has passed and people move on to something less toxic. Even if not, we'll make sure he's in lots of social groups and camps where the focus is doing things rather than spending time on a device.
  • udit99 2y ago
    My son is 4 and we read books to him that are a lot simpler than the Oz book(s). I'm impressed that your kid can handle them.
• failrate 2y ago
  They did not have screen time without me watching with them, discussing what we were watching. Also, paying for no ads was a big benefit, but we talk about ads to make sure they are prepared for the psychic assault.
• lacker 2y ago
  As a parent of an 11-year-old, messaging is the hardest thing to handle. If you allow kids to message their friends, their friends will send all sorts of inappropriate content, exposing them to essentially everything bad on the internet. If you don't allow kids to message their friends, then they will miss out on fun events that all of their friends are doing. At least at our local public school, when I talk with parents of high schoolers, 100% of them have given up and allowed messaging. So by 14 I think you really can't "shield them" from internet content. What you can do is fight back against the human desire to waste lots of time, by limiting screen time. I think that's the best we're going to get.
  • pj_mukh 2y ago
    I do wonder what the dumb hammer of a blanket school ban is going to do. A bunch of states are trying that.
    • NetOpWibby 2y ago
      People are incredible inquisitive and intelligent about finding ways around bans. Kids are this, intensified. They literally have nothing but time.
      • pj_mukh 2y ago
        Right but speed demons don't nullify the need for Stop Signs and Speed limits.
    • phatfish 2y ago
      Nothing dumb about it, unless you are not a parent. No reason for kids to be scrolling in school.
    • lacker 2y ago
      Most "school bans" that I have seen so far are actually things like, "A teacher-enforced official policy of no using phones during class." In other words, usually the same as the status quo, because what teacher says, "yes go ahead and use your phone while I'm talking to you". The local public high school makes students put their phones in pouches during classes. It seems good at preventing distraction but doesn't really do much about kids wasting lots of time on social media, sharing terrible material on social media, communicating between classes, or after classes. Probably better than nothing.
• Tade0 2y ago
  Mine are too small for any of this yet but I gave it some thought and here's what I have: -Social media etc. are a means of avoiding one's emotions. Your job as a parent is to help your children process those so that they don't crave such distractions as much. -Education is key. This is a huge topic, but one of the first things I taught my preschooler is that people do all kinds of things only because they want money. That is equally true in meatspace, as e.g. this enclosed playground we occasionally go to is dotted with shelves with toys that are, of course, not free, so if you want one you have to pay. I lost count how many things I explained with a short "they do it only because it brings them more money". -It so happens that the worst brainrot is at the same time data-intensive, so data allowance is something I'm planning on introducing once the time comes. I sort of had this in my youth when my data plan was a whopping 1GB per month, so I had to be deliberate in my choice of entertainment. As a final, optimistic note, it appears that generation alfa picked up on the fact that we, the parents, either try to distract them with screens or look at screens instead of paying attention to them. They don't like that one bit and my prediction is that their attitude towards this will be very much like my generation's towards our parents having the TV on at all times.
• topkai22 2y ago
  Mine aren’t teenagers yet, so we aren’t quite at the danger zone. So far we’ve been focused on letting them use devices in a controlled manner. I’ve set up various network level controls via Pi-hole and opendns family shorties (obviously this is mostly dns based). YouTube and all the search engines are set to in strict mode. The devices we have also have various restrictions on them. Kindle kids edition has been great- lots of options for games and videos but limited ability to get into stuff they shouldn’t. We also have iPads now, with the suite of family controls applied. Our lives are complex enough that our kids have Apple Watches now, again with parent controls in place. It’s a good compromise- they can chat with thier friends in sms, but not the stuff that pushes content on you. It’s not perfect, but we plan on not getting smart phones or allowing normal social media until like age 18
• sinuhe69 2y ago
  My kids don't have smartphones until they're 17. I keep them busy with maths, programming, robotics and other things they like. It seems to work. But now my older son is 17 and he hangs out with his friends on Discord all the time, sometimes it's even affecting his health (sleep) and his schoolwork. But it's less the effect of social media and more the effect of his age. However, I don't know how it will be in later years, whether he will be able to develop a healthy habit of using devices or not, and I'm a bit worried.
