21 ms·
High-speed train collision in Spain kills at least 39
- alphadatavault 9mo ago[flagged]
- salynchnew 9mo ago[flagged]
- dankwizard 9mo agoUnusual for a train though. We already know Americans can't drive but with trains like... how do you mess up a straight line?
- toomuchtodo 9mo ago> For the last decade, an average of 1,300 trains derailed each year (in the US), accounting for 61% of all train accidents. https://usafacts.org/articles/are-train-derailments-becoming-more-common/ https://usafacts.org/articles/are-train-derailments-becoming... > In 2024, there were 1,507 significant railway accidents in the EU, with a total of 750 people killed and 548 seriously injured. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Railway_safety_statistics_in_the_EU https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derailment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derailment
- fsckboy 9mo agoAmerican trains are largely freight travelling long rural distances. You didn't mention it, so I presume because you didn't take it into account, so your statistics sound to me like they don't mean anything comparable.
- toomuchtodo 9mo agoDerailments are common is what the stats show. US derailments are largely property damage as they are freight centric, while in Europe, passenger deaths are higher due to more heavy passenger utilization. Derailment is hard to defend against.
- Symbiote 9mo agoNo, they are not common. The numbers you've been given are completely wrong. The GGP has quoted the derailments figure from the USA page, but the total accidents (including trespassers and level crossing accidents) for the EU. The EU page they cite says there were 63 derailments in 2024. A derailment in Europe tends to make the news even when there are no injuries. This single accident has killed more train passengers in Spain than were killed in the whole EU in 2024 (16).
- toomuchtodo 9mo agoThey're not? Commuter train crashes into crane in Murcia, marking Spain's fourth train crash in five days - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46725317 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46725317 - January 2026
- jacquesm 9mo agoThe bulk of those are accidents involving railway crossings. There is a program to get rid of all level crossings in NL but it will take a lot of time and cost a ton of money. But there really is no way in which you can make a level crossing safe in combination with normal train speeds.
- rsynnott 9mo agoI'm half-convinced our good friends the magic robots are totally defeating peoples' ability to read. > In 2024, there were 1,507 significant railway accidents in the EU, with a total of 750 people killed and 548 seriously injured. See the graph titled "Rail accidents by type of accident". There were 63 derailments in 2024; most of the accidents were non-fatal accidents of this type: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Glossary:Accidents_to_persons_caused_by_rolling_stock_in_motion https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php...
- georgemcbay 9mo ago> how do you mess up a straight line? One thing I learned working on a system that did train positioning for the 7 Line subway in NYC is that train systems are a lot more complicated than just straight lines. They are complicated networks with custom signaling and the trains don't necessarily travel on the usual side in the usual direction at all times. That said, in this particular case it basically was just two straight lines side by side and one of the trains derailed and travelled into the path of the other track. Trains don't often derail on straight sections, likely either someone fucked up really bad on rail maintenance or someone sabotaged the rail.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- userbinator 9mo ago...when they come off the tracks. a high-speed train travelling from Malaga to Madrid derailed and crossed over onto another track
- Dylan16807 9mo agoYes we know it derailed, that's not the answer to *how* it failed on a straight line. How in the cause and effect sense, not which direction it went.
- wk_end 9mo agoFWIW: a single car crash killing 21 people would still be newsworthy in America. And I think if you math it out with something per capita equivalent, this would actually be an exceptionally bad day/incident for the US. But of course you're not wrong, trains are vastly safer than private cars. If anyone uses this as evidence against having a proper rail system, they're ignorant. But - until someone does that, there's no reason to make this about the US or cars vs. trains. It's borderline offensive to reflexively politicize this before anyone else had; it almost feels like you're intentionally trying to sow conflict, here.
- rubenflamshep 9mo ago~107 people die per day from car accidents in the USA [0]. 0. Per 2024 stats from the NHTSA (https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/nhtsa-estimates-39345-traffic-fatalities-2024#:~:text=NHTSA%20Estimates%2039%2C345%20Traffic%20Fatalities%20in%202024&text=The%20U.S.%20Department%20of%20Transportation's,people%20died%20in%20traffic%20crashes https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/nhtsa-estimates-39345-t...)
- wk_end 9mo agoRight, so, mathing it out, the US has a population of around 340 million but Spain has a population of around 49 million. 340/49 is roughly 7, so the per capita equivalent in the US would be a single incident killing 21*7=147 people. So that'd be one incident killing 1.5x the average number of people usually killed across the rest of the country combined. Like I said, a pretty bad day.
