12 ms·
Life as an OnlyFans 'chatter'
- anovikov 8mo agoNow this is almost entirely automated anyway, there is a big adult ecosystem here in Cyprus and i talk to a lot of people. No manual work is used there anymore, "chatters" are a thing of the past. Now they are well on the path to automate OnlyFans models themselves, there are plenty of hybrid sites where known live models are attracted with good terms to bring in the users, and then slowly switched for AI ones, and it WORKS. Adult industry is so competitive and fast-evolving because there are few deep moats, it shows the way for everyone else, in fact.
- createaccount99 7mo agoThat's pretty smart.
- vimda 7mo agoGod that's depressing. Even when you _pay_ for human connection you're being fobbed off onto an AI
- PeterStuer 7mo agoBet you had some really deep human connection with that guy chatting to you from the Philippines.
- vimda 7mo agoYou betray your ignorance of how parasocial OnlyFans and their ilk get. Yes, people get real connection out of it, whether its with who they think they're talking to or not. I think that connecting those people into a chat bot instead of a real human is depressing, and a bad thing for society, but you're welcome to disagree with that
- ndriscoll 7mo agoTalking to a real human seems more depressing to me, especially when they're making less than $2/hour doing it, have multiple chats going all trying to hit sales targets, and they feel bad for you in the interaction. Paying for female attention is pretty bad, but not even getting the attention you paid for is just bleak. At that point go with the machine. At least it's not thinking "what the hell am I doing here?" while it's generating messages.
- luckylion 7mo agoWhat's the difference? The users think they talk to some specific person and form a connection with them, and they don't. Whether they get strung along by a human, a chatbot, or a simple cronjob - does it matter?
- nkrisc 7mo agoIt’s not a real connection. It’s completely invented in their mind. Probably more accurate to call it a delusion.
- PeterStuer 7mo agoI'll admit. I' too old to 'get' OF.
- sillyfluke 7mo agoNow that you got the balls rolling in an unwanted direction, I'm sure you're not the only one here with blue jewels.
- superb_dev 7mo agoI don’t think it’s an age thing, I think is desperation. I’m not desperate enough to get it
- sillyfluke 7mo agoI'm also often not desperate for a pun from a stranger, but I think a 'get' it.
- cess11 7mo agoWhat do you mean by "human connection"?
- steve_adams_86 7mo agoIt appears a lot of people using OF are using it as a parasocial medium, not strictly for porn. They want to believe they're actually in touch with the performer and part of their lives to some degree.
- cess11 7mo agoWhat does "para-" mean? Edit: Right, 'beside', 'outside', like in paranormal. Now, are parasocial relationships "human connection"?
- jihadjihad 7mo agopara- has a variety of meanings [0] depending on which word it’s used to form. Parasocial itself means “one-sided” in a relationship [1]. 0: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/para-#English https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/para-#English 1: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/parasocial https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/parasocial
- jfengel 7mo agoIt means that it shares some, but not all, aspects of a social relationship. It's often applied to one-sided relationships with celebrities, where you feel a personal connection to them but they literally don't know you exist.
- nine_k 7mo agoTo pay for a human connection, take someone out for a dinner, and foot the bill. At OnlyFans you're paying for a video feed, and computers are pretty good at producing convincing video feeds now.
- localuser13 7mo ago>To pay for a human connection, take someone out for a dinner, and foot the bill. I'm married now, and never used any parasocial platform OnlyFans or another, but trivializing the problem of young adult loneliness is either ignorant or condescending. A large fraction of young males don't have anyone to "take out for a dinner", or at least have no idea how to initiate that. You may scoff at that, but I certainly wouldn't know how to do it, and money was not a problem. Paying for human connection, especially online, was tempting.
- prepend 7mo agoThe solution to loneliness isn’t fake connections. And I think makes it even worse because fake friends don’t act like real people and make it harder to form real relationships with people who have their own desires and needs and aren’t just sycophants receiving pay.
- asdff 7mo agoTaking someone out for a dinner and footing the bill does not require you to be some cassanova. Escort services are a thing and honestly somewhat increasingly normalized. The latest chris hemsworth movie had him using an escort and didn't paint him as weird for it or anything, kind of just seemed like a gym membership or any other service the way it was casually broached (he played a certain healthy/rich/clean cut professional thief/perhaps even autistic character).