• austin-cheney 2y ago
  This is unpopular but I don’t gives a shit: 1. Children don’t need a cell phone until high school. 2. Block social media at the house with a PiHole. 3. When your kids get sad about how unfair is it they aren’t popular or don’t have access like other kids remind them they aren’t paying for it.
  • ranguna 2y ago
    > remind them they aren’t paying for it. Do you really think an average 10 year old will understand what you mean by that?
    • austin-cheney 2y ago
      I know they won’t understand, but the fact remains they are a 10 year old and can cry about it all they want but they are still a child and supposedly you are the adult. Who really runs your household?
      • wbazant 2y ago
        Constantly reminding someone of your authority surely leads to resentment over time. Is it not basically a recipe for your kids systematically removing you from their life as they grow?
        • austin-cheney 2y ago
          Do you have children or is that some theoretical posturing (bullshit)? I have two adult children that are doing just fine.
      • ranguna 2y ago
        My dad used to do that, I don't speak with him much anymore.
• latexr 2y ago
  This is an interesting question which will lead to interesting answers on its own right, but be aware that by the time you have children your worries will already be outdated. Not putting your infant in front of a screen to shut them up is going to be an evergreen good recommendation, but social media will have changed drastically by the time your kids are old enough for it. More importantly, our attitudes around it will have changed. You can already see countries and communities adopting social media bans on children, so in ten years you can expect that the main things to worry about will be different. Today, I worry that adults just gobble up any misinformation they read regurgitated by some rando or an LLM without critical thinking.
• kylecazar 2y ago
  Fwiw, I don't have kids but my two nephews went to a Waldorf school K-12 (graduating this year). They are by far the most well-adjusted young men I'm around. Excelling academically, sports, volunteering, lots of interest in the outdoors, part-time jobs, all of their own volition. Barely ever catch them on a cell phone, despite having their own with unrestricted access for a while now at this point. It might be worth looking into some of that school's principles around gradual introduction of technology specifically (I know there is some other controversial stuff you can ignore). Although... I do think the benefit in their case is in part due to everyone in their grade having had the same rules in years prior. So, it may be difficult to replicate in an environment where phones are ubiquitous by middle school.
• flerchin 2y ago
  Kids are an experiment that you run without a control group. You do the best you can with the information you have, from a place of love. That's it. Social media is crappy and dangerous, and you keep them away from it until you are able to explain to them why it's crappy and dangerous. It's also everywhere. YouTube comments, HackerNews, Reddit, Roblox. All are various flavors of social media, many of which are hard to justify complete blockage.
• tmaly 2y ago
  I play Roblox with my kids age 11 and 6. I grew up with the original Nintendo when I was seven. The older child is allowed to use YouTube to look up learning videos and cat videos. Screen time is strictly limited to 15-30 minutes a day.
• artlessmax 2y ago
  Two buddies and I built a private “landline” network for their kids (~9 year olds) and their kids’ friends. We used analog phones and VoIP components, so there’s no screens or anything like that. It’s been cool seeing kids go from begging to use the family iPad after school to running to the home phone to dial their friends. We ended up turning it into a network others can join[1] after other families started to ask about it. Having over a hundred local families join within a few weeks has given me hope that the next generation isn’t just condemned to live in a social-media-saturated hell, or that smartphones will inevitably be a part of kids’ lives earlier and earlier. [1] https://tincan.kids/ https://tincan.kids/ – Disclosure: it’s not free, but we’ve tried to make it low-cost.
• seattleman12345 2y ago
  Don't let them use it. Are you fucking dumb?
• seattleman12345 2y ago
  Don't let them use it. Are you dumb?
