Dweller1622

7 ms·

1.
by Dweller1622 17d ago
I'm curious if you're familiar with the particulars of how Huggingface was hacked. They were negligent in their own ways and rights. Mounting a host path volume in a Kubernetes pod is really not "super hacker" territory!
2.
by Dweller1622 18d ago
> I think there needs to be a certain level of intention to make the fantasy reality for it to be a kink. Hopefully this isn't to imply that people with fantasies actually want to have non-consensual sex in some capacity. If so then
3.
by Dweller1622 2mo ago
Unfortunately, for this to be an answer to my question, it would actually have to elaborate. Bare assertions aren't an explanation, and as it stands this message communicates nothing to me.
4.
by Dweller1622 2mo ago
> I want every platform to be safe > We don't allow arsenic in bread I'm curious what work the verbiage of "safety" is doing throughout these posts. It's particularly interesting to me because I'd also li
5.
by Dweller1622 8mo ago
The world at large seems to have descended into moral panic on all sorts of subjects and it's difficult for me to understand precisely how or why. Perhaps it's no coincidence that over the last decade and change there seems to hav
6.
by Dweller1622 9mo ago
I can find a "US v Fletcher" from 2008 that deals with obscenity law, though the only "US v McCoy" I can find was itself about charges for CSAM. The latter does seem to reference a previous case where the same person was
7.
by Dweller1622 9mo ago
What in the world is this referring to?
8.
by Dweller1622 11mo ago
uBlock Origin Lite is available for Safari on mobile, though that's not exactly the same extension. Orion supports standard uBlock Origin on mobile, but then that's not a browser "of note." You win this round!
9.
by Dweller1622 1y ago
I'm not the biggest fan of how I phrased some of this. Perhaps "and so I'm opting not to speak to those point." Unfortunate how short the edit window for comments is on here. In either case, I suppose what I'm sayin
10.
by Dweller1622 1y ago
There's a number of things being said here, but much of it seems orthogonal to the original discussion and so I'm not going to address it. Rather, if these characters aren't agents, I wonder where this leaves us re: sex posit
11.
by Dweller1622 1y ago
No, that's fine, since I think it's not only the case that these are sufficient, but that I simply wasn't explicit enough in my rejection. What I'm disputing is any application of objectification theory to media analysis
12.
by Dweller1622 1y ago
I've definitely seen people say it's about agency, though exactly what they mean by that and why they think that matters tends to vary. That said, I suspect your response is in line with the person I was originally responding to.
13.
by Dweller1622 1y ago
Can you give me an example of this? As far as I understand it sex positivity doesn't seem to be concerned with "media sexualizing women" in and of itself. Consequently I'm not sure what "media [that] sexualizes wome
14.
by Dweller1622 2y ago
What does it mean to "handle online media?" How is it you would say "most adults" fall short of this?
15.
by Dweller1622 2y ago
Product development disagreements are largely immaterial to me, though the discussion around their integrations with Yandex remind me of prior discussions around their integrations with Brave. Either way, thanks for sharing.
16.
by Dweller1622 2y ago
What is the direction that things are going at Kagi now? What were they before?
17.
by Dweller1622 2y ago
It’s not entirely clear what this is in reference to or what you’re attempting to say.
18.
by Dweller1622 2y ago
The supposition that this is “more nuanced than I think” given the particular example you’ve chosen strikes me as quite bizarre. Does “17 year olds collecting nudes of 14 year olds to gawk at and bully them over” not strike you as abusive a
19.
by Dweller1622 2y ago
> It's trying to exclude "innocent" things like selfies or "simulated" things like drawings, but those are just as illegal in some or all countries. Selfies shared between teenagers are innocent! When an adult en
20.
by Dweller1622 2y ago
> then what's with the pronouns It's been the case that when I encounter people with non-normative pronouns they're trans, but you're right that isn't necessarily the case. My mistake! I know I asked the initial
21.
by Dweller1622 2y ago
> and it is cultural not innate > he/they I sometimes see people make this assertion, and interestingly enough it's usually trans people. What exactly makes you say this?
22.
by Dweller1622 2y ago
Take a guess at what they might have been into when they were kids!
23.
by Dweller1622 3y ago
Ah, alright. I suppose it comes down to the fact that even thought labeled as such, this speech isn't actually fictitious. I see your point here.
24.
by Dweller1622 3y ago
> or depending on the "speech" when properly labeled as fictitious (though some speech is wrong regardless of its labeling). What's an example of this?
25.
by Dweller1622 3y ago
> what is morally good is objective and not fully accounted for by consent, or utility. Could you elaborate here? I'm curious what is meant by this.
26.
by Dweller1622 3y ago
> I suspect tentacle porn is creating mass shooters at scale. This is a rather fascinating sort of assertion. I wonder how we, or the people in question, move from one to the other.
27.
by Dweller1622 3y ago
> [...]if you subscribe at least partially to the Sapir-Wharf hypothesis[...] Why would anyone subscribe to the Sapir-Wharf hypothesis, in whole or in part?
28.
by Dweller1622 3y ago
> Loosely, addiction can be useful-- the thrill seekers[...] This seems like a strange conception of addiction, unless we aren't seriously comparing mountain climbing with heroin. If we are then I wonder what utility the classificat
29.
by Dweller1622 3y ago
> On the flip side if you attach value to what you have and are, then it logically follows that if you have the chance to "ask your ancestors to screw" - you would. Why does that follow?
30.
by Dweller1622 3y ago
> He's trying really hard to disprove Haidt's post by poking holes in many of the studies. Because this is how evidence based reasoning works. If the evidence that is supposed to support the hypothesis is fundamentally flawed,

More ›