- deaux 9mo agoA completely unremarkable day, more like it. Given stochasticity there's bound to be at least a dozen days per year with 50% more than the average, especially since car deaths depend a lot on weekday, holidays, weather and so on - much moreso than train deaths. No one would look up from it, wouldn't make the news.
- 9mo ago
- tomhow 9mo agoPlease don't post like this on HN. This kind of comment is a generic tangent (and a rather ghoulish one), that can be made about any tragedy; yes, no matter how bad something is, there's always something worse. It's the fact that this is an unusual occurrence that makes it noteworthy. The guidelines ask us to converse curiously and avoid generic tangents and shallow dismissals. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- deadbabe 9mo agoAlways try to sit in seats where your back is toward the direction of motion.
- xlbuttplug2 9mo agoHuh. I'd never thought of this. If that is actually meaningfully beneficial, I wonder if they'd design self driving cars with the seats facing backwards, given there's no longer a necessity to look at the road. (edit: I guess it's more of no-brainer on a train/bus where you don't have a seat belt)
- radicaldreamer 9mo agoInfant car seats face backwards, they recommend backwards facing for a long as possible (until the kid is too big to fit comfortably in a backwards facing position).
- keyle 9mo agoNot the author, but I think there was some research and it's indeed better for you if you have head support, to be facing back towards the front. If prevents a whole range of injuries, from your neck, to becoming a projectile yourself. But it's really theoretical, and does not account for the passenger in front of you headed head-first into your throat. PS: I laughed hard that xlbuttplug2 is answering to deadbabe. The internet lives!
- rooo999 9mo agoNot sure what kind of cars you drive but in mine all the seats face the same direction. Why would they change that when making it safer?
- denkmoon 9mo agoConsider the "booth seats" in trains and busses. So people can chat etc facing each other. If you've got a waymo with your friends why wouldn't you want the seats facing each other so you can be social, excluding this safety factor.
- t1234s 9mo ago[flagged]
- pixl97 9mo agoFrom a derailed train on a straight stretch of track... no. Very likely maintenance related somehow.
- drdirk 9mo agoSpanish article from LaVanguardia states that the train was rather new and the track recently maintained.
- AdamN 9mo agoNew isn't always better. Lots of these types of accidents are because there was a repair or update that caused the failure.
- pixl97 9mo agoRecently maintained is more concerning if you look at the failure rate as a bathtub curve. Failure rates are much higher within the days after maintenance because any defects in repairs are apt to show up quickly.
- ycombinatrix 9mo agoHow would a cyberattack cause a train to derail on a straight stretch of track?
- zhfanlqeo 9mo agoThe train in question is a Frecciarossa 1000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frecciarossa_1000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frecciarossa_1000 The Italians designed it but won't run it at more than 300km/h in Italy citing local infrastructure concerns. I guess that leaves other countries to find the edge cases. I'll be interested to find out how fast it was going during the crash.
- singingbard 9mo agoLooks like a Frecciarossa 1000 derailed in 2020 but it was due to a manufacturer defect in a track switch replaced the night before. The defect was not caught by the manufacturer or the system operator. It was due to two crossed wires in an assembly. I know a lot more engineering goes into these trains due to the higher stakes. Japan’s high speed rail hasn’t had a fatal accident in 60 years. I’m wondering what the cause of this will turn out to be.
- rurban 9mo agoActually the defect was detected by the operators, who installed it that night. They disabled the switch, but apparently this didn't reach the day shift.
- shiroiuma 9mo agoJapan's shinkansen system has never had a fatal accident, except for one incident in 1995 where someone got killed at a station because he was caught in a door as the train departed the station (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mishima_Station_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mishima_Station_incident). No one has ever died in a derailing, crash, etc.
- bouke 9mo agoAnsaldoBreda did also manufacture the Fyra trains for the short-lived high-speed trains here in The Netherlands. After three trains lost parts in the first month, it was banned from operations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fyra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fyra
- kccqzy 9mo ago
- sillysaurusx 9mo agoIf you’re interested in this kind of thing, look up plainly difficult on youtube. He has more videos on train crashes than I’ve seen, and I’m embarrassed how many I’ve seen. Here’s one to get you started: https://youtu.be/VV2rIHEp5AM?si=sSBT9s49PqbLTGbt https://youtu.be/VV2rIHEp5AM?si=sSBT9s49PqbLTGbt There are a lot of safety lessons embedded in these videos, which is why I like them. I also did a double take when I heard "semaphore"; its history goes back far longer than the ~century of software engineering. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semaphore https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semaphore
- bigmeme 9mo agoOh you silly duck! Semafor is a common word in a handful of other languages for things like traffic lights and such. I had to do a double take when I first saw it in a programming class. Also hope you’re doing well it’s been a minute since our paths crossed on gdnet.
