Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
crote
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
crote
5d ago
You make HBM by stacking a whole bunch of dies on top of each other. The signals from the upper dies need to pass through vias in the lower dies to get out - taking up valuable die space in a way which simply isn't needed with regular
2.
▲
by
crote
5d ago
This is already happening, by the way. SK Hynix's new Cheongju M15x fab was originally intended to be for DDR, but mid-construction they shifted it to HBM. Similarly, the Icheon M10F packaging line has been retooled to HBM, allowing it
3.
▲
by
crote
6d ago
Rather the opposite, actually. With the rising living standards and a looming population cliff due to the one-child-policy wages in China have steadily been rising - and they'll get even higher in the future. Any Chinese industry relyi
4.
▲
by
crote
7d ago
It's a $1 MCU, which will get embedded into a $50 device. If you're a company selling a cloud-plus-device product, then that 250k tooling cost and not-exactly-trivial attack process will be quite effective at stopping Chinese clon
5.
▲
by
crote
7d ago
Most attackers aren't nation states, and your security shouldn't rely on obscurity anyways. Having to attack each individual device and having to get specialized equipment to do a highly-skilled attack breaks the vast majority o
6.
▲
by
crote
7d ago
Not really. The RP2350 just adds some bog-standard security features the ESP32 family and plenty of others have had for ages, that's all. The goal of the bounty is to demonstrate that they aren't just a company making toys for h
7.
▲
by
crote
7d ago
A Yubikey is basically a single chip and a bunch of plastic. At their $50 price point, there's plenty of room for some chip manufacturer to skim off a couple of dollars per chip to add an additional metal layer for a tamper protection
8.
▲
by
crote
7d ago
Yup, four cores. No crazy muxing needed because only one kind is ever active at a time and the other kind kept in reset, so there's no need to do any runtime arbitration - basically just a dumb switch on few dozen signals. The bonus RI
9.
▲
by
crote
8d ago
More specifically: it sounds like something which was supposed to be an atomic operation was split into two by the preempting task, with corruption happening because that task also interacted with the same piece of (now-temporarily-invali
10.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
Those are "reinvent the world" level of changes. We're talking about an industry where nothing is standardized, and you want to rely on highly formalized documentation!? I'm not exaggerating when I say that "which
11.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
> A real verifier needs to additionally check the encoded data matches the human-readable data on the front of the card. I mean, not really? Only the machine-readable part is signed, so it should be treated as the sole source of truth. B
12.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
Don't forget jailing the idiot politicians who okayed handing over all those driver's licenses to a private company.
13.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
Roundabouts don't need any expensive control electronics, and have very little upkeep. In the long run they are likely cheaper than traffic lights.
14.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
That's just traditional design failure. A well-designed road network has higher-speed through roads and lower-speed local roads - and a school (serving the local neighbourhood) has zero business being near a through road. And to make
15.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
Depends on the roundabout, actually. With a turbo roundabout[0] the lanes form a spiral rather than a circle, so you are automatically forced to the outside and doing multiple turns is physically impossible. [0]: https://nl.wikip
16.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
I live in The Netherlands and roundabouts work just fine. Other European countries seem to have very similar experiences. Is there something unique about American drivers or traffic engineers which makes them incapable of handling the conce
17.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
> when you’re going straight all that centripetal force is annoying to deal with. I have literally never noticed this. Are you perhaps speeding through them, instead of properly slowing down? > there’s always a bit of chaos involved
18.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
> there's a whole internet cult for them, composed mostly of people who don't really live in an area with roundabouts. Alternatively: it's people who do live in areas which have a lot of them - and well-designed ones at
19.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
They are also better for cyclists. Take a look at [0], for example: the pedestrian crossing forces an early stop for cars entering, and there's a neat one-car-sized waiting area for cars leaving. They both reduce the sight angles betwe
20.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
Perfectly fine, actually. For example, the one at [0] regularly sees bendy buses[1] traverse it without any issues. The trick is that there's an outer ring of asphalt and an inner layer of paving stones: cars the asphalt as it is far
21.
▲
by
crote
9d ago
And it's a classic case of Not Invented Here as well: this problem was solved decades ago and the solution is widely-deployed in passports and most European identity documents - just use NFC! Cryptographic NFC chips are basically fr
22.
▲
by
crote
10d ago
Counterpoint: all of the identity-verification flows I have experienced in the last few years used NFC to read the chip in my identity documents - from car rental apps to my bank doing KYC. If anything, verifying NFC is easier than imag
23.
▲
by
crote
11d ago
A similar hijack will soon(ish) become impossible, as the current train protection system will be replaced by ERTMS. Basically, the current system works by injecting a small current signal on one rail and trying to sense it on the other rai
24.
▲
by
crote
11d ago
Stopping traffic on railways isn't much different from stopping traffic on highways, is it?
25.
▲
by
crote
11d ago
Stop, not derail. The saboteurs aren't physically damaging the railways: they are shorting the rails together , causing a fake train to be detected. But indeed, XR is the least likely subject. They have stopped trains before, but th
26.
▲
by
crote
11d ago
Of those, the "tractors on highways" is the only one which has resulted in someone dying. So much for rational...
27.
▲
by
crote
11d ago
Climate activists are definitely known for disliking fossil fuel plants - and there's one directly next to that. I could see an activist naïvely thinking that this would sever that one power plant from the grid, making a clear anti-f
28.
▲
by
crote
11d ago
Russia isn't the only group interested in doing terrorism in The Netherlands. Recently the Farmers Defense Force and Extinction Rebellion have caused far greater disruption. Could it be Russia? Obviously. But in my opinion the odds are
29.
▲
by
crote
11d ago
It is indeed possible Russia is behind it, but considering a domestic farmers' terror group has told its followers to cause disruption today (as it is a politically-significant day), and those are definitely disrupting highways, ch
30.
▲
by
crote
11d ago
But officer, I didn't mean for my autonomous bank vault busting robot to autonomously bust any bank vaults!
More ›