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- TheOtherHobbes 7mo agoLA is weird and not everyone wants to live there. Escort services are still a very niche interest in most of the world. And they provide a simulacrum of human connection.
- throwaway5752 7mo agoIt's going to kill the software industry as we know it! We're literally killing our field by making the devices and internet so repulsive that people are actively unplugging. You can't hear about this online because the bot generated content is filling the gap and the people doing it aren't online to tell you about it. Children are getting addicted to everything because the internet has killed any sense of self-stimulation and they are growing up into gamblers with cards, sports, and prediction markets or rage-addicted media consumers. There is plenty of human connection to be had out there, it is free, and all you have to do is put down the phone or computer. It is getting extremely compelling as an alternative for increasing large groups of people. The tech industry is energetically strangling its golden goose.
- SoftTalker 7mo agoThere will be some interesting game theory studies in the aftermath.
- localuser13 7mo agoI think that's just a good old prisoner dilemma. You can't have a free-range golden goose, because if you grow it responsibly, others will abuse it first and you will get out of business. The only way is to be as greedy as legally allowed, because otherwise you're left behind.
- roysting 7mo agoIronically, I was trying to explain to someone I know that was somewhat considering getting into that milieu that what such people are really doing is selling affection to an affection deprived audience. Every person that sells themselves has the same orifices and they more or less all look the same, and everyone has seen thousands of them by now. The differentiation is the connection and being able to identify the particular sad void needing to be fill. AI will make this really bad, because it will surely quickly learn how to tap into your deepest impulses and desires for connection and affection. It sounds weird, but in a way, there is some strong correlation between other forms of fraud, the most obvious being romance cons/frauds; where women are not looking for big rods, but for romance lady boners... yet another form of seeing affection. Some of us harm ourselves for a lack of an affection, others fall prey to it making them vulnerable. I do hope that AI could and will also be used to help people get a semblance of healthy affection, if not maybe even facilitate making real connections that can provide real human affection.
- tehjoker 7mo agoDoes that mean that people do not recognize that some of the content is AI? Or do they simply accept it?
- firtoz 7mo agoThere's enough people on both camps I'm sure.
- myhf 7mo agoA little bit of real content goes a long way toward getting people to pay for something unknown, which then turns out to be AI-generated. Even if they are not satisfied, that counts as AI content making a sale. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_in_a_poke https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_in_a_poke
- vova_hn2 7mo agoSaw a funny video [0] in the music-adjacent part of YouTube about an Instagram trend when man record themselves playing a musical instrument (usually guitar), then use AI video editing to turn themselves into scantily clad women and use these videos to lure people into viewing their adult content (also AI generated). [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqrJgjrBV2I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqrJgjrBV2I (it's a very short video, only 45 seconds)
- scorpioxy 7mo agoI noticed this thing on Youtube in general with cover images and I've always wondered if it was the content creator that does it or Youtube's platform. I find it both depressing and understandable that this is the kind of content that gets the most views.
- theshrike79 7mo agoEven bigger stars seem to be doing it. This is Carmen Electra's _verified_ Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/CarmenElectra https://www.facebook.com/CarmenElectra Scroll down a bit and you'll see all of the images have the exact same face plastered on a clearly AI body and the account is posting new photos multiple times per day. And every single post has thousands of likes and hundreds of messages from actual humans. People either don't notice the obvious fakes or don't care. Instagram is similar, you don't need to go far to find extremely obvious AI generated "people" with big accounts and links to OF accounts. There's no way to report these either, because Meta doesn't care.
- hasbot 7mo agoHeh, she's 53 years old! Obviously her followers don't care they're looking at fake photos.
- pjc50 7mo agoIsn't it technically against Meta TOS anyway to promote sex work?
- jazzyjackson 7mo agotry reporting an account and see what options you have. 'this person is advertising sex work' is not one of them, they dont care.
- theshrike79 7mo agoAlso "this account is CLEARLY fully AI-generated and pretends to be an actual human" is not an option.
- kotaKat 7mo agoSure, but it takes at least something like 17 founded reports to get someone punted off the platform, so good luck getting through the report-walls and AI content moderation to punt it out. "Our robot thinks this is OK to post, so screw you."