- seanmcdirmid 9mo ago[flagged]
- karmakurtisaani 9mo agoCopy pasting AI vomit is like leetspeak or all caps. Should not be used in online discussion.
- seanmcdirmid 9mo agoI disagree, but we are all entitled to our own opinions, and I get that there are a lot of luddites on HN these days. The fact that you consider it vomit rather than useful information just says more about you than me. If there was just a wiki page on how railway terms were used in computing, I would have just linked that (search didn't turn up anything in the first few pages).
- 9mo ago
- OutOfHere 9mo ago[flagged]
- jonp888 9mo agoFor many years the Spanish state-owned company RENFE had a monopoly on Spain's huge high speed rail network. However their high prices, inconvenient schedules and poor customer service were often criticized, and so when, to the annoyance of RENFE and many spanish politicians, additional foreign operators entered the market on the key Madrid - Barcelona route, ridership doubled whilst ticket prices halved. So I would standby for this tragedy to be used for political purposes to try and get foreign operators banned from Spanish tracks, regardless of the facts of the matter.
- diegocg 9mo agoForeign operators are mandated by the EU, they can't be banned. Spain has been one of the first countries to allow foreign high speed operators (unlike other European countries that did attempt to delay their entrance as much as possible
- arielcostas 9mo agoFrance, for example, has been trying to delay allowing Renfe (Spanish operator) to operate through the country as much as possible, while their public operator SNCF (branded as Ouigo) has been able to operate here since 2021.
- michieldotv 9mo agoThis EU free-rider behavior is unfortunately typical of French public sector policy. European energy markets were famously liberalised in 1996, allowing French state-owned EDF to acquire the previously state-owned monopolist Electrabel in Belgium. All the while France negotiated an exemption for not privatising EDF because of its nuclear facilities. EU regulations should prevent this type of free-ridership: state-owned companies shouldn't be able to compete abroad if they don't face competition at home.
- nyreed 9mo agoInterestingly SNCF is expected to subsidise less profitable local services with funds from the profitable high speed routes. Open competition kind of spoils this model. It's not really sustainable.
- elnatro 9mo ago[flagged]
- arielcostas 9mo agoEvery government in Spain for the last decade or more has been cutting corners in maintaining the rail networks: high speed (where this accident happened), the conventional network and commuter rail. You failed to mention the fact our budget has been extended since 2023, that the actual track where this happened was given maintenance under a year ago (per the minister, [^1]) and the train that first derailed (Iryo's ETR1000) was last checked 4 days ago. Regarding the former Minister (Ábalos), he's awaiting trial and not yet convicted (even though, IMHO he is probably guilty), and he hasn't been in the ministry since 2021[^2] so it makes no sense to bring it up when he has been out for nearly 4.5 years now. [^1]: https://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/espana/2026/01/18/oscar-puente-sobre-accidente-adamuzdos-vagones-tren-renfe-salieron-despedidos/00031768773270864198878.htm#:~:text=En%20ese%20tramo%2C%20los%20trabajos%20concluyeron%20el%20pasado%20mes%20de%20mayo https://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/espana/2026/01/18/osca... [^2]: https://www.elconfidencialdigital.com/articulo/otros/jose-luis-abalos-sale-gobierno-deja/20210710150121260184.html https://www.elconfidencialdigital.com/articulo/otros/jose-lu...
- elnatro 9mo agoAccording to current minister, the issues come from others before him, so it indeed makes sense to bring that up. Blaming others for the current underinvestment of the railway network is disingenuous.
- jacquesm 9mo agoPoliticians always blame their predecessors.
- throwaway85825 9mo agoThat's the innovation of democracy. It allows a change of course without locking in policy.