• mitchellst 2y ago
  (Father of children ages 7, 5, and 2.) 3 thoughts, ordered from most concrete and practical to most speculative. Concretely, how do I do this? My kids go to a Waldorf school. (waldorfeducation.org) Is it expensive? Yeah. But, among many other benefits, you're automatically joining a conspiracy of parents dead set against tech-ified childhood. (A HUGE number of whom, you know, _work in technology,_ which tells you something.) Second, and more reflective: I find that as a general matter, I spend more time thinking about how to call my kids toward things rather than away from things. Yes, social media and TV and video games will fill attention voids. But only if there are voids. The stereotype is that a parent will try to keep kids from doing 12 million things, but really you spend your best parenting effort trying to get them to love or value about 4 things. If you succeed, avoiding destructive habits and behaviors is much easier. Third, and most speculative but most optimistic: I think we have hit peak social media for teens. It feels a lot like that point with cigarettes where everyone was still addicted to nicotine but nobody was pretending it was cool or sexy anymore. If you don't have kids yet, then society has 10-15 years to get its act together on this stuff before your kid is in the really dangerous age range for bad mental health outcomes from being drowned in tech. Could it remain this bad? Sure. But it's (literally) a generation from now in every respect: culturally, technically, politically, and socially. There is momentum for reform at many levels: legislative, private, school-level, and social. You have time for several of those reforms to fail and iterate. Someone will have figured it out by then. You may have to move—or join a cult—but I promise your kid will be worth enough to you to go find those people and live among them.
• trod1234 2y ago
  It should worry you. There are dreadful things happening in these spaces, and they are of such sophistication that children, and even many adults cannot fully ascertain. The problem you describe is a cursed problem. You have so many malign influences being exposed that the only rational approach is to teach them as much as you can early to recognize and appropriately deal with these things. That is easier said than done because at its core, you effectively have to teach your children how to lie, so they can recognize and discern the sophisticated lies. There is also an element of biology, we call it the age of reason because there's a point where reason emerges, and prior to that point it isn't possible. Prior to that age, they shouldn't be exposed. That will require a monumental amount of work because these influences are everywhere. Even in the Family movies (especially Pixar). I would start following a classical education curricula (Trivium/Quadrivium) which includes philosophy, aristotle-in logic, Method, and reason. Following that, there should also be education on perceptual blindspots, and its intrinsic link to communication, as well as how distorted reflected appraisal works (and its impacts). These are blindspot biases we all have as humans, and they will need to know and recognize the limits to defend themselves. Robert Cialdini wrote a book on the levers of Influence. Communications should roughly follow an Intro course that you see in college with particular emphasis on perception, uniquely shared meaning, deceitful or manipulative structures, with guided exposure towards the end, relating to deceitful, misleading, and false narratives. The basis requirements for torture should also be taught, so they can recognize it when it happens to them. Coercion should be fully understood so they are not helpless when its eventually applied to them. This should also include how you handle people who lie and how to case-build, and employ countermeasures in such areas. Being capable of retaining rational thought under applied stress at higher amounts than others, will offer them the best chance at survival.
• leyth 2y ago
  I have children, and I will never allow them to use social media while they are under my care. Once they are grown and independent, they can make their own choices. As a father, my responsibility is to protect them from harm, and I am fully committed to doing so until they reach adulthood. Here's an excerpt from an article titled “Facebook’s War on Free Will” by The Guardian. > The many Facebook experiments add up. The company believes that it has unlocked social psychology and acquired a deeper understanding of its users than they possess of themselves. Facebook can predict users’ race, sexual orientation, relationship status and drug use on the basis of their “likes” alone. It’s Zuckerberg’s fantasy that this data might be analysed to uncover the mother of all revelations, “a fundamental mathematical law underlying human social relationships that governs the balance of who and what we all care about”.