- profdevloper 7mo ago[flagged]
- morkalork 7mo agoNow you have two problems: That poor soul has lost their meager income and you've criminalized countless people who will no doubt still be consuming porn but from illicit sources
- zoklet-enjoyer 7mo agoThat's what the private prisons are for!
- steve1977 7mo agoThat's a good plan. We did that with drugs and it worked fabulously.
- SpicyLemonZest 7mo agoIt did! We saw with the opioid crisis just how much devastation can be caused by a single drug wiggling its way into legality.
- steve1977 7mo agoWhat was that single drug?
- SpicyLemonZest 7mo agoOxycodone. Purdue Pharma sold a formulation of it in their product called OxyContin, which had (still has!) a variety of legitimate medical uses. But it's also very easy for addicts to abuse, and Purdue pushed doctors to prescribe it widely with few controls, which is generally believed to have sparked the US's huge surge in opioid abuse. (Of course, merely cracking down on oxycodone didn't resolve the problem, because once someone's addicted they become highly motivated to find some other opioid.)
- PeterStuer 7mo ago2$ an hour chatter and 20$ an hour 'model', both replaced by AI.
- anticensor 7mo agoAnd then there is 2500$ a hour solo creator not replaced by AI (different mode of operation though).
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- cedarscarlett 7mo agoLet me complain about how I'm being exploited at my job while voluntarily choosing said job over literally every other job available to me.
- swiftcoder 7mo agoPlease do enumerate these other jobs that are available to the Filipino currently performing this job for... checks notes... $2/hour?
- mhb 7mo agoPlease say what you think the hourly average wage is in the Philippines and how you conclude that this isn't the woman's best option despite her revealed preference that it is.
- swiftcoder 7mo agoI don't think you and I are disagreeing here? The article explicitly states that she only took this work because she couldn't find other work, and that she dislikes the work intensely (... but has no better job prospects)
- phendrenad2 7mo agoSo what is your point exactly? That we as a society should see to it that no matter how much sex work pays, we provide an equally high-paying and easy job for people? What do you propose?
- SpicyLemonZest 7mo agoI'd endorse that principle. It's true, of course, that societies without an abundance of easy and high-paying jobs may struggle to satisfy it except by banning sex work.
- swiftcoder 7mo ago
- autoexec 7mo agoHow is this not fraud, or at least false advertising? If I'm paying money to chat with a specific sex worker how is it even legal to let some random dude in a third world country pretend to be the person I'm supposed to be talking to? I've never personally engaged in these types of systems, but I don't think there's a problem with them as long as they are run honestly. It sounds like Onlyfans is exploiting workers and their own customers.
- bawolff 7mo agoI wonder to what extent the clients care. Either way its still paying for a fantasy.
- Fricken 7mo agoAverage wages in the Phillipines are around $360/month USD, so $2/hr isn't too bad for an easy job. BBC is playing rage-bait arbitrage with that headline.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- AstroBen 7mo agoThat's fairly misleading because the average person around there is very poor. It's not what you'd consider average in a first world country.
- danparsonson 7mo agoTrue although prices are also not what you'd consider average in a developed country. Purchasing power parity is important too.
- AstroBen 7mo agoThey're not low enough to offset the low wages, though. [0] puts $2/hr at around $15k/yr purchasing power in Chicago which sounds about right. People live with families in multi-generational homes until they're married, sometimes after. Retirement plans are your kids looking after you. Prices also aren't lowered across the board - it's mostly housing and anything where labor is a major part of the cost. Cars are similar prices. Groceries, utilities and tech also. 0: https://www.paritydeals.com/ppp-calculator/ https://www.paritydeals.com/ppp-calculator/
- bawolff 7mo ago> She would be set targets to earn the model hundreds of dollars worth of sales of pictures and videos during her shift. So lets assume $300 per shift, so with an 8 hour shift, that would be about $37.50/hour of merchandise per hour. So the workers makes about 5.3%. Google says standard for sales workers paid on comission normally get 5-10%. So its possible this is within what would be normal for a low end non-salary commision job, but it depends on what "hundreds" really mean. Of course i think normally for commision only sales jobs you move much more expensive product to make it worth your while. Otoh they probably deserve a lot higher than normal sales commision given the nature of the job and all the stuff they undoubtedly have to put up with.
