Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
morgante
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
38 ms
·
391.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
And that's how you end up with a system which very few top performers want to work under. I positively shudder at the thought of a system which coupled my compensation to years of experience. That is in no way a reliable gauge of abili
392.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
Online applications in general are rarely successful. Pardon my directness, but if you've applied to 100+ jobs then you're likely doing it wrong. You are almost always better off finding a quality set of positions (10-15) and gett
393.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
> All the best flavours are sharp or sour. That's an extremely subjective statement.
394.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
Secession can certainly be illegal, but that simply means any outcome of an unsanctioned referendum is legally irrelevant. As far as I can tell, Spain is going to great lengths to curtail the rights of citizens to express their opinions on
395.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
I don't currently own any furniture. For the past few years, I've been moving every month or two and never acquired any furniture.
396.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
For what it's worth, Google does support 2FA with USB security keys: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6103534?hl=en Personally I wouldn't trust most sites to implement complex auth mechanisms.
397.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
The notion of a referendum being "illegal" is farcical. No democracy should prohibit people from deciding to get together and conduct a poll on something.
398.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
Thanks for the detailed reply. Personally, IKEA fits my lifestyle pretty well as a young urban-dweller. I don't really anticipate having my furniture for more than 5-10 years and their aesthetic definitely matches my preferences. I
399.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
What would you use?
400.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
It's not particularly difficult but nor is it particularly fun. I certainly don't plan to assemble the furniture for my next apartment myself.
401.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
It's not clear to me what good this does. Say a narrow set of "information" sources follow this model and produce quality journalism. Meanwhile the vast majority of traffic continues to go to "entertainment" journal
402.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
Any moderation would be a start. Gab's whole raison d'etre is to be an unmoderated social network where you can post the hate speech which would get you kicked off more mainstream networks.
403.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
You should read more carefully, or listen to interpretations from lawyers. The license referred to in that document is the license to any Facebook patents granted within, which might not even exist. The patent grant is separate from the c
404.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
I'm going to stop engaging with you, since it's clear that you'd rather make up facts and deliberately misinterpret my statements than discuss in good faith. For example, I specifically said $60k/yr in expenses —which o
405.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
You lose the patent grant, which applies to all Facebook open source projects (not just React), so they can use all patents they own as part of a defensive portfolio. If initiating a patent war with Facebook is a foreseeable business outcom
406.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
> Bullshit. Don't tell me my own life is bullshit, that's ridiculously patronizing. You'll trust a calculator over my own personal direct experience? Not to mention that the very forum you linked says $60k is very possible
407.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
The patent clause isn't designed to give Facebook leverage. It's designed to grant patents unless you sue them. Even though patent trolls don't use React, Facebook wants to ensure that they don't grant patent licenses
408.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
> some possible future that will never happen Facebook has been subject to numerous patent litigations and is very likely to be involved in future patent litigations. Maintaining a defensive patent portfolio is an important part of prepa
409.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
My estimate is skewed downwards because you asked for average, and a significant percentage of the cohort is new grads and relatively inexperienced developers. Senior developers can certainly make above $300k. You seem to put far too much s
410.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
$200-300k in total compensation.
411.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
Personally, I have a hard time imagining that any Facebook patents you use with React wouldn't also apply to Preact. Then again, I think this whole patents issue is mostly FUD. The number of companies who have to reasonably consider su
412.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
> That would be true only if you assumed around a huge number of top tech company hires were those prime developers. I do assume that. Yes, there is a distribution of abilities at top tech companies—but virtually everyone I've worke
413.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
It's certainly more than 1%. Top tech companies alone employ more than 1% of developers. > There are plenty of talented people, even in these "top" tech companies, who do not have 6-7 offers thrown at them That doesn'
414.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
> If this were true, salaries would be skyrocketing In my corner of the world, they definitely are. I think a lot of these discussions are complicated by the fact that there are essentially two developer job markets: prime and sub-prime.
415.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
I don't dispute that there are poorly-run companies which want to underpay and abuse their developers. We don't need a union to solve those companies. Just don't work for them.
416.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
> Since there is a short supply of software engineers, why do you think wages haven't risen? They definitely have, at least for the high end of the market. For example, Hired shows a 3.28% increase in salaries for SF engineers this
417.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
> I mean right now you hear about high demand for tech people, but wages don't reflect that. By what metric? Software developers can make $250k+ in SV. I have a hard time imagining pay doubling broadly. Only a small cohort of employ
418.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
> I think a tech union would significantly raise the wages of technical people. By what mechanism? Either they engage in collective bargaining, which is filled with problems, or artificially constrict the supply of labor by requiring add
419.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
Yes. They are supposed to return it eventually, and even if they don't I'm willing to pay $1,000 to protect civil liberties.
420.
▲
by
morgante
9y ago
No, if you're just visiting they can ask for whatever they please.
More ›