• theshrike79 2y ago
  My kid didn't get access to Youtube until they were 12. It's fine otherwise now, but Youtube Shorts is a cesspool and it CANNOT be turned off in any way. There are no parental controls to limit or disable it. Before that we did try Youtube Kids, but it's creepy AF. There's a ton of "this kid gets to buy EVERYTHING he wants!" -shit in there. I decided I'd rather pay for _every_ streaming service, give the kid a child account in there and let them watch anything. It kinda worked. Their ability to tolerate the basic screaming jump-cutting Youtuber is close to zero. I've had chats with them where they explicitly said that "X does interesting videos but they shout all the time so I don't want to watch them". With Netflix, Disney+ and our local PBS equivalent I can sorta trust that the content is professionally made and even slightly educational. The age limit for social media over here is 13 at the moment, we'll need to burn that bridge this summer. Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook and all that will be open after that. I'm not going to encourage that but we'll see what peer pressure does.
• darthrupert 2y ago
  My experience from parenting two children to adulthood and being way too lax about devices led me to roughly the following rules for the rest of my kids: 1. Absolutely no phones in bed at any point of the day. Dpublecheck at bedtime that the phone is where it's supposed to be. 2. I vet every app on the phone. 3. Web browser is whitelisted. 4. I vet every contact on signal/whatsapp. No other messaging apps. 5. When they get access to a computer, I let them know that I can know everything they do with it. Also, the computer is stationary in a central place in the house. When they complain that their friends have more rights, I will lament the unfortunate situation where I cannot dictate the rules of other families. I'll obviously revise these rules as they grow and I get the feeling that they can handle it. The default mode for parents must always be that they can not.
• crocowhile 2y ago
  I am in my late 40s and my two boys are 11 and 15. They make great use of the internet, especially youtube. One is a big fan of all the STEM channels on youtube and he is getting an education through those that, when I was at his age, I could only dream about: Matt Parker, 3B1B, Mark Rober, Steve Mould, and so on. He watches hours of those videos every week. The younger is in the VR/Gorilla Tag phase and has created his own youtube channel - https://www.youtube.com/@MagicianTheMonkey-p1f https://www.youtube.com/@MagicianTheMonkey-p1f He taught himself how to install Mods, how to script and create contents in capcut, how to advertise his channel. The internet can be an amazing opportunity for kids. We should be careful about policing it too much. My recommendation is: keep a close eye on how their behaviour changes (the output) but do not worry too much on what inputs they choose and receive. They have to build their own filters after all.
• koliber 2y ago
  Limit the amount of exposure to social media and talk to them. There are no shortcuts. Don't cut off completely, but limit, talk to them about it, show examples of when it is a positive impact, show examples of negative impact.
• efitz 2y ago
  At 18, I went to see the movie "RoboCop" in the theater and walked out because I had never been exposed to such gratuitous violence before. This was long before the internet, cell phones, or social media. Would I have been as shocked/traumatized if I had previously been even a little bit exposed to something much less intense? Now that kind of stuff is passe. I don't want my children traumatized; obviously I'm going to do whatever I can to prevent them from premature exposure to lots of extreme content. But we live in a different world than I grew up in, and I'm worried that kids need SOME exposure, especially to positive experiences but also just a little to mild bad experiences, in order to build up life skills like getting along and interacting with others, even with people who aren't nice to you. I'm struggling with how to do that and where to draw the line but it definitely involves limits (that change over time), supervision, and communication.
• loismiller 2y ago
  Set clear boundaries for screen time, monitor content, encourage open communication, and promote offline activities to balance social media's influence on your children.
• junto 2y ago
  Try to make sure they know how they stay safe online as best as possible. No phones until high school. Limit phone usage via parental controls. No posting photos of themselves online. Closed social media accounts in their teens. WhatsApp contacts limited to people they know in person. We play the game of pragmatic averages. We aren’t the first of the parents in their friends group to allow their kids to have access to <insert app here>, but we also aren’t the last. Honestly though, it’s a minefield.