- tclancy 7mo agoWhy? Why do the math on someone else’s misery? What is the best case scenario you could have ended with?
- bawolff 7mo agoThe central claim of the article seems to be that they are being compensated unfairly relative to the value they bring in. I think its a pretty natural question to ask how their compensation stacks up to other industries. The best case scenario you could end with would be that they are not being economically exploited. The worst case scenario would be that they are hopelessly being exploited. The truth seems to be that on a pure economic level they are being exploited about as much as your average low wage worker in capitalism in a poorer country (which is a significant amount of exploitation) but its not quite extreme level of exploitation as the article implies. However, you also have to somehow account for the ickyness/mental affects of the job and its unclear how to do that. And yes, i believe its important to do the math on human suffering. That is how we make a better world. Not all claims of suffering are equal. The millionaire techbro sad he cant afford a private jet is not sufering in the same way as someone who is struggling to pay for a meal. We distinguish the cases by doing the math.
- Dylan16807 7mo agoThey're doing sex work and sales at the same time. Even if it wasn't sex work specifically, they're doing a lot of direct labor which also makes a fair cut much higher than 5%.
- system2 7mo agoI am still amazed that prostitution is legal when done online, and these teenage sex workers are allowed to continue selling themselves.
- beejiu 7mo ago(a) It's not prostitution, and (b) while prostitution is illegal in the US it's perfectly legal in the UK and many other countries.
- Invictus0 7mo agoIt's not illegal in the US
- ghurtado 7mo agoYou're right - it's only 99.9% illegal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_the_United_Sta...
- system2 7mo ago(A) https://reason.com/2025/05/28/is-buying-onlyfans-content-now-illegal-in-sweden/ https://reason.com/2025/05/28/is-buying-onlyfans-content-now... (B) Just because the laws do not explicitly mention it does not make it less of a form of prostitution. (C) Selling your body regardless of the medium is prostitution. (D) I am looking at it from a moral perspective. Not legal. Let me know if you think selling your body is not prostitution.
- Acrobatic_Road 7mo agoVery much agree. They're not "creators", they are prostitutes, as are porn-stars.
- nickthegreek 7mo agoselling your body for cash is what a warehouse worker does.
- mschuster91 7mo agoRelated: in Germany, there currently is a huge scandal surrounding the company "Fanblast", where you could purchase the supposed "whatsapp phone number" of various "celebrities" and, allegedly, the chats were also run by random freelancers [1]. [1] https://www.comicschau.de/news/fanblast-aloa-me-klengan-kritik-707718/ https://www.comicschau.de/news/fanblast-aloa-me-klengan-krit...
- chaseadam17 7mo agoSomewhat unrelated but I won’t be surprised if we eventually find out a lot of OnlyFans revenue is money laundering.
- Invictus0 7mo agoDoubtful, there are other, less-well known pay-for-content platforms than take a smaller percentage cut than onlyfans. It wouldn't make any sense for a launderer to use the most expensive platform.
- chaseadam17 7mo agoFor larger operations wouldn’t it be most effective to mix laundered money with legitimate earnings? If so that would make OF the top choice.
- throwup238 7mo agoMoney laundering via platforms can work indirectly, where the dirty money is spent on advertising and other expenses used to drive business to legitimate vendors. Sex sells quite well so OnlyFans is a great platform for that kind of laundering, even if they take a higher cut. It might not matter anyway, if a dollar of dirty money drives more than a dollar of legitimate income that covers OF’s cut and their AI costs.
- fgonzag 7mo agoMexican cartels absolutely use OF to launder massive quantities of money. They use OF because it's the one thats actually used by people. It's a lot easier and less suspicious to declare ridiculous high subscriber counts in OF that other platforms.
- prepend 7mo agoIsn’t $2/hour a pretty high salary in Philliphines? This is skeezy (edit: fixing autocorrect’s sleepy), but then so is chatting with onlyfans models. It’s already a fake, paradoxical relationship and even that aspect is fake. It’s delusions on deceptions.