- aarroyoc 9mo agoUpdated to 39 people now, but probably the number can still go up
- utopiah 9mo agoTerrible and condolences to anybody affected. For a bit of context according to the OECD 2023 Spain had ~1800 on the road during the previous year, so that's about 5/day. There are more deaths on the road in Spain in a couple of weeks than this tragic accident. Either way it's too many deaths obviously but I want to highlight what a freak event this is compared to a more popular mode of transportation. Edit : Motivation behind that clarification https://ourworldindata.org/does-the-news-reflect-what-we-die-from https://ourworldindata.org/does-the-news-reflect-what-we-die... read some months ago but that stuck with me.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- hexbin010 9mo agoBlame game has started. Minister saying the track was renewed in May. Train operator saying the train was inspected 4 days ago. I'm in Spain currently. Very sad news.
- littlestymaar 9mo ago> Blame game has started. And the top comment of this tread is doing exactly that. We still have no idea of what happened and the bodies aren't even cold yet, it's disgusting.
- sillyfluke 9mo agoNot to go too off-topic but what was the last word on the internet blackout and also the (unrelated) stolen train cable wire incidents from last year? Were there any satisfying conclusions? In both you had people saying wait till the thorough investigation finishes, but I don't recall any commotion or bells and whistles around any final reports on those events. Unless I totally missed it of course.
- hexbin010 9mo agoNo idea but yeah of course it's a common tactic to squash criticism by being all haughty and saying everyone must wait for official investigations etc. There's middle ground. Especially when proper journalism is basically non existent these days
- thecopy 9mo agoAs a reference, ~1500-2000 people die every year due to cars in Spain.
- ifwinterco 9mo agoYou have to divide that by miles travelled to get a meaningful number - trains will still be a lot safer, but comparing oranges to apples doesn't help the argument
- embedding-shape 9mo agoRelative comparison for 2023: United States: 7.83 deaths/km Spain: 4.41 deaths/km Sweden: 2.79 deaths/km
- mlrtime 9mo agoI knew this would come up so specifically searched for the comment. And I knew the death rate for cars would be >>>> than trains. HOWEVER, there is something unique scary about a single incident that kills more people that fit in a typical car. Combined with the fact that you have 0 control over it is much more frightening (for lack of a better word) than car static deaths. Just my opnion, may not be rational but I'd still rather be behind the wheel?
- embedding-shape 9mo ago> but I'd still rather be behind the wheel Maybe if it's a trip I do once in a while. But going from Málaga to Madrid and back once a week, in a car, driving? Or Barcelona <> Madrid once a week? No, hard pass, I'd rather be driven by someone else, in a comfy carriage, where I can comfortably sleep or do other things in the meantime. Me and thousands of others agree, otherwise we wouldn't have one of the most expansive train networks in the world. Spain might be larger than people think, driving to everywhere in the country while fun, isn't feasible for repeated trips, the distances are just too large. With that said, every once in a while a road trip with a car is really nice, maybe every 1-2 years, and driving across Europe stopping when you see something interesting or driving towards interesting things you see in the distance. Hard to get that same "explorer" feeling with other modes of transportation :)
- igleria 9mo agoTaking the commuter train to and from Dublin, sometimes another train on the other direction passes and it's a bit unnerving. I cannot imagine such a collision between two high speed trains :(
- SwiftyBug 9mo agoI have the same feeling riding the TGV in France. When another train passes in the opposite direction, the pressure in the interior of the cabin even changes. Not sure if it lowers or raises, but I can definitely feel it in my ears.
- tsoukase 9mo agoLook for train collision in Greece (1), the only in a developed country. Extensive research has been done, from a simple switch malfunction to plasma scale temperatures. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempi_train_crash https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempi_train_crash
- rr2841 9mo agoWhat we know so far: 1. The last 3 cars from the Iryo train (Frecciarossa 1000) derailed for unknown reasons. It's a straight line, so this is extremely rare. 2. The Renfe train (Alvia) didn't have time to break and hit the derailed trains from Iryo, the two first cars derail as a consequence of the impact. 3. The Iryo train(Frecciarossa 1000), that caused the accident, was manufactured in 2022 and it passed a technical inspection just 4 days ago. 4. The renovation of this specific part of the infrastructure finished on May 2025, so it's practically new. Spanish high speed trains are one of the best in the world and it had plenty investment from governments of different sign over the years. This has nothing to do with the regional network (Cercanias) and the local struggles in certain regions. IMHO, this is a horribly timed accidental technical issue. https://english.elpais.com/spain/2026-01-19/at-least-39-dead-in-collision-between-two-high-speed-trains-in-spain.html https://english.elpais.com/spain/2026-01-19/at-least-39-dead... https://archive.ph/Ase0v https://archive.ph/Ase0v
- christkv 9mo agoYes. The Frecciarossa 1000 (ETR 1000) is an EMU, and the trainset’s coaches/cars are equipped with braking equipment as part of the integrated braking system—so it’s not “only the power cars” doing the braking. So my first gut instinct is that one wagons breaks malfunctioned and suddenly applied breaking power since it was the last two wagons that went off.
