AdamN

4 ms·

1.
by AdamN 5d ago
Yeah it was so much more accessible to play around with configs and pricing and then all you needed was a credit card. Even now I think enterprise companies should be more open about what's possible and what the price and delivery date
2.
by AdamN 6d ago
Funny enough you're doing an Italian/Brooklyn accent but the example I was thinking of is birds that mimicked the car alarms in Brooklyn in the 90s/00s and I'm wondering if they still do that now that alarms aren't
3.
by AdamN 6d ago
Is it possible that after the JFK speech and exposure to English this mode of using 'ein' actually became more acceptable? If not I wonder what drove this story.
4.
by AdamN 6d ago
Yeah I think East Asia will drive alot here. That's where the large screen phone trend started as well. I'm also suspect of a $2k phone that also has had to make a number of compromises to support the new format. But the market
5.
by AdamN 8d ago
Great - now you've trained the next set of AI to put things like "Hi, mom" into their text as a tell that they're human ...
6.
by AdamN 8d ago
Twitter is definitely not more successful now than before. So many people left and are gone forever. I would read a deep dive though into the history of Twitter (with the financials) to understand better and I do get that for a single prod
7.
by AdamN 8d ago
> I have friends who dropped everything to support the Vision Pro, and I don’t think any of them felt like it was worth it in retrospect. Even the ones that got featured by Apple as a result didn’t see more than a few thousand downloads.
8.
by AdamN 8d ago
First of all it can. Second I'm talking about attribution to copywritten material (and royalties being paid accordingly). This would only be for for-profit AI implementations though.
9.
by AdamN 8d ago
Correct solution here is to make sure royalties are embedded in the AI responses (and work output). These should be appropriately priced and go back to the owners of the IP. If the IP is no longer owned then it can be free use. There shou
10.
by AdamN 9d ago
I think you're right - this was also during Covid where I was home and barefoot alot more. The effect is the same though which is that I need bigger shoes now and just that simple change solved alot of pain (also getting jeans that fi
11.
by AdamN 9d ago
Even if you did the $1MM test there is very low likelihood that the $100MM event would be fully mitigated 10 years down the line (after who knows how many changes - physical, logical, and even in the org chart). The only way to approach rea
12.
by AdamN 12d ago
That's been a posited theory for decades - it's not just some HN edgelord thing. There are some obvious problems with it of course and the P5 have instead taken a maximalist attitude towards keeping the genie in the bottle (notwi
13.
by AdamN 13d ago
For me I didn't realize that my feet had actually grown and I was cramming my feet into the old sized shoes (and kept buying the old size too). Took years to figure that one out :-/
14.
by AdamN 13d ago
Only if the marketplace makes sense. They can't just roll their own CAD system to use internally - mostly because it's a huge space and it requires working with external stakeholders/vendors
15.
by AdamN 15d ago
> A wiki is largely indistinguishable in structure from an SEO link farm Not just indistinguishable but the same. The only difference really is the intent of the owners/authors and (possibly) the quality of the content.
16.
by AdamN 15d ago
> I think there's a difference between "photography will change art--we need to be ready" and "photography will change art, therefore stop photography." That wasn't the critique. The statements then were th
17.
by AdamN 15d ago
That's focusing on low class drug use. Elite drug use leaves a very different trail and has a different impact.
18.
by AdamN 15d ago
That's why you have agents to clean the code written by the other agents.
19.
by AdamN 15d ago
We're not jurors or NTSB investigators - this is just a public messageboard on a tech-focused platform. It's totally fine to speculate and wonder here ... and to be corrected respectfully.
20.
by AdamN 15d ago
It's one of those situations where any one risk not occurring probably would have ended up with no excursion but all risks present at the same time made this outcome.
21.
by AdamN 15d ago
There have been big changes over the decades on that but the counterfactual is also that you could imagine lots of crashes from confusion in the cockpit during critical times if two pilots are working towards cross-objectives or are more oc
22.
by AdamN 17d ago
If so that's an extremely good thing
23.
by AdamN 18d ago
That's been proposed before btw and game theorists can justify that as being more stable in some ways. However it reduces the power of the incumbents (so why let it happen?) and the odds of having an irrational actor with nukes goes u
24.
by AdamN 18d ago
Even when buried wouldn't their orientation shift over time from geological forces?
25.
by AdamN 18d ago
As has been said before we've been cleaning up garbage code for generations and that doesn't look even close to changing anytime soon.
26.
by AdamN 18d ago
both. And it's important to remember that. Luck being a main force (which is really true for almost any outcome good or bad). The other forces being talent and labor.
27.
by AdamN 19d ago
I like this tidbit, "Emperor Nero is rumored to have had the last sprig."
28.
by AdamN 19d ago
Man shearing this one is a pain in the a$$. Hand me the sticking knife ...
29.
by AdamN 19d ago
Only give the permissions you want the device/agent/human to use - no more. Same for anything whether you trust it or not (or somewhere in between).
30.
by AdamN 23d ago
Furniture in general is a low turnover industry and tough. One of the ironic reasons that Ikea/Wayfair do well is their stuff looks good but is basically garbage and can't survive a move or two so people are forced to buy from the

More ›