- Lerc 7mo agoI have never seen sleepy used that way before. I did a quick run of the numbers and it is rather hard to tell what the average hourly rate ìs. But it look a like if you went for four 40 hour weeks to get 320 it seems to be a little below the average pay for a call center operator. In one sense this is a story of someone feeling bad about being paid to do something wrong. It is not quite so simple when the reason why this happens is the income differential between countries makes it possible for people to be paid enough to put aside their ethics. That becomes easier when the processes is normalised so that they are not the only person making the same compromise. Adding to the complexity of the situation is the fact that paying people like this puts money into the their economies and that can spur regional development to provide a higher pay level all round, causing the ethically dubious work to become less attractive. In the very long term the only way to avoid the higher power of foreign weather from doing this is to balance incomes around the world. That requires accepting that the current wealthy countries cannot get cheap things by paying poorer people low wages, and that means having less for themselves.
- prepend 7mo agoSorry, autocorrect changed “skeezy” to “sleepy.” I think at the end of the comment, too. It wasn’t an immediate word or sentence change. I need to work harder to proof comments before posting. (Autocorrect changed “proof” to “prof” at the end of that sentence)
- jazzyjackson 7mo agoyou can also turn off this bug in aurocorrsct settings and hust deal wuth tge misspellongs
- chrononaut 7mo agoAs an aside: > OnlyFans, which generated $7.2bn (£5.3bn) revenue in 2024, .. I didn't expect their revenue to be that high, but I suppose it's also unsurprising.
- dan-robertson 7mo agoThis and companies like paddy power are the breakout British business successes of the last few decades
- renewiltord 7mo agoEach region’s greatest successes represent them quite well: UK: gambling and porn Europe: luxury goods US: advertising and retail e-commerce China: direct from manufacturer commerce
- dan-robertson 7mo agoI’m not so convinced by this. In the uk I think the big home grown successes are either serving the local market physically like supermarkets (though they are not very new as companies) or they will be relying on some difference in regulations from other anglophone countries. A business not in those categories needn’t be worse in general terms to lose to an American company, but the American competitor will have lots of advantages (cheaper fundraising, bigger market with more discretionary spending, more pro-business political environment, etc).
- e40 7mo agoScott Galloway said the other day that their revenue per employee is higher than any company.
- sequoia 7mo agoI find it sad that there's a story of people (mostly women) doing this disgusting job for little pay (yes, chatting up horny men online because you need the money is disgusting, there's no glamour and little dignity to it), and the top comment is how this is unfair to the john (purchaser of sex work) because it's misleading.
- sneak 7mo agoSex work is work. They’re not being coerced. There’s no more or less dignity to it than being a waitress or checkout clerk. It’s no more or less disgusting than being a hospice nurse or a garbage collector. It’s just a job. Jobs are not inherently fraudulent, however. A deal is a deal, and this is plainly fraud. It is unfair to the purchaser, and it is not unfair to the people who voluntarily accept these jobs (when other jobs are obviously available).
- palata 7mo ago> it is not unfair to the people who voluntarily accept these jobs (when other jobs are obviously available). Are you saying that jobs are obviously available in this case, or are you saying that it is not unfair under the condition that other jobs are obviously available? That's very different.
- palata 7mo agoI love how on the Internet one can be downvoted for asking for precision when not understanding a statement.
- sequoia 7mo ago> There’s no more or less dignity to it than being a waitress or checkout clerk. Do you imagine this is how the workers feel about it? Do you think they tell their friends "I seduce western men online for pennies an hour" the same way they'd say "I am a waitress?" You can ignore this fact if you wish, but these jobs carry a social stigma and most people would prefer not to role play intimacy with men online if there were another option. "Sex work is work" is like saying slavery could theoretically be OK under some circumstances (We're all born under legal obligations, how is slavery different etc etc.). A tortured theoretical argument could be made to support either of these, but in reality we know that slavery is unconscionable because of the indignity and brutality of it, regardless of theory. "Sex work" is the same: in reality it is a dangerous and unpleasant job (that overlaps with slavery a lot, incidentally) done mostly be vulnerable women, and that they're often abused and left injured by it. See this article before you go saying prostitution is benign and harmless, this stance is divorced from reality: https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/human-trafficking-persists-despite-legality-of-prostitution-in-germany-a-902533.html https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/human-trafficki...
- tonymet 7mo agoI question tech community integrity because they will constantly attack Meta or Microsoft for aggressive anti-privacy, Uber for exploitative rates & policies but turn a blind eye to how corrosive & exploitative OF and PornHub are. Maybe because they are subscribers? Why aren't we collectively trying to shut down smut?