- tomasphan 9mo agoThat’s how every train works since this system was made mandatory in the US in 1893(!). Asymmetric breaking does not cause cars to come off. The joint is stronger than the breaking force. Anyway, we know it was a portion of the track that had a weld fracture.
- dust42 9mo agoFrom the aerial imagery it looks like the accident sequence started at the track switch [1]. The RENFE is rested south of it and the Iryo is north. Quite similar to the 1998 Eschede ICE accident which started with a broken wheel rim and finally derailed at a track switch. I wonder how anybody knows that it was the Iryo train that caused the accident. [1] https://maps.app.goo.gl/Cek9DgChguXJxVpd6 https://maps.app.goo.gl/Cek9DgChguXJxVpd6
- andy12_ 9mo agoThe most important context is this image[1] from the Guardia Civil. Using Google Maps, and using as context the tree, post and yellow connection box in the image, we can place its location at 180m before the accident in the tracks of the Iryo train. The image appears to show a track welding failure. This would match the reports of some passengers[2] that reported that the "train started shaking violently" before the accident. Photo at 38.00771000519087, -4.565435982666953 Accident at 38.009292813090475, -4.564960554581273 [1] https://img2.rtve.es/im/16899875/?w=900 https://img2.rtve.es/im/16899875/?w=900 [2] https://x.com/eleanorinthesky/status/2012961856520917401?s=20 https://x.com/eleanorinthesky/status/2012961856520917401?s=2...
- bob1029 9mo agoThe first image looks like sabotage to me. Continuous welded rail sections are much longer than this gap.
- parliament32 9mo agoLooks like a pull-apart: bad weld, then cold weather caused contraction from both sides making a gap. Pretty massive for a pull-apart but not impossible.
- verytrivial 9mo agoIf sabotage it will be plain as day to a trained eye. I await the report. That break could also be explained by the rail heading away in that photo snapping at that point because the train pushed it out, noting the rail has rotated 90 degrees clockwise -- something did that work, and it was probably the train going out and over. I'm not a rail tie expert (nor is anyone likely to be on HN) so I don't know if this is an unusual failure mode. But there was a line change point intersection immediately south of the crash. My money is there was a fault (accidental or deliberate) there, not at this snapping point.
- laurencerowe 9mo agoWouldn't the gap simply be the result of loss of tension after the weld broke? Metal expands in the heat (about 1cm per degree C per km). Weather shows it got down to around 0C in Córdoba last night while the summer record is around 47C so one would expect a fairly large gap once tension is released.
- shevy-java 9mo agoWhat is tragic is that the high tech approach here ("super-fast trains") does not put security at the forefront. This should have been the number #1 criterium from the get go, already during the planning stage. The usual reason this is not done is because of cutting down on costs, but just simple things such as: how can it be possible that another train comes by at the same time and crashes? This would not have prevented the one train going off, but you have to wonder how that is even possible design-wise to catch two trains. And even trains going off, should not be possible - this can most assuredly be detected as it happens, so what counter-measures are available to minimize damage and maximize safety?
- eudamoniac 9mo agoAs an American with no good rails, I've always been curious: what stops a crazy person from throwing a boulder onto the high speed tracks, or a raccoon getting on it, or other such derailment attempts? Is there high security electric fencing all around the track the whole route or something like that?
- mholm 9mo agoAnimals become a fine red mist when presented with these sorts of forces. The train feels a bump, but will not crash. I'm unsure at what size a rock will cause issues, but I would expect in most cases they would be kicked away by the train without issue, if a person can move them.
- cguess 9mo agoWe do have good rails, but they're regional. the NE Corridor is pretty solid overall and METRA and Amtrak in the Chicago area works quite well.
- eudamoniac 9mo agoThe brand new fastest rail in the country is barely over half the speed of the Shanghai bullet train, so I have to disagree about our rails being "good" even in the best case.
- jacekm 9mo agoAnimals on tracks remain a problem, although they do not pose risk to human life (just damages to the trains). One of the attempts to protect animals include acoustic deterrents, here's a Polish one as an example [1] but they are manufactured around the world. The Polish one plays sounds of predators, dying creatures, hunting dogs, etc to scare away forest animals (search for "UOZ-1" on youtube if you want to hear the sounds). Such devices significantly lower the number of collisions but unfortunately they are not 100% effective. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0j68iepI88 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0j68iepI88
- elnatro 9mo agoThe investigation is already pointing on the direction of poor maintenance[1]. [1]: https://euroweeklynews.com/2026/01/19/focus-of-guardia-civils-investigation-into-adamuz-train-tragedy-beginning-to-look-at-poor-maintenance/ https://euroweeklynews.com/2026/01/19/focus-of-guardia-civil...
- pvaldes 9mo agoAfter the TV videos, it seems that a chunk of 80cm or one meter of the railway was missing, or broke by the train passing. Just to add context: In 2025 August, the Spanish government blocked the attempt from Ganz MaVag Europe to buy Talgo, the main Spanish train maker. Ganz Magyar Vagon is an Hungarian company linked with Oil oligarchs close to the Victor Orban government. The government alleged National Security reasons when the National Intelligence Center started to suspect that the operation was really funded by a Russian Company, lending money to the Hungarians, via Corvinus International Investment Ltd. https://www.ft.com/content/e3074c51-7de1-4ed4-aafd-e3c20d9be0ef https://www.ft.com/content/e3074c51-7de1-4ed4-aafd-e3c20d9be... So it seems that Moscow could be trying to gain access to the Spanish train technology for some reason. Also, this crash happened in Andalucia. On 8 January 2026 the high velocity trains in Andalucia were delayed some hours by somebody stealing small amounts of copper cable from several vital parts of the system. It was ruled as common thievery, and it was not the first time. Similar events on may 2025: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm24l14l4zmo https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm24l14l4zmo Stealing copper from the Spanish railway is like an Olympic sport lately. It seems strangely common on the previous hours to a big holiday, election or major event. The problem is causing serious economic damage and lots of troubles to the users of the Spanish Commuter rail system "Cercanias" and now escalated also to the high speed railway. The troubles with Cercanias can be often attributed to poor maintenance, but sometimes include also somebody placing rocks and trunks directly on the railway with the mere purpose to create chaos. EU is on an hybrid war with Russia, and that there are many documented boycotts against relevant European infrastructure, like the regular cut of submarine cables. At this moment is to soon to discard anything.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- zrn900 9mo agoIt looks like 40 cm of track was cut away from the tracks. It looks like sabotage or terrorism.
- zrn900 9mo agoAnd voila, three more incidents in just the following three days. Even the opposition party is now making very cautious statements.
- pvaldes 9mo agoA third train in the Cercanias railway has crashed today and derailed after finding rocks laid in the railway and losing a wheel Axle on a rock. And of course, as in the last thousand times, it was on a very particular northern part of Spain that has lots and lots of similar sabotages in the last years. No victims this time. One time is maybe accident, two times in two days... nope. We are obviously under attack. All high speed trains in Spain were ordered to reduce the speed to a half temporarily. If seems that somebody really, really, don't wants the Spanish president going to the Davos Forum.
- pvaldes 9mo agoA new accident today in Catalonia, three train crashes in three days of the Davos Forum with four trains involved. The fourth train crashed against obstacles in the railway. One machinist killed and all commuter trains in the region halted until the railway is reviewed. High-speed velocity has been restored to normal values. Machinists went on strike and the narrative of poor maintenance is all around the place on internet. The chance of this happening just by random is zero. We didn't have a train crash in Spain in years and now we have three at the same time.
- timbooktwo 9mo agoLocal chats are saying that this is retaliation by a drug cartel after a 10-ton shipment of drugs was intercepted - this was reported in the news recently. In general, Spain has a long history of railway attacks carried out for mafia-linked, pseudo-political reasons.
- elnatro 9mo agoAll evidence shows that the railway was broken when the Iryo train reached that point. So, a maintenance issue because of lack of investment.
- elnatro 9mo agoThe derailing happened where an old piece of rail from 1989 was soldered to a new rail[1]. [1]: https://www.elmundo.es/economia/2026/01/24/69751757e85ecebc3e8b4577.html https://www.elmundo.es/economia/2026/01/24/69751757e85ecebc3...