- tonymet 7mo agoAs expected
- LightBug1 7mo ago"OnlyFans, which generated $7.2bn (£5.3bn) revenue in 2024" ... Holy mother of ... the feet business is booming. I kind of regret studying 3 years of economics ... we studied the rational consumer maximising their utility. Is this what that looks like? (LOL)
- everyone 7mo agoThe most surprising thing imo is that the chatter is a real person and female.. I would have assumed that they were, in order of likelihood... 1. AI chatbot 2. A reddit mod type guy
- sashank_1509 7mo agolol, a job that I would support to be 100% automated by OpenAI
- aucisson_masque 7mo agoJust put an ai behind it already. People will get bored of it and onlyfans will die by itself. If OF managements can't see what's coming, I think it's well deserved. Hell, there are even cases of only fans models being entirely AI. photo, video and chat entirely made by ai. I mean at this point you're better getting a chatgpt subscription, right ?
- danparsonson 7mo agoYou're joking, right? Haven't you heard the stories of people having 'relationships' with their chatbots? Far from getting bored of these things, we're getting hooked on them.
- aucisson_masque 7mo agoOh man I'd rather not believe it. Getting hooked on a computer program which has no will, decision, or even say in love matter...
- thebunnymaster 7mo agoThis is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to seedy OF behaviors. The goal of the most successful OF chatters and chatting is to develop parasocial romantic relationships with highly invested whales who then go into debt due to their obsession. Many fans do it hoping they'll one day be with the girl in real life (and this is insinuated and propagated by the chatting team). Fans will rack up credit card debt and in extreme cases, have been cited to take out loans or sell their possessions to continue purchasing. Overtime, such whales are tracked by the agency via advanced CRMs where they are then shuffled from account to account via shout outs on the model's accounts. If you want to directly address this chatter's grievances, the going rate for most chatters is $3+/hour + commissions. I won't share links but this can be found via Telegram or Google. ~$500/mo base is pretty good for the Philippines when call centers make you work 6 days a week for the same price without commission.
- sublinear 7mo ago> The most popular creators on the platform claim to earn millions of dollars per month. This has never made sense and I'm convinced these "creators" are a front for money laundering.
- Havoc 7mo agoHorny people will pay and much like software this scales. A creator can record something once and sell it 100 times Perception is definitely slanted in that only the top few percent make the big bucks but I have zero doubt that they make millions
- jazzyjackson 7mo agoOF has control of what models are promoted, they shift their firehouse of money from one model to another so there's always someone becoming a millionaire. its to recruit new models.
- anticensor 7mo agoOF deliberately lacks a functioning promotion algorithm. And no, those manual promotions are rarer than you'd think.
- mpalmer 7mo agoDespicable of OnlyFans to hold this at arm's length.
- wolvoleo 7mo agoYeah I saw one of these online. An onlyfans performer was livestreaming on another platform, clearly not typing and at the same time chatted me up on onlyfans lol. Clearly it wasn't her herself. I kinda strung "her" on and she sent me some obvious stock pics saying "she" was out on the town. I only pay genuine performers, some of whom I even know in person. I only subscribed to the above one because it was a free sub. But I was kinda appalled. First I thought it was a chatbot but it probably was a person like this. For me the connection is a lot more important than the erotic content. But it's pretty easy to weed them out for now. Maybe this will change with better AI. I hope not.
- fbrncci 7mo agoYou’ll be shocked to see how many job postings for only fans chatters are up on Reddit when you search for them (several are posted every hour). Some ads are looking for 10-20 chatters at once. But the people taking on these jobs are applying for them still. Somehow I find it hard to be sympathetic? Ok I get it the job opportunities in the Philippines aren’t great, but it’s not like you’re being forced to be an OF chatter; you can simply stop being one.
- animal531 7mo agoThe sad thing about AI usage and the lack of jobs here in the poorer part of the world is that around the $6 mark per hour there would be literal queues of people forming to sign up for the job. At about the $10-12 mark you'd be able to hire people with serious linguistic skills.
- wr639 7mo agoI do not see the point of OnlyFans. I just don't get why anyone would want to interact with anyone on this site or would believe it to be anything other than what it is. Just another platform to take advantage of lonely people and horny guys who